End-stage Renal Disease Program Research Articles

Fifty Years of a National Program for the Treatment of Kidney Failure

This Viewpoint examines the first 50 years of the US End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program, including technological updates and continuing challenges to update cost and quality.

Trends in Cost Attributable to Kidney Transplantation Evaluation and Waiting List Management in the United States, 2012-2017

While recent policy reforms aim to improve access to kidney transplantation for patients with end-stage kidney disease, the cost implications of kidney waiting list expansion are not well understood. The Organ Acquisition Cost Center (OACC) is the mechanism by which Medicare reimburses kidney transplantation programs, at cost, for costs attributable to kidney transplantation evaluation and waiting list management, but these costs have not been well described to date. To describe temporal trends in mean OACC costs per kidney transplantation and to identify factors most associated with cost. This economic evaluation included all kidney transplantation waiting list candidates and recipients in the United States from 2012 to 2017. A population-based study of cost center reports was conducted using data from all Center of Medicare & Medicaid-certified transplantation hospitals. Data analysis was conducted from June to August 2021. Year, local price index, transplantation and waiting list volume of transplantation program, and comorbidity burden. Mean OACC costs per kidney transplantation. In 1335 hospital-years from 2012 through 2017, Medicare's share of OACC costs increased from $0.95 billion in 2012 to $1.32 billion in 2017 (3.7% of total Medicare End-Stage Renal Disease program expenditure). Median (IQR) OACC costs per transplantation increased from $81 000 ($66 000 to $103 000) in 2012 to $100 000 ($82 000 to $125 000) in 2017. Kidney organ procurement costs contributed to 36% of mean OACC costs per transplantation throughout the study period. During the study period, transplantation hospitals experienced increases in kidney waiting list volume, kidney waiting list active volume, kidney transplantation volume, and comorbidity burden. For a median-sized transplantation program, mean OACC costs per transplantation decreased with more transplants (-$3500 [95% CI, -$4300 to -$2700] per 10 transplants; P < .001) and increased with year ($4400 [95% CI, $3500 to $5300] per year; P < .001), local price index ($1900 [95% CI, $200 to $3700] per 10-point increase; P = .03), patients listed active on the waiting list ($3100 [95% CI, $1700 to $4600] per 100 patients; P < .001), and patients on the waiting list with high comorbidities ($1500 [9% CI, $600 to $2500] per 1% increase in proportion of waitlisted patients with the highest comorbidity score; P = .002). In this study, OACC costs increased at 4% per year from 2012 to 2017 and were not solely attributable to the cost of organ procurement. Expanding the waiting list will likely contribute to further increases in the mean OACC costs per transplantation and substantially increase Medicare liability.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and the Kidney.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) accounts for about half of individuals entering end-stage renal disease programs. Patients with DKD frequently have associated microvascular complications and are at very high risk for developing macrovascular complications. Comprehensive treatment involves slowing or preventing the decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and preventing macrovascular and further microvascular complications. Maintaining an A1C <6.5% represents primary prevention; in established DKD, tight blood pressure control is essential. ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors can be used in combination to slow the rate of decline in GFR. This article reviews the general approach to DKD treatment and summarizes renal outcomes in four cardiovascular outcomes trials of SGLT2 inhibitors. Together, these trials provide conclusive evidence that SGLT2 inhibitors, added to an ACE inhibitor or ARB, slow the progression of DKD.

Thyroid Pathology in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis.

