Research Article| December 01, 2001 Reply: REPLY John A. Vines; John A. Vines 1Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0420, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Richard D. Law Richard D. Law 1Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0420, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (2001) 29 (12): 1157–1158. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<1158:>2.0.CO;2 Article history first online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation John A. Vines, Richard D. Law; Reply: REPLY. Geology 2001;; 29 (12): 1157–1158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<1158:>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search We thank Stevens et al. for their interest in our emplacement model for the Santa Rita Flat pluton. Below we briefly address five of the main points raised by Stevens et al.; additional comments on wall rock structure and the depth and rate of pluton emplacement are addressed in the GSA Data Repository1 material. We also take this opportunity to state that our magnetic fabric work was carried out using anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) techniques, which was misprinted as “accelerator mass spectrometry” in our paper. 1. In our model for evolution of the Santa Rita Flat pluton we... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.