Endpoint Definitions Research Articles

#2379 Acute kidney injury as a key predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly raises cardiovascular event risks. The influence of acute-on-chronic kidney incidents is less understood. This study examines the link between acute kidney injury (AKI) episodes and subsequent Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in CKD patients. Method From 2013 to 2016, the CKD-REIN cohort enrolled 3033 adults with CKD stages 3-5 (average age 67; 66% male; mean eGFR 33 mL/min/1.73m²) from 40 French outpatient nephrology clinics, reflecting national geographic and legal diversity. During a 5-year follow-up, all AKI episodes, whether inpatient or outpatient, were identified, confirmed, and categorized per KDIGO-AKI standards by an expert panel. Cardiovascular events were evaluated using clinical trial Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions. MACE cumulative incidences (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular death) post-AKI were calculated using Aalen-Johansen methods, accounting for kidney failure and death risks. The impact of the first AKI episode on MACE risk was analyzed using a multivariable Cox model, treating AKI as a time-variable and stratifying by characteristics (in/outpatient status, AKI stage, pre-renal causes, renal recovery at discharge). Factors like demographics, cardiovascular risks, CKD severity, and treatments were considered. Interaction and sensitivity analyses were performed, excluding those with prior AKI or cardiovascular disease. Results During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 530 patients experienced an incident AKI episode. The cumulative incidence of MACE at 1 year following this initial episode of AKI was 8.1% [95% confidence interval, 6.1; 10.8], with a median time to occurrence of 6.7 months after AKI. After adjustment for multiple confounders, we observed a substantial increased hazard of MACE associated with a first episode of AKI (HR = 5.99 [4.63; 7.76], p < 0.001), and this association remained significant for each MACE component (Fig. 1A). A dose-response relationship was observed, with higher risks in more severe AKI cases (KDIGO grades 2-3) and among hospitalized versus non-hospitalized patients (Fig. 1B). This association was also observed across all subgroups, without any interaction with age, sex, nor major comorbidities (diabetes, history of AKI, or cardiovascular events), as well as in various sensitivity analyses. Overall, we estimated an attributable risk fraction of 18.1% [13.6; 22.4] for MACE associated with AKI episodes within this population. Conclusion Our study highlights a strong dose-response relationship between incident AKI events and the risk of subsequent major cardiovascular events in CKD patients. These findings suggest that AKI may not only be a marker of increased cardiovascular risk but also a potential mediator of this risk. From a clinical perspective, these results underscore the importance of close monitoring and management of AKI in CKD patients to reduce the risk of MACE. This study improves our understanding of the interplay between renal and cardiovascular health, emphasizing the need for integrated care approaches in this high-risk population.

The instability of the inner horizon of the quantum-corrected black hole

We analyse the stability of the inner horizon of the quantum-corrected black hole which is proposed in loop quantum gravity as the exterior of the quantum Oppenheimer–Snyder and Swiss Cheese models. It is shown that the flux and energy density of a test scalar field measured by free-falling observers are both divergent near the Cauchy horizon. By considering the generalized Dray–’t Hooft–Redmond relation which is independent of the field equation, we find that the mass inflation always happens and the scalar curvature and Kretschmann scalar are also divergent on the inner horizon. These suggest that the inner horizon is unstable and will probably turn into a null singularity.The results support the strong cosmic censorship hypothesis.However, this also implies that the quantum corrected model may not be the definitive endpoint as a regular black hole.Besides, it further proposes that it may be challenging to observe the astronomical phenomenon which depends on the existence of the inner horizon of the black hole

Abstract PO1-03-03: STEEP criteria v2.0 validation: A multi-trial analysis using GEICAM and TRIO adjuvant trials to evaluate surrogate endpoints for overall survival

