Emergency Department Pharmacist Research Articles

Nexus of Quality Use of Medicines, Pharmacists’ Activities, and the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review

Acute care provided in the hospital’s emergency department (ED) is a key component of the healthcare system that serves as an essential bridge between outpatient and inpatient care. However, due to the emergency-driven nature of presenting problems and the urgency of care required, the ED is more prone to unintended medication regimen changes than other departments. Ensuring quality use of medicines (QUM), defined as “choosing suitable medicines and using them safely and effectively”, remains a challenge in the ED and hence requires special attention. The role of pharmacists in the ED has evolved considerably, transitioning from traditional inventory management to delivering comprehensive clinical pharmacy services, such as medication reconciliation and review. Emerging roles for ED pharmacists now include medication charting and prescribing and active participation in resuscitation efforts. Additionally, ED pharmacists are involved in research and educational initiatives. However, the ED setting is still facing heightened service demands in terms of the number of patients presenting to EDs and longer ED stays. Addressing these challenges necessitates innovation and reform in ED care to effectively manage the complex, rising demand for ED care and to meet government-imposed service quality indicators. An example is redesigning the medication use process, which could necessitate a shift in skill mix or an expansion of the roles of ED pharmacists, particularly in areas such as medication charting and prescribing. Collaborative efforts between pharmacists and physicians have demonstrated positive outcomes and should thus be adopted as the standard practice in improving the quality use of medicines in the ED.

Medication reviews by emergency department pharmacists in patients hospitalised for an adverse drug event: a cost study

ObjectiveTo perform a cost study of pharmacist-led medication reviews in patients with an acute hospitalization for adverse drug events.MethodEmergency department pharmacists performed medication reviews in patients hospitalized after visiting the emergency department for an adverse drug event (ADE). Control patients were hospitalized after an emergency department visit not related to an ADE and received usual care. The costs of the intervention were labour costs of the junior emergency department pharmacist and the cost savings consisted of costs of medication that was stopped or reduced during six months after the intervention. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate different scenarios.ResultsIn the intervention group (n = 104) 113 medication changes led to stopping or reducing medication, accounting for averted costs of €22,850. In the control group (n = 112) 39 medication changes led to stopping or reducing medication, accounting for averted costs of €299. The mean labour costs of the intervention were €138 per patient, resulting in saved costs of €61 per patient per six months. Sensitivity analyses showed that if the intervention would be performed by a senior clinical pharmacist, there are no cost savings (€-21), if parts of the intervention would be executed by pharmacy technicians (e.g. administrative tasks), cost savings would be augmented to €87, if outliers in costs associated with medication reduction would be excluded, there are no cost savings (€-35) and if the costs of reduced medication were extrapolated to one year, cost savings would be €260.ConclusionIn this study, medication reviews by junior emergency department pharmacists in patients hospitalized after an emergency department visit for an ADE lead to a cost reduction over a six month period.Trial registrationThe main study is registered on the ISRCTN registry with trial ID ISRCTN12506329 on 06-03-2022.

Sepsis call emergency department pharmacist service: a single healthcare network cohort study

AbstractBackgroundSepsis and septic shock are common emergency department (ED) presentations, with current guidelines recommending early administration of antibiotics to reduce mortality.AimSepsis calls with pharmacist attendance have been introduced at two EDs, and the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this service on outcomes of all septic patients.MethodAt a multisite, single healthcare network, located in Victoria, Australia, emergency medicine pharmacists were trained in assisting medical staff in antibiotic selection, dosing, and delivering antibiotics directly to nursing staff. The sepsis call service was introduced in May 2022 at one site and in March 2023 at another site, with time to first antibiotic administration, morbidity, and mortality being compared to the outcomes of patients from the same EDs from January–April 2022 (group 1). Post the sepsis call introduction, two cohorts were compared: sepsis call attended patients without a pharmacist (group 2) and with a pharmacist (group 3). This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: RES‐23‐0000‐237Q). The justification for this ethics exemption was as follows: the study was retrospective, included privacy protections for patients' data, and presented no increased risk to patient care.ResultsThe study included 201 patients, with time to first antibiotic administration on average 302.0 min in group 1, 201.3 min (p = 0.007) in group 2, and 89.8 min (p < 0.001) in group 3. Mortality (p = 0.306), rates of acute kidney injury (p = 0.111), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (p = 0.002), and need for dialysis (p = 0.497) were all reduced in group 3. Adherence to antibiotic guidelines was increased in group 3 (p < 0.001).ConclusionEmergency medicine pharmacist contribution led to reduced time to first antibiotic, an improved adherence to antibiotic guidelines, and positive trends in secondary clinical outcomes. Further research is required to determine the significance of improvements in mortality, intensive care unit admissions, and renal impairment.

