Emergency Abdominal Surgery Research Articles

MaskAppendix: Backbone-Enriched Mask R-CNN Based on Grad-CAM for Automatic Appendix Segmentation

Background: A leading cause of emergency abdominal surgery, appendicitis is a common condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Automatic and accurate segmentation of the appendix from medical imaging is a challenging task, due to its small size, variability in shape, and proximity to other anatomical structures. Methods: In this study, we propose a backbone-enriched Mask R-CNN architecture (MaskAppendix) on the Detectron platform, enhanced with Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), for precise appendix segmentation on computed tomography (CT) scans. In the proposed MaskAppendix deep learning model, ResNet101 network is used as the backbone. By integrating Grad-CAM into the MaskAppendix network, our model improves feature localization, allowing it to better capture subtle variations in appendix morphology. Results: We conduct extensive experiments on a dataset of abdominal CT scans, demonstrating that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in appendix segmentation, outperforming traditional segmentation techniques in terms of both accuracy and robustness. In the automatic segmentation of the appendix region in CT slices, a DSC score of 87.17% was achieved with the proposed approach, and the results obtained have the potential to improve clinical diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: This framework provides an effective tool for aiding clinicians in the diagnosis of appendicitis and other related conditions, reducing the potential for diagnostic errors and enhancing clinical workflow efficiency.

Timing of Stoma Closure in Neonates: the ToSCiN mixed-methods study.

Neonates undergoing emergency abdominal surgery frequently require a stoma; closing this stoma with a second operation is an essential part of recovery. Timing of closure varies. Optimal timing is unclear and would be best resolved through a randomised controlled trial; such a trial is likely to be challenging. To determine if it is feasible to conduct a clinical trial comparing 'early' versus 'late' stoma closure in neonates. Mixed methods comprising three parallel workstreams incorporating: a clinician survey, prospective observational cohort study, parent interviews, focus groups, database analyses and consensus meeting. Specialist neonatal surgical centres across the United Kingdom. Neonatologists, neonatal surgeons, neonatal dietitians and neonatal nurses who care for neonates with stomas. Neonates with recent stoma, their parents and the clinicians looking after them. Three existing, overlapping clinical databases. One hundred and sixty-six professionals from all 27 neonatal surgical centres completed the survey: 6 weeks was the most common target time for stoma closure across clinical scenarios, although there was wide variation. Timing of closure was influenced by nutrition, growth and stoma complications. The prospective cohort study enrolled 56 infants from 8 centres. Infants were mostly preterm with necrotising enterocolitis or intestinal perforation. Clinicians identified extreme preterm gestation and clinical conditions as reasons for not randomising babies into a hypothetical trial comparing early and late stoma closure. Parents and healthcare professionals identified that comparator arms needed more clinical flexibility in relation to timing of stoma closure. Analysis of existing databases revealed wide variation in current timing of stoma closure in neonates and identified approximately 300 eligible infants for a trial per annum in the United Kingdom. A trial of 'early' compared to 'late' stoma closure in neonates is feasible and is important to families and health professionals. The population of eligible babies in the United Kingdom is sufficient for such a trial. Challenges centre around lack of equipoise in certain scenarios, specifically: extremely preterm infants; infants waiting too long for stoma closure in the 'late' comparator; and logistical issues in closing a stoma at a trial-allocated time. These challenges are addressable by incorporating flexibility based on gestation at birth, communicating that both trial arms are standard practice and valid treatment options, and providing resources, for example, for operating lists. We recommend the following population, intervention, comparator and outcome as a starting point to inform future trial design. Population: neonates with stomas (excluding those with a fixed treatment pathway). Intervention: stoma closure at 6 weeks and after 32 weeks post conceptual age. Comparator: expectant management with stoma closure undertaken when the clinical team determines is best for the infant. Primary outcomes: weight gain/growth or length of hospital stay. This study is registered as IRAS Project ID 278331, REC Reference 20/LO/1227. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128617) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 71. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Review of the treatment options and results of earthquake-related pelvic injuries after the Türkiye earthquake on 6th February.

