Blood Cultures In Emergency Department Research Articles

91. Implementation of a blood culture algorithm in emergency department patients as a diagnostic stewardship intervention

Abstract Background Blood cultures (BCx) are commonly ordered for patients at low risk of bacteremia. Liberal ordering can increase false-positive results due to contamination, along with increasing length of stay, excess antibiotics, and unnecessary diagnostic procedures. We implemented an algorithm for appropriate blood culture obtainment (Figure 1) in an academic tertiary care emergency department (ED) and assessed the intervention’s impact on various operational, clinical, and safety metrics.Figure 1:ED Blood culture algorithm Methods We performed a prospective cohort study in the Duke University Hospital ED from 12/2022 to 3/2023 using historical controls from 12/2020-11/2022. The BCx algorithm was disseminated in-person, electronically, and accessible online. Weekly chart review of all eligible patients for algorithm adherence was completed by 7 ED clinicians with monthly feedback provided to all ED providers. We defined a BCx event as 1 or more BCx sets within 24 hours. We excluded patients < 18 years, absolute neutrophil count < 500 109/L, and heart and lung transplant recipients. We measured BCx order volume, indication, algorithm adherence, BCx positivity rate, antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), and 30-day hospital readmission. Results Average monthly BCx volume was 1387 pre-intervention compared to 1226 post-intervention (p= 0.046). An increase in culture positivity was see post-intervention with a rate of 13.9% compared to 11.23% in the pre-intervention group (Figure 2, p< 0.001). The majority of the 2168 BCx adhered to the algorithm. (Figure 3). The most common reasons for non-adherence were isolated fever or leukocytosis (29%), non-severe community-acquired pneumonia or healthcare-associated pneumonia (6.9%) and non-severe cellulitis (4%). No change in DOT (786 vs. 783 days of therapy per 1000 patient days, p-value 0.85) (Figure 4) or monthly 30-day hospital readmission (21.1% vs 19.6%, p-value 0.30) was observed.Figure 2:Blood cultures drawn per month and % appropriate pre/post-intervention (N=2168)Figure 3:Algorithm Adherent vs. Algorithm Non-Adherent blood cultures per month (N=2168)Figure 4:Emergency Department anti-bacterial days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient days Conclusion Introduction of a BCx algorithm in an academic tertiary care ED, resulted in a decrease in BCx volume, increase in BCx positivity rate, and no increase in DOT or readmission was observed. (Table 1)Table 1:Blood culture volume, positivity rate, days of antibiotic therapy, and 30-day readmission Disclosures Jessica Seidelman, MD, MPH, Uptodate: content editor for pelvic osteomyelitis page

Getting to zero: Impact of a device to reduce blood culture contamination and false-positive central-line-associated bloodstream infections.

To assess the impact of initial specimen diversion device (ISDD) on inpatient and emergency department blood culture contamination (BCC), central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) standardized infection ratios (SIRs), and antibiotic administration. Single-center quasi-experimental prospective cohort study wherein phlebotomists used traditional venipuncture with or without the ISDD while registered nurses (RNs) used traditional venipuncture. BCC events among phlebotomists and RNs were observed and compared from March 17, 2019, through January 21, 2020, defined by contaminant detection in 1 of 4 bottles for matched sets or 1 of 2 bottles in both subsets for coagulase negative staphylococci. CLABSIs throughout this period were recorded and SIRs were calculated. Enhanced oversight took place through July 21, 2019, with chart review assessing antibiotic use for patients with possible BCC. Overall, 24% of blood cultures obtained were from patients in intensive care. Phlebotomists using traditional venipuncture (n = 4,759) had a 2.3% BCC rate; phlebotomists using the ISDD (n = 11,202) had a 0% BCC rate. RNs drew 7,411 BCs with a 0.8% BCC rate. The CLABSI SIR was decreased from 1.103 in 2017 and 0.658 in 2018 to 0.439 in 2019. The CLABSI incidence was 33%-64% of predicted value for each 2019 quarter. This range fell to 18%-37% after the exclusion of likely false-positive results. Among 42 patients with possible BCC under enhanced oversight, 2 patients were treated with prolonged antibiotic courses. ISDD use by phlebotomists was associated with BCC reduction and reduced false-positive CLABSI results. This patient-care quality improvement could constitute sustainable antibiotic stewardship expansion.

Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice: Impact on Emergency Department Blood Culture Contamination.

Blood culture collection is a common procedure performed in emergency departments. Rate of blood culture contamination is a metric that is tracked by organizations to ensure appropriate treatment for patients suspected of having bacteremia and ensure appropriate use of hospital resources. A team of nurses and technicians undertook a quality improvement project to decrease blood culture contamination rates in a suburban emergency department. The project included use of standardized blood culture collection kits, creation of a dedicated collection team, and implementation of a new blood culture collection device. Through this work, blood culture contamination rates decreased from greater than 3.0% to less than 1.5% consistently for nearly 24 months. Providing feedback and continued monitoring has made this quality improvement initiative a success for the department and the organization and has resulted in cost savings of nearly 2 million dollars.

Decreasing Blood Culture Contamination Rates Using A Specimen Diversion Device: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Background: Blood culture contamination rates are frequently higher than the ≤3% standard in the emergency department (ED). Objective: We sought to determine whether the implementation of a blood diversion device that mechanically sequesters the initial aliquot of the blood culture sample decreased blood culture contamination rates. Methods: We performed a quasi-experimental study in two 500-bed hospitals. The blood-diversion device was implemented in the ED in hospital A, but not in hospital B, starting in January 2018. Preintervention data were collected over a 29-month baseline period, and postintervention data were collected for 20 months. Both hospitals provided ongoing feedback on contamination rates. Blood culture contamination was defined as presence of common skin microbiota (eg, coagulase-negative staphylococci) in only 1 of ≥2 blood culture sets collected within 24 hours. Preintervention and postintervention blood culture contamination rates were calculated based on total blood cultures collected and were compared within and between hospitals using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Changes in preintervention and postintervention total and ED contamination rates within hospitals were calculated as rate ratios (RRs) using interrupted time series (ITS) analysis with segmented Poisson regression. Results: Among 212,789 total blood cultures (hospital A, 70,005; hospital B, 142,784), 4,025 (1.8%) were contaminated. In hospital A, the intervention resulted in a decrease in overall median blood culture contamination rates (2.4% vs 1.4%; P < .001) and ED median blood culture contamination rates (4.7% vs 2.6%; P < .001), whereas in hospital B there was no significant change during the same period in overall (2.3% vs 2.0%) or ED (5.0% vs 5.0%) median blood culture contamination rates. In the ITS analysis, the intervention was associated with an immediate decrease in hospital A’s contamination rate by 21.3% (level change RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63–0.98; P = .04) overall and 21.0% (level change RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62–1.0; P =.06) in the ED. After the intervention, there was a continued decrease in hospital A’s overall (trend change RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93–0.97; P < .001) and ED (trend RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92–0.96; P < .001) blood culture contamination rates, but not in hospital B’s overall (trend change RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00–1.02; P = .01) or ED (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99–1.02; P = .30) blood culture contamination rates during the same period. Conclusions: Implementation of the blood diversion device in the ED resulted in a >20% relative reduction from a baseline of 5% of ED blood culture contamination rates. Continued improvement after implementation suggests ongoing efforts to address the workflow and the culture of safety are needed to optimize the use of this device.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Bacteriemia en pacientes adultos dados de alta en el servicio de urgencias

