Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Research Articles

What Is the Prosthetic Survival After Resection and Intercalary Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Diaphyseal Bone Metastases of the Humerus and Femur?

Large metastatic lesions of the diaphysis can cause considerable pain and result in difficult surgical challenges. Resection and cemented intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction offer one solution to the problem, but it is an extensive operation that might not be tolerated well by a debilitated patient. The risk of aseptic loosening and revision after intercalary endoprosthetic replacement has varied in previous reports, which have not examined the risk of revision in the context of patient survival. (1) In a small case series from one institution, what is the survivorship of patients after cemented intercalary endoprosthetic replacement for diaphyseal metastasis, and what is the cumulative incidence of revision for any reason? (2) What are the complications associated with cemented intercalary reconstruction? (3) What is the functional outcome after the procedure as assessed by the MSTS93 score? We retrospectively studied 19 patients with diaphyseal long bone metastases who were treated with resection and cemented intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction by five participating surgeons at one referral center from 2006 to 2017. There were 11 men and eight women with a median age of 59 years (range 46 to 80 years). The minimum follow-up required for this series was 12 months; however, patients who reached an endpoint (death, radiographic loosening, or implant revision) before that time were included. One of these 19 patients was lost to follow-up but was not known to have died. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 0 to 116 months). Eight of the 19 patients presented with pathologic fractures. Ten of 19 lesions involved the femur, and nine of 19 were in the humerus. The most common pathologic finding was renal cell carcinoma (in 10 of 19). Survival estimates of the patients were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A competing risks estimator was used to evaluate implant survival, using death of the patient as the competing risk. We also estimated the cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening in a competing risk analysis. Radiographs were analyzed for radiolucency at the bone-cement-implant interfaces, fracture, integrity of the cement mantle, and component position stability. Complications were assessed using record review that was performed by an individual who was not involved in the initial care of the patients. Functional outcomes were assessed using the MSTS93 scoring system. Patient survivorship was 68% (95% CI 50% to 93%) at 1 year, 53% (95% CI 34% to 81%) at 2 years, and 14% (95% CI 4% to 49%) at 5 years; the median patient survival time after reconstruction was 25 months (range 0 to 116 months). In the competing risk analysis, using death as the competing risk, the cumulative incidence of implant revision was 11% (95% CI 2% to 29%) at 1 year and 16% (95% CI 4% to 36%) at 5 years after surgery; however, the cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening (with death as a competing risk) was 22% (95% CI 6% to 43%) at 1 year and 33% (95% CI 13% to 55%) at 5 years after surgery. Other complications included one patient who died postoperatively of cardiac arrest, one patient with delayed wound healing, two patients with bone recurrence, and one patient who experienced local soft tissue recurrence that was excised without implant revision. Total MSTS93 scores improved from a mean of 12.6 ± 8.1 (42% ± 27%) preoperatively to 21.5 ± 5.0 (72% ± 17%) at 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 21.6 ± 8.5 (72% ± 28%) at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.98; 3 months versus 2 years). Resection of diaphyseal metastases with intercalary reconstruction can provide stability and short-term improvement in function for patients with advanced metastatic disease and extensive cortical destruction. Aseptic loosening is a concern, particularly in the humerus; however, the competing risk analysis suggests the procedure is adequate for most patients, because many in this series died of disease without undergoing revision. Level IV, therapeutic study .

Evaluation of endoprosthetic reconstruction after distal femoral bone-tumor resection

