End-expiratory Lung Volume Research Articles

Deciphering Mechanisms of Respiratory Fetal-to-Neonatal Transition in Very Preterm Infants.

Rationale: The respiratory mechanisms of a successful transition of preterm infants after birth are largely unknown. Objectives: To describe intrapulmonary gas flows during different breathing patterns directly after birth. Methods: Analysis of electrical impedance tomography data from a previous randomized trial in preterm infants at 26-32 weeks gestational age. Electrical impedance tomography data for individual breaths were extracted, and lung volumes as well as ventilation distribution were calculated for end of inspiration, end of expiratory braking and/or holding maneuver, and end of expiration. Measurements and Main Results: Overall, 10,348 breaths from 33 infants were analyzed. We identified three distinct breath types within the first 10 minutes after birth: tidal breathing (44% of all breaths; sinusoidal breathing without expiratory disruption), braking (50%; expiratory brake with a short duration), and holding (6%; expiratory brake with a long duration). Only after holding breaths did end-expiratory lung volume increase: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) = 2.0 AU/kg (0.6 to 4.3), 0.0 (-1.0 to 1.1), and 0.0 (-1.1 to 0.4), respectively; P < 0.001]. This was mediated by intrathoracic air redistribution to the left and non-gravity-dependent parts of the lung through pendelluft gas flows during braking and/or holding maneuvers. Conclusions: Respiratory transition in preterm infants is characterized by unique breathing patterns. Holding breaths contribute to early lung aeration after birth in preterm infants. This is facilitated by air redistribution during braking/holding maneuvers through pendelluft flow, which may prevent lung liquid reflux in this highly adaptive situation. This study deciphers mechanisms for a successful fetal-to-neonatal transition and increases our pathophysiological understanding of this unique moment in life. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04315636).

Effect and mechanical mechanism of spontaneous breathing on oxygenation and lung injury in mild or moderate animal ARDS

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to determine the effect and mechanical mechanism of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation on oxygenation and lung injury using Beagles dogs mild or moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) model.MethodsAfter inducing mild or moderate ARDS by infusion of oleic acid, Eighteen Beagles dogs were randomly split into Spontaneous breathing group (BIPAPSB, n = 6), and Complete muscle paralysis group (BIPAPPC, n = 6),Six Beagles without ventilator support comprised the control group. Both groups were ventilated for 8 h under BIPAP mode. High-pressure was titrated TV to 6 ml/kg. A multi-pair esophageal balloon electrode catheter was used to measure respiratory mechanics and electromyogram. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV), gas exchange and respiratory variables were recorded in the process of mechanical ventilation. The contents of Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 in lung tissue were measure using qRT-PCR. Besides, lung injury score was calculated in the end of mechanical ventilation.ResultsBased on the comparable setting of ventilator, BIPAPSB group exhibited higher safety peak transpulmonary pressure, abdominal pressure, EELV and P/F(PaO2/FiO2) than BIPAPPC group, whereas mean transpulmonary pressure, the mRNA levels of the IL-6 and IL-8 in the lung tissues and lung injury score in BIPAPSB group were lower than those in BIPAPPC group.ConclusionIn mild to moderate ARDS animal models, during mechanical ventilation, SB may improve respiratory function and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury. The mechanism may be that spontaneous inspiration up-regulates peak transpulmonary pressure and EELV; Spontaneous expiration decreases mean transpulmonary pressure by up-regulating intra-abdominal pressure, thereby reducing stress and strain.

Physiological effects of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy after extubation: a randomized crossover study