Abstract Background: Standardized definitions of efficacy endpoints are needed to improve clinical trial designs, data reporting and interpretation of results, and to allow cross-trial comparisons. STEEP (Standardized Definitions for Efficacy Endpoints) criteria were proposed in 2007 by an expert panel from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to provide common definitions for clinical trials in early breast cancer (BC). Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) was selected as a candidate surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in adjuvant trials and has been widely used in the last 15 years. Advances in BC systemic treatment led to review these criteria (STEEP v2.0), with the definition of a new modified endpoint: invasive BC-free survival (IBCFS). IBCFS excludes second primary non-breast invasive cancers from IDFS which may better detect efficacy effects when the toxicity profile of the intervention is well-known and the risk of second primary cancer is small. Methods: We proposed a multi-trial analysis of 8 adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) trials from GEICAM and TRIO to evaluate the different surrogate endpoints defined in the STEEP v2.0. Trial-level surrogacy was assessed through correlation between the ln hazard ratio (HR) of OS and the ln HR of the different studied endpoints across trials. The correlation was estimated by the weighted, by trial size, least squares regression (WLS) line and evaluated comparing the R2 values between OS and the corresponding endpoint tested. Primary analyses evaluated the correlation of OS with IDFS/IBCFS. Secondary analyses evaluated the correlation of OS with other STEEP v2.0 endpoints (distant disease-free survival [DDFS], distant relapse-free survival [DRFS], recurrence-free survival [RFS], recurrence-free interval [RFI] and distant recurrence-free interval [DRFI]) and explored the surrogacy between OS and all endpoints in specific groups of patients (pts) according to their risk of relapse: hormone receptors positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) pts with intermediate/high and high-risk and triple negative (TN) pts. Results: A total of 14,473 pts were included. Median age was 50 years (range, 20–82). All were female, and 51.8% were postmenopausal. With a median follow-up of 115 months (range, 0.0–188) we found 2,504 OS events, 4,146 IDFS events (60.9% being distant recurrences) and 3,810 IBCFS events (62.4% being distant recurrences). For each trial, HR of OS, IDFS and IBCFS indicated same conclusions. If HR< 1 for OS, it was also for IDFS and IBCFS and the same was true when HR >1. R2 results of the weighted linear correlations between the ln HR of OS versus (vs) IDFS and OS vs IBCFS were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Confidence intervals (CI) at 95% were both overlapping. All other efficacy endpoints showed strong correlation with OS in the overall analysis. R2 values for HR+/HER2- intermediate/high and high-risk pts were 0.89 (OS vs IDFS) and 0.84 (OS vs IBCFS). For TN pts the correlations were weaker, being 0.63 (OS vs IDFS) and 0.73 (OS vs IBCFS). All WLS R2 values are described in the table. Conclusions: All tested STEEP v2.0 endpoints were strongly correlated with OS (R2 close to 1), meaning that their use as surrogate endpoints for adjuvant CT trials is appropriate. Notably, no differences were found between them in this multi-trial analysis. Therefore, none of them is more appropriate than other to discriminate the value of a new intervention vs comparator in adjuvant CT studies with mature data and long-term follow-up. Table: Citation Format: Sara López-Tarruella, Marina Pollan, Ander Urriticoechea, Eva Carrasco, Gonzalo Spera, Miguel Martín, Begoña Bermejo, Linnea Chap, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, John Crown, Jose Angel García-Sáenz, Arlene Chan, Angel Guerrero, Valerie Bee, Lourdes Calvo, Rodrigo Fresco, Andrea Blasco, Andrés Hernando, Dennis Slamon. STEEP criteria v2.0 validation: A multi-trial analysis using GEICAM and TRIO adjuvant trials to evaluate surrogate endpoints for overall survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-03.

Critical importance of correctly defining and reporting secondary endpoints when assessing the ethics of research biopsies.

This article reviews the implementation challenges to the American Society of Clinical Oncology's ethical framework for including research biopsies in oncology clinical trials. The primary challenges to implementation relate to the definitions of secondary endpoints, the scientific and regulatory framework, and the incentive structure that encourages inclusion of biopsies. Principles of research stewardship require that the clinical trials community correctly articulate the scientific goals of any research biopsies, especially those that are required for the patient to enroll on a trial and receive an investigational agent. Furthermore, it is important to sufficiently justify the characterization of secondary (as distinguished from exploratory) endpoints, protect the interest of research participants, and report accurate and complete information to ClinicalTrials.gov and the published literature.

Factor XI: structure, function and therapeutic inhibition.