Background Endoprosthetic reconstruction is considered a reliable reconstructive option after periarticular tumor resection as it provides component modularity, improved fixation, near-anatomic appearance, and good functional outcomes. This study aimed at evaluation of the outcomes of the cemented modular distal femoral tumor prosthesis after wide intra-articular resection of aggressive or malignant bone tumors. Patients and methods The mean age of the patients was 29.77 years. There were 12 males and six females. The final diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 13 patients, giant-cell tumor in three patients, and chondrosarcoma in two patients. All patients with osteosarcoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Wide intra-articular tumor resection was done through the anteromedial approach of the femur with reconstruction by cemented modular endoprosthesis. Results One patient died with pulmonary metastasis. The 5-year cumulative patient-survival rate was 88.88% and 5-year cumulative implant-survival rate was 93.65%. Local recurrence occurred in one (5.5%) patient, while distant metastasis occurred in another. Both of those patients died and were consequently excluded from further statistical work. The mean functional score, the modified Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating scale, was 73.7%. Complications occurred in five (27.7%) patients. One (5.5%) patient had had a deep infection with failure of reconstruction requiring two-staged revision. There were four cases of superficial wound infection that were successfully treated conservatively. There was no aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture or dislocation, soft-tissue problem, or vascular impairment in the operated limb till the final follow-up. Conclusion Modular prosthetic reconstruction after wide resection of aggressive and malignant bone tumors of distal femur offers satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes as it allows immediate postoperative stability, early mobilization, and rehabilitation, with reasonable complication rate. Level of evidence: IV case series.

Occlusive wound closure prevents prolonged wound discharge-A randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur because of metastatic bone disease.

Prolonged wound discharge is a common postoperative complication of orthopaedic procedures and a risk factor for implant-related infection. Occlusive wound closure methods have previously been suggested to reduce or even prevent this complication. We performed a randomised controlled trial on 70 patients who underwent surgical treatment for metastatic bone disease involving the proximal femur at our centre between January 2017 and August 2018. At conclusion of the tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction procedure, patients were randomised to either occlusive wound closure (n=35), using the Dermabond Prineo-22 skin closure system, or routine wound closure with conventional skin staples (n=35). Skin closure with occlusive wound closure resulted in a lesser degree (P < .0001) and shorter duration of postoperative wound discharge (HR 2.89 [95% CI 1.6-5.05], P < .0018). Compared with staples, surgical wounds were already dry after a mean of 3.5 days [95% CI 3.2-3.9] versus 6.1 days [95% CI 4.8-7.3] (P < .0001). Prolonged wound discharge for 7 days or more was observed in 23% of patients (n=8) in the Staples-group but was entirely absent in the occlusive wound closure group (P < .003). This study provides strong evidence that occlusive wound closure reduces frequency, degree, and duration of wound discharge in a patient population at particularly high risk for this complication.

SILVER-COATED MEGAPROSTHESES IN RECONSTRUCTION FOR ORTHOPAEDIC ONCOLOGY AND BONE LOSS

Rates of prosthetic joint infection in megaprostheses are high. The application of silver ion coating to implants serves as a deterrent to infection and biofilm formation.A retrospective review was performed of all silver-coated MUTARS endoprosthetic reconstructions (SC-EPR) by a single Orthopaedic Oncology Surgeon. We examined the rate of component revision due to infection and the rate of infection successfully treated with antibiotic therapy. We reviewed overall revision rates, sub-categorised into the Henderson groupings for endoprosthesis modes of failure (Type 1 soft tissue failure, Type 2 aseptic loosening, Type 3 Structural failure, Type 4 Infection, Type 5 tumour progression).283 silver-coated MUTARS endoprosthetic reconstructions were performed for 229 patients from October 2012 to July 2022. The average age at time of surgery was 58.9 years and 53% of our cohort were males. 154 (71.3%) patients underwent SC-EPR for oncological reconstruction and 32 (14.8%) for reconstruction for bone loss following prosthetic joint infection(s). Proximal femur SC-EPR (82) and distal femur (90) were the most common procedures. This cohort had an overall revision rate of 21.2% (60/283 cases). Component revisions were most commonly due to Type 4 infection (19 cases), Type 2 aseptic loosening/culture negative disease (15 cases), and Type 1 dislocation/soft tissue (12 cases).Component revision rate for infection was 6.7% (19 cases). 15 underwent exchange of implants and 4 underwent transfemoral amputation due to recalcitrant infection and failure of soft tissue coverage. This equates to a limb salvage rate of 98.3%. The most common causative organisms remain staphylococcus species (47%) and polymicrobial infections (40%).We expand on the existing literature advocating for the use of silver-coated endoprosthetic reconstructions. We provide insights from the vast experience of a single surgeon when addressing patients with oncological and bone loss-related complex reconstruction problems.

The history of resection prosthesis.

