Emergence Of Artemisinin Resistance Research Articles

The global challenge of antimalarial drug resistance

The continued geographic expansion of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin derivatives is an urgent public health concern. The last decade has witnessed dramatic progress in global malaria control and elimination efforts, in large part because of the scale-up of vector control interventions and improved access to effective antimalarials, especially artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). Malaria cases have fallen by >50% in 43 countries since 2001. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have declined by >25% globally, and by >33% in the WHO African Region. Malaria patients worldwide are dependent on the efficacy of ACTs. In 2010, more than 180 million ACT treatment courses were procured for the public sector alone. Resistance to artemisinins was first confirmed on the Cambodia-Thailand border in late 2006, and reported in 2008. The first containment project - the Artemisinin Resistance Containment and Elimination (ARCE) project -was funded by BMGF and coordinated by WHO-GMP; it ran from late2008-2011. The project did not eliminate malaria from the affected area; however, active case detection, strengthened community case management and better vector control did result in a sustained and dramatic reduction in Plasmodium falciparum burden. To mobilize global and local stakeholders for containment and ultimately elimination of artemisinin resistance, WHO, together with RBM, launched the Global Plan for Artemisinin Resistance Containment (GPARC) in January 2011. The GPARC defines priorities to contain or eliminate artemisinin resistance where it already exists, or to prevent it where it has not yet appeared. While strong country-level activities are the central building blocks in the response, artemisinin resistance does not respect national boundaries. Resistance has generally been identified in areas with high numbers of migrants and close to national borders. Consequently, national responses to the threat of resistance are not sufficient; strong regional coordination is crucial. Despite the emergence of artemisinin resistance in the Greater Mekong subregion, ACTs remain the most effective treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria; most patients with delayed response are cured if the partner drug remains effective. However, mefloquine resistance is widespread in Thailand and Cambodia, and piperaquine resistance may have emerged in Western Cambodia, limiting the number of treatment options for uncomplicated malaria. In addition to the existing foci, there is growing evidence of resistance to artemisinin, as defined by delayed parasite clearance times in south-eastern Myanmar and southern and central Vietnam. It is not known if these new foci represent spread or de novo emergence of artemisinin resistance. In response to new data, containment efforts have been started in western Thailand, south-eastern Myanmar and Vietnam. These new programmes will draw on the lessons learned during the containment project in Cambodia and Thailand. In addition, routine monitoring must be strengthened for the early detection of artemisinin resistance, ensure that recommended first-line ACTs are effective, and that timely changes in treatment policies can be made. Many aspects of artemisinin resistance are still not well understood. Consequently, there is an urgent need for further research to refine our knowledge of artemisinin resistance, including the identification of molecular markers and better in vitro sensitivity tests. These efforts require full funding to ensure that artemisinin resistance does not spread and compromise global success in malaria control and elimination.

Optimal sampling designs for accurate estimation of parasite clearance in the context of artemisinin resistance

Background The emergence of artemisinin resistance in South East Asia threatens the efficacy of artemisinin derivatives (AD). Since the pharmacodynamic hallmark of AD is rapid parasite clearance, the clinical phenotype of slow clearance characterises resistance. This indicator remains critically important to monitor the extent of the problem in the absence of molecular marker(s) associated with artemisinin resistance and lack of sensitivity of current in vitro tests. Frequent parasite counts are needed to define clearance rate but it is uncertain what sampling frequency is required to ensure reliable estimates.

Poor-quality antimalarial drugs in southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa

Poor-quality antimalarial drugs lead to drug resistance and inadequate treatment, which pose an urgent threat to vulnerable populations and jeopardise progress and investments in combating malaria. Emergence of artemisinin resistance or tolerance in Plasmodium falciparum on the Thailand-Cambodia border makes protection of the effectiveness of the drug supply imperative. We reviewed published and unpublished studies reporting chemical analyses and assessments of packaging of antimalarial drugs. Of 1437 samples of drugs in five classes from seven countries in southeast Asia, 497 (35%) failed chemical analysis, 423 (46%) of 919 failed packaging analysis, and 450 (36%) of 1260 were classified as falsified. In 21 surveys of drugs from six classes from 21 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, 796 (35%) of 2297 failed chemical analysis, 28 (36%) of 77 failed packaging analysis, and 79 (20%) of 389 were classified as falsified. Data were insufficient to identify the frequency of substandard (products resulting from poor manufacturing) antimalarial drugs, and packaging analysis data were scarce. Concurrent interventions and a multifaceted approach are needed to define and eliminate criminal production, distribution, and poor manufacturing of antimalarial drugs. Empowering of national medicine regulatory authorities to protect the global drug supply is more important than ever.

