ABSTRACT Despite its close relationship to employment rights, the concept of the public interest in labour law lacks extensive discussion. Even fewer scholars have studied employment discrimination in China from this perspective, despite China signing many international Conventions and Recommendations related to employment rights. This article analyses the social-based attributes in China's employment anti-discrimination laws, arguing that the laws should prioritise the protection of public interests. It then distils the connotation of the social public interest carried by the laws from the perspectives of legal values, the independence of legal interest, and legislative purposes. Subsequently, this article examines the implementation of the laws at judicial and administrative levels, identifying limitations in individual-oriented approaches and deficiencies in safeguarding the public interest. These limitations and deficiencies primarily manifest in the fact that labour agencies generally do not accept employment discrimination complaints or subtly exclude hiring processes from the scope of administrative enforcement, while courts are accustomed to a private law rationale of compensating for actual losses. Accordingly, this article suggests establishing and maintaining a fair labour market competition order by imposing punitive damages to deter potential discrimination, activating administrative enforcement to rectify past discrimination, and guiding employers to proactively assume social responsibility.
Read full abstract