The purpose of this historical review is to highlight the progression and development of prosthetic reconstruction with a focus on the modular distal femur with hinged total knee arthroplasty. Scientific literature was searched for descriptions of endoprosthetic reconstruction of the extremities to provide a thorough overview of the subject, focusing the research on the evolution of limb salvage of the distal femur. After the first works of Gluck and Giordano, with ivory and metal and the pioneer shoulder prosthesis by Pean in the late 1890s, a great advancement was brought by reconstructions performed for injured soldiers of the Great War. By the 1940s, replacement of all the main joints had been attempted, and documented. Walldius in the 1950s developed a fully constrained hinge knee, offering for the first time a consistent and replicable method of substituting the joint. In 1953, Shiers' prosthesis allowed for good flexion and extension. Stanmore and GUEPAR group prosthesis in the 1960s were the first to have a different right and left side model. The rotating hinge was developed in 1978 by Walker, with the innovative concept of six degrees of freedom. Between 1979 and 1982, Kotz developed the modular segmental replacement that, added to a fixed hinge knee, permitted the revolutionary creation of the modern distal femur replacement. The study of the materials and mechanical solutions that was brought to the modern distal femur resection prosthesis is a good example of a virtuous multidisciplinary teamwork between orthopaedic surgeons, anatomists, and biomechanical engineers.

Autologous menisci-cruciate ligament composite as a flap for soft tissue reconstruction following malignant bone tumor resection around the knee.

Despite significant improvements in oncological treatment, the management of soft tissue defects following malignant tumor resection remains challenging. We investigated whether autologous menisci and cruciate ligament, which are traditionally discarded, can be recycled as a supplemental flap in repairing soft tissue defects following malignant bone tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction around the knee. Four knee specimens were dissected to provide a basis for the design of the menisci-cruciate ligament composite. Then, 40 patients with bone malignancies around the knee were enrolled and underwent reconstruction with free or vascularized composite following malignant tumor resection. The clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of this technique were evaluated in >1-year follow-up in each patient and compared with 87 patients who suffered from bone malignancies around the knee and were treated by limb salvage but without composite at our center over the same period. During the follow-up, a composite from one patient who underwent secondary amputation was retrieved and examined for in vivo remodeling. Fourteen patients were treated with vascularized composite transfer (10 distal femurs and 4 proximal tibias) and 26 patients with free composite transfer (19 distal femurs and 7 proximal tibias). The composite can be used to cover the area of soft tissue defect from 22 to 48.38 cm2 (34.67 ± 6.48 cm2 ). With contrast-enhanced ultrasound, peripheral rim healing and dotted blood flow signal at the side of anastomosis were detected on a patient 16 months after free composite transfer. Gross macroscopic remodeling and histopathologic analysis of a retrieved composite also indicated good healing with surrounding tissues and living cells in the composite. The complications and oncologic outcomes were comparable between study and control cohorts, but better Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score for patients reconstructed with composite (26.68 vs. 25.66, p =0.004). Of note, MSTS score was higher for patients reconstructed with composite at distal femur subdivision compared with the same subdivision in the control cohort (26.97 vs. 25.90, p =0.009). No statically significant difference was noted in complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes for patients reconstructed with free or vascularized composite. Autogenous menisci-cruciate ligament composite is an alternative option for soft tissue reconstruction. Either vascularized or free composite can be applied, depending on the size and localization of the defect.

Rotationplasty with Tibial Nerve Coaptation: A Case Report.

We present the case of a 14-year-old adolescent boy with a distal femoral osteosarcoma partially encasing the tibial nerve. He underwent rotationplasty with resection and coaptation (end-to-end repair) of the tibial nerve. By 1 year postoperatively, he had recovered sensation on the plantar aspect of his foot and Medical Research Council scale 4+/5 gastro-soleus contraction that powered extension of the new knee. Tibial nerve resection is not an absolute contraindication for rotationplasty, even in an adolescent. Nerve coaptation allows for well-functioning rotationplasty as an alternative to endoprosthetic reconstruction or above-knee amputation.

Novel axial compressive endoprosthesis ACE can enhance metaphyseal fixation and facilitate osseointegration: A biomechanical study.