Objectives: Chronic kidney disease is a rising cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries, including end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The prevalence of thyroid comorbidities in persons with chronic kidney disease is documented higher than in normal population. The study aims to investigate the prevalence of morphological and functional thyroid disorders in patients with chronic kidney disease, with renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 123 consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5, on hemodialysis during a period of one month (May 2019–June 2020). All patients were enrolled for maintenance hemodialysis in B Braun Hemodialysis Center Timisoara and were examined on conventional 2B ultrasound. Thyroid blood tests were done, including serum free thyroxin (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) at the time of starting hemodialysis. Results: We evaluated 123 patients (male to female ratio 70/53) mean age 62.2 ± 11.01, mostly above 65 years old, enrolled in the end-stage renal disease program, on renal replacement therapy. From the cohort, 76/123 presented thyroid disease, including autoimmune hypothyroidism, nodular goiter or thyroid cancer. Among them, 63 patients presented nodular goiter, including 3 thyroid cancers, confirmed by surgery and histopathological result, 22 patients had thyroid autoimmune disease. The serum thyroid-stimulating hormone levels found in the cohort was 3.36 ± 2.313 mUI/mL, which was in the normal laboratory reference range. The thyroid volume was 13 ± 7.18 mL. A single patient in the cohort presented Graves Basedow disease, under treatment and three patients present subclinical hyperthyroidism. We have found that thyroid disease risk is increased by 3.4-fold for the female gender and also the increase of body mass index (BMI) with one unit raises the risk of developing thyroid disease with 1.083 times (p = 0.018). Conclusion: To conclude, this study aimed to quantify the prevalence of thyroid disease in end-stage kidney disease population, especially nodular goiter, important for differential diagnosis in cases with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Thyroid autoimmune disease can be prevalent among these patients, as symptoms can overlap those of chronic disease and decrease the quality of life. We have found that thyroid disease has a high prevalence among patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Thyroid goiter and nodules in ESRD patients were more prevalent than in the general population. Clinical surveillance and routine screening for thyroid disorders can improve the quality of life in these patients.

A historical perspective of how public policy shaped dialysis care delivery in the United States.

Broadly defined public policy has been said to be whatever "governments choose to do or not to do" As applied to healthcare, public policy can be traced back to the 4000-year-old Code of Hammurabi. As it applies to dialysis care its history is barely 50years old since national coverage for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was legislated as Public Law 92-603 in 1972. As with most healthcare policy changes, it was a result of medical progress which had changed renal function replacement by dialysis from its rudimentary beginnings during the Second World War into an experimental acute life-saving procedure in the 1950s and to an established life-sustaining treatment for the otherwise fatal disease of uremia in the 1960s that was limited by its costs. Since 1973, the Medicare ESRD Program has saved the lives of thousands of individuals, a compassionate achievement that has come at increasing costs which have exceeded all estimates and evaded containment. Apart from cost containment, policy changes in dialysis care have been directed at improving its safety and adequacy. Some of the results of these changes are evident as one compares the outcomes and complications of dialysis encountered in the 1970s to those in the present; others, particularly those related to vascular access and hospitalization rates have improved modestly. This article recounts the historical background in which national coverage for dialysis care was developed, legislated and has evolved over the past 50years.

Assessing Residual Bias in Estimating Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness

Estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness using an unvaccinated comparison group may result in biased effect estimates. To explore the reduction of confounding bias in an active comparison of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines, as compared with vaccinated versus unvaccinated comparisons. Using Medicare data from the United States end-stage renal disease program (2009-2013), we compared the risk of all-cause mortality among recipients of high-dose vaccine (HDV) versus standard-dose vaccine (SDV), HDV versus no vaccine, and SDV versus no vaccine. To quantify confounding bias, analyses were restricted to the preinfluenza season, when the protective effect of vaccination should not yet be observed. We estimated the standardized mortality ratio-weighted cumulative incidence functions using Kaplan-Meier methods and calculated risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences between groups. Among 350,921 eligible patients contributing 825,642 unique patient preinfluenza seasons, 0.8% received HDV, 70.5% received SDV, and 28.7% remained unvaccinated. Comparisons with unvaccinated patients yielded spurious decreases in mortality risk during the preinfluenza period, for HDV versus none [RR, 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-0.70)] and SDV versus none (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.70-0.75). The effect estimate was attenuated in the HDV versus SDV comparison (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.03). Estimates on the absolute scale followed a similar pattern. The HDV versus SDV comparison yielded less-biased estimates of the all-cause mortality before influenza season compared to those with nonuser comparison groups. Vaccine effectiveness and safety researchers should consider the active comparator design to reduce bias due to differences in underlying health status between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.