BackgroundProphylactic high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy can decrease the risk of extubation failure. It is frequently used in the postextubation phase alone or in combination with noninvasive ventilation. However, its physiological effects in this setting have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to determine comprehensively the effects of HFNC applied after extubation on respiratory effort, diaphragm activity, gas exchange, ventilation distribution, and cardiovascular biomarkers.MethodsThis was a prospective randomized crossover physiological study in critically ill patients comparing 1 h of HFNC versus 1 h of standard oxygen after extubation. The main inclusion criteria were mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h due to acute respiratory failure, and extubation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). We measured respiratory effort through esophageal/transdiaphragmatic pressures, and diaphragm electrical activity (ΔEAdi). Lung volumes and ventilation distribution were estimated by electrical impedance tomography. Arterial and central venous blood gases were analyzed, as well as cardiac stress biomarkers.ResultsWe enrolled 22 patients (age 59 ± 17 years; 9 women) who had been intubated for 8 ± 6 days before extubation. Respiratory effort was significantly lower with HFNC than with standard oxygen therapy, as evidenced by esophageal pressure swings (5.3 [4.2–7.1] vs. 7.2 [5.6–10.3] cmH2O; p < 0.001), pressure–time product (85 [67–140] vs. 156 [114–238] cmH2O*s/min; p < 0.001) and ΔEAdi (10 [7–13] vs. 14 [9–16] µV; p = 0.022). In addition, HFNC induced increases in end-expiratory lung volume and PaO2/FiO2 ratio, decreases in respiratory rate and ventilatory ratio, while no changes were observed in systemic hemodynamics, Troponin T, or in amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.ConclusionsProphylactic application of HFNC after extubation provides substantial respiratory support and unloads respiratory muscles.Trial registration January 15, 2021. NCT04711759.

Relationship of End Expiratory Lung Volume, Compliance, and Plateau Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

COVID-19 ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome), caused by SARS-CoV-2,involves a decrease in the end expiratory lung volume (EELV), compliance, and hypoxemia. The authors retrospectively analysed the relationship between the EELV, Plateau pressure (Pplat), and compliance of the respiratory system in a group of 21 mechanically ventilated COVID ARDS patients with moderate to severe hypoxia who were subjected to a recruitment manoeuvre. Further, these parameters were studied after dividing them into two groups as Group 1 of clinically non-recruitable and Group 2 of clinically recruitable patients.There was relationship between EELV, compliance, and Pplat among those patients who were clinically recruited versus those who were not in a homogeneous group of COVID ARDS patients. In Group 1, the statistical value of EELV and compliance were r = 0.395, p>0.05, EELV and Pplat were r = 0.021, p>0.05, and compliance and Pplat were r = -0.848, p<0.001. In Group 2, the statistical values of EELV and compliance were (r = 0.605, p<0.001), EELV and Pplat were r = -0.391, p<0.05, compliance and Pplat were r = -0.848, p<0.001. The additional information gained after understanding this relationship can help to optimise ventilator settings. Key Words: COVID, ARDS, End expiratory lung volume, Plateau pressure, Compliance, Recruitment, Ventilation.

Ventilatory limitations in patients with HFpEF and obesity

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients have an increased ventilatory demand. Whether their ventilatory capacity can meet this increased demand is unknown, especially in those with obesity. Body composition (DXA) and pulmonary function were measured in 20 patients with HFpEF (69 ± 6 yr;9 M/11 W). Cardiorespiratory responses, breathing mechanics, and ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB, 0–10) were measured at rest, 20 W, and peak exercise. FVC correlated with %body fat (R2 =0.51,P = 0.0006), V̇O2peak (%predicted,R2 =0.32,P = 0.001), and RPB (R2 =0.58,P = 0.0004). %Body fat correlated with end-expiratory lung volume at rest (R2 =0.76,P < 0.001), 20 W (R2 =0.72,P < 0.001), and peak exercise (R2 =0.74,P < 0.001). Patients were then divided into two groups: those with lower ventilatory reserve (FVC<3 L,2 M/10 W) and those with higher ventilatory reserve (FVC>3.8 L,7 M/1 W). V̇O2peak was ∼22% less (p < 0.05) and RPB was twice as high at 20 W (p < 0.01) in patients with lower ventilatory reserve. Ventilatory reserves are limited in patients with HFpEF and obesity; indeed, the margin between ventilatory demand and capacity is so narrow that exercise capacity could be ventilatory limited in many patients.

Mechanical Power Correlates With Stress, Strain, and Atelectrauma Only When Normalized to Aerated Lung Size in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