Arterial and venous thromboembolism is a major medical concern that requires therapeutic anticoagulation in various medical fields to prevent its drastic consequences. Despite significant advances in anticoagulant therapy, thrombosis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Traditional anticoagulants like heparin and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have shown efficacy in preventing and treating thrombosis but come with an inherent risk of bleeding due to their non-specific inhibition of multiple coagulation factors. Subsequent direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), targeting specific factors such as Xa or thrombin, demonstrated improved safety profiles compared to VKAs, yet bleeding remains a concern. Accordingly, research is focused on developing anticoagulants with improved safety profiles. A safer class of anticoagulants would have broad appeal. The intrinsic pathway of coagulation, involving factor XI (FXI), has attracted attention as a potential target for safer anticoagulants. Preclinical studies and epidemiological data indicate that FXI deficiency or inhibition protects against thrombosis with minimal bleeding. Current research involves evaluating various FXI-directed strategies, and phase 2 studies have shown promising results in orthopedic surgery, atrial fibrillation, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Several agents, such as antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, small synthetic molecules, natural peptides, and aptamers, have been developed to inhibit FXI at different stages, offering potentially safer alternatives to traditional anticoagulants. However, the optimal balance between preventing thrombosis and the risk of bleeding associated with FXI inhibitors requires validation through extensive phase 3 clinical trials using definite clinical endpoints. Several of such trials are currently underway or planned to define the role of FXI inhibitors in clinical practice and determine the most suitable FXI inhibitor for each specific indication. The current review highlightsthe rationale behind developing FXI inhibitors, presenting the most advanced agents in development, summarizing completed clinical trials, and discussing ongoing research efforts.

Assessing the one-month mortality impact of civilian-setting prehospital transfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Based on convincing evidence for outcomes improvement in the military setting, the past decade has seen evaluation of prehospital transfusion (PHT) in the civilian emergency medical services (EMS) setting. Evidence synthesis has been challenging, due to study design variation with respect to both exposure (type of blood product administered) and outcome (endpoint definitions and timing). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to execute an overarching assessment of all civilian-arena randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence focusing on administration of blood products compared to control of no blood products. The review structure followed the Cochrane group's Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Using the Transfusion Evidence Library (transfusionevidencelibrary.com), the multidatabase (e.g. PubMed, EMBASE) Harvard On-Line Library Information System (HOLLIS), and GoogleScholar, we accessed many databases and gray literature sources. RCTs of PHT in the civilian setting with a comparison group receiving no blood products with 1-month mortality outcomes were identified. In assessing a single patient-centered endpoint-1-month mortality-we calculated an overall risk ratio (RR) estimate. Analysis of three RCTs yielded a model with acceptable heterogeneity (I2 = 48%, Q-test p = 0.13). Pooled estimate revealed civilian PHT results in a statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.38) relative mortality reduction of 13% (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63-1.19). Current evidence does not demonstrate 1-month mortality benefit of civilian-setting PHT. This should give pause to EMS systems considering adoption of civilian-setting PHT programs. Further studies should not only focus on which formulations of blood products might improve outcomes but also focus on which patients are most likely to benefit from any form of civilian-setting PHT.

O127: Global DELPHI Consensus Study on anticoagulation for splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis

Abstract Introduction Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT) occurs in 16.6%-22.6% of acute pancreatitis cases, influenced by pancreatitis severity and imaging techniques. Serious sequelae include hepatic and bowel failure, while management with anticoagulation remains controversial amidst perceived bleeding risks. This study's aim, driven by heterogeneity in literature, utilized DELPHI methodology to discern expert consensus on SpVT treatment, advocating for standardized research approaches. Methods Using purposive, non-probability sampling and DELPHI methodology, n=173 global experts in SpVT-related acute pancreatitis were engaged from international networks. From April 2022-2023, a three-round Delphi process was implemented to completion. n=26 statements were posed, spanning diagnosis, prognosis, management, and outcomes, with feedback via a 4-point Likert scale. By Round 3, n=54/173 participants remained. Results The mean acute pancreatitis caseload per expert per year was 68.0, 72.6 and 73.0 across successive DELPHI rounds. Regarding SpVT anatomical location, there was strong consensus favouring anticoagulation for portal vein (90.7%) and SMV thrombosis (92.6%), but no consensus to treat splenic vein thrombosis (48.2%). 83.7% advocated anticoagulation for complete thrombus occlusion and 70.9% for partial occlusion. Expert views on anticoagulation duration were dichotomous, with 40.7% endorsing 3 or 6 months. In DELPHI Round 3, 74.1% rejected radiological resolution as a definitive treatment endpoint. Conclusion Grading of recommendations for SpVT treatment is precluded by heterogeneity in the evidence base. This inaugural DELPHI study underscores the salient considerations for future research. Overwhelming consensus stratified treatment for SpVT localization and degree of thrombus occlusion. 94.5% of experts agree on the feasibility of RCT to investigate treatment of SpVT.