Do current quality measures truly reflect the quality of dialysis?

The US End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Program, which came into existence in 1973, was initially envisioned to provide needed financial coverage for about 50 000 patients through Medicare. Over the past 45 years the evolution of the ESRD program has been quite different, and it now serves over one half million dialysis and transplant patients. The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) of 2008 Section 153(c) requires the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop and implement quality measures for dialysis patients as part of the ESRD Quality Incentive Program (QIP) beginning in payment year (PY) 2012. The annual ESRD Prospective Payment System (PPS) rulemaking process allows CMS to create ESRD QIP rules that specify the measures, scoring methods, and payment reduction ranges applicable to the respective PY. CMS assesses each facility's performance and calculates a score for each measure, according to the method detailed for that PY. Scores for each measure are combined to create the Total Performance Score (TPS) for each facility. If a facility's TPS does not meet or exceed the performance standards established during the earlier comparison period, the facility will incur a payment reduction of up to 2% for the entire PY. The QIP program has evolved over the several years since its inception. There have been deletions and additions of various measures. CMS uses additional measures in its Dialysis Facility Compare (DFC) website which is available to the public and forms the basis of the 5-star rating system for dialysis facilities. The evidence underlying inclusion many of these measures in the QIP and DFC remains an area of debate. In this review, we discuss the evolution of these measures and their appropriateness. We recommend that some of the current QIP and DFC measures should not be used for public reporting and/or payment as unintended consequences may occur. Nonetheless, all the current QIP and DFC measures and others are suitable for internal quality review.

Business of dialysis and the role of the medical director.

Since the inception of the Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Program in 1972, the medical director has been an important leader in the dialysis unit. The initial duties of the medical director were focused on quality and safety but were gradually expanded over the decades to include the development and oversight of protocols to manage metabolic bone disease and anemia. As the total cost of ESRD care has escalated, there have been progressive attempts to control costs through additional bundling and the creation of alternative payment schemes. While we await the financial and clinical outcomes of these initiatives, the medical director's role continues to expand in scope and now includes an enhanced role for not only clinical outcomes but financial outcomes as well.

What the non-nephrologist needs to know about dialysis.

The End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program now serves approximately 675,000 individuals in the United States at a cost of $26.1 billion to the Medicare system. Given the size of this population, healthcare providers from all disciplines will deliver care to patients on dialysis. Mortality remains high among patients on chronic dialysis, with 42.3% surviving 5years. As this is a vulnerable population, it is important in the care of ESRD patients that non-nephrologists have a working knowledge of issues germane to dialysis. This review examines the physiology, mechanics, complications, and care delivery concerns of kidney dialysis modalities relevant to the non-nephrologist. The majority of patients receive in-center hemodialysis thrice weekly, with a small proportion on home-based therapies such as peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis. Inpatients may undergo hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, and in critically ill patients, continuous renal replacement therapies are utilized. Practical aspects of each of these modalities are discussed.