First, to investigate whether the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) influences ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) risk in ventilated patients with similar mechanical power of respiratory system (MPRS). Second, to determine whether, under these circumstances, there is a relationship between transpulmonary mechanical power (MPTp) normalized to the aerated lung (specific lung mechanical power or SLMP) and VILI risk, and third, to determine whether normalizing MPRS to compliance of respiratory system (CRS) can replace SLMP to bedside. Prospective cohort study. The study was conducted in a tertiary academic ICU. The study included 18 patients with ARDS. Ventilatory settings were adjusted to achieve a similar MPRS. Mechanical power was normalized to CRS (specific mechanical power or SMP = MPRS/CRS), and SLMP was calculated as the ratio between MPTp and end-expiratory lung volume (SLMP = MPTp/EELV). The strain was defined as the ratio between tidal volume and EELV (strain = Vt/EELV), stress as transpulmonary pressure at the end of inspiration, and atelectrauma as the difference between expiration and inspiration in the nonaerated lung. Although patients had been ventilated with similar MPRS = 23.75 (23-24) J/min and MPTp = 11.6 (10.8-12.8) J/min, SLMP increased linearly with the fall in Pao2/Fio2 (R = -0.83, p = 0.0001). MPRS only correlated positively with VILI-associated mechanisms when normalized to aerated lung size: correlations between SLMP and stress (R = 0.9, R2 = 0.84, p = 0.00004), strain (R = 0.97, R2 = 0.94, p < 0.00001) and atelectrauma (R = 0.82, R2 = 0.70, p = 0.00002), and correlations between SMP and stress (R = 0.86, R2 = 0.75, p = 0.00001), strain (R = 0.68, R2 = 0.47, p = 0.001) and atelectrauma (R = 0.67, R2 = 0.46, p = 0.002). The results suggest that normalizing mechanical power to lung-aerated size or CRS may correlate positively with stress, strain, and atelectrauma.

Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats.

Background: Respiratory parameters in experimental animals are often characterised under general anaesthesia. However, anaesthesia regimes may alter the functional and mechanical properties of the respiratory system. While most anaesthesia regimes have been shown to affect the respiratory system, the effects of general anaesthesia protocols commonly used in animal models on lung function have not been systematically compared. Methods: The present study comprised 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats divided into five groups (N = 8 in each) according to anaesthesia regime applied: intravenous (iv) Na-pentobarbital, intraperitoneal (ip) ketamine-xylazine, iv propofol-fentanyl, inhaled sevoflurane, and ip urethane. All drugs were administered at commonly used doses. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV), airway resistance (Raw) and tissue mechanics were measured in addition to arterial blood gas parameters during mechanical ventilation while maintaining positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values of 0, 3, and 6cm H2O. Respiratory mechanics were also measured during iv methacholine (MCh) challenges to assess bronchial responsiveness. Results: While PEEP influenced baseline respiratory mechanics, EELV and blood gas parameters (p < 0.001), no between-group differences were observed (p > 0.10). Conversely, significantly lower doses of MCh were required to achieve the same elevation in Raw under ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia compared to the other groups. Conclusion: In the most frequent rodent model of respiratory disorders, no differences in baseline respiratory mechanics or function were observed between commonly used anaesthesia regimes. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in response to ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia should be considered when designing experiments using this regime. The findings of the present study indicate commonly used anaesthetic regimes allow fair comparison of respiratory mechanics in experimental animals undergoing any of the examined anaesthesia protocols.

Interactions between extracorporeal support and the cardiopulmonary system.

This review describes the intricate physiological interactions involved in the application of extracorporeal therapy, with specific focus on cardiopulmonary relationships. Extracorporeal therapy significantly influences cardiovascular and pulmonary physiology, highlighting the necessity for clinicians to understand these interactions for improved patient care. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (veno-arterial ECMO) unloads the right ventricle and increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, potentially exacerbating LV failure and pulmonary edema. Veno-venous (VV) ECMO presents different challenges, where optimal device and ventilator settings remain unknown. Influences on right heart function and native gas exchange as well as end-expiratory lung volumes are important concepts that should be incorporated into daily practice. Future studies should not be limited to large clinical trials focused on mortality but rather address physiological questions to advance the understanding of extracorporeal therapies. This includes exploring optimal device and ventilator settings in VV ECMO, standardizing cardiopulmonary function monitoring strategies, and developing better strategies for device management throughout their use. In this regard, small human or animal studies and computational physiological modeling may contribute valuable insights into optimizing the management of extracorporeal therapies.

