Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education Research Articles

"Ardor and diligence": Quantifying the faculty effort needed in emergency medicine graduate medical education.

Regulatory requirements around protected faculty effort to support graduate medical education (GME) programs have changed. The amount of labor required to run a GME program is unknown. We sought to describe the work performed by program leadership and core faculty in emergency medicine (EM). We performed a prospective survey study of core faculty in EM. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire followed by quarterly time surveys, covering activities in eight domains: evaluation, teaching and education, scholarly activity, service, interview/recruitment, clinical supervision, student responsibilities, and wellness and administration. We collected data from April 2022 to March 2023. We calculated descriptive statistics and used analyses of variance (ANOVA) to assess differences by faculty role and quarter. A total of 596 physicians completed the demographic questionnaire and 347 (58.2%) completed at least one quarterly time survey including 142 (41%) females, 48 (14%) program directors (PDs), 84 (24%) assistant/associate program directors (APDs), and 215 (62%) general core faculty (GCF). The mean number of hours per week spent on nonclinical education work was 60 h for PDs, 47 h for APDs, and 44 h for GCF. ANOVA found significant differences in mean hours per week and faculty role in domains of evaluation (p < 0.001), service (p = 0.007), and interview/recruitment (p < 0.001). We detected differences in mean hours per week and quarter in domains of evaluation (p < 0.001), teaching and education (p < 0.001), interview and recruitment (p < 0.001), and clinical supervision (p < 0.001). Running a residency program requires many hours of faculty work, which can vary based on faculty role and time of year. These results can inform decisions regarding faculty support.

Expanding DEI Curricula in Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education: A Pilot Innovation Project

Expanding DEI Curricula in Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education: A Pilot Innovation Project

Simulation in emergency medicine graduate medical education: a call to lead.

Simulation in emergency medicine graduate medical education: a call to lead.

Growth of for-profit involvement in emergency medicine graduate medical education and association between for-profit affiliation and resident salary.

BackgroundFollowing projections of an emergency medicine (EM) physician oversupply, the growth of EM residency programs affiliated with for‐profit hospitals has been subject to increased attention and speculation. However, essentially no literature exists regarding these programs. Resident pay is one area where these programs could differ from nonprofit‐affiliated programs, as investor obligations could make for‐profit corporations more likely to reduce resident salaries to increase profit margins. Here, we aim to quantify the growth of EM for‐profit affiliated residency programs from 2001–2021 and determine if PGY1 salaries differ between these program types.MethodsMedicare and ACGME accreditation data were used to determine the profit status of hospitals affiliated with EM residency programs. ACGME new accreditation data from 2001–2021 were used to quantify the growth of both for‐profit and nonprofit affiliated programs over this period. We searched program websites and called programs to determine 2021–2022 PGY1 salary. Multiple regression was used to model the relationship between profit status and salary using program characteristic covariates to control for confounding variables.ResultsThe number of EM programs increased from 117 to 276 from 2001–2021 while the number of for‐profit affiliated EM residency programs increased from 1 to 29 during this period. Most (85.7%, [24/29]) for‐profit affiliated programs were accredited from 2016–2021. Mean for‐profit affiliated program salary ($55,658, n = 24) was $3840 lower than mean nonprofit affiliated program salary ($59,498, n = 203). For‐profit affiliation was a significant predictor of lower 2021–2022 PGY1 salary after controlling for other program characteristics using multiple regression ( ß = −1919.88, P = 0.010).ConclusionsWe found a substantial growth of newly ACGME accredited for‐profit affiliated EM residency programs from 2016–2021. We also found for‐profit affiliated programs pay lower PGY1 salaries than nonprofit–affiliated programs after controlling for potential confounding variables, which suggests more oversight over the salary determination process could be necessary to prevent resident underpayment.

Radiology Education Among Emergency Medicine Residencies: A National Needs Assessment.

IntroductionRadiology training is an important component of emergency medicine (EM) education, but its delivery has been variable. Program directors have reported a lack of radiology skills in incoming interns. A needs assessment is a crucial first step toward improving radiology education among EM residencies. Our objective was to explore the current state of radiology education in EM residency programs.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey study of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited EM programs in the United States. Program leadership completed an online survey consisting of multiple choice, Likert scale, and free-response items. We calculated and reported descriptive statistics.ResultsOf eligible EM programs, 142/252 (56%) completed the survey including 105 postgraduate year (PGY) 1–3 and 36 PGY 1–4 programs. One respondent opted out of answering demographic questions. 23/141 (16%) were from the Western region, 29/141 (21%) were from the North Central region, 14/141 (10%) were from the South-Central region, 28/141 (20%) were from the Southeast region, and 47/141 (33%) were from the Northeast region. A total of 88/142 (62%) of responding programs did not have formal radiology instruction. Of the education that is provided, 127/142 (89%) provide it via didactics/lectures and 115/142 (81%) rely on instruction during clinical shifts. Only 51/142 (36%) provide asynchronous opportunities, and 23/142 (16%) have a dedicated radiology rotation. The majority of respondents reported spending 0–2 hours per month on radiology instruction (108/142; 76%); 95/141 (67%) reported that EM faculty “often” or “always” provide radiology instruction; 134/142 (95%), felt that it was “extremely” or “very important” for ED providers to be able to independently interpret radiograph results; and 129/142 (90.84%) either “sometimes” or “always” rely on their independent radiograph interpretations to make clinical decisions. The radiology studies identified as most important to be able to independently interpret were radiographs obtained for lines/tubes, chest radiographs, and radiographs obtained for musculoskeletal-related complaints.ConclusionA minority of EM residency programs have formal instruction in radiology despite the majority of responding program leadership believing that these are important skills. The most important curricular areas were identified. These results may inform the development of formal radiology curricula in EM graduate medical education.