Beneficiary characteristics and vaccinations in the end-stage renal disease Medicare beneficiary population, an analysis of claims data 2006-2015.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) routinely recommends three vaccines - influenza, hepatitis B, and pneumococcal vaccines - for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) dialysis patients. We sought to assess vaccination coverage among fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD who received Part B dialysis services at any point from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2015 (through June 30, 2016 for influenza). To assess influenza vaccination rates in a given influenza season, we restricted the population to beneficiaries who were continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B throughout all twelve months of that season. To assess hepatitis B and pneumococcal vaccine coverage following dialysis initiation, we developed a Kaplan-Meier curve for all patients who began dialysis between 2006 and 2015. For influenza vaccination, we identified an average of approximately 325,000 ESRD dialysis beneficiaries enrolled through each influenza season from 2006-2015. Seasonal influenza vaccination rates steadily increased during the 10-year period, from 52% in 2006-2007 to 71% in 2015-2016. The greatest increases in influenza vaccination appear in non-white beneficiaries with overall utilization in non-whites higher than in whites (p < .001). For the hepatitis B and pneumococcal vaccinations, we identified over 350,000 ESRD dialysis beneficiaries who began dialysis over the 10-year study window. The probability of receiving a hepatitis B vaccine within the first three years of entering into the ESRD program was higher (77%) than the probability of receiving any pneumococcal vaccine (53%). 45% of ESRD patients completed at least one dose of the two hepatitis B series (three-dose or four-dose) at any time during the study period. Opportunities exist at regional and facility levels to improve vaccination coverage. Compliance to ACIP recommendations may directly affect risk for ESRD dialysis patients for complications from diseases that can be mitigated by vaccination.

Effects of Medicare Coverage for the Chronically Ill on Health Insurance, Utilization, and Mortality

I study the effect of the 1973 expansion of Medicare coverage to individuals with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on insurance coverage, health care utilization, and mortality. Between the ESRD expansion and a simultaneous expansion of Medicare coverage to long-term Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipients, insurance coverage increased by 4.4 to 8.3 percentage points and the bulk of the increase in insurance coverage was due to an increase in Medicare coverage. The expansion was also associated with an increase in physician visits and a seven log point reduction in mortality from kidney disease, which I replicate in cross-country comparisons. Lastly, I provide evidence for two mechanisms that affected mortality: 1) an increase in access to and use of treatment, which is plausibly driven by changes in insurance coverage; and 2) an increase, by 1975, in entry of dialysis clinics in areas with a greater burden of kidney disease in 1971. Based on changes in the ages at which people died form kidney disease and all other causes, the ESRD program cost between $29000 and $245000 per life year saved, which includes a range of welfare improving values.

Palliation Versus Dialysis for End-Stage Renal Disease in the Oldest Old: What are the Considerations?

As the US population continues to age, new cases of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in individuals, aged 85 years or older (the oldest old), are increasing. Many patients who begin hemodialysis despite questionable benefit may struggle with high symptom burden and rapid functional decline. This article reviews the history regarding the funding and development of the Medicare ESRD program, reviews current approaches to the oldest old with ESRD, and considers strategies to improve the management approach of this vulnerable population.

Burden of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Latin America

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) represents a major challenge for Latin America (LA). Epidemiological information needed to assist in the development of ESRD care in the region. The Latin American Dialysis and Renal Transplant Registry (RLADTR), has published several reports and its continuity has implied a sustained effort of the entire LA Nephrology community. This paper summarizes the results corresponding to year 2012. Our methods have been reported previously. Participant countries complete an annual survey collecting data on incident and prevalent patients undergoing renal replacement treatment (RRT) in all modalities. 20 countries participated in the surveys, more than 90% of the Latin America. The prevalence of ESRD under RRT in LA increased from 119 patients Per million population (pmp) in 1991 to 661 pmp in 2012. HD continues to be the treatment of choice in the region (82%). A wide rate variation in incidence is observed: from 472.7 in Jalisco (Mexico) to 14 pmp in Guatemala. Diabetes remained the leading cause of ESRD. The most frequent cause of death was cardiovascular. There is a wide rate variation of nephrologist by country, from 1.8 pmp in Honduras to 45.2 pmp in Cuba. The heterogeneity or even absence of registries in some LA countries is congruent with the inequities in access to RRT in such countries, as well as the availability of qualified personnel. The SLANH is currently running training programs as well as cooperation programs between LA countries to help the least developed start ESRD programs. In this spirit, RLADTR is training personnel to carry out dialysis and transplant registries in LA.