Advanced respiratory mechanics assessment in mechanically ventilated obese and non-obese patients with or without acute respiratory distress syndrome

BackgroundRespiratory mechanics is a key element to monitor mechanically ventilated patients and guide ventilator settings. Besides the usual basic assessments, some more complex explorations may allow to better characterize patients’ respiratory mechanics and individualize ventilation strategies. These advanced respiratory mechanics assessments including esophageal pressure measurements and complete airway closure detection may be particularly relevant in critically ill obese patients. This study aimed to comprehensively assess respiratory mechanics in obese and non-obese ICU patients with or without ARDS and evaluate the contribution of advanced respiratory mechanics assessments compared to basic assessments in these patients.MethodsAll intubated patients admitted in two ICUs for any cause were prospectively included. Gas exchange and respiratory mechanics including esophageal pressure and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) measurements and low-flow insufflation to detect complete airway closure were assessed in standardized conditions (tidal volume of 6 mL kg−1 predicted body weight (PBW), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O) within 24 h after intubation.ResultsAmong the 149 analyzed patients, 52 (34.9%) were obese and 90 (60.4%) had ARDS (65.4% and 57.8% of obese and non-obese patients, respectively, p = 0.385). A complete airway closure was found in 23.5% of the patients. It was more frequent in obese than in non-obese patients (40.4% vs 14.4%, p < 0.001) and in ARDS than in non-ARDS patients (30% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.029). Respiratory system and lung compliances and EELV/PBW were similarly decreased in obese patients without ARDS and obese or non-obese patients with ARDS. Chest wall compliance was not impacted by obesity or ARDS, but end-expiratory esophageal pressure was higher in obese than in non-obese patients. Chest wall contribution to respiratory system compliance differed widely between patients but was not predictable by their general characteristics.ConclusionsMost respiratory mechanics features are similar in obese non-ARDS and non-obese ARDS patients, but end-expiratory esophageal pressure is higher in obese patients. A complete airway closure can be found in around 25% of critically ill patients ventilated with a PEEP of 5 cmH2O. Advanced explorations may allow to better characterize individual respiratory mechanics and adjust ventilation strategies in some patients.Trial registration NCT03420417 ClinicalTrials.gov (February 5, 2018).

A technique to determine the end-expiratory lung volume and dead space in a ventilated patient: Theoretical considerations

The term “dead space (VD)” refers to the volume of air/gas in the respiratory tract which does not take part in gas exchange. VD can increase in some pathological settings and has been found to be a prognostic marker in acute lung injury and respiratory distress syndrome. The end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) in a mechanically ventilated patient is the volume in the lungs at the end of passive expiration which is often influenced by disease, atelectasis, airway resistance, shunt, pulmonary vascular resistance, right heart strain, etc. Measuring EELV and VD may allow monitoring of disease state and treatment effect. VD can be derived from the arterial and exhaled CO2 partial pressures. In the intensive care unit, certain ventilators can measure EELV automatically. Unfortunately, there are no means of measuring EELV in the operating room. We herein propose a technique that may theoretically allow for measurement of the EELV and VD in the operating room setting without special equipment or an arterial blood sample.

Mechanical ventilation decreases tidal volume heterogeneity but increases heterogeneity in end-expiratory volumes.

How the heterogeneous distribution of lung volumes changes in response to different mechanical ventilation (MV) strategies is unclear. Using our well-developed four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) high-resolution imaging technique, we aimed to assess the effect of different MV strategies on the distribution and heterogeneity of regional lung volumes. Healthy adult female BALB/c mice received either 2 h of "injurious" MV [n = 6, mechanical ventilation at high PIP with zero PEEP (HPZP)] with a peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) of 20 cmH2O and zero positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), or 2 h of "protective" MV [n = 8, mechanical ventilation at low PIP with PEEP (LPP)] with PIP = 12 cmH2O and PEEP = 2 cmH2O. 4DCT images were obtained at baseline (0 h) and after 2 h of MV. Tidal volume (Vt) and end-expiratory lung volume (EEV) were measured throughout the whole lung on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Heterogeneity of ventilation was determined by the coefficient of variation (COV) of Vt and EEV. Our data showed that MV had minimal impact on global Vt but decreased EEV in the HPZP group (P < 0.05). Both ventilation modes decreased the COV of Vt (39.4% for HPZP and 9.7% for LPP) but increased the COV in EEV (36.4% for HPZP and 29.2% for LPP). This was consistent with the redistribution index, which was significantly higher in the HVZP group than in the LPP group (P < 0.001). We concluded that regional assessment of the change in EEV showed different patterns in progression between LPP and HPZP strategies. Both ventilation strategies decreased heterogeneity in Vt after 2 h of MV but increased heterogeneity in EEV. Further work is required to determine the link between these effects and ventilator-induced lung injury.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Tidal volume heterogeneity decreases over time in response to mechanical ventilation, in contrast to end-expiratory volume heterogeneity which increases.

