In the legendary, unanimous landmark opinion in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) authored by Mr Chief Justice Earl Warren, he declared that public education must be made available to all on equal terms. Unknowingly, in countermanding Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), Brown removed the mechanism for internalizing the externality of segregation (Reeves 2021), allowing Milliken v. Bradley (1974), establishing de facto segregation in schools, and San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973), decided a year earlier legalizing unequal school funding schemes, to sanction separate but unequal schools and render Brown a lion with no teeth. Under Brown Milliken-Rodrieguezcum, there is no obligation for the Court to bring equality to even a manifest disequilibrium and hopeless state for children under blatant de facto segregation; or is there. If Steve Jobs had been hampered from acquiring his technological skills, Apple would be worth only a fraction of its USD 2.25 trillion market capitalization (Szmigiera 2021), the global economy would be a scale replica, and the global Society would be unrecognizable. Cognizing human capital and the intellectual property that it produces are both forms of property, we aver that State enactments that for whatever reason restrict an individual from freely accumulating and upgrading her human capital stock in the market are violative of the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Additionally, enactments that restrict population segments non-uniformly could potentially violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Furthermore, because human capital and intellectual property are instrumentalities of commerce, such enactments would be repugnant to the Commerce Clause. As the Court has observed, it is highly improbable that any schooling program operating with even de facto, separate but unequal schools would survive a single let alone run a gauntlet of Constitutional challenges. Finally, even if State de facto separate but unequal schooling systems can withstand the Constitutional challenges, we proffer that the Federal government, while it does not need one, has a compelling state interest to intervene in the distribution and allocation of human capital to ensure that the aggregate stock of human capital is sufficient to meet the military, national security, and strategic macroeconomic needs of the nation. The Constitutional challenges together with the Federal government’s compelling state interest lay the groundwork to finally ensure education is made available to all on equal terms.
Read full abstract