The aim of this study was to review the characteristics and classifications of pelvic injuries due to earthquake trauma, to determine the treatment options and outcomes, and to present the experiences of our single trauma center. Sixty patients (23 male, 37 female) who underwent surgical treatment for pelvic ring injuries after the earthquake were analyzed in this study. Demographic data, such as age and gender, operations, and fracture details were recorded. Laboratory results and the amount of blood used were included in the analysis. Fractures were classified according to the Young-Burgess classification. Surgical treatment methods, side of injury, accompanying injuries, and treatment results were analyzed using SPSS software. Left-sided trauma was the most common mechanism of injury, with 36 patients (60%) sustaining left-sided pelvic fractures. Pelvic ring fractures were detected in 78.3% of patients, and combined acetabulum and pelvic ring fractures were identified in 21.7% of patients. Thoracic trauma and extra-pelvic fractures were seen in 12 (20%) and 18 (30%) patients, respectively. Twenty percent of patients underwent emergency abdominal surgery prior to pelvic surgery. Complications were observed in 7 patients (11.6%) in the early period. The average amount of blood used for patients was 2.91 U (min: 0, max: 13 U, SD: 2.66). This study has shown us that lateral compression injuries are more common, and that low hemoglobin levels, high inflammation parameters, previous abdominal surgery, accompanying fractures, and lung injury are the main characteristics of patients with earthquake-related pelvic injuries. It also demonstrates that for the optimal use of materials and implants, experience in different techniques is required, and shows the significant need for blood transfusions in the treatment of these injuries. Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.

The number of patients living with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has gradually increased in the past decade. Non-cardiac surgery (NCS) in patients with LVAD poses a unique situation with its inherent challenges. We conducted a comprehensive review to investigate the perioperative complications and mortality associated with emergent or elective NCS in patients with LVAD. A comprehensive literature search for any papers referring to continuous LVAD patients with NCS. All publications with at least five durable LVAD patients who had NCS were eligible for inclusion. Twenty articles matching our criteria were found and included in our study. This systematic review included 6,476 LVAD patients who underwent 6,824 NCS. There were 5-3,216 LVAD patients with NCS in each study. The median age was between 39 and 65 years, and most of the patients (78.8%) were male. Thirty-day postoperative mortality ranged from 0% to 60%. Eight studies reported no death within the 30 days of the operation. Common complications include gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, intracranial bleeding, infection, acute kidney injury (AKI), urinary tract infection (UTI), stroke, sepsis, pneumonia, and VAD exchange. Emergent abdominal surgery had the highest (up to 60%) mortality rate, and vascular and neurological operations had the highest complication rates. Due to the diverse range of patients in each publication and the combination of outcomes presented in various publications, a meta-analysis was not conducted. In LVAD patients, noncardiac surgery may be performed effectively and safely. LVAD patients who undergo non-cardiac surgery may require more transfusions due to their complex coagulopathies. However, perioperative management of LVAD patients undergoing emergent NCS should be optimized to reduce mortality. https://osf.io/fetsb/.

Organization of abdominal emergency surgical care across healthcare services in Senegal: a cross-sectional nationwide survey

