Aim. This article aims to assess the effectiveness of uroflowmetry in detecting residual urine and to investigate the relationship between the sensation of incomplete bladder emptying, as measured by the IPSS questionnaire, and the presence of residual urine.Materials and methods. A cohort of patients treated at the Urination Pathology Centre (Vladivostok) for benign prostatic hyperplasia was observed and data were collected. Patients ranged in age from 50 to 73 years (with an average age of 60.5 ± 8.2 years) and were observed during from 2 to 24 months (with an average of 8.4 ± 5.5 months).Results. The analysis of ultrasound data and uroflowmetry results demonstrates convincingly that the SIGMA uroflowmeter can reliably detect residual urine with a high degree of accuracy (p < 0.01). However, during the study, no consistent correlation was found between the symptom of feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, as assessed by the IPSS questionnaire, and the presence of residual urine detected by the SIGMA uroflowmeter.Conclusion. Uroflowmetry conducted with the SIGMA uroflowmeter reliably identifies instances of incomplete bladder emptying, as evidenced by comparison with ultrasound data. At the same time, clinical assessment using the IPSS charts, particularly for the symptom of incomplete bladder emptying, does not adequately indicate the presence of residual urine. Uroflowmetry offers a means to identify incomplete bladder emptying and measure residual urine volume without requiring specialised equipment or medical personnel, thus broadening the diagnostic scope for both conservative and surgical treatment approaches.
Read full abstract