How Do Pharmacists Distribute Their Work Time during a Clinical Intervention Trial?-A Time and Motion Study.

Emergency departments (EDs) handle urgent medical needs for a diverse population. Medication errors and adverse drug events pose safety risks in the ED. Clinical pharmacists, experts in medication use, play a crucial role in identifying and optimizing medication therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate how clinical pharmacists introduced into the ED interdisciplinary teams distribute their work time. In a time and motion study, we used the Work Observation Method By Activity Timing (WOMBAT) to observe pharmacists in two Norwegian EDs. The pragmatic approach allowed pharmacists to adapt to ED personnel and patient needs. The pharmacists spent 41.8% of their work time on medication-related tasks, especially those linked to medication reconciliation, including documenting medication-related issues (16.2%), reading and retrieving written information (9.6%), and obtaining oral information about medication use from patients (9.5%). The remaining time was spent on non-medication-related tasks (41.8%), and on standby and movement (17.4%). In conclusion, ED pharmacists spent 42% of their work time on medication-related tasks, predominantly medication reconciliation. Their relatively new role in the interdisciplinary team may have limited their broader clinical impact. Relative to other ED healthcare professionals, ED pharmacists' goal remains to ensure accurate patient medication lists and appropriate medication use.

The effect of an extended-hours ED clinical pharmacy service on admission medication prescribing errors.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a 7-day extended-hours clinical pharmacy service in the ED on medication prescribing errors upon hospital admission and time to medication reconciliation. In this retrospective observational study, high-needs patients reviewed by ED pharmacists were compared against those not reviewed, to determine if the service was associated with reduction in admission medication errors. The primary outcome was the rate of medication errors. Errors were independently rated by two senior clinicians using a risk-probability matrix. Secondary outcomes included service's impact on time to best possible medication history (BPMH) and medication reconciliation. There were 242 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 105 intervention vs 137 control. In the intervention arm, 74 patients had at least 1 medication error compared with 113 in the control arm (total errors 206 vs 407). The error rate per 10 medications (interquartile range) was 1.4 (0, 2.9) in the intervention arm compared with 2.7 (1.2, 4.3) in the control arm (risk ratio 0.66 [95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.78]; P < 0.001). There were 33 moderate-risk and no high-risk errors (intervention), compared with 84 moderate-risk and 3 high-risk errors (control). Percent agreement was 98.98% (weighted kappa: 0.62). Time to BPMH and medication reconciliation were reduced from 40.5 and 45.0 h to 7.8 and 40.0 h, respectively. The 7-day extended-hours ED clinical pharmacy service was associated with a reduction in medication prescribing errors in high-needs patients and improved time to BPMH and medication reconciliation.

Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in the emergency department

Study objectivesRabies is a zoonotic single-stranded RNA lyssavirus that can cause acute infections of the central nervous system (CNS) including encephalomyelitis, encephalitis, and meningoencephalitis that is progressively fatal. Rabies is more common in developing countries, but approximately 23,000 people in the United States (US) are estimated to have been exposed or to have received post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) yearly. Nebraska Medicine follows the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines for the vaccination series, as well as the 20 units/kg administration of immunoglobulin (RIG).Nebraska Medicine Medical Center (NMC) and Bellevue Medical Center (BMC) treat the scheduling of the complete rabies vaccine series differently. At both campuses, patients receive their immunoglobulin and first vaccine in the Emergency Department (ED). At NMC, patients are scheduled to receive the remainder of their vaccination series at the outpatient infusion center by the ED pharmacist. At BMC, the subsequent vaccinations are given as “Nurse Only” return visits to the ED. The objective of this study was to compare patient compliance of two different processes for follow-up rabies vaccine series completion. This project's primary aim was to determine the rate of patient compliance for follow up rabies vaccine doses. The secondary aims of this project were to determine if there was a difference in patient follow-up compliance between the two campuses, patient specific factors that impact compliance, and potential cost savings if a dose rounding protocol for RIG was utilized. MethodsThis retrospective chart review was completed as a quality improvement project. Data from patients who had received either rabies immunoglobulin and/or a rabies vaccine, were >18 years of age, and were not admitted were collected for a 3-year period from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. Data were abstracted from the patient's EMR (electronic medical records) using a SQL (Structured query language) query of pre-identified data elements. When unable to abstract with SQL query, data elements were manually abstracted. All data abstracted was collated and descriptive analysis performed. ResultsA total of 723 individual encounters were identified during the study period. After combining rabies series for each individual patient, 173 unique patients remained. After exclusions were applied, 143 patients were included: 104 patients from NMC, and 39 from BMC. For the primary outcome, appropriate completion between the two campuses was 78.3%. When comparing the two campuses, completion rates were higher at NMC (82% vs. 69%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Appropriate completion of vaccine series was statistically significant for both payor and exposure type. Application of a dose rounding policy with those >45 kg, rounding to the nearest vial, as well as rounding down if at the midpoint interval, 56 fewer vials would have been used between the two campuses. This would have resulted in a potential cost savings of $57,928.64 over the study period.

Expanding expedited partner therapy and HIV prophylaxis in the emergency department.

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continue to have a disproportionate impact on individuals belonging to sexual, gender, and racial minorities. Across the nation, many emergency medicine pharmacists (EMPs) possess the skills and knowledge to expand the provision of expedited partner therapy (EPT) for STIs and provide HIV prophylaxis within existing practice frameworks. This report serves as a call to action for expanded provision of EPT and HIV prophylaxis by EMPs and highlights current barriers and solutions to increase pharmacist involvement in these practice areas. Emergency medicine pharmacy practice continues to expand to allow for limited prescribing authority through collaborative practice agreements (CPAs). In recent years, CPA restrictions have been changed to facilitate treatment of more patients with less bureaucracy. This report addresses the unique challenges and opportunities for expanding EPT and HIV pre- and postexposure prophylaxis provision by pharmacists in emergency departments (EDs). Furthermore, current strategies and treatments for EPT, such as patient-delivered partner therapy and HIV prophylaxis, are discussed. Pharmacist involvement in STI treatment and HIV prevention is a key strategy to increase access to high-risk populations with high ED utilization and help close current gaps in care. Expanding EMP provision of EPT and HIV prophylaxis may be beneficial to reducing the incidence of STIs and HIV infection in the community. CPAs offer a feasible solution to increase pharmacist involvement in the provision of these treatments. Legislative efforts to expand pharmacist scope of practice can also contribute to increasing access to EPT and HIV prophylaxis. With these efforts, EMPs can play an essential role in the fight against STIs and HIV.

What do emergency department pharmacist practitioners know and understand about patient safeguarding? A qualitative study