Evolution of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance: implications for the development and containment of artemisinin resistance

Malaria is a protozoan disease transmitted by the bite of the Anopheles mosquito. Among five species that can infect humans, Plasmodium falciparum is responsible for the most severe human malaria. Resistance of P. falciparum to chloroquine and pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine, conventionally used antimalarial drugs, is already widely distributed in many endemic areas. As a result, artemisinin-based combination therapies have been rapidly and widely adopted as first-line antimalarial treatments since the mid-2000s. Recent population and evolutionary genetic analyses have proven that the geographic origins of parasite lineages resistant to the conventional drugs are considerably limited. Almost all resistance emerged from either Southeast Asia or South America. The Greater Mekong subregion in Southeast Asia is probably the most alarming source of resistance, from which P. falciparum resistant to chloroquine and pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine dispersed to Africa. The emergence of artemisinin resistance has also recently been confirmed in the Greater Mekong. The WHO Global Malaria Programme has recently launched a "Global Plan for Artemisinin Resistance Containment," which aims to prevent the spread of artemisinin resistance while also stopping the emergence of novel resistance. However, an inadequate understanding of a mechanism of artemisinin resistance and the lack of reliable genetic markers to monitor artemisinin resistance make it difficult to survey the spread of resistance. Elucidation of such markers would substantially contribute to the design of an effective policy for the containment of artemisinin resistance.

Recent clinical and molecular insights into emerging artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) have been deployed globally with remarkable success for more than 10 years without having lost their malaria treatment efficacy. However, recent reports from the Thai-Cambodian border reveal evidence of emerging resistance to artemisinins. The latest published clinical and molecular findings are summarized herein. Clinical studies have identified delayed parasite clearance time as the most robust marker of artemisinin resistance. Resistance has only been documented from South-east Asia and has been observed in isolates that show no significant decrease in drug susceptibility in vitro. Genetic investigations have yet to uncover robust molecular markers. In-vitro studies have identified parasite quiescence or dormancy mechanisms that protect early 'ring-stage' intra-erythrocytic parasites against short-term artemisinin exposure. This might be achieved by reducing the rate of hemoglobin degradation, important for artemisinin bioactivation. Should ACTs fail, no suitable alternatives exist as first-line treatments of P. falciparum malaria. Intensified efforts are essential to monitor the spread of resistance, define therapeutic and operational strategies to counter its impact, and understand its molecular basis. Success in these areas is critical to ensuring that recent gains in reducing the burden of malaria are not lost.

Assessment of the efficacy of first-line antimalarial drugs after 5 years of deployment by the National Malaria Control Programme in Côte d'Ivoire

Correspondence: Andre T Offianan Malariology Department, Institut Pasteur de Cote d’Ivoire, PO Box 490, Abidjan 01, Cote d’Ivoire Tel +225 22 44 84 25 Fax +225 22 48 53 05 Email andre_offianan@yahoo.fr Background: The emergence of artemisinin resistance has raised concerns that the most potent antimalarial drug may be under threat. Artesunate + amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemetherlumefantrine (AL) are respectively the firstand second-line treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cote d’Ivoire. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of these two drug combinations was necessary to make evidence-based drug treatment policies. Methods: In an open-label, non inferiority, randomized, controlled clinical trial, children aged 6–59 months were randomized to receive ASAQ or AL. Both drug regimens were given for 3 days, and follow-up was for 28 days. The primary endpoint was the 28-day cure rates and was defined as proportion of patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-corrected cure rate after 28 days of follow-up. Findings: A total of 251 patients who were attending the Ayame and Dabakala hospitals and presenting with symptomatic acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria were randomized to receive ASAQ (128) and AL (123). The intention-to-treat analysis showed effectiveness rates of 94.5% and 93.5% for ASAQ and AL, respectively on day 28. After adjustment for PCR results, these rates were 96.1% and 96.8%, respectively. On day 28, the per-protocol analysis showed effectiveness rates of 98.4% and 96.6% for ASAQ and AL, respectively. After adjustment by PCR for reinfection, these rates were 100% for each drug, and both regimens were well tolerated. Conclusion: ASAQ and AL remain efficacious treatments of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ivorian children 5 years after adoption. The efficacy of ASAQ and AL in Cote d’Ivoire requires, therefore, continuous monitoring and evaluation.

Socially