Background: Metaphyseal fixation for endoprosthetic reconstruction after bone tumor resection is difficult due to the short residual bone length and reverse funnel shape of the metaphysis. In the current study, 3D-printed axial compressive endoprosthesis (ACE) with a short stem and intramedullary axial compressive mechanism is proposed to improve metaphyseal fixation. The rationales of ACE are that 1) intramedullary axial compress enhances the stability of endoprosthesis and facilitates bone ingrowth at the osteotomy site; 2) 3D printed porous metallic surface at osteotomy surface and stem allows bone ingrowth to achieve osseointegration. Methods: A biomechanical study was performed to explore the initial stability using Sawbones. A diaphysis and metaphyseal segmental defect were created and four fixation structures were simulated: 1) ACE; 2) ACE + lateral plate; 3) stem prosthesis + unilateral plate; 4) stem prosthesis + bilateral plates. Bending and torsional stiffness were determined with a material testing machine. The relationship between the torque of the compression nut and the axial compression force of the bone-implant surface was measured using a round gasket load sensor. Results: ACE + lateral plate was the stiffest in the bending test (sagittal 324.3 ± 110.8N/mm, coronal 307.7 ± 8.7N/mm). ACE + lateral plate and stem prosthesis + bilateral plates had the highest torsional stiffness (10.9 ± 1.3Nm/° and 10.7 ± 0.2Nm/° respectively). The bending stiffness of ACE was equivalent to stem prosthesis + bilateral plates (sagittal 196 ± 10N/mm vs. 200 ± 7N/mm, coronal 197 ± 14N/mm vs. 209 ± 3N/mm), but the torsional stiffness of ACE was inferior to stem prosthesis + bilateral plates (6.1 ± 1.3Nm/° vs. 10.7 ± 0.2Nm/°). Stem prosthesis + unilateral plate was the least stiff both in bending and torsion. The relationship between torque (T/Nm) and axial pressure (F/N) was F = 233.5T. Conclusion: The axial compressive design of ACE enhances primary stability and facilitates osseointegration, which provides an alternative option of metaphyseal fixation for endoprosthetic reconstruction.

Oncology

The December 2022 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Is high-dose radiation therapy associated with early revision with a cemented endoprosthesis?; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity sarcomas: does timing impact complication rates?; Late amputation after treatment for lower extremity sarcoma; Osteosarcoma prediagnosed as another tumour: a report from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group; The influence of site on the incidence and diagnosis of solitary central cartilage tumours of the femur: a 21st century perspective.

Functional Outcome Following Proximal Tibial Osteosarcoma Resection and Reconstruction by Modular Endoprosthesis

PurposeThe proximal tibia is a common location for osteosarcoma. Modular endoprosthesis is a popular reconstructive option, yet it has been associated with many complications. Our study aimed to evaluate the functional outcome and complications of proximal tibial osteosarcoma patients treated by limb salvage using modular endoprosthesis.MethodsA retrospective study of a prospective database was performed during the period between January 2000 and July 2017. Fifty-five patients with proximal tibial osteosarcoma underwent resection and modular endoprosthetic reconstruction. The functional outcome was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal tumor society scoring system and knee range of motion. Postoperative complications were classified according to Henderson classification; Type 1 (soft tissue failure), Type 2 (aseptic loosening), Type 3 (structural failure), Type 4 (infection) and Type 5 (local tumor progression).ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 71.69 ± 49.76 months. The mean musculoskeletal tumor society score was 26.5 ± 2.22; the mean range of motion was 72.63 ± 25.07, and the mean extension lag was 15.09 ± 15.38. Type 1, type 2, type 3, type 4, and type 5 complications occurred in 7.3%, 14.5%, 21.8%, 23.6%, and 5.5%, respectively. Chest metastasis developed in 10 patients (18.2%). The estimated 5-year and 10-year survival rates for the treated patients were 83.6% and 79.9%.ConclusionsProximal tibial osteosarcoma reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis is a reliable treatment option for retaining limb function. Most complications are manageable.

What's New in Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery.

What's New in Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery.