Reply to Wang etal.

Reply to Wang etal.

Effect of modified high-flow oxygen therapy on positive end-expiratory pressure and end-expiratory lung volume based on simulated lung platform

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of modified high-flow oxygen therapy on end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in tracheotomized patients with normal pulmonary, acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). MethodsA ventilator and an artificial lung model were used to simulate the normal or strong inspiratory effort state of normal lung, AHRF and COPD patients. The traditional high-flow respiratory humidification therapy device connected with a standard interface (group A), and the modified therapy device added two types of resistance valves (group B, inner diameter 7.7 mm, length 24.0 mm; group C, inner diameter 7.7 mm, length 34.0 mm) to the exhalation end of the standard interface. The changes of end-expiratory lung volume (ΔEELV) and PEEP with the increase of flow rate (10 L/min, 20 L/min, 30 L/min, 40 L/min, 50 L/min, 60 L/min) in the three groups was recorded. ResultsUnder simulated conditions of normal lung, AHRF and COPD, as the flow rate increased by using the modified therapy device, the PEEP values in all groups showed an exponential increasing trend, and the ΔEELV also increased accordingly. In addition, under the same flow rate level, the PEEP values of the two modified high-flow oxygen therapies (Group B and Group C) were significantly higher than those of the standard high-flow oxygen therapy (Group A) (p < 0.05). In the normal lung model with normal or strong inspiratory effort, and in the AHRF or COPD model with strong inspiratory effort, when the flow rate was higher than 30 L/min, the PEEP levels of Group B were significantly lower than those of Group C (p < 0.05). In the AHRF model with normal inspiratory effort, when the flow rate was between 10 L/min and 60 L/min, the PEEP levels of Group B were significantly lower than those of Group C (p < 0.05). Moreover, in the COPD model with normal inspiratory effort, the PEEP levels of Group B were significantly lower than that of Group C only when the flow rate was 60 L/min (p < 0.05). ConclusionThe addition of different types of resistance valves to the high-flow exhalation end may be a feasible solution to improve the clinical efficacy of tracheotomized high-flow oxygen therapy.

Recruitment-to-inflation ratio assessed through sequential end-expiratory lung volume measurement in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) benefits in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are driven by lung dynamic strain reduction: this depends on the variable extent of alveolar recruitment. The recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio estimates recruitability across a 10-cmH2O PEEP range through a simplified maneuver. Whether recruitability is uniform or not across this range is unknown. The hypotheses of this study are that R/I represents an accurate estimate of PEEP-induced changes in dynamic strain, but may show a non-uniform behaviour across the conventionally tested PEEP range (15-5 cmH2O). Twenty patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS underwent a decremental PEEP trial (PEEP 15-13-10-8-5 cmH2O). Respiratory mechanics and end-expiratory lung volume by nitrogen dilution were measured the end of each step. Gas exchange, recruited volume, R/I, changes in dynamic, static and total strain were computed between 15 and 5 cmH2O (global R/I) and within narrower PEEP ranges (granular R/I). Between 15 and 5 cmH2O, median [Interquartile range] global R/I was 1.27 [0.40-1.69] and displayed a linear correlation with PEEP-induced dynamic strain reduction (r=-0.94, p<0.001). Intra-individual R/I variability within the narrower ranges was high (85% [70-109]). The relationship between granular R/I and PEEP was mathematically described by a non-linear, quadratic equation (r 2=0.96). Granular R/I across the narrower PEEP ranges had itself a linear correlation with PEEP-induced reduction in dynamic strain (r=-0.89, p<0.001). Both global and granular R/I well estimate PEEP-induced changes in lung dynamic strain. However, the effect of 10-cmH2O of PEEP on lung strain may be non-uniform. Granular R/I assessment within narrower PEEP ranges guided by end-expiratory lung volume measurement may aid more precise PEEP selection, especially when R/I obtained with the simplified maneuver between PEEP 15 and 5 cmH2O yields intermediate values, that are difficult to interpret for a proper choice between a high vs. low PEEP strategy.

