Abstract

Historically, rural schools have been geographically and politically isolated to the extent that some might say that they have been the victims of, or beneficiaries from, an unstated government policy of benign neglect. Recently, conditions and relationships have changed with the enactment of state and federal accountability legislation and legal challenges to the constitutionality of state funding systems for schools. Federal concerns about the quality of teachers and the progress of students are accompanied by state standards, proficiency tests for high school graduation, and school report cards. Most of these requirements are unfunded or under-funded mandates. However, rural schools likely will benefit from the recent shift in school finance litigation from a single emphasis on equity to a dual interest in equity and adequacy. If education is a state responsibility, then in an era of state-mandated standards and assessments, the state has an inherent responsibility to ensure that students have access to the human and material resources required for them to meet standards and pass state proficiency examinations.

Highlights

  • Rural schools have been geographically and politically isolated to the extent that some might say that they have been the victims of, or beneficiaries from, an unstated government policy of benign neglect

  • One edge of the sword is that rural schools historically have had limited oversight from state education agencies (SEAs) and have had virtually no federal controls except for those through the Office for Civil Rights and the rules and regulations related to the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA)

  • Student performance has been primarily a local concern, but the scene has changed with the enactment of the federal legislation “No Child Left Behind Act” and the resulting reporting requirements adequate yearly progress (AYP) to the school community and the SEA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rural schools have been geographically and politically isolated to the extent that some might say that they have been the victims of, or beneficiaries from, an unstated government policy of benign neglect. The opposite edge of the sword is that many rural districts likely will benefit from the recent state court decisions concerning state school finance programs.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call