PSAT287 Metastatic Thyroid Carcinoma from an Old Teratoma

Abstract Introduction Struma ovarii is rare and makes up 1% of all ovarian tumors out of which only 5-10% are malignant. We present the third reported case of delayed bony metastasis of malignant struma ovarii years after surgical removal. Clinical Case A 63 years old female with a medical history of cerebral palsy and teratoma resected in 2013, presented with complaints of right arm pain for 6 months in 2019. Routine lab work and X-rays of the right humerus were normal. An arthrogram showed a destructive process involving the proximal humeral meta-diaphysis, presumably malignant in etiology which was confirmed by a CT scan of the upper arm. A PET scan subsequently showed increased tracer activity associated with the right humeral head and neck along with replacement of marrow cavity by soft tissue density material. A fine needle aspiration of the lesion showed metastatic carcinoma of thyroid follicular origin. Serum TSH was 2.369 miu/ml (normal 0.350-5.500 miu/ml). An ultrasound of the neck demonstrated a normal thyroid without any identifiable nodules. She underwent radical resection of the right proximal humerus with endo-prosthetic reconstruction followed by postoperative radiation to the right shoulder. A repeat bone scan 3 months later showed increased activity in the ribs bilaterally and the distal right humerus. This was followed by a total thyroidectomy that showed no evidence of follicular cancer. A repeat TSH 8 weeks later came back at 88.36miu/ml but surprisingly even after the removal of thyroid gland the serum thyroglobulin remained elevated at 62.2 ng/ml (normal 2.8-40.9 ng/ml). This prompted a nuclear medicine thyroid whole body scan which revealed metastatic disease to the lumbar spine and multiple metastases to the abdomen. Treatment with radioactive iodine was started. The treatment, however was considered suboptimal in her case and she was started on radiation therapy which she is still receiving. Discussion Struma ovarii is a specialized ovarian teratoma made up of more than 50% mature thyroid tissue. Of these only 5-10% have malignant potential with less than 200 cases ever being reported. The NRAS, BRAF and JAK3 oncogene mutations have been implicated in the pathogenesis but the exact cause is unknown, resulting in the absence of any guideline directed therapy. The most common sites of metastasis are the peritoneum, mesentery and omentum. Bones are a less common metastatic site. Current treatment strategies include total thyroidectomy with iodine ablation and radioiodine scanning with serum thyroglobulin levels being followed as a tumor marker. It can rarely present as a late metastatic disease years after surgical resection of the tumor and a high index of suspicion is required to make the correct diagnosis. Presentation: Saturday, June 11, 2022 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.

Survivorship of proximal femoral replacement in neoplastic and non-neoplastic elderly patients.

Massive bone loss is a serious problem in the elderly. Joint replacement with modular prostheses represents the most common reconstructive technique after oncological and non-oncological resections. Megaprostheses are broadly available, adaptable and versatile and allow early mobilization and rehabilitation. Although segmental endoprosthetic implants are now widely used and despite innovations, complications remain far high. Our purpose is to establish what happens to megaprostheses of a specific anatomical site in the long term in a population with oncologic and non-oncologic indications treated at a single center solely by a few skilled surgeons. We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database. We collected 35 patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction exclusively of the proximal femur for neoplastic and non-neoplastic disease between 2008 and 2021. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Complications were collected and classified, and also adapted to the non-oncological setting. Taking into consideration the entire population, 94% of this survived the follow-up at 6 months, subsequently 85% at 1 year and 82% at 2 years. At follow-ups after 5 years, 79% of megaprostheses showed no mechanical failure. Analyzing prosthetic survival in the two groups, this was >50% at 24 months after surgery in both groups, with better survival for the oncological one. Proximal femur replacement can be a valid option in treatment of oncological and non-oncological cases. Due to the high complication rate, only selected cases should undergo this kind of surgical procedure.

Early rehabilitation of cancer patients after endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of the lower extremity long bones

Aim of the study: to conduct a systematic analysis of the data available in the modern literature, prognostic factors, and modern methods of rehabilitation of cancer patients after endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of the lower extremity long bones. Material and methods. We assessed reports of clinical trials published over the past 10 years, which evaluated prognostic factors, rehabilitation programs for cancer patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of the lower extremity long bones, depending on the location and size of the implant and the age of the patient. The review also evaluated various prognostic factors that affected functional recovery following resection of the lower extremity long bones. Results. Findings that helped in choosing the best option for surgical treatment, thus providing the best quality of life in the postoperative period, were published. Conclusion. Further studies are needed to optimize rehabilitation techniques and develop new algorithms for the treatment of cancer patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of the lower extremity long bones.