IntroductionStudying surgical services and the workforce in sub-Saharan Africa is crucial for enhancing access to quality surgical care in the region. Despite many recommendations to produce evidence based on reliable data on this subject to guide policymakers, there is still a knowledge gap on this topic. The aim of this nationwide survey was to describe the organization of abdominal emergency surgical care across healthcare services in Senegal.MethodologyThis was a cross-sectional nationwide survey. The study period was between October 1st, 2023, and January 20th, 2024. The target population included all registered healthcare facilities in Senegal offering emergency surgical services. A structured questionnaire was designed to gather infrastructure-related data, surgical activities, and human resources.ResultsAll 33 identified healthcare facilities responded to the survey (100%). Emergency abdominal surgery services were available for 96.7% of the surveyed structures. The teams were mainly composed of surgeons and residents (45.2%) or surgeons and medical trainees (48.8%). The average bed capacity of the services was 21.9, with a standard deviation of 13.9. The absence of a dedicated hospitalization section for patients requiring special monitoring was found in 69.6% of the facilities. Operating rooms dedicated to emergency abdominal digestive surgery were present in 54.6% of the services. On average, the services performed 17.6 scheduled surgical interventions with a standard deviation of 11.5 and 29.7 emergency surgical interventions with a standard deviation of 16.8 per month. Morbidity and mortality conferences were not routinely held in the majority of departments (only 27.3%). Professional development programmes were present only in 24.2% of departments. Most of the departments did not have adequate human resources (69.6%). A total of 70 surgeons were identified, resulting in a national ratio of 0.39 general surgeons per 100,000 inhabitants. The strategies employed to address staff shortages included additional working hour by staff (54.5%), temporary workers (30.3%) or the use of trainee doctors or nurses (12.1%).ConclusionThis research shows that significant deficiencies are present in the essential physical and human resources needed to conduct fundamental life-saving surgical procedures. These findings suggest potential areas for improvement in the delivery of emergency surgical care in the region.

Extracted Plasma Cell-Free DNA Concentrations Are Elevated in Colic Patients with Systemic Inflammation.

Colic is a common and potentially life-threatening condition in horses; in many cases, it remains challenging for clinicians to determine the cause, appropriate treatment, and prognosis. One approach that could improve patient care and outcomes is identification of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a biomarker that shows promise for characterizing disease severity and predicting survival in humans with acute abdominal pain or requiring emergency abdominal surgery. In horses, we recently determined that extracted plasma cfDNA concentrations are elevated in colic patients compared to healthy controls. For this current study, we hypothesized that extracted plasma cfDNA concentrations would be significantly higher in horses with strangulating or inflammatory colic lesions, in colic patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and in non-survivors. Cell-free DNA concentrations were measured in extracted plasma samples using a compact, portable Qubit fluorometer. Colic patients that met published criteria for equine SIRS had significantly higher median extracted plasma cfDNA compared to non-SIRS colic patients. There were no significant differences in extracted plasma cfDNA concentrations between other groups of interest. Our data offer early evidence that extracted plasma cfDNA concentration may provide information about systemic inflammation in colic patients, and additional research is warranted to expand on these findings.

A Prospective Observational Study to Assess the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and C-reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio (CAR) in Predicting Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery.

Background Emergency abdominal surgeries pose significant challenges, especially in the Indian population, due to comorbidities, delayed presentations, and limited resources. Accurately predicting morbidity and mortality is crucial for timely interventions and improved patient care. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) have shown potential as prognostic markers, balancing inflammation and nutritional status. Aim The study aims to evaluate the predictive efficacy of NLR and CAR with regard to postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, thereby contributing to better risk stratification and management strategies. Patients and methods A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospitalin northern Karnatakafrom August 2022 to June 2024, involving 102 patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgeries. The sample size (71) was calculated using G*Power software, targeting a 95% power with a 5% significance level. The inclusion criterion was patients aged over 18 years undergoing emergency abdominal surgeries;those who were immunocompromised, on steroid therapy, having malignancies,undergoing radiotherapy, or having chronic liver diseases were excluded from the study. Patients coming into the surgical inpatient department (IPD) with an acute abdomen requiring emergency abdominal surgeries as an emergency were preoperatively assessed using complete blood count (CBC), CRP, and serum albumin tests. NLR and CAR were evaluated preoperatively and at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. The outcome measures included surgical site infection rates, hospital stay duration, and outcomein the form of recovery or death. SPSS version 20 was used for statistical analyses. Results The study included 102 patients whose mean age was 43.7 ± 18.9 years; 74 of the participants (72.5%) were male. The most common procedures were exploratory laparotomy (64 patients; 62.7%) and appendicectomy (32 patients; 31.4%). A significant increase in CAR levels was observed on postoperative days 1 and 2 compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Preoperative NLR ≥ 8 was significantly associated with higher mortality (65% vs. 50%, p < 0.01). Preoperative albumin > 3.2 g/dL was associated with better outcomes (recovery in54 patients; 65.9%) compared to < 3.2 g/dL (15 patients; 75% mortality). This study showed that NLR and CAR are valuable predictors of postoperative outcomes, with CAR indicating the risk for surgical site infections (SSI) and NLR predicting mortality. Conclusion The preoperative NLR had a significant association with mortality among the patients. Hence the NLR can be a good marker for the worst outcome and CAR during the postoperative period can be considered as a marker to detect the risk of SSI. NLR and CAR are simple, inexpensive tests readily available from routine blood investigations. The utility of NLR and CAR as valuable prognostic markers in the perioperative assessment of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery could enhance the prediction of patient outcomes and guide more effective management strategies to improve patient outcomes in high-risk emergency abdominal surgery.

Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature

BackgroundsLaparoscopic surgery is widely used in abdominal emergency surgery (AES), and the possibility of extending this approach to the more recent robotic surgery (RS) arouses great interest. The slow diffusion of robotic technology mainly due to high costs and the longer RS operative time when compared to laparoscopy may represent disincentives, especially in AES. This study aims to report our experience in the use of RS in AES assessing its safety and feasibility, with particular focus on intra- and post-operative complications, conversion rate, and surgical learning curve. Our data were also compared to other experiences though an extensive literature review.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed a single surgeon series of the last 10 years. From January 2014 to December 2023, 36 patients underwent urgent or emergency RS. The robotic devices used were Da Vinci Si (15 cases) and Xi (21 cases).Results36 (4.3%) out of 834 robotic procedures were included in our analysis: 20 (56.56%) females. The mean age was 63 years and 30% of patients were ≥ 70 years. 2 (5.55%) procedures were performed at night. No conversions to open were reported in this series. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 2 (5.5%) major complications were collected. Intraoperative and 30-day mortality were 0%.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that RS may be a useful and reliable approach also to AES and intraoperative laparoscopic complications when performed in selected hemodynamically stable patients in very well-trained robotic centers. The technology may increase the minimally invasive use and conversion rate in emergent settings in a completely robotic or hybrid approach.

Enhanced recovery after surgery and intestinal obstruction: A scoping review.

Acute intestinal obstruction is a blockage of the intestine which causes a range of clinical symptoms such as acute and severe abdominal pain, nausea, and obstipation. Intestinal obstruction is a medical emergency and can be life-threatening when left untreated. In cases where treatment involves emergency abdominal surgery, a multimodal perioperative care pathway (enhanced recovery after surgery ERAS) has shown to accelerate patient recovery after surgery, reduce hospital length of stay, and improve overall outcomes. The objective of this scoping review was to identify and synthesize the existing evidence regarding the implementation of ERAS components with a focus on postoperative components in patients undergoing surgery for acute intestinal obstruction. This scoping review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews framework. PubMed-Medline and Embase database were searched. The search identified 1860 studies of which 16 were included in the final analysis. All the studies were quantitative. Eleven studies used 10 or more ERAS interventions (range 10-28). The most common interventions were multimodal systemic analgesia, and the least common were the management of blood glucose and screening tools. This scoping review found that 56% (n=9/16) of the identified studies used 10 or more ERAS interventions out of a possible 35. This review highlighted the need for studies on the ERAS emergency laparotomy guidelines.

Comparative Rates of Stroke and Rehospitalization of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation Following Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery and Patients with Non-perioperative Atrial Fibrillation.