BackgroundPharmacists with additional clinical skills now work in UK emergency departments. Known as Emergency Department Pharmacist Practitioners, the role was developed in response to a shortage of physicians and nurses. They carry out activities typical of traditional hospital pharmacists, but also novel ‘practitioner’ activities such as examining patients, and acting as designated care provider. The role includes a responsibility to safeguard patients from harm. Professional competence, i.e. to safeguard patients, is underpinned by knowledge of the subject, but also knowledge application.AimTo investigate what Emergency Department Pharmacist Practitioners know and understand about safeguarding vulnerable children and adults.MethodThirteen Emergency Department Pharmacist Practitioners were interviewed to explore their knowledge and understanding of safeguarding. Interview questions were developed from review of relevant literature, as were vignettes with variables identified and altered to produce different scenarios. Template analysis was used to code data to a priori themes for each of the stages of the initial safeguarding process, and new themes that emerged throughout the process.ResultsSix themes were identified in addition to the four a priori themes. Overall, participants frequently described how safeguarding concerns are both recognised and responded to, but seemed more comfortable when responding to medicines related concerns. Factors thought to influence the safeguarding process included: resources and setting; and education, training and experiential learning; and culture.ConclusionWhile Emergency Department Pharmacist Practitioners interviewed were aware of the safeguarding process, there were some misconceptions as to the roles of different healthcare workers in this process.

Evaluation of the impact of a Pharmacy Technician within the Emergency Department, Royal Stoke University Hospital

Abstract Introduction The Emergency Department (ED) at the Royal Stoke University Hospital has come under increasing pressure, and it is well published that patients within the ED are at a higher risk of medication misadventure and missed doses of critical medicines1. This was a particular risk at the Royal Stoke in winter 2022/23 with the re-introduction of ED corridor care and patients waiting over 24 hours for a medical bed. A prescribing pharmacist has been in post in the ED since 2019, but additional funding was obtained for a pharmacy ED technician to support for 6 months during winter pressures. Aim The aim of this service evaluation was to assess the impact of the pharmacy technician within the ED, with a particular focus on medicines reconciliation, allergy status recognition and pharmacist prescribing activity. Methods Ethical approval was not required for this project, as it was a service evaluation. Data was collected over an 11 week period, Monday-Friday from October-December 2022. Data was collated into an Excel® spread sheet and assessed the number of patients reviewed by the pharmacy technician and prescribing pharmacist, the number of medicines prescribed by a prescribing pharmacist (including number of critical and non-critical medicines), and any missed allergy status’ by the clerking practitioner. Results Over 11 weeks, the pharmacist prescriber was able to prescribe 183 medicines, 46 of which were critical medicines. 23 patients were identified as having allergies (with 61% being penicillin allergy) which had previously not been documented by the clerking practitioner within the ED and/or patients were not wearing the appropriate red allergy wristband. This included 2 patients who had previously experienced anaphylaxis as a result of their drug allergy. Finally, comparing the data from the time period with the pharmacy technician, to without a pharmacy technician, demonstrated an almost 10-fold increase in pharmacist prescribing activity. Discussion/Conclusion This service evaluation has demonstrated the significant positive impact of a pharmacy technician within the ED. The data collected for this service evaluation was limited as it was only collected on weekdays, and further work should be done to assess the impact of a 7 day service. It is therefore recommended that permanent funding is secured all year round for ED pharmacy technician support, ideally 7 days per week. This will increase medicines reconciliation activity allowing ED pharmacists to focus on clinical review and prescribing for patients, increasing the number of patients seen by pharmacy, allowing earlier identification of patients on critical medicines, reducing the number of missed doses and potential harm. A pharmacy technician also allows earlier confirmation of patients’ allergy status, further reducing harm within the ED.

2949. Emergency Department (ED) Discharge Antibiotic Prescription Review by Hospital Pharmacists at a Large Academic Medical Center