IntroductionBacteraemia is a marker of severity of infectious processes. However, sometimes in Emergency Department blood cultures are drawn from patients who are discharged without results being available. Material and methodsProspective study of bacteraemia was conducted on adult patients from Emergency Department of tertiary university hospital from March 2014 to February 2015. Epidemiological, clinical and microbiological data were collected from patients admitted and discharged. After the detection of bacteraemia, the microbiology department telephoned the physician responsible (patients admitted) or Primary Care physician (patients discharged). ResultsA total of 429 episodes of bacteraemia were included, of which 13.52% were discharged. These patients were younger (68.5 vs 73.59 years, P=.0001), had a lower Charlson index (1.603 vs 2.309, P=.0013) and lower severity (septic shock 0 vs 34; P<.0001) than admitted patients. After the call to Primary Care, oral antibiotics were started in 10.3%, a change in oral antibiotic in 6.9%, 12% were admitted to hospital, and the rest of them continued same treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. ConclusionsThere was a significant number of patients with bacteraemia were discharged from Emergency Department. To discharge a clinically stable patient with blood cultures taken in Emergency Department is safe, if there is a re-assessment of the patient if these cultures are positive.

Impact of an Institutional Guideline on the Care of Neonates at Risk for Herpes Simplex Virus in the Emergency Department.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is rare in neonates but carries significant morbidity and mortality in that group. Emergency department (ED) clinicians have little guidance to decide when to test for HSV and give acyclovir. We created an institutional guideline to provide guidance in patients younger than 6 weeks. Our objective was to evaluate whether guideline implementation affected the ED's decision to test for HSV, and ED use of HSV polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) and acyclovir. We reviewed charts for patients 1 year before implementation and 1 year after implementation of our guideline. Inclusion criteria were younger than 60 days, admitted through the ED, symptom onset younger than 6 weeks, and any one of the following criteria: (1) ED blood culture obtained, (2) ED or inpatient HSV PCR obtained, and (3) ED or inpatient acyclovir treatment. Premature patients and transfer patients were excluded. We compared whether the decision to initiate HSV testing, ED use of HSV PCRs, serum alanine aminotransferase, and acyclovir use changed post-guideline implementation. We reviewed 173 charts pre-implementation and 129 post-implementation. We found a significant decrease in ED testing for HSV among patients who did not meet guideline criteria (P < 0.01). We saw an improvement in the use of alanine aminotransferase among patients who met criteria for testing (P = 0.02), but no change in the use of HSV PCRs or acyclovir use among tested patients. Guideline implementation reduced HSV evaluations in low-risk patients, but did not improve test utilization or acyclovir administration among those tested. Additional work is needed to improve guideline utilization.

Reducing the contamination rate of emergency department blood cultures: 4 years experience from a district general emergency department

Reducing the contamination rate of emergency department blood cultures: 4 years experience from a district general emergency department

A Performance Improvement Project: Reducing Emergency Department Blood Culture Contamination Rate Using Six Sigma Methodology

The blood culture (BC) contamination rate in our hospital’s Emergency department (ED) was high in Calendar Year (CY) 2011 compared to the national benchmark of ≤ 3%. This led to increased health care costs, increased length of stay, over utilization of resources, unnecessary antibiotic use and physician dissatisfaction. The estimated additional cost of each contaminated BC is $5,000. We deployed Six Sigma Methodology to reduce our BC contamination rate in the ED.

Reducing Blood Culture Contamination in Community Hospital Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Intervention