Major emergency abdominal surgery is associated with postoperative complications and high mortality. Long-term outcomes in patients with perioperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) have recently received increased attention, especially POAF in non-thoracic surgery. This study aimed to compare long-term AF related hospitalization and stroke in patients with POAF in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery and in patients with non-perioperative AF. We crosslinked data from Danish nationwide registries and identified all patients who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery (2000-2018) and were diagnosed with POAF, and patients who developed AF in a non-perioperative setting. Patients with POAF were matched in a 1:5 ratio on age, sex, year of AF diagnosis and oral anticoagulation (OAC) status at the beginning of follow-up with patients with non-perioperative AF. From discharge, we examined adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of stroke using multivariable Cox regression analysis. The study population comprised 1,041 (out of 42,021 who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery) patients with POAF and 5,205 patients with non-perioperative AF. The median age was 78 years [interquartile range: 71-84] for those initiated on OAC therapy and 78 years [interquartile range: 71-85] for those not initiated on OAC therapy. During the first year of follow up, POAF was associated with similar rates of stroke as non-perioperative AF (patients initiated on OAC: HR 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.77) and patients not initiated on OAC: HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.41-1.15). POAF in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery was associated with similar rates of stroke as non-perioperative AF. These results suggest that POAF not only carry an acute burden but also a long-term burden in patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery.

Emergency Abdominal Surgery in Children With COVID-19: An National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Propensity Score Matched Analysis

IntroductionEvidence suggests that coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with increased perioperative mortality in adults. We hypothesized that children with COVID-19 had worse outcomes after emergency surgery compared to children without COVID-19. MethodsChildren <18 y who underwent emergency abdominal surgery were included in the 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Children with COVID-19 diagnosed preoperatively were identified. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed, matching demographic and clinical factors. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were assessed. Due to event rarity, a composite outcome for postoperative morbidity was also assessed. Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests identified differences between groups. Logistic regression identified the odds of the composite morbidity outcome. ResultsOverall, 13,619 children (median age 10.8 y, interquartile range: 6.4-14.2) underwent emergency abdominal surgery, of whom 224 (1.6%) had COVID-19. The majority were female (58.2%), White (61.3%), and non-Hispanic (53.4%). On unadjusted analysis, there was an association between COVID-19 status and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P < 0.01). A greater proportion of COVID-19-positive children had dirty/infected wounds (30.4% versus 22.2%, P < 0.01). Also, a greater proportion of COVID-19-positive children suffered cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1.3% versus 0.2%, P < 0.01). Matched cohorts of 224 COVID-19-positive and 224 COVID-19-negative children did not differ by demographic or clinical factors (P > 0.05). Propensity score matching did not reveal significant differences in postoperative morbidity or mortality. Children with COVID-19 did not demonstrate increased odds of morbidity analyzed as a composite outcome (odds ratio: 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.29-1.48, P = 0.31). ConclusionsContrary to findings in adults, COVID-19 was not associated with worse clinical outcomes in children undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.

Trauma patients with metastatic cancer undergoing emergent surgery: A matched cohort analysis

BackgroundThere is a paucity of literature guiding trauma surgeons in the care of patients with active metastatic cancer (MC). Even less is known regarding outcomes for MC patients requiring emergent surgery after trauma. We hypothesized that trauma patients with active Metastatic Cancer (MC) have an increased mortality rate and undergo increased rates of withdrawal of care (WoC) within 72-hours following emergent operations, compared to similarly matched patients without MC. MethodsPatients with active MC at the time of traumatic injury were matched 1:2 against patients without active MC based on demographics, comorbidities, vital signs on admission, and injury profile. ResultsFrom 43,826 patients, 0.2 % had MC. After matching 39 MC patients to 78 without MC, there was no difference in demographics, comorbidities, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, vitals on admission (blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate) and need for blood transfusion (all p > 0.05). Compared to patients without MC, patients with MC had higher rates and associated risk of death during index hospitalization (38.5 % vs. 15.2 %, p = 0.005; OR 3.49, CI 1.43–8.51, p = 0.006), as well as a higher rate and associated risk of WoC within 72-hours (12.8 % vs. 1.3 %, p = 0.007; OR 11.47, CI 1.29–101.93, p = 0.029). ConclusionTrauma patients with MC requiring emergent thoracic or abdominal surgery have a high risk of death and an over ten-fold higher associated risk for WoC within the first three days. In some cases, palliative care consultation should be considered, and counseling should be offered to this high-risk trauma population to enable individualized and patient-centric decisions. Key messageThis research highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary team consisting of trauma surgeons, oncologist, and palliative care physicians in caring for the high-risk trauma patients with disseminated cancer requiring urgent surgery.