Harmonising outcome measurement for child focused domestic abuse interventions. Reflections on the development and implementation of a core outcome set.

There is appetite in the UK to better measure the impact of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) interventions on children. The spread of outcomes-based commissioning means outcome measurement is no longer just the territory of academic researchers but is now firmly within the purview of practitioners and policy makers. However, outcomes measured in trials only partially represent the views of those delivering and using services with respect to how success should be defined and captured. Even within trials there is huge inconsistency in the definition and measurement of important endpoints. This yields a body of evidence that is difficult to make sense of, defeating the ends for which it was produced - to improve the response to children and families who have experienced abuse. Development of Core Outcome Sets (COS) is seen as a solution to this problem, by establishing consensus across key stakeholder groups regarding a minimum standard for outcome measurement in trials, and increasingly in service delivery contexts. To date COS development has addressed outcomes relating to health conditions or interventions, with limited application to public health challenges. We reflect on our efforts to develop a COS to evaluate psychosocial interventions for children and families experiencing DVA. We highlight the value of COS development as a mechanism for improving evidence quality and the response to families experiencing abuse. Finally, we make recommendations to researchers and COS guideline developers to support this broader application of COS methodology.

Resazurin to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration on antifungal susceptibility assays for Fonsecaea sp. using a modified EUCAST protocol.

Chromoblastomycosis is a fungal chronic disease, which affects humans, especially in cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues. There is no standard treatment for Chromoblastomycosis, and it is a therapeutic challenge, due natural resistance of their causative agents, inadequate response of patients and common cases of relapse. Protocols for determination of antifungal drugs susceptibility are not standardized for chromoblastomycosis agents and endpoint definition is usually based on visual inspection, which depends on the analyst, making it sometimes inaccurate. We presented a colorimetric and quantitative methodology based on resazurin reduction to resofurin to determine the metabolic status of viable cells of Fonsecaea sp. Performing antifungal susceptibility assay by a modified EUCAST protocol allied to resazurin, we validated the method to identify the minimum inhibitory concentrations of itraconazole, fluconazole, amphotericin B, and terbinafine for eight Fonsecaea clinical isolates. According to our data, resazurin is a good indicator of metabolic status of viable cells, including those exposed to antifungal drugs. This work aimed to test resazurin as an indicator of the metabolic activity of Fonsecaea species in susceptibility assays to antifungal drugs. Species of this genus are the main causative agents of Chromoblastomycosis, which affects humans.

Posterior left atrial isolation is associated with a lower incidence of atrial tachycardia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Patients may develop atrial tachycardia (AT) after left atrial (LA) ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The population consisted of 101 consecutive patients (age = 64.3 ± 8.7years, 70 males (69%), LA = 4.6 ± 0.8cm, ejection fraction = 48.5 ± 16%) undergoing their initial procedure for persistent AF. After pulmonary vein isolation, patients either underwent posterior LA isolation (n = 50; study group) or linear ablation at the LA roof with verification of conduction block (n = 51; control group). A repeat procedure was performed in 17 (34%) and 28 (55%) patients in the study and control groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Patients in the study group were less likely to develop AT (9/50 [18%] vs. 18/51 [35%]; p = 0.02), roof-dependent (1/50 [2%] vs. 8/51 [16%]; p = 0.008), and multi-loop AT (6/50 [12%] vs. 14/51 [27%]; p = 0.03) as compared to controls. Among various factors, only posterior LA isolation was associated with a lower likelihood of AT recurrence and roof tachycardia at redo procedure (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.00, p = 0.05, and OR, 0.1, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.96; p < 0.05, respectively). In patients with persistent AF, posterior LA isolation is associated with a lower risk of a redo procedure, roof-dependent macro-reentry, and post-ablation AT in general as compared to controls who only received roof ablation. Posterior LA isolation also obviates the need for pacing maneuvers, and may be a more definitive endpoint than linear ablation at the LA roof.

Drug-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in the perspective of bibliometric analysis.