Abstract Background Direct patient discharge from the Emergency Department (ED) presents an ideal time to promote antimicrobial stewardship (AS). On March 1, 2021 we initiated a pilot program where ED pharmacists conduct a review of discharge antibiotic prescriptions (abx Rxs). The aim of this program is to ensure appropriate discharge abxs. Willow Pharmacy Epic Analysts, ED and AS pharmacists collaborated on this program which included Epic integration of Rx Discharge Track Board, ED Discharge InBasket, ED Discharge Rx iVent and AS-led education sessions. Methods Data for 2022 ED patients with discharge abx Rxs and iVents were extracted via Epic Reports. The first encounter per patient was included. We compared discharge abx Rxs and patient outcome data in Pharmacy vs No Pharmacy Review Groups (PRG, NPRG). Pharmacy iVents were used as a process measure. Results Among 5747 ED adult patients with discharge abx Rxs, 2638 (46%) were reviewed by pharmacy (PRG). PRG and NPRG had similar prevalence of chronic pulmonary disease (12% vs. 13%), diabetes mellitus (9% vs. 10%), malignancy (8% vs. 9%), peripheral vascular disease (6% vs. 8%), renal disease (4% vs. 5%), and HIV (1% vs. 2%) despite a difference in mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.64 vs 0.75, p&amp;lt; 0.01). The primary ED diagnosis was skin and soft tissue, urinary, intra-abdominal infections and pneumonia (25 vs 23%, 18 vs 17%, 8 vs 9%, 5 vs 6%, respectively all p=NS). In PRG, discharge abxs demonstrated an increase use of penicillin (26 vs 24%, p=0.017) and 2nd generation cephalosporin (17 vs 14%, p&amp;lt; 0.001). The PRG also decreased use of 3rd generation cephalosporin (11 vs 12%, p=NS), quinolones (6 vs 7%, p=NS) and clindamycin (1.7 vs 2.4%, p=NS). There was no difference in ED length of stay (LOS 4.8h in each group), C. difficile infection (CDI) within 8 weeks (0.1 vs 0.2%, p=NS), and 30 days repeat ED visit or inpatient admission with the same diagnosis as index ED encounter (2.8 vs 2.6%, p=NS). Pharmacists intervened in 10% (272/2638) of ED abx Rxs with 92% (249/272) acceptance rate. The top 3 pharmacy interventions were recommending alternative abx (42%), dose optimization (31%) and abx duration (6%). Conclusion Engaging pharmacists in ED discharge Rxs review resulted in use of narrower spectrum abx with lower CDI risk without any negative impact on ED LOS and clinical outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Hospital pharmacist experience in a multidisciplinary team in special care settings

The COVID-19 pandemic is placing huge strain on health systems and professionals. Emergency departments and their pharmacy services have been the first to face this challenge before any other pharmacy units. This article provides a description of the experience of two public hospitals located in the Autonomous Community of Madrid, Spain.Team working and reciprocal trust have made it possible to meet the unprecedented demand for health services and has facilitated rapid decision making. Strategies have been developed to guarantee the availability, distribution and safe use of medications. Other strategies have included favoring communication within Emergency Departments pharmacy services, and between these services and Emergency Departments during the pandemic.Multidisciplinary cooperation and information sharing have traditionally formed the base for efficient and quality work, along with solid technologies that guarantee a safe use of medications. The crucial role of information and communication technologies during the pandemic may give rise to a new model of pharmaceutical care, which should not replace face-to-face Emergency Department pharmacist support and advice. Promoting the re-humanization of healthcare and pharmacy services is essential. An adequate technical training and the development of abilities such as flexibility, planning and coordination skills, and an assertive communication and management of emotions will be key to the successful management of unimaginable settings in the future.

A pharmacist-driven deprescribing protocol for negative urine and sexually transmitted infection cultures in the emergency department increases antibiotic-free days.

Emergency department (ED) pharmacists commonly perform positive culture follow-ups that result in optimized antibiotic prescribing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential positive impact on the outcome of antibiotic-free days through an ED pharmacist-driven protocol to contact patients with negative urine cultures and sexually transmitted infection (STI) test results who were discharged with antibiotics. This was a single-center, prospective, observational, pre-post intervention study to determine antibiotic use in patients with negative urine cultures who were discharged from the Loyola Medical University Center ED with antibiotics prescribed. Patients were identified through daily positive culture reports. The primary outcome was days free of antibiotics, defined as the number of calendar days within 28 days after urine culture or STI test collection on which the patient did not receive any antibiotic treatments. One hundred ninety-two patients were screened. Sixty-three and twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria in the pre- and postintervention groups, respectively. The study identified 163/465 (35.1%) antibiotic free days for the preintervention group, compared to 150.5/187 (80.5%) antibiotic-free days for the postintervention group. A majority of the patients did not have urinary tract infection as the chief complaint. The most common urinary and STI symptoms upon ED admission in the pre- and postintervention groups were dysuria (19.2% vs 28.1%) and unusual discharge (30.8% vs 28.6%), respectively. This study showed that a pharmacist-driven protocol increased the number of antibiotic-free days for patients prescribed empiric antibiotic therapy and discharged from the ED with subsequent negative urine cultures and STI results. We propose taking a novel approach in discontinuation of antibiotics by implementing an expansion of ED culture programs to include negative cultures that promote antimicrobial stewardship.