The Symptoms Prevalence, Medical Interventions, and Health Care Service Needs for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease in a Renal Palliative Care Program.

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the symptoms prevalence and interventions initiated in the last 2 weeks of life, health care service utilization, and causes of death of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD under a renal palliative care (RPC) program. A total of 335 RPC patients were included, of which 226 patients died during the study period. The 5 most prevalent symptoms were dyspnea (63.7%), fatigue (51.8%), edema (48.2%), pain (44.2%), and anorexia (38.1%); and the 5 most prevalent interventions initiated were oxygen (69.5%), parenteral infusion (67.3%), antibiotics (53.5%), bladder catheterization (44.7%), and analgesic (39.8%) in the last 2 weeks of life. Each patient received 3.5 ± 4.4 outpatient clinic visit, 3.4 ± 10.3 home care visits, and 3.1 ± 2.7 hospital admissions. Besides ESRD (51.8%), the most common causes of death were cardiovascular events (18.6%) and infection (17.2%).

Comparison of trends in colorectal cancer screening in the US end-stage renal disease population and the US Medicare population.

BackgroundAlthough patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis are at an increased risk of colorectal cancer compared with the general population, national practices for colorectal cancer screening have not been reported in this population. We assessed the performance of colorectal cancer screening in the US end-stage renal disease program in comparison with the US Medicare population.MethodsWe studied the United States Renal Data System for US prevalent hemodialysis patients between 2002 and 2011 who had Medicare as their primary insurer. We assessed procedure codes for performance of common colorectal cancer screening tests, including fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. We assessed screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy only and excluded patients who had preexisting colon cancer or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Because colorectal cancer screening recommendations are established for hemodialysis patients who have been listed for kidney transplantation, but no general recommendations exist for patients who are not wait-listed, we assessed colorectal cancer screening separately for the two groups.ResultsWe found that 1-year performance of colonoscopy in wait-listed hemodialysis patients was similar to or higher than that in general Medicare patients of the same age, while performance of colonoscopy in non-wait-listed patients was significantly lower than among general Medicare patients of the same age.ConclusionsGiven improved survival among hemodialysis patients in the last decade, the utility of colorectal cancer screening even among non-wait-listed hemodialysis patients should be reassessed.

Forecast of the incidence, prevalence and burden of end-stage renal disease in Nanjing, China to the Year 2025.

BackgroundThere are limited data on the trends of incidence or prevalence of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in China. To assist in future planning for the ESRD program, the trends of incidence, prevalence and health care costs were analyzed and forecasted to the year 2025 by modeling of historical data from 2004 through 2014.MethodsNanjing urban employee basic medical insurance (NJUEBMI) data were obtained from the Nanjing Medical Insurance Information System from 2004 to 2014. The time series forecasting system in SAS 9.4 was used. Each variable was independently forecasted by the fittest model, which was selected automatically or manually.ResultsThe forecasting models demonstrated mean percent errors of −2.49 to 5.62 %, relative to the observed values. The R-square values for the forecasting models ranged from 0.756 to 0.997. On the basis of trends in the historical data, the models projected that the average annual increase in the NJUEBMI population was 4.77 %, with forecasted values of 5,029,270 in 2025 (95 % CI, 4,960,423-5,098,117). The incidence and prevalence of ESRD were projected to increase by 1.19 and 1.95 % annually and were expected to reach 250.5 pmp (95 % CI, 247.7–253.3) and 1505 pmp(95 % CI, 1450–1560) by 2025. Additionally, the costs associated with ESRD were forecasted to increase at a growth rate of 5.80 % for healthcare costs and 7.25‰ for per capita medical expenses, with forecasted values of ¥600.3 million ($92.4 million) (95 % CI, 541.8–658.9) and ¥99.0 thousand ($15.2 thousand) (95 % CI, 98.6–99.3), respectively, by 2025. The incidence and prevalence of kidney transplantation were projected to decrease by 6.58 and 9.79 % annually.ConclusionsThese projections suggest that the incidence, prevalence, healthcare costs, and per capita medical expenses of ESRD would increase in the NJUEBMI population. They provide a basis for discussing the trends of ESRD in China and facing the challenges from the ESRD program.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0269-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Mortality and illicit drug dependence among hemodialysis patients in the United States: a retrospective cohort analysis