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T and Frailty Predict Short-Term Mortality in Patients ≥75 Years Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.

An elevated cardiac troponin concentration is a prognostic factor for perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. In elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, frailty is a recognized risk factor, but little is known about the prognostic value of cardiac troponin in these vulnerable patients. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic significance of elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration and frailty in a cohort of elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. We included consecutive patients ≥75 years of age who presented for emergency abdominal surgery, defined as abdominal pathology requiring surgery within 72 hours, in a university hospital in Norway. Patients who underwent vascular procedures or palliative surgery for inoperable malignancies were excluded. Preoperatively, frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and blood samples were measured for hs-cTnT. We evaluated the predictive power of CFS and hs-cTnT concentrations using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox proportional hazard regression with 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included (1) a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or coronary revascularization; and (2) 90-day mortality. Of the 210 screened and 156 eligible patients, blood samples were available in 146, who were included. Troponin concentration exceeded the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) in 83% and 89% of the patients pre- and postoperatively. Of the participants, 53% were classified as vulnerable or frail (CFS ≥4). The 30-day mortality rate was 12% (18 of 146). Preoperatively, a threshold of hs-cTnT ≥34 ng/L independently predicted 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-9.45), and the composite outcome of 30-day mortality and MACE (HR 2.58, 95% CI, 1.07-6.49). In this model, frailty (continuous CFS score) also independently predicted 30-day mortality (HR 1.42, 95% CI, 1.01-2.00) and 30-day mortality or MACE (HR 1.37, 95% CI, 1.02-1.84). The combination of troponin and frailty, 0.14 × hs-cTnT +4.0 × CFS, yielded apparent superior predictive power (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC] 0.79, 95% CI, 0.68-0.88), compared to troponin concentration (AUC 0.69, 95% CI, 0.55-0.83) or frailty (AUC 0.69, 95% CI, 0.57-0.82) alone. After emergency abdominal surgery in elderly patients, increased preoperative troponin concentration and frailty were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. The combination of increased troponin concentration and frailty seemed to provide better prognostic information than troponin or frailty alone. These results must be validated in an independent sample.

First do no harm: Predicting futility of intervention in geriatric emergency general surgery

BackgroundEmergent surgical conditions are common in geriatric patients, often necessitating major operative procedures on frail patients. Understanding risk profiles is crucial for decision-making and establishing goals of care. MethodsWe queried NSQIP 2015–2019 for patients ≥65 years undergoing open abdominal surgery for emergency general surgery conditions. Logistic regression was used to identify 30-day mortality predictors. ResultsOf 41,029 patients, 5589 (13.6 ​%) died within 30 days of admission. The highest predictors of mortality were ASA status 5 (aOR 9.7, 95 ​% CI,3.5–26.8, p ​< ​0.001), septic shock (aOR 4.9, 95 ​% CI,4.5–5.4, p ​< ​0.001), and dialysis (aOR 2.1, 95 ​% CI,1.8–2.4, p ​< ​0.001). Without risk factors, mortality rates were 11.9 ​% after colectomy and 10.2 ​% after small bowel resection. Patients with all three risk factors had a mortality rate of 79.4 ​% and 100 ​% following colectomy and small bowel resection, respectively. ConclusionsIn older adults undergoing emergent open abdominal surgery, septic shock, ASA status, and dialysis were strongly associated with futility of surgical intervention. These findings can inform goals of care and informed decision-making.