Current definitions of the breathing cycle in alveolar breath-by-breath gas exchange analysis.

Identification of the breathing cycle forms the basis of any breath-by-breath gas exchange analysis. Classically, the breathing cycle is defined as the time interval between the beginning of two consecutive inspiration phases. Based on this definition, several research groups have developed algorithms designed to estimate the volume and rate of gas transferred across the alveolar membrane ("alveolar gas exchange"); however, most algorithms require measurement of lung volume at the beginning of the ith breath (VLi-1; i.e., the end-expiratory lung volume of the preceding ith breath). The main limitation of these algorithms is that direct measurement of VLi-1 is challenging and often unavailable. Two solutions avoid the requirement to measure VLi-1 by redefining the breathing cycle. One method defines the breathing cycle as the time between two equal fractional concentrations of lung expired oxygen (Fo2) (or carbon dioxide; Fco2), typically in the alveolar phase, whereas the other uses the time between equal values of the Fo2/Fn2 (or Fco2/Fn2) ratios [i.e., the ratio of fractional concentrations of lung expired O2 (or CO2) and nitrogen (N2)]. Thus, these methods identify the breathing cycle by analyzing the gas fraction traces rather than the gas flow signal. In this review, we define the traditional approach and two alternative definitions of the human breathing cycle and present the rationale for redefining this term. We also explore the strengths and limitations of the available approaches and provide implications for future studies.

Use of positive end-expiratory pressure titration and recruitment maneuvers in pediatric intensive care unit – A narrative review

Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving support for patients suffering with acute respiratory distress syndrome. This modality is likely to cause ventilator-induced lung injury if not used judiciously and appropriately. Lung protective ventilation strategy is routinely practiced in adult and pediatric intensive care units. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are used in “Open Lung Ventilation” strategy and to keep the lung open. PEEP is applied to recruit collapsed alveoli to improve oxygenation, compliance, reduce tidal stress, and strain on the lungs and to promote homogenous lung ventilation. There is no agreement on methods to set “Best PEEP” for a particular patient. There are many approaches described in published literature to optimize PEEP. PEEP titration may be done with PEEP/FiO2 grid, targeted compliance, driving pressure, by using pressure-volume curve and stress index. Esophageal manometry and measurement of end-expiratory lung volume may be used if special equipment, machines, and expertise are available. No single method of PEEP titration has been shown to improve outcome. RM is characterised by sudden transient increase in transpulmonary pressure. Different RMs including high-frequency oscillator ventilation and prone position ventilation have been studied in adults and pediatric patients with very conflicting results and inconsistent survival benefits. Serious complications, hemodynamic instability, air leak syndrome, transient, or no improvements in oxygenation are reported. In this narrative review, we have discussed different methods of PEEP titration and RMs and available evidence for each especially in children.

Continuous positive airway pressure increases CSF flow and glymphatic transport.

Respiration can positively influence cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in the brain, yet its effects on central nervous system (CNS) fluid homeostasis, including waste clearance function via glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic systems, remain unclear. Here, we investigated the effect of supporting respiratory function via continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on glymphatic-lymphatic function in spontaneously breathing anesthetized rodents. To do this, we used a systems approach combining engineering, MRI, computational fluid dynamics analysis, and physiological testing. We first designed a nasal CPAP device for use in the rat and demonstrated that it functioned similarly to clinical devices, as evidenced by its ability to open the upper airway, augment end-expiratory lung volume, and improve arterial oxygenation. We further showed that CPAP increased CSF flow speed at the skull base and augmented glymphatic transport regionally. The CPAP-induced augmented CSF flow speed was associated with an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP), including the ICP waveform pulse amplitude. We suggest that the augmented pulse amplitude with CPAP underlies the increase in CSF bulk flow and glymphatic transport. Our results provide insights into the functional crosstalk at the pulmonary-CSF interface and suggest that CPAP might have therapeutic benefit for sustaining glymphatic-lymphatic function.

High positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation mitigates the progression from unilateral pulmonary contusion to ARDS: An animal study.