BackgroundIllicit drug use is common and known to cause and exacerbate a wide spectrum of kidney disease, often leading to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but little is known about its prevalence or associated mortality among incident hemodialysis patients.MethodsThis study is a retrospective cohort analysis using data obtained from the United States Renal Data System. We assembled a cohort of 511,821 incident hemodialysis patients age 20 years and older who initiated hemodialysis between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010. Illicit drug dependence was defined by comorbidity on the ESRD Medical Evidence Report (Form CMS-2728). We performed survival analysis to examine the association of drug dependence with overall mortality and mortality due to diagnoses that can be associated with intravenous drug use (drug-sensitive diagnoses) in the first year after initiating hemodialysis.ResultsDrug dependence was recorded for 1.5 % (n = 7,461). Drug dependence was independently associated with a 1.3-fold and 2.5-fold higher hazard of overall mortality and mortality due to a potentially drug-sensitive diagnosis [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.34 (1.27–1.41) and 2.54 (2.05–3.14), p < 0.001, respectively]. This association varied significantly by age (pinteraction < 0.001), with a 9-fold higher hazard of mortality due to a potentially drug-sensitive diagnosis among the youngest patients with drug dependence [AHR 9.21 (5.15–16.44), p < 0.001].ConclusionIllicit drug dependence is a burden within the ESRD program and is strongly associated with premature mortality, particularly among younger patients. Targeted intervention is needed to help reduce this burden.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0271-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Interview With Linda J. Knodel, FACHE, Senior Vice President and Chief Nursing Officer at Mercy

Linda J. Knodel, FACHE, is senior vice president and chief nursing officer (CNO) at Mercy, based in Chesterfield, Missouri. Composed of 45 hospitals, 40,000 employees, and more than 2,000 Mercy Clinic physicians, Mercy is the seventh largest Catholic healthcare system in the United States and serves residents in a four-state region.Ms. Knodel was previously vice president and CNO of Mercy Springfield Communities in Springfield, Missouri, and senior vice president and CNO at St. Alexius Medical Center in Bismarck, North Dakota. She has served in various local, regional, and national governance capacities, most recently as president of the American Organization of Nurse Executives (AONE). Ms. Knodel has served on the ACHE Board of Governors, Regents Advisory Council, and Finance Committee. She participated on AONE's strategic planning, membership, bylaws, and annual meeting committees and has served as a regional policy board member for the American Hospital Association. Ms. Knodel currently serves on the Health Professions Program Council with Western Governors University in Salt Lake City, Utah. She has written a book titled Nurse to Nurse: Nursing Management and in 2011 was recognized by the Springfield Business Journal as one of the 12 People You Need to Know.Ms. Knodel is the 2016 recipient of ACHE's Gold Medal Award in the category of healthcare delivery organization. The Gold Medal Award is the highest honor bestowed by ACHE on outstanding leaders who have made significant contributions to the healthcare profession.Dr. Kash: As a nurse leader, how have you worked effectively with both administrators (on the business side) and physicians (on the clinical side) in a large not-for-profit health system ?Ms. Knodel: Two years after finishing nursing school, I was a young nurse working in the dialysis unit of a hospital, and the federal government had put together the End-Stage Renal Disease program, under which Medicare funded treatment for end-stage renal disease. In the mid-1970s, our dialysis unit received $120 per dialysis treatment to care for this patient population. I soon became the department leader and wondered how we could manage the care of these patients for $120 per treatment. We had to come up with a care model under which we provided care for that amount or even less, depending on our ability to negotiate contracts for artificial kidneys, lines, medications, and so forth. That process really intrigued me. I loved the finance side, and the position allowed me to work with our medical director from a practice standpoint to ensure quality patient outcomes, as well as with administration and finance to make sure we were meeting our budget requirements. I thought this was such a healthy model, and that is how I began to grow in the profession.Shortly afterward, our CEO asked me to take over a division that included the quality department, infection control, utilization review, a home care department, and medical records. We were looking at diagnosis-related groups, which was a foreign language to me. That experience prompted me to obtain a bachelor's degree in health administration and then a master's degree in health administration at the University of Minnesota. The education enabled me to bridge my knowledge with administrative and clinical skills.At the same time, the hospital was on the Magnet journey (a designation of the American Nurses Credentialing Center). Just before we submitted our application, the credentialing requirements changed and CNOs needed to have a bachelor's or master's degree in nursing, and I had neither. The local college, which was run by the same order of sisters that owned the hospital, put together a program that allowed 23 other nurse managers and me to receive a master's degree in nursing. About a year and a half later, the hospital achieved Magnet status, the first hospital in North Dakota to do so.Administrators and physicians have to want to work together. …