Regular Medications in the Emergency Department Short Stay Unit (ReMedIES): Can Prescribing be Improved Without Increasing Resources?

Background: Hospital medication errors are frequent and may result in adverse events. Data on non-prescription of regular medications to emergency department short stay unit patients is lacking. In response to local reports of regular medication omissions, a multi-disciplinary team was tasked to introduce corrective emergency department (ED) process changes, but with no additional financing or resources. Aim: To reduce the rate of non-prescription of regular medications for patients admitted to the ED Short Stay Unit (SSU), through process change within existing resource constraints. Methods: A pre- and post-intervention observational study compared regular medication omission rates for patients admitted to the ED SSU. Included patients were those who usually took regular home medications at 08:00 or 20:00. Omissions were classified as clinically significant medications (CSMs) or non-clinically significant medications (non-CSMs). The intervention included reinforcement that the initially treating acute ED doctor was responsible for prescription completion, formal checking of prescription presence at SSU handover rounds, double-checking of prescription completeness by the overnight SSU lead nurse and junior doctor, and ED pharmacist medication reconciliation for those still identified as having regular medication non-prescription at 07:30. Results: For the 110 and 106 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods, there was a non-significant reduction in the CSM omission rate of -11% (95% CI: -23 to 2), from 41% (95% CI: 32-50) to 30% (95% CI: 21-39). Conclusion: Non-prescription of regular CSMs for SSU patients was not significantly reduced by institution of work practice changes within existing resource constraints.

Evaluating the impact of emergency department clinical pharmacist integration within a discharge urine culture follow‐up program

AbstractIntroductionPatients are often discharged from the emergency department (ED) prior to final culture results, leading to the development of post‐ED discharge urine culture review programs (UCRPs) to ensure appropriate management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact ED pharmacists have on antibiotic management and determine areas for improved antimicrobial stewardship efforts.MethodsThis was a single‐system, retrospective, quasi‐experimental study of patients who visited the ED for evaluation of a urinary tract infection comparing no pharmacist involvement in a culture review to a process when ED pharmacists were involved. Patients included those discharged from the ED requiring review under a UCRP. Incarcerated patients and those admitted to an inpatient service from the ED were excluded. The primary outcome was the receipt of guideline‐appropriate management. Secondary outcomes included unplanned admission or ED revisit within 14 and 30 days related to the initial ED visit, all‐cause hospital admission or ED revisit within 14 and 30 days, and acceptance rate of pharmacist recommendations.ResultsA total of 142 patients were included (before pharmacist integration = 70, after pharmacist integration = 72). Receipt of guideline‐appropriate management occurred at 33% without pharmacist integration and 85% in the arm with pharmacist integration, p &lt; 0.001. Pharmacist recommendations were accepted in 97% of cases. No difference was noted between ED revisit within 14 and 30 days with a chief complaint directly related to the initial ED visit, 14 and 30 day admission related to the initial encounter, and all‐cause hospital admission or ED revisit within 14 and 30 days. In patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria, there was a higher receipt of inappropriate management 67% (20/30) in the time before pharmacist integration versus 19% (9/48) after pharmacist integration (p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionThere was a significantly higher number of patients with appropriate antimicrobial management after pharmacist involvement in UCRP review.

Impact of a sepsis tracking sheet and emergency department pharmacists on sepsis compliance measures: a prospective emergency department analysis.