Evaluation of Possum and P Possum Scoring Systems in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgeries

Evaluation of Possum and P Possum Scoring Systems in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgeries

Predictors of emergency abdominal surgery for patients aged 90 years or older: A retrospective study

BackgroundWith the aging of the population, more and more patients ≥90 years old are undergoing surgery. We retrospectively examined factors affecting morbidity and in-hospital mortality among patients ≥90 years old who underwent emergency abdominal operations. Materials and methodsForty-six cases of emergency abdominal surgery for patients ≥90 years old who underwent surgery at our hospital between 2011 and 2022 were included in this study. Factors affecting morbidity and in-hospital mortality were analyzed statistically. Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM)-predicted morbidity and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM)-predicted mortality were calculated. ResultsPostoperative complications occurred in 30 patients (65.2 %) and 5 patients (10.8 %) died in the hospital. Factors affecting morbidity included American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, operative time and blood loss, and operative severity score. Multivariate analysis identified male sex, operative severity score, and length of hospital stay as factors affecting morbidity. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and physiological score were identified as factors influencing mortality in hospital, and only physiological score was identified in the multivariate analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for POSSUM-predicted morbidity was 0.796 and area under the ROC curve for P-POSSUM-predicted mortality was 0.805, both of which were moderately accurate. ConclusionRisk of emergency abdominal surgery in patients ≥90 years old may be predictable to some extent, and we are able to provide convincing explanations to patients and families based on these data.

Venous thrombosis and embolism in surgical hospital patients in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic

Background. Venous thrombosis and embolism are one of the main and most threatening complications in emergency abdominal surgery in the conditions of global pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2, which is constantly worsening the morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the accumulation of sufficient knowledge on the problem of venous thromboembolism in general, understanding the unique prothrombotic pathophysiology of the virus and its potentiation of the coagulation system in patients with COVID-19 remains at a suboptimal level. The purpose of the study is to assess the extent of venous thrombosis in patients undergoing emergency surgery for abdominal pathology with concomitant coronavirus disease and to determine the main measures to improve the effectiveness of prevention and treatment. Materials and methods. The results of the treatment of 3,476 patients in the Surgical center 1 of the CNPE of the Lviv Territorial Medical Union “Multidisciplinary Clinical Hospital of Intensive Treatment Methods and Emergency Medical Care” from April 2021 to March 2022 were analyzed, 89.3 % of them were hospitalized urgently. One hundred and fifty-nine (4.6 %) patients died, mainly from purulent-septic complications, multi-organ (primarily severe respiratory) failure and venous thrombosis and embolism. Results. Non-specific prevention of venous thrombosis and embolism was carried out in all patients. It consisted in elastic compression of the legs before transporting the patient to the operating room and early ambulation after surgery. Adequate analgesia and assistance from medical staff were considered an important component of motor activity recovery. Specific prevention of venous thrombosis was carried out by subcutaneous injection of low-molecular-weight heparins once or twice a day. With the beginning of the pandemic and a sharp rise of thromboembolic complications, a longer prophylaxis with increased dose and frequency of anticoagulant administration began to be used in clinical practice. Conclusions. Unresolved issues that stood in the way of optimizing the prevention of venous thrombosis and embolism in the clinic are the new challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, insufficient alertness of doctors to the problem of thromboembolic complications, difficulties in objective assessment of the risk of deep vein thrombosis in the presence of many factors, absence of scales for evaluating the risk of venous thrombosis adapted to today’s conditions.