The Envy of Scholars: Applying the Lessons of the Framingham Heart Study to the Prevention of Chronic Kidney Disease.

During the past 50 years, a dramatic reduction in the mortality rate associated with cardiovascular disease has occurred in the US and other countries. Statistical modeling has revealed that approximately half of this reduction is the result of risk factor mitigation. The successful identification of such risk factors was pioneered and has continued with the Framingham Heart Study, which began in 1949 as a project of the US National Heart Institute (now part of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute). Decreases in total cholesterol, blood pressure, smoking, and physical inactivity account for 24%, 20%, 12%, and 5% reductions in the mortality rate, respectively. Nephrology was designated as a recognized medical professional specialty a few years later. Hemodialysis was first performed in 1943. The US Medicare End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Program was established in 1972. The number of patients in the program increased from 5,000 in the first year to more than 500,000 in recent years. Only recently have efforts for risk factor identification, early diagnosis, and prevention of chronic kidney disease (CKD) been undertaken. By applying the approach of the Framingham Heart Study to address CKD risk factors, we hope to mirror the success of cardiology; we aim to prevent progression to ESRD and to avoid the cardiovascular complications associated with CKD. In this paper, we present conceptual examples of risk factor modification for CKD, in the setting of this historical framework.

System Dynamics Modeling Can be Leveraged to Predict Critical Care Pathways and Costs for End Stage Renal Disease: US Population to 2020.

Background: End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) accounts for 9% of Medicare spending, with the beneficiaries suffering from ESRD costing 7-9 times more than the average. This population is expected to continue to grow as a portion of Medicare beneficiaries. To provide clinicians and administrators with a greater understanding of the combined costs associated with the multiple critical care pathways for End Stage Renal Disease we have developed a model to predict ESRD populations through 2020. Methods: A system dynamics model was designed to project the prevalence and total costs of ESRD treatment for the United States through 2020. Incidence, transplant and mortality rates were modeled for 35 age and primary diagnosis subgroups coursing through different ESRD critical care pathways. Using a web interface that allows users to alter certain combinations of parameters, several demonstration analysis were run to predict the impact of three policy interventions on the future of ESRD care Results: The model was successfully calibrated against the output of United States Renal Data System's (USRDS) prior predictions and tested by comparing the output to historical data. Our model predicts that the ESRD patient population will continue to rise, with total prevalence increasing to 829,000 by 2020. This would be a 30% increase from the reported 2010 prevalence. Conclusions: Findings suggest that clinical care and policy changes can be leveraged to more effectively and efficiently manage the inevitable growth of ESRD patient populations. Patients can be shifted to more effective treatments, while planning integrating systems thinking can save Medicare's ESRD program billions over the next decade.