Event Abstract Back to Event How does context affect our perception of emotional faces? Using eye-tracking to explore differences in younger and older adults Emily Salanitro-Chafei1* and Fiona Kumfor1, 2, 3 1 University of Sydney, Psychology, Australia 2 Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Australia 3 Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (ARC), Australia Aims: Recognising emotional expressions is fundamental for successful social interactions. However, most emotion recognition studies use isolated, context-free stimuli. Furthermore, how contextual information influences perceptions of faces with age has largely been unexplored. The current study investigated how contextual cues, such as body language and scenes, that varied in congruency, influenced younger and older adults’ perception of emotional expressions. Additionally, we compared gaze patterns of age groups towards emotional stimuli, to determine whether older adults are more influenced by contextual information than younger adults. Method: Forty participants (21 younger; 19 older) completed three emotion recognition tasks (Face-Alone, Face-Body, Face-Scene) and were asked to identify facial emotional expressions. Eye-tracking data was simultaneously recorded to objectively measure the amount of time participants dwelled on the faces compared to the contexts, across tasks. Results: Contrary to previous findings, age groups did not differ in their ability to recognise context-free emotional stimuli. Notably, when the context was congruent (i.e. face and context emotion matched) participants performed better, irrespective of task (p =.02). Interestingly, when the context was incongruent on the Face-Body task, older participants performed worse than younger participants (p =.01). Eye-tracking results revealed that younger participants exhibited significantly longer dwell times towards the face and contextual interest areas compared to the older participants, in the Face-Body (p <.001) and Face-Scene (p =.001) tasks. However, on the incongruent condition of the Face-Body task, older participants significantly increased their gaze attention towards the faces (p =.004). Conclusions: Our behavioural and eye-tracking analyses demonstrate that older individuals are more strongly influenced by incongruent body language than younger individuals, performing worse in their emotion recognition performance despite increasing their gaze attention towards faces. Hence, it appears that older individuals are more susceptible to the influence of body language, revealing the importance of context in emotion recognition processes. Keywords: eye-tracking;, emotion recognition, Ageing and cognitive function, context effects, Congruency effect Conference: ASP2017: 27th Annual Meeting for the Australasian Society for Psychophysiology, Parramatta, Australia, 29 Nov - 1 Dec, 2017. Presentation Type: Oral Presentation Topic: Abstract (General) Citation: Salanitro-Chafei E and Kumfor F (2019). How does context affect our perception of emotional faces? Using eye-tracking to explore differences in younger and older adults. Conference Abstract: ASP2017: 27th Annual Meeting for the Australasian Society for Psychophysiology. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2017.224.00031 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 15 Oct 2017; Published Online: 25 Jan 2019. * Correspondence: Ms. Emily Salanitro-Chafei, University of Sydney, Psychology, Sydney, Australia, emily.chafei@gmail.com Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Emily Salanitro-Chafei Fiona Kumfor Google Emily Salanitro-Chafei Fiona Kumfor Google Scholar Emily Salanitro-Chafei Fiona Kumfor PubMed Emily Salanitro-Chafei Fiona Kumfor Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.