Compliance with core sepsis measures in Emergency Departments (ED) remains low, with a limited number of prospective trials highlighting strategies for improvement. A prospective historically case-controlled observational analysis assessing the pre- and post -intervention impact of a sepsis tracking sheet (STS) and the involvement of ED pharmacists. PrimaryThe primary outcome was the improvement in compliance with core sepsis measures. SecondaryThe secondary outcome was to assess the frequency of respiratory interventions and mortality with pre-defined strata of fluid resuscitation (≤10, 10-20, 20-30, 30, ≥30cc/kg of ideal body weight). 194 patients were enrolled over a six -month period with a 9.3% all-cause mortality and a 10.3% rate of new respiratory interventions after fluid boluses. Post-STS implementation compliance of repeat lactate measurement was 88% (vs. 33% pre-STS), broad-spectrum antibiotic administration within 3h of presentation improved to 96% (vs. 20% pre-STS), blood cultures were drawn on 98% of patients (vs. 9% pre-STS), and 30cc/kg fluid boluses were administered to 39% of patients (vs. 25% pre-STS). Of the 18 deaths and 21 respiratory interventions, only two patients fell into both categories. Mortality was highest in those patients that received greater than 30cc/kg of fluid resuscitation (50%). Respiratory interventions were greatest in the strata receiving 10-20cc/kg of fluids (47.6%). Patients receiving the lowest fluid aliquots of <10cc/kg had the highest clinical severity scores but did not have higher rates of historical diagnoses of volume overload. The ED -based implementation of a sepsis tracking sheet and the involvement of dedicated ED pharmacists was effective in improving core measures of sepsis compliance. Patients receiving higher fluid aliquots did not experience higher rates of respiratory interventions, though had higher all-cause mortality. No relationship could be identified between patients getting lower aliquots of fluid and prior diagnoses of volume overload.

Pathophysiology and treatment of adults with arrhythmias in the emergency department, part 1: Atrial arrhythmias.

This article, the first in a 2-part review, aims to reinforce current literature on the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias and various evidence-based treatment approaches and clinical considerations in the acute care setting. Part 1 of this series focuses on atrial arrhythmias. Arrhythmias are prevalent throughout the world and a common presenting condition in the emergency department (ED) setting. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and expected to increase in prevalence. Treatment approaches have evolved over time with advances in catheter-directed ablation. Based on historic trials, heart rate control has been the long-standing accepted outpatient treatment modality for AF, but the use of antiarrhythmics is often still indicated for AF in the acute setting, and ED pharmacists should be prepared and poised to help in AF management. Other atrial arrhythmias include atrial flutter (AFL), atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), which warrant distinction due to their unique pathophysiology and because each requires a different approach to utilization of antiarrhythmics. Atrial arrhythmias are typically associated with greater hemodynamic stability than ventricular arrhythmias but still require nuanced management according to patient subset and risk factors. Since antiarrhythmics can also be proarrhythmic, they may destabilize the patient due to adverse effects, many of which are the focus of black-box label warnings that can be overreaching and limit treatment options. Electrical cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias is generally successful and, depending on the setting and/or hemodynamics, often indicated. Atrial arrhythmias arise from a variety of mechanisms, and appropriate treatment depends on various factors. A firm understanding of physiological and pharmacological concepts serves as a foundation for exploring evidence supporting agents, indications, and adverse effects in order to provide appropriate care for patients.

Emergency department pharmacist impact on time to administration of heparin: a brief report

AbstractIn the United States, venous thromboembolisms (VTE) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulant medicines, such as heparin, are often indicated to stop or prevent clot formation, and early administration of heparin has been associated with reduced mortality. There is no literature evaluating whether administration of heparin is expedited when pharmacists are involved in patient care in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to determine whether the presence of an ED pharmacist decreased time to heparin administration for patients with VTE or ACS. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth (SCL) Health Institutional Review Board (reference number: 2021‐047). This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated patients who presented to the ED between 1 January 2019 and 30 May 2022 and received an order for unfractionated heparin with a confirmed diagnosis of VTE or ACS. The chi‐square test and Wilcoxon ranked‐sum test were used to detect differences between groups. A total of 65 patients were included in the analyses. Comparison of the median time between order and administration of heparin revealed that patients with an order placed while a pharmacist was present in the ED received heparin sooner than patients without an ED pharmacist present (32 min vs 50 min, p = 0.02). Time to administration of heparin was significantly shorter when a pharmacist was present in the ED at the time the order was placed by the care team. Findings suggest that the presence of an ED pharmacist expedites time to heparin administration.