Blood culture contamination is a common and preventable problem in the emergency department (ED). In a previous single-center study, changing the process of ED blood culture collection from the traditional "clean," nonsterile procedure to a fully sterile procedure with standardized use of sterile gloves, large-volume chlorhexidine skin antisepsis, and fenestrated sterile drapes resulted in a substantial reduction in contamination. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this sterile blood culture collection process for reducing blood culture contamination in two community hospital EDs. The authors implemented the sterile blood culture collection process in the ED of two hospitals, including Hospital A, which historically had a contamination rate of approximately 5%, and Hospital B, with a 2.5% historical contamination rate. With an interrupted times-series design and segmented regression analysis to adjust for secular trends and autocorrelation, the monthly percentages of cultures contaminated at each hospital during an intervention period (sterile technique) were compared to a 10-month baseline period immediately preceding implementation (clean technique). At Hospital A, the full sterile blood culture collection process was used throughout the 16-month intervention period. At Hospital B, user feedback indicated poor adherence to the process due to difficulty implementing the fenestrated drape component; therefore, the process was simplified to the modified sterile collection process, in which the fenestrated drape component was dropped and sterile gloves and large-volume skin antisepsis were emphasized. Hence, at Hospital B, two intervention periods were compared to the baseline period: the 8-month intervention period 1 (full sterile process) and the subsequent 8-month intervention period 2 (modified sterile process). At Hospital A, during the baseline period, 165 of 3,417 (4.83%) cultures were contaminated, while 142 of 5,238 (2.71%) were contaminated during the intervention period (p < 0.01). In the segmented regression model, the full sterile blood culture collection process was associated with an immediate 2.68% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43% to 3.52%) absolute reduction in contamination and sustained reductions during the entire intervention period. At Hospital B, during the baseline, 63 of 2,509 (2.51%) cultures were contaminated. In intervention period 1 with the full sterile process, 51 of 1,865 (2.73%) cultures were contaminated (p = 0.65), with segmented regression results showing no changes compared to baseline. After simplification of the process to address poor adherence, the modified sterile process during intervention period 2 was associated with a significant reduction in contamination, with 17 of 1,860 (0.91%) cultures contaminated (p < 0.01 compared to baseline). The segmented regression model demonstrated the modified sterile process was associated with an immediate 1.53% (95% CI = 1.00% to 1.88%) absolute reduction in contamination with significant sustained reductions. Changing the method of blood culture collection from the commonly used nonsterile technique to a sterile process resulted in significant reductions in blood culture contamination at two community hospital EDs, including one with low baseline contamination. Monitoring the implementation process at both sites was important to identify and overcome operational challenges. At one study site, simplification of the process by removing the fenestrated drape component was a key for successful implementation.

Reducing Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: An Interrupted Time Series Quality Improvement Study

Blood culture contamination is a common problem in the emergency department (ED) that leads to unnecessary patient morbidity and health care costs. The study objective was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement (QI) intervention for reducing blood culture contamination in an ED. The authors developed a QI intervention to reduce blood culture contamination in the ED and then evaluated its effectiveness in a prospective interrupted times series study. The QI intervention involved changing the technique of blood culture specimen collection from the traditional clean procedure to a new sterile procedure, with standardized use of sterile gloves and a new materials kit containing a 2% chlorhexidine skin antisepsis device, a sterile fenestrated drape, a sterile needle, and a procedural checklist. The intervention was implemented in a university-affiliated ED and its effect on blood culture contamination evaluated by comparing the biweekly percentages of blood cultures contaminated during a 48-week baseline period (clean technique) and 48-week intervention period (sterile technique), using segmented regression analysis with adjustment for secular trends and first-order autocorrelation. The goal was to achieve and maintain a contamination rate below 3%. During the baseline period, 321 of 7,389 (4.3%) cultures were contaminated, compared to 111 of 6,590 (1.7%) during the intervention period (p < 0.001). In the segmented regression model, the intervention was associated with an immediate 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2% to 3.2%) absolute reduction in contamination. The contamination rate was maintained below 3% during each biweekly interval throughout the intervention period. A QI assessment of ED blood culture contamination led to development of a targeted intervention to convert the process of blood culture collection from a clean to a fully sterile procedure. Implementation of this intervention led to an immediate and sustained reduction of contamination in an ED with a high baseline contamination rate.

