AbstractIntegrating the voice endorsement literature and behavioral integrity theory, this research first advances the constructs and develops the scales for supervisors' word‐oriented and deed‐oriented voice endorsement in Study 1. In Study 2, we examine how supervisors' word‐oriented and deed‐oriented voice endorsement influence employee voice behavior. Results from a four‐wave field study demonstrate that supervisors' word‐oriented voice endorsement is negatively related to perceived supervisor behavioral integrity, whereas supervisors' deed‐oriented voice endorsement is positively related to perceived supervisor behavioral integrity. Perceived supervisor behavioral integrity enhances employees' willingness to discuss ideas and ultimately promotes their voice behavior. In addition, a higher (versus lower) level of explanation providing weakens the negative impact of supervisors' word‐oriented voice endorsement and strengthens the positive impact of supervisors' deed‐oriented voice endorsement on perceived supervisor behavioral integrity. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Read full abstract