Predictors of Functional Recovery among Musculoskeletal Oncology Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Endoprosthetic Reconstruction.

Background and Objectives: Functional outcomes are important for oncology patients undergoing lower extremity reconstruction. The objective of the current study was to describe patient reported function after surgery and identify predictors of postoperative function in musculoskeletal oncology patients undergoing lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstruction. Methods: We performed a cohort study with functional outcome data from the recently completed Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial. We utilized the 100-point Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), which was administered pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning, and the minimally important difference is 11 points. We calculated mean functional scores at each timepoint after surgery and developed a logistic regression model to explore predictors of failure to achieve excellent post-operative function (TESS ≥ 80) at 1 year after surgery. Results: The 555 patients included in our cohort showed important functional improvement from pre-surgery to 1 year post-surgery (mean difference 14.9 points, 95%CI 12.2 to 17.6; p < 0.001) and 64% achieved excellent post-operative function. Our adjusted regression model found that poor (TESS 0–39) pre-operative function (odds ratio [OR] 3.3, 95%CI 1.6 to 6.6); absolute risk [AR] 24%, 95%CI 8% to 41.2%), older age (OR per 10-year increase from age 12, 1.32, 95%CI 1.17, 1.49; AR 4.5%, 95%CI 2.4% to 6.6%), and patients undergoing reconstruction for soft-tissue sarcomas (OR 2.3, 95%CI 1.03 to 5.01; AR 15.3%, 95%CI 0.4% to 34.4%), were associated with higher odds of failing to achieve an excellent functional outcome at 1-year follow-up. Patients undergoing reconstruction for giant cell tumors were more likely to achieve an excellent functional outcome post-operatively (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.95; AR −9.9%, 95%CI −14.4% to −0.7%). Conclusions: The majority of patients with tumors of the lower extremity undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction achieved excellent function at 1 year after surgery. Older age, poor pre-operative function, and endoprosthetic reconstruction for soft tissue sarcomas were associated with worse outcomes; reconstruction for giant cell tumors was associated with better post-operative function. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV.

Risk factor investigation for hip dislocation after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction via thin-slice CT-based 3D model

Dislocation of the hip remains a major complication after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. The position of the acetabular component is an important modifiable factor for surgeons in determining the risk of postoperative dislocation. We investigated the significance of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal displacement of the hip centre of rotation (COR) on postoperative dislocation using a CT-based 3D model, as well as other potential risk factors for dislocation. A total of 122 patients who underwent reconstruction following resection of periacetabular tumour between January 2011 and January 2020 were studied. The risk factors for dislocation were investigated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis on patient-specific, resection-specific, and reconstruction-specific variables. The dislocation rate was 13.9% (n = 17). The hip COR was found to be significantly shifted anteriorly and inferiorly in most patients in the dislocation group compared with the non-dislocation group. Three independent risk factors were found to be related to dislocation: resection of gluteus medius (odds ratio (OR) 3.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24 to 19.70); p = 0.039), vertical shift of COR > 18 mm (OR 24.8 (95% CI 6.23 to 128.00); p = 0.001), and sagittal shift of COR > 20 mm (OR 6.22 (95% CI 1.33 to 32.2); p = 0.026). Among the 17 patients who dislocated, 70.3% (n = 12) were anterior dislocations. Three independent risk factors were identified, suggesting the importance of proper restoration of the COR and the role of the gluteus medius in maintaining hip joint stability.Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(10):1180-1188.

Tourniquet use in patients undergoing tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the knee.