Reducing False-Positive Peripheral Blood Cultures in a Pediatric Emergency Department

False-positive peripheral blood cultures due to contamination pose clinical and financial consequences for patients, families, and hospitals. Educating staff who draw peripheral blood cultures about hospital policy, using a blood culture-drawing kit, having a dedicated team obtaining peripheral blood cultures, and following up with staff who draw a contaminated peripheral blood cultures have been shown to reduce the rate of false-positive peripheral blood cultures. The objective of this study was to reduce the rate of false-positive peripheral blood cultures in a pediatric emergency department using the previously mentioned measures. This quality-improvement initiative used a retrospective chart-review approach to examine false-positive peripheral blood cultures drawn in 2009. In June 2010 a month-long education campaign about the initiative was conducted for nurses and clinical assistant staff to reduce false-positive peripheral blood cultures. From July 2010 through June 2011, monthly retrospective chart audits of false-positive peripheral blood cultures were completed in conjunction with bimonthly e-mail communication about the study, development of a blood culture-drawing kit, and follow-up with staff who drew the false-positive cultures. In 2009 the false-positive peripheral blood culture rate in the emergency department was 2.1%. After educational interventions and use of a blood culture-drawing kit, the rate of false-positive peripheral blood cultures decreased to 1.4%. The decline in contaminated blood cultures shows that the interventions described significantly reduced the rate of false-positive peripheral blood cultures in the emergency department.

Approach of Empirical Antibiotic Treatment: Analyzing Bacterial Resistance of Community-acquired Bacteremia

Nosocomial bacterial resistance has been advanced and well studied in Taiwan, but there were few reports describing the antibiotic susceptibility of community-acquired pathogens. Through collecting data from those who received blood cultures in emergency department, we presented an epidemiological study to analyze appropriate empirical therapy for the community-acquired bacteremia in Southern Taiwan. From July 1998 to June 1999, patients presented at emergency department of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital with fever, chills or symptoms of sepsis were routinely performed two sets of blood cultures. Those of positive blood cultures without prior admission history to the hospital within 2 weeks were further analyzed for the etiologic pathogens, antibiotic susceptibility, and risk factors of community-acquired bacteremia. A total of 303 episodes were enrolled for analysis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 76.3% of the isolates. Most of the community-acquired bacteremia was secondary bacteremia. Eighty-four percents of E. coli, 89% of K. pneumoniae, and 76% of S. aureus were susceptible to cefazolin. Susceptible rates of the three major pathogens to gentamicin were 72%, 92%, and 68% respectively. While treating community-acquired bacteremia in Southern Taiwan, the first generation antibiotic, cefazolin plus gentamicin, was effective in vitro for the majority of cases. However, since the community-acquired bacteremia is mostly secondary in origin, it is necessary to explore the underlying primary lesions to attain therapeutic success. Further on-going epidemiological surveillance on bacterial resistance of community-acquired bacteremia is necessary to provide evidence-based appropriateness of empirical therapy.

LIMITED USEFULNESS OF INITIAL BLOOD CULTURES IN ALL PATIENTS ADMITTED WITH PNEUMONIA IN A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL

PURPOSE: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) (as per core measure PN-3b) mandates that all pneumonia patients should have initial emergency department blood cultures done prior to administration of first dose of antibiotics. Our objective is to evaluate the usefulness and cost effectiveness of blood cultures on all patients admitted with pneumonia. We also wanted to see if there was a need to change antibiotics based on blood culture results.

133: Emergency Department Blood Cultures Have Limited Usefulness in the Management of Children Hospitalized for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

133: Emergency Department Blood Cultures Have Limited Usefulness in the Management of Children Hospitalized for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Who Needs a Blood Culture? A Prospectively Derived and Validated Prediction Rule