Urgency adjusted outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are a complex cohort who are relatively poorly represented in published literature. This is partly due to the lack of consensus of the definition of the term emergency in IBD surgery. There is ongoing and recent work defining clinical urgency for unplanned surgical procedures and categorizing the high-risk surgical patient. This paper aims to report the difference in patient metrics and risks as recorded by the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA). Complete patient data, including histology, were available in the NELA database between 2013 and 2016. Urgency categories recorded by NELA are <2h, 2-6h, 6-18h, and >18h. Patient characteristics, physiology, biochemistry, and outcomes are reported according to these urgency categories with regression analysis used to compare differences between them. Mortality in Crohn's disease (CD) ranged from 1.4% in the >18h urgency to 14.6% in the most urgent. In ulcerative colitis (UC), this range was from 3.1% to 14.8%. In both CD and UC, there were significant trends in hemodynamic instability, serum white cell count, serum electrolytes and creatinine, and outcome measures length of stay and unplanned return to theater. Patients having emergency surgery for IBD are not a single cohort when considering physiology, blood biochemistry, or most importantly, outcomes. Risk counseling and management should reflect this. Hemodynamic changes are subtle and may be missed in this cohort.

Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative adhesion mapping by ultrasonography for laparoscopic surgery in patients with past abdominal surgery with special reference to loose adhesion.

Endoscopic surgery is widely accepted for both elective and emergent abdominal surgery. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of preoperative adhesion mapping by abdominal ultrasonography (US). Intra-abdominal intestinal adhesions on the abdominal wall in 50 patients with a history of abdominal surgery were prospectively assessed by the visceral slide test with US before laparoscopic surgery from 2019 to 2022. Adhesion was assessed in six separate abdominal zones during US. Actual adhesion on the abdominal wall was confirmed during laparoscopic surgery. The sliding distances in upper right, upper central, upper left, lower right, lower central, and lower left zones in patients with versus without intestinal adhesion were 4.4 versus 1.4 cm (P = .004), 3.4 versus 2.5 cm, 4.3 versus 1.3 cm (P = .011), 3.1 versus 1.5 cm (P = .0014), 3.3 versus 1.1 cm (P = .013), and 3.4 versus 0.8 cm (P = .0061), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the optimal value of sliding distance as 2.5 cm and the area under the curve as 0.86. The specificity of US assessment of adhesion was lower in the central zone than in lateral zones. Loose adhesion mostly seen around the scar was attributed to either filmy tissue or omental adhesion, leading to visceral sliding during US. This study revealed the reason for insufficient accuracy of preoperative US assessment of intestinal adhesion around the scar area because of loose adhesion. The upper lateral area might be optimal for first port insertion.

Surgical and Pre-surgical Factors Affecting Appendectomy Outcomes in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Record Review.

Appendectomy is the preferred treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis and the most common emergency abdominal surgery. While previous studies have investigated variables affecting post-appendectomy complications, local research is limited, and data on complication rates are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate appendectomy outcomes and the factors influencing them. This retrospective record review included all patients who underwent appendectomies at our center between 2013 and 2023, excluding those who underwent appendectomies as part of other procedures. Data were retrieved from the hospital database and recorded on predesigned Google Forms. A total of 556 patients were included. Complications occurred in 60 patients (10.8%); the most common included intra-abdominal collections (n=19, 3.4%), postoperative fever (n=13, 2.3%), and surgical site infections (n=11, 2.0%). The most frequently documented histopathological diagnoses included acute appendicitis (n=402, 72.3%), perforated appendicitis (n=109, 19.6%), and gangrenous appendicitis (n=19, 4.4%). Surgical site infection rates were higher after open appendectomies (6.0% vs. 0.9%, P=0.006), while intra-abdominal collections were more frequent after laparoscopic appendectomies (4.1% vs. 0.0%, P=0.095). Additionally, histopathology results showing complicated or chronic appendicitis were associated with higher complication rates (P<0.001, odds ratio=3.793, 95% confidence interval=1.957-7.350). To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective review of appendectomy cases in Saudi Arabia. However, this study was conducted in a tertiary care center, which may have caused the rates of complications to appear lower than those in primary centers. We recommend a multi-center study be conducted to establish more accurate results.