Better preparing emergency medicine physician trainees for global and rural practice settings: a longitudinal component of university of Arizona's south campus emergency medicine graduate medical education curriculum

Better preparing emergency medicine physician trainees for global and rural practice settings: a longitudinal component of university of Arizona's south campus emergency medicine graduate medical education curriculum

Rural Clinical Experiences for Emergency Medicine Residents: A Curriculum Template

Rural emergency departments (EDs) in the United States are less likely to be staffed with emergency medicine (EM) residency-trained and American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM)-certified physicians than urban EDs. Rural EM clinical experiences during residency training have been suggested as a strategy to encourage future rural practice, but past Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine program requirements and a lack of familiarity with rural rotations in the EM graduate medical education (GME) community have limited their availability. To provide a template for the development and implementation of a rural EM clinical experience, Kern's six-step approach was followed.

Ethics Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education

Ethics education is an essential component of graduate medical education in emergency medicine. A sound understanding of principles of bioethics and a rational approach to ethical decision-making are imperative. This article addresses ethics curriculum content, educational approaches, educational resources, and resident feedback and evaluation. Ethics curriculum content should include elements suggested by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and the Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. Essential ethics content includes ethical principles, the physician-patient relationship, patient autonomy, clinical issues, end-of-life decisions, justice, education in emergency medicine, research ethics, and professionalism. The appropriate curriculum in ethics education in emergency medicine should include some of the content and educational approaches outlined in this article, although the optimal methods for meeting these educational goals may vary by institution.

Industry Relations With Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education Programs

A panel of physicians from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Graduate Medical Education (GME), Ethics, and Industry Relations Committees were asked by the SAEM Board of Directors to write a position paper on the relationship of emergency medicine (EM) GME with industry. Using multiple sources as references, the team derived a set of guidelines that all EM GME training programs can use when interacting with industry representatives. In addition, the team used a question-answer format to provide educators and residents with a practical approach to these interactions. The SAEM Board of Directors endorsed the guidelines in June 2009.

Graduate Medical Education and Knowledge Translation: Role Models, Information Pipelines, and Practice Change Thresholds

This article reflects the proceedings of a workshop session, Postgraduate Education and Knowledge Translation, at the 2007 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on knowledge translation (KT) in emergency medicine (EM). The objective was to develop a research strategy that incorporates KT into EM graduate medical education (GME). To bridge the gap between the best evidence and optimal patient care, Pathman et al. suggested a multistage model for moving from evidence to action. Using this theoretical knowledge-to-action framework, the KT consensus conference group focused on four key components: acceptance, application, ability, and remembering to act on the existing evidence. The possibility that basic familiarity, along with the pipeline by Pathman et al., may improve KT uptake may be an initial starting point for research on GME and KT. Current residents are limited by faculty GME role models to demonstrate bedside KT principles. The rapid uptake of KT theory will depend on developing KT champions locally and internationally for resident physicians to emulate. The consensus participants combined published evidence with expert opinion to outline recommendations for identifying the barriers to KT by asking four specific questions: 1) What are the barriers that influence a resident's ability to act on valid health care evidence? 2) How do we break down these barriers? 3) How do we incorporate this into residency training? 4) How do we monitor the longevity of this intervention? Research in the fields of GME and KT is currently limited. GME educators assume that if we teach residents, they will learn and apply what they have been taught. This is a bold assumption with very little supporting evidence. This article is not an attempt to provide a complete overview of KT and GME, but, instead, aims to create a starting point for future work and discussions in the realm of KT and GM.

Financing of Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education Programs in an Era of Declining Medicare Reimbursement and Support

Financing of Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education Programs in an Era of Declining Medicare Reimbursement and Support

Financing of Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education Programs in an Era of Declining Medicare Reimbursement and Support

In May 2004, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) National Affairs Committee was tasked with evaluation of graduate medical education (GME) funding in the face of declining Medicare reimbursement and support, and its implications for emergency medicine. This article was developed to educate the SAEM membership on the current status and climate of funding for GME and to serve as the basis of a position statement from SAEM on this topic. The paper presents the history and background on GME financing followed by currently known changes from the recently signed Medicare Act of 2003.

Patient Care Competency in Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education: Results of a Consensus Group on Patient Care

“Patient Care” is the first listed core competency of the six new core competencies recently formulated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and, arguably, the most important. To assist emergency medicine (EM) program directors in incorporating and assessing this competency, the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD‐EM) held a consensus conference in March 2002. Definitions of this competency were generated that are specific for the training of practitioners in EM. These built upon the ACGME base definition, but include elements unique to or critically important in EM. In addition, all of the ACGME assessment tools were examined and prioritized for use in assessing the competency of EM residents in the area of patient care. Suggestions for an implementation process are also described.

Patient care competency in emergency medicine graduate medical education: results of a consensus group on patient care.

"Patient Care" is the first listed core competency of the six new core competencies recently formulated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and, arguably, the most important. To assist emergency medicine (EM) program directors in incorporating and assessing this competency, the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD-EM) held a consensus conference in March 2002. Definitions of this competency were generated that are specific for the training of practitioners in EM. These built upon the ACGME base definition, but include elements unique to or critically important in EM. In addition, all of the ACGME assessment tools were examined and prioritized for use in assessing the competency of EM residents in the area of patient care. Suggestions for an implementation process are also described.