The study objective was to derive and validate a clinical decision rule for obtaining blood cultures in Emergency Department (ED) patients with suspected infection. This was a prospective, observational cohort study of consecutive adult ED patients with blood cultures obtained. The study ran from February 1, 2000 through February 1, 2001. Patients were randomly assigned to derivation (2/3) or validation (1/3) sets. The outcome was “true bacteremia.” Features of the history, co-morbid illness, physical examination, and laboratory testing were used to create a clinical decision rule. Among 3901 patients, 3730 (96%) were enrolled with 305 (8.2%) episodes of true bacteremia. A decision rule was created with “major criteria” defined as: temperature > 39.5°C (103.0°F), indwelling vascular catheter, or clinical suspicion of endocarditis. “Minor criteria” were: temperature 38.3–39.4°C (101–102.9°F), age > 65 years, chills, vomiting, hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg), neutrophil% > 80, white blood cell count > 18 k, bands > 5%, platelets < 150 k, and creatinine > 2.0. A blood culture is indicated by the rule if at least one major criterion or two minor criteria are present. Otherwise, patients are classified as “low risk” and cultures may be omitted. Only 4 (0.6%) low-risk patients in the derivation set and 3 (0.9%) low-risk patients in the validation set had positive cultures. The sensitivity was 98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96–100%) (derivation) and 97% (95% CI 94–100%) (validation). We developed and validated a promising clinical decision rule for predicting bacteremia in patients with suspected infection.

Do Emergency Department Blood Cultures Change Practice in Patients With Pneumonia?

Do Emergency Department Blood Cultures Change Practice in Patients With Pneumonia?

Do Emergency Department Blood Cultures Change Practice in Patients with Pneumonia?

Do Emergency Department Blood Cultures Change Practice in Patients with Pneumonia?

Do Emergency Department Blood Cultures Change Practice in Patients With Pneumonia?

Although it is considered standard of care to obtain blood cultures on patients hospitalized for pneumonia, several studies have questioned the utility and cost-effectiveness of this practice. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of emergency department (ED) blood cultures on antimicrobial therapy for patients with pneumonia. We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study of consecutive adult (age > or =18 years) patients treated at an urban university ED between February 1, 2000 and February 1, 2001. Inclusion criteria were radiographic evidence of pneumonia, clinical evidence of pneumonia, and blood culture obtained. Blood cultures were classified as positive, negative, or contaminant based on previously established criteria. Additionally, data were collected on antimicrobial sensitivities, empiric antibiotic therapy, antibiotic changes, and reasons for changes. There were 3,926 ED visits with blood cultures obtained for any reason, of which 3,762 (96%) were available for review. Of these, 414 of 3,762 (11%) patients met pneumonia study inclusion criteria, and blood cultures identified 29 of 414 (7.0%) patients with true bacteremia. In the 414 patients, blood culture results altered therapy for 15 patients (3.6%) with suspected pneumonia, of which 11 (2.7%) patients had their coverage narrowed; only 4 (1.0%) patients had their coverage broadened because of resistance to empiric therapy. For the 11 patients with bacteremia whose therapy was not altered, culture results actually supported narrowing therapy in 8 (1.9%) cases, but this was not done. Blood cultures rarely altered therapy for patients presenting to the ED with pneumonia. More discriminatory blood culture use may potentially reduce resource utilization.

Do emergency department blood cultures change practice in patients with pneumonia?

Do emergency department blood cultures change practice in patients with pneumonia?

Postinjury Shock and Early Bacteremia

Gut bacteria translocation has been invoked as a prime cause of early postinjury death. To examine this hypothesis, we obtained emergency department blood cultures in 132 acutely injured patients requiring urgent laparotomy for trauma. In the latter half of these patients, mesenteric lymph node and liver biopsy cultures were also performed. The incidence of early bacteremia was 11% (10/94) in the patients without shock compared with 32% (12/38) in the group with shock. The majority (73%) were gram-positive bacteremias. Most notably, Staphylococcus was isolated in 13% (5/38) of the patients with shock, but these isolates were of no apparent clinical significance. In contrast, 18% (7/38) of the patients with shock had enteric bacteremias, and all of these patients died. Cultures were positive in 11% of the liver samples and 15% of the mesenteric lymph nodes. With the exception of two patients with concurrent enteric bacteremias, these hepatic and mesenteric lymph node bacteria were of no clinical significance. In conclusion, bacterial translocation occurs infrequently, and virtually all enteric bacteria were found in dying patients; the cause or effect remains to be defined.