Utilization and Impact of Pharmacist-led, Urinary Culture Follow-Up After Discharge from the Emergency Department.

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are a common reason for an emergency department (ED) visit. The majority of these patients are discharged directly home without a hospital admission. After discharge, emergency physicians have traditionally managed the care of the patient if a change is warranted (as a result of urine culture results). However, in recent years clinical pharmacists in the ED have largely incorporated this task into their standard practice. In our study, we aimed to 1) describe our unique process in having a pharmacist-led, urinary culture follow-up, and 2) compare it to our previous, more traditional process. In our retrospective study, we evaluated the impact of a pharmacist-led, urinary culture follow-up program after discharge from the ED. We included patients prior to and after the implementation of our new protocol to compare the differences. The primary outcome was time to intervention after urine culture result was released. Secondary outcomes included rate of documentation of intervention, appropriate interventions made, and repeat ED visits within 30 days. We included a total of 265 unique urine cultures from 264 patients in the study: 129 cultures were from the period prior to implementation of the protocol, and 136 were from the post-implementation period. There were no significant differences between pre- and post-implementation groups for the primary outcome. Appropriate therapeutic intervention based on positive urine culture results was 16.3% in the pre-implementation group vs 14.7% in the post-implementation group (P=0.72). Secondary outcomes of time to intervention, documentation rates, and readmissions were similar between both groups. Implementation of a pharmacist-led, urinary culture follow-up program after discharge from the ED led to similar outcomes as a physician-run program. An ED pharmacist can successfully run a urinary culture follow-up program in an ED without physician involvement.

Perspectives on and experiences of emergency department–initiated buprenorphine among clinical pharmacists: A multi-site qualitative study

IntroductionClinical pharmacists are well positioned to enhance efforts to promote emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Among clinical pharmacists in urban EDs, we sought to characterize barriers and facilitators for ED-initiated buprenorphine to inform future implementation efforts and enhance access to this highly effective OUD treatment. MethodsThis study was conducted as a part of Project ED Health (CTN-0069, NCT03023930), a multisite effectiveness-implementation study aimed at promoting ED-initiated buprenorphine that was conducted between April 2017 and July 2020. Data collection and analysis were grounded in the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework to assess perspectives on the relationship between 3 elements: evidence for buprenorphine, the ED context, and facilitation needs to promote ED-initiated buprenorphine. The study used an iterative coding process to identify overlapping themes within these 3 domains. ResultsThe study conducted eight focus groups/interviews across four geographically disparate EDs with 15 pharmacist participants. We identified six themes. Themes related to evidence included (1) varied levels of comfort and experience among pharmacists with ED-initiated buprenorphine that increased over time and (2) a perception that patients with OUD have unique challenges that require guidance to optimize ED care. With regards to context, clinical pharmacists identified: (3) their ability to clarify scope of ED care in the context of unique pharmacology, formulations, and regulations of buprenorphine to ED staff, and that (4) their presence promotes successful program implementation and quality improvement. Participants identified facilitation needs including: (5) training to promote practice change and (6) ways to leverage already existing pharmacy resources outside of the ED. ConclusionClinical pharmacists play a unique and critical role in the efforts to promote ED-initiated buprenorphine. We identified 6 themes that can inform pharmacist-specific interventions that could aid in the successful implementation of this practice.

Patient perceptions and experiences with medication-related activities in the emergency department: a qualitative study

BackgroundEmergency department (ED) pharmacists reduce medication errors and improve quality of medication use. Patient perceptions and experiences with ED pharmacists have not been studied. The aim of this study was...