Pulmonary contusion (PC) is common in severely traumatized patients and can lead to respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) might aggravate lung damage. Despite underrepresentation of trauma patients in trials on lung-protective MV, results are extrapolated to these patients, potentially disregarding important pathophysiological differences. Three MV protocols with different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels: ARDSnetwork lower PEEP (ARDSnet-low), ARDSnetwork higher PEEP (ARDSnet-high), and open lung concept (OLC) were applied in swine for 24 hours following PC. Gas exchange, lung mechanics, quantitative computed tomography, and diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) score were analyzed. Results are given as median (interquartile range) at 24 hours. Statistical testing was performed using general linear models (group effect) over all measurement points and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests for DAD. There were significant differences between groups: PEEP ( p < 0.0001) ARDSnet-low (8 [8-10] cmH 2 O), ARDSnet-high (12 [12-12] cmH 2 O), OLC (21 [20-22] cmH 2 O). The fraction of arterial partial pressure of oxygen and inspired oxygen fraction ( p = 0.0016) was lowest in ARDSnet-low (78 (73-111) mm Hg) compared with ARDSnet-high (375 (365-423) mm Hg) and OLC (499 (430-523) mm Hg). The end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) differed significantly ( p < 0.0001), with highest values in OLC (64% [60-70%]) and lowest in ARDSnet-low (34% [24-37%]). Costa's surrogate for mechanical power differed significantly ( p < 0.0001), with lowest values for ARDSnet-high (73 [58-76]) compared with OLC (105 [108-116]). Diffuse alveolar damage was lower in ARDSnet-high compared with ARDSnet-low (0.0007). Progression to ARDS, 24 hours after PC, was mitigated by OLC and ARDSnet-high. Both concepts restored EELV. ARDSnet-high had the lowest mechanical power surrogate and DAD. Our data suggest, that ARDSnet-high restored oxygenation and functional lung volume and reduced physiological and histological surrogates for VILI. ARDSnet-low generated unfavorable outcomes, such as loss of EELV, increased mechanical power and DAD after PC in swine. The high respiratory rate in the OLC may blunt favorable effects of lung recruitment.

Measuring Expiratory Diaphragm Activity: An Electrifying Tool to Guide Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategy in Critically Ill Children?

Measuring Expiratory Diaphragm Activity: An Electrifying Tool to Guide Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategy in Critically Ill Children?

Individualized Positive End-expiratory Pressure Titration Strategies in Superobese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: Prospective and Nonrandomized Crossover Study.

Superobesity and laparoscopic surgery promote negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure that causes atelectasis formation and impaired respiratory mechanics. The authors hypothesized that end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure differs between fixed and individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategies and mediates their effects on respiratory mechanics, end-expiratory lung volume, gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters in superobese patients. In this prospective, nonrandomized crossover study including 40 superobese patients (body mass index 57.3 ± 6.4 kg/m2) undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, PEEP was set according to (1) a fixed level of 8 cm H2O (PEEPEmpirical), (2) the highest respiratory system compliance (PEEPCompliance), or (3) an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure targeting 0 cm H2O (PEEPTranspul) at different surgical positioning. The primary endpoint was end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure at different surgical positioning; secondary endpoints were respiratory mechanics, end-expiratory lung volume, gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters. Individualized PEEPCompliance compared to fixed PEEPEmpirical resulted in higher PEEP (supine, 17.2 ± 2.4 vs. 8.0 ± 0.0 cm H2O; supine with pneumoperitoneum, 21.5 ± 2.5 vs. 8.0 ± 0.0 cm H2O; and beach chair with pneumoperitoneum; 15.8 ± 2.5 vs. 8.0 ± 0.0 cm H2O; P < 0.001 each) and less negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (supine, -2.9 ± 2.0 vs. -10.6 ± 2.6 cm H2O; supine with pneumoperitoneum, -2.9 ± 2.0 vs. -14.1 ± 3.7 cm H2O; and beach chair with pneumoperitoneum, -2.8 ± 2.2 vs. -9.2 ± 3.7 cm H2O; P < 0.001 each). Titrated PEEP, end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure, and lung volume were lower with PEEPCompliance compared to PEEPTranspul (P < 0.001 each). Respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure and mechanical power normalized to respiratory system compliance were reduced using PEEPCompliance compared to PEEPTranspul. In superobese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, individualized PEEPCompliance may provide a feasible compromise regarding end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures compared to PEEPEmpirical and PEEPTranspul, because PEEPCompliance with slightly negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures improved respiratory mechanics, lung volumes, and oxygenation while preserving cardiac output.