This article examines the issues of the theory of deconcentration in the domestic and foreign scientific literature. In this context, the author consistently examines the existing positions regarding the understanding of the category “deconcentration” and its relationship with the concept of “decentralization”, and also studies the types of deconcentration. In particular, it is noted that in the Russian legal system, unlike other countries, this term is not used. Thus, deconcentration as one of the factors of the organization of power has been reflected in France and Cambodia. However, despite the absence of mention in Russian legislation, this mechanism is widely used within the framework of the territorial organization of public administration. As for the literature, most researchers point out that deconcentration is one of the forms of decentralization of public power. At the same time, among other manifestations of the latter, it is characterized by the least degree of autonomy of local government structures. The author understands by deconcentration the movement of the central government to the periphery through the formation of territorial subjects (or the empowerment of local subjects) as agents (representatives) of the central government, characterized by relations of power and subordination and not involving the creation of a separate level of public authority. The article also touches upon the issue of classification of the types of the analyzed legal phenomenon.
Read full abstract