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and impact of tourniquet use in patients undergoing limb salvage surgery with endoprosthetic reconstruction for a tumour around the knee. We retrieved data from the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial; specifically, differences in baseline characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative functional outcomes between patients who had undergone surgery under tourniquet and those who had not. A linear regression model was created to evaluate the impact of tourniquet use on postoperative Toronto Extremity Salvage Scores (TESSs) while controlling for confounding variables. A negative-binomial regression model was constructed to explore predictors of postoperative length of stay (LOS). Of the 604 patients enrolled in the PARITY trial, 421 had tumours around the knee joint, of whom 225 (53%) underwent surgery under tourniquet. The tourniquet group was younger (p = 0.014), more likely to undergo surgery for a tumour of the tibia, and had shorter operating times by a mean of 50 minutes (95% confidence interval 30 to 72; p < 0.001). The adjusted linear regression model found that the use of a tourniquet, a shorter operating time, and a higher baseline TESS independently predicted better function at both three- and six-month follow-up. The negative-binomial regression model showed that tourniquet use, shorter operating time, younger age, and intraoperative tranexamic acid administration independently predicted a shorter LOS in hospital. The results of this study show that in patients undergoing resection of a tumour around the knee and endoprosthetic reconstruction, the use of an intraoperative tourniquet is associated with a shorter operating time, a reduced length of stay in hospital, and a better early functional outcome.Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(10):1168-1173.

Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study

BackgroundHip megaprostheses are a long known reconstructive method in the treatment of proximal femur metastases. The use of cemented or uncemented stems is still matter of debate. The aim of this study to compare cemented and uncemented megaprostheses on functional outcomes and complications, in order to establish the role of cementation.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed 51 metastatic patients with proximal femur metastases treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction by megaprostheses, 25 with cementless stems and 26 with cemented ones with different megaprosthetic implants. The primary endpoint was MSTS score, and the secondary endpoint was to state the incidence of surgical and clinical complications in the two groups. An un-paired T test was used to compare anthropometric, anamnestic data, and MSTS. Chi-square test was performed for evaluation of complication in the two group. Multiple linear regression was used to match the functional outcomes and complications’ incidence in the population study. Logistic regression was performed to analyse the odds ratio of different parameters and their role in the incidence of complications.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 50.1 months (+ 12.5). In thirty case right side was involved. No statistical differences were noticed between Group A and B regard the age, gender, active fracture/impending fracture. Comparing the MSTS results within the two groups at last follow-up, the score cemented group was higher than cementless one (17.9 + 7.8 vs 24.2 + 5.3; statistical significance p = 0.001). Regarding surgical complications a logistic regression was performed to analyse the odds ratio of age, cementation and length of resection; cementation confirm and odds ratio of 11 times in the incidence of surgical complications.ConclusionsCementation seems to be more liable to complications onset, while improves functional score in metastatic patients compared to uncemented megaprostheses. More studies have to be conducted in order to create a protocol and establish criteria to use cemented or uncemented stems in a frail population like metastatic patients.

Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Ewing's Sarcoma Patients: A Systematic Review of Postoperative Complications and Functional Outcomes.

Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) is a rare primary bone cancer managed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgical resection. The existing literature on limb salvage surgery with endoprostheses combines data for ES patients with osteosarcoma. This review aimed to evaluate surgical and functional outcomes of endoprosthetic reconstruction in exclusively Ewing’s patients. We believe that this is the first comprehensive review to evaluate the outcomes of limb salvage surgery with endoprostheses exclusively in Ewing’s sarcoma patients. Clinical data and outcomes were collected from PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies on limb salvage surgery in ES patients, where individual patient data was available. Seventeen studies with a total of 57 Ewing’s patients were included in this review. Fifty-three of the ES patients preserved the limb after limb salvage with endoprostheses. The average five-year implant survivorship was 85.9% based on four studies in this review. Postoperative complications were categorised by Henderson’s failure modes. Soft tissue failure was the most common, occurring in 35.1% of patients, followed by deep infection in 15.7% of patients. There was a suggestion of ‘good’ functional outcomes with limb salvage surgery. The salient limitation of this review is the variability and rarity of the patient population. Homogenous data in a larger population is necessary to provide more insight into outcomes of limb reconstruction in ES.

What Is the Long-term Survivorship of Primary and Revision Cemented Distal Femoral Replacements for Limb Salvage of Patients With Sarcoma?

What Is the Long-term Survivorship of Primary and Revision Cemented Distal Femoral Replacements for Limb Salvage of Patients With Sarcoma?