Drug-eluting stents (DES) play a crucial role in treating coronary artery disease (CAD) by preventing restenosis. These stents are coated with drug carriers that release antiproliferative drugs within the vessel. Over the past two decades, DES have been employed in clinical practice using various materials, polymers, and drug types. Despite optimizations in their design and materials to enhance biocompatibility and antithrombotic properties, evaluating their long-term efficacy and safety necessitates improved clinical follow-up and monitoring. To delineate future research directions, this study employs a bibliometric analysis approach. We comprehensively surveyed two decades' worth of literature on DES for CAD using the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). Out of 5,778 articles, we meticulously screened them based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, we conducted an in-depth analysis encompassing annual publication trends, authorship affiliations, journal affiliations, keywords, and more. Employing tools such as Excel 2021, CiteSpace 6.2R3, VOSviewer 1.6.19, and Pajek 5.17, we harnessed bibliometric methods to derive insights from this corpus. Analysis of annual publication data indicates a recent stabilisation or even a downward trend in research output in this area. The United States emerged as the leading contributor, with Columbia University and CRF at the forefront in both publication output and citation impact. The most cited document pertained to standardized definitions for clinical endpoints in coronary stent trials. Our author analysis identifies Patrick W. Serruys as the most prolific contributor, underscoring a dynamic exchange of knowledge within the field.Moreover, the dual chart overlay illustrates a close interrelation between journals in the "Medicine," "Medical," and "Clinical" domains and those in "Health," "Nursing," and "Medicine." Frequently recurring keywords in this research landscape include DES coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, implantation, and restenosis. This study presents a comprehensive panorama encompassing countries, research institutions, journals, keyword distributions, and contributions within the realm of DES therapy for CAD. By highlighting keywords exhibiting recent surges in frequency, we elucidate current research hotspots and frontiers, thereby furnishing novel insights to guide future researchers in this evolving field.

Clinical Adjudication of Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: Findings from the REDUCCTION Trial.

Hemodialysis central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (HD-CRBSI) are a significant source of morbidity and mortality among dialysis patients, but benchmarking remains difficult due to varying definitions of HD-CRBSI. This study explored the effect of clinical adjudication process on HD-CRBSI reporting. The REDUcing the burden of Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach (REDUCCTION) trial implemented an evidence-based intervention bundle using a stepped-wedge design to reduce HD-CRBSI rates in 37 Australian kidney services. Six New Zealand services participated in an observational capacity. Adult patients with a new hemodialysis catheter between December 2016 and March 2020 were included. HD-CRBSI events reported were compared to the adjudicated outcomes using the endpoint definition and adjudication processes of the REDUCCTION trial. The concordance level was estimated using Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1) adjusted for service-level effects and implementation tranches (Australia only), with the primary outcome being the concordance of confirmed HD-CRBSI. A total of 744 hemodialysis catheter-related infectious events were reported among 7,258 patients, 12,630 catheters and 1.3 million catheter-exposure days. The majority were confirmed HD-CRBSI, with 77.9% agreement and 'substantial' concordance (AC1=0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73, 0.81). Exit site infections have the highest concordance (AC1=0.85, 95% CI 0.78, 0.91); the greatest discordance was in events classified as Other (AC1=0.33, 95% CI 0.16, 0.49). The concordance of all hemodialysis catheter infectious events remained 'substantial' (AC1=0.80, 95% CI 0.76, 0.83) even after adjusting for the intervention tranches in Australia and overall service-level clustering. There was a substantial level of concordance in overall and service-level reporting of confirmed HD-CRBSI. A standardized endpoint definition of HD-CRBSI resulted in comparable hemodialysis catheter infection rates in Australian and New Zealand kidney services. Consistent endpoint definition could enable reliable benchmarking outside clinical trials without the need for independent clinical adjudication.

Diagnosis, prognostic factors, and assessment of ALL in adults: 2024 ELN recommendations from a European expert panel

AbstractWorking groups of the European LeukemiaNet have published several important consensus guidelines. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has many different clinical and biological subgroups and the knowledge on disease biology and therapeutic options is increasing exponentially. The European Working Group for Adult ALL has therefore summarized the current state of the art and provided comprehensive consensus recommendations for diagnostic approaches, biologic and clinical characterization, prognostic factors, and risk stratification as well as definitions of endpoints and outcomes. Aspects of treatment, management of subgroups and specific situations, aftercare, and supportive care are covered in a separate publication. The present recommendation intends to provide guidance for the initial management of adult patients with ALL and to define principles as a basis for future collaborative research.

DOP53 Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease up to 3 Years of Treatment: Results From the FORTIFY Open-Label Long-term Extension

Abstract Background The ongoing FORTIFY maintenance open-label extension (OLE) substudy evaluates the long-term efficacy and safety of risankizumab (RZB), a p19 interleukin-23 inhibitor, for treatment of moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD). Here, we report 2-year results of FORTIFY OLE. Methods The FORTIFY (NCT03105102) OLE enrolled patients (pts) who completed 52-wks maintenance dosing in the FORTIFY substudies or RZB phase 2 OLE.1,2 All pts received 180 mg subcutaneous (SC) RZB every 8 wks (Q8w), starting at wk56, except for pts who had prior rescue therapy (single 1200mg intravenous [IV] RZB dose then 360mg SC Q8w) who continued 360mg SC Q8w in the OLE. Pts with inadequate response (increased symptoms plus objective marker of inflammation) during the OLE could receive rescue therapy as described above. Pooled data from both treatment groups (RZB 180 mg &amp; 360 mg SC) were assessed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated every 24 wks (endpoint definitions in Figure footnote). Endoscopy was performed every 96 wks. Results are reported as observed. Efficacy data for pts receiving rescue therapy in the OLE were included up to rescue initiation. Safety was assessed through the cutoff date of 05MAR2023. As this trial is ongoing, most patients have not reached the wk152 study visit. Any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported on or after the first dose in the OLE were analysed. Results As of the cutoff date, 1147 pts entered the OLE, of which 203 (17.6%) pts received rescue therapy during the OLE. Clinical response and remission rates were generally maintained with RZB from wks 56 to 152 (CD activity index [CDAI] clinical response, 85.8% to 86.5%, respectively; enhanced clinical response, 88.6% to 89.2%; CDAI clinical remission, 68.5% to 77.6%; stool frequency/abdominal pain score clinical remission, 64.4% to 71.0%) (Figure). At wks 56 and 152, respectively, rates of endoscopic response were 53.4% and 74.2%, endoscopic remission were 37.5%, and 58.9%, and ulcer-free endoscopy were 31.0% and 50.0%. There were no new trends for exposure-adjusted rates of TEAEs, and rates of adjudicated major cardiovascular adverse events, malignancies, serious infections and hepatic events remained stable with no new safety risks identified. There were no events of active tuberculosis, serious hypersensitivity, or adjudicated anaphylactic reaction. Three deaths occurred during the OLE (see Table footnote), all assessed by investigators as unrelated to study drug. Conclusion Pts receiving long-term RZB maintenance therapy in FORTIFY demonstrated sustained clinical and endoscopic efficacy with at least 3 years of treatment. The safety profile is consistent and supports long-term RZB treatment. 1doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab093 2doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00466-4.

Eligibility and Endpoints for Clinical Trials in Trimodality Therapy for Bladder Cancer.

Trimodality therapy (TMT) is a viable option for muscle-invasive localized bladder cancer, providing an alternative to radical cystectomy in properly selected patients. The approval of novel therapeutics in different stages of bladder cancer treatment has sparked interest in exploring concurrent systemic therapies with radiation in clinical trials to enhance long-term outcomes. Achieving uniformity in trial eligibility criteria and endpoint definitions is imperative in describing clinical significance, comparing trials, and changing standard of care guidelines. To delineate eligibility criteria and appropriate endpoints for TMT clinical trials in an attempt to achieve uniformity in trial eligibility criteria and endpoint definitions which will then help move the field of bladder preservation forward and improve the current standard of care. An expert panel, comprising individuals with extensive experience in bladder cancer clinical trials, clinical practice focused on bladder cancer treatment, and patient advocacy, was assembled. The panel systematically reviewed phase II/III clinical trials previously published and assessing the role of radiation in definitive therapy with the specific goal of preserving native bladder function during bladder cancer treatment. Recommendations were summarized based on review of these trials and past experiences of the investigators. To ensure a holistic perspective, the summary was further subjected to rigorous reevaluation by a patient advocate, who added valuable insights from a patient's standpoint. The resulting consensus statements were summarized in this publication to contribute to the evolving landscape of bladder cancer research and treatment. The eligibility criteria for TMT should be pragmatic to encompass patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, bladder cancer stage T2-T4a N0±N1M0, unilateral tumor-associated hydronephrosis, attempted maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), both pure urothelial carcinoma and/or mixed histologic subtypes (excluding rare and aggressive small cell variants) and patients who are non- cystectomy candidates. Bladder intact event-free survival (BIEFS) is proposed as a suitable endpoint for registration trials designed to compare two different treatment interventions, defined as the time from randomization to muscle-invasive or locoregional recurrence, systemic recurrence, radical cystectomy from any cause, or death from any cause. Overall survival is deemed an appropriate secondary endpoint or a co-primary end point as recent improvements in systemic therapy can produce significant improvement in long-term outcomes. Primary and secondary endpoints should be supported with patient-reported quality of life assessments, when available. The standardization of clinical trial design, eligibility criteria, and endpoints is essential for expediting progress in the field. Inclusivity, patient-centricity, and clinically meaningful endpoints will facilitate the analysis, comparison, and meta-analysis of different trials, fostering advancements in bladder cancer treatment.

Endpoints in clinical trials in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: time for more dialogue?

We observed lack of clarity and consistency in end point definitions of large randomized clinical trials in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. These inconsistencies are such that trials might, in fact, address different clinical questions. They complicate interpretation of results, including comparisons across studies. Problems arise from different ways to account for events occurring after randomization including absence of improvement in disease status, treatment discontinuation or the initiation of new therapy. We call for more dialogue between stakeholders to define with clarity the questions of interest and corresponding end points. We illustrate that assessing different end point rules across a range of plausible patient journeys can be a powerful tool to facilitate such a discussion and contribute to better understanding of patient-relevant end points.

Concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) frequently have coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Usually, PCI and TAVI are performed in two separate procedures and current studies are investigating potential benefits regarding the order. However, the two interventions may also be performed simultaneously, thereby limiting the risk associated with repeated vascular access. Data evaluating benefit and harm of concomitant procedures are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate concomitant PCI(coPCI) in TAVI patients regarding Valve Academic Research Consortium 3(VARC-3) endpoints and long-term mortality. A total of 2233 consecutive TAVI patients from the EVERY-VALVEregistry were analyzed according to the VARC-3 endpoint definitions. A total of 274 patients had undergone TAVI and concomitant PCI (coPCI group). They were compared to 226 TAVI patients who had received PCI within 60 days before TAVI in a stepwise approach (swPCI group) and to the remaining 1733 TAVI patients who had not undergone PCI recently (noPCI group). Overall median age was 81.4 years, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 4.0%. Patients in the coPCI and in the swPCI group were predominantly male with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction. Rates of VARC-3 composite endpoints technical success and 30-day device success were comparable between all three groups. Mortality rates at 3 years after TAVI were similar (coPCI, 34.2% vs. swPCI, 31.9% vs. noPCI, 34.0% p = 0.84). coPCI during TAVI seems comparable in a retrospective analysis. Compared to a stepwise approach, it has similar rates of composite endpoints technical success and device success as well as long-term mortality.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To assess the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in comparison to standard-of-care (SOC) anticoagulants in the management and prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in pediatric populations. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published between January 1, 2015, and December 18, 2022. A meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effect of DOACs on clinically significant endpoints, employing trial-level data with harmonized endpoint definitions. The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism (VTE). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The study was registered with INPLASY (2022120065). Three studies encompassing 934 subjects were included. The incidence of VTE was reduced in patients administered DOACs compared to those on SOC anticoagulants (OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.19-0.93], I²=0%, P = 0.03). No significant differences were observed between the DOAC and SOC groups in all-cause mortality (OR 0.50 [95% CI 0.07-3.59], I²=0%, P = 0.35) or serious adverse events (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.50-1.12], I²=0%, P = 0.16). The risk of major bleeding (OR 0.50 [95% CI 0.13-1.87], I²=44%, P = 0.30) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.23 [95% CI 0.50-3.00], I²=0%, P = 0.65) exhibited no significant differences between the groups. DOACs are associated with a reduced risk of VTE in pediatric patients without increasing the risk of bleeding, all-cause mortality, or serious adverse events when compared to SOC anticoagulants. DOACs may be an alternative for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events in the pediatrics.

Clinical Trial Design in Ulcerative Colitis: Interpreting Evolving Endpoints Based on Post Hoc Analyses of the Vedolizumab Phase 3 Trials GEMINI 1 and VISIBLE 1.

The 12-point total Mayo score including a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of disease activity has been used to assess outcomes in clinical trials for ulcerative colitis (UC). In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued guidance advising the removal of the PGA in future trials. We examined how endpoints in UC trials have evolved and conducted a post hoc analysis of the GEMINI 1 and VISIBLE 1 trials to understand how the use of a 9-point modified Mayo score, excluding PGA, compares with the total Mayo score. Endpoint definitions of clinical remission in phase 3 trials were extracted from published literature and ClinicalTrials.gov. The difference (%Δ) between the proportions of patients in GEMINI 1 and VISIBLE 1 achieving clinical remission with vedolizumab versus placebo at week 52 was measured according to 4 endpoint definitions. Trials completed up to the end of 2019 used the total Mayo score to assess clinical remission. Most trials that were completed or estimated to be completed by June 2020 or later used modified Mayo scores. Post hoc analysis revealed decreasing endpoint stringency was associated with increasing %Δ values. The modified Mayo score definition most like the definition recommended by the FDA produced %Δ values like those reported using the total Mayo score in GEMINI 1 and VISIBLE 1. Endpoint definitions for UC clinical trials have evolved following FDA guidance. The efficacy of vedolizumab, measured using modified Mayo scoring, was comparable to values reported using the total Mayo score.

Differing Definitions of Vaso-Occlusion in Clinical Studies of Sickle Cell Disease Can Result in Differing Outcomes

Background: Frequent episodes of vaso-occlusion are the hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD), but the definition of what constitutes a vaso-occlusive episode is not consistently applied across clinical trials, creating challenges in evaluating and comparing efficacy results among different therapies. Here, we compare vaso-occlusion endpoint definitions from clinical trials for various therapies, including genetic therapies, and use clinical trial data to demonstrate the potential for outcomes differences based on differing definitions of vaso-occlusive episodes. Methods: We reviewed completed and ongoing clinical trials and published articles using endpoints assessing the reduction or elimination of vaso-occlusive crisis/events, including trials of (i) exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel, CRISPR/Cas-9 based genome editing treatment), (ii) lovotibeglogene autotemcel (lovo-cel, gene addition therapy), (iii) L-glutamine, (iv) voxelotor, (v) hydroxyurea (HU) and (vi) crizanlizumab. Outcomes related to vaso-occlusion were compared across variables including care setting, care duration, treatments, and complications. Data from the CLIMB SCD-121 trial of exa-cel in patients aged 12 to 35 years with severe SCD (data cut as of 10 Feb 2023) were evaluated using different published definitions of vaso-occlusion. Results: The most substantial differences in vaso-occlusion endpoint definitions were associated with frequency and duration of visits to medical facilities for acute pain and inclusion of specific SCD specific complications. Definitions of vaso-occlusions for acute pain related events differed across studies. The definitions of severe vaso-occlusive crises for exa-cel (severe VOC; exa-cel), sickle cell pain-related crises (SCPC; crizanlizumab and L-glutamine), and VOC (VOC; voxelotor) include events with medical facility visits of any duration (severe VOC and SCPC) or medical records of a patient being seen or contacting a physician within 1 business day of an event (VOC), whereas the definition of severe vaso-occlusive events (severe VOE; lovo-cel) requires a ≥ 24-hour hospital or emergency room (ER) observation unit visit or ≥2 visits to a day unit or ER over 72 hours. Vaso-occlusion definition for HU (painful crisis) required a facility visit of ≥4 hours duration. All endpoints include acute chest syndrome and priapism; however, the definition of severe VOE requires ≥4 visits to a medical facility for priapism to meet criterion, while others require only a single visit. The exa-cel phase 3 trial in SCD employs a broad and inclusive definition for severe VOC which counts each individual medical facility visit, regardless of frequency or duration of hospitalization. Based on this, 19 out of 20 patients (95%) met the primary endpoint of freedom from severe VOCs for at least 12 consecutive months (95% CI, 75.1%, 99.9%; P&amp;lt;0.0001). However, when the primary endpoint was analyzed using the severe VOE definition, all patients (20/20; 100.0%) were free from severe VOEs for at least 12 consecutive months (95% CI: 83.2%, 100.0%; P&amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusions: Requirements for health care facility visits in the definitions of severe VOC (exa-cel), VOC, and SCPC were more broadly inclusive and include events that would not be counted in the definitions of severe VOE (lovo-cel) or painful crisis. Clinically, support for this observation comes from our analysis of exa-cel SCD pivotal clinical trial data using these different definitions, which showed the number of patients free from vaso-occlusive episodes changed depending on the definition of vaso-occlusion employed. These results show differences in vaso-occlusion definitions have the potential to impact assessments of treatment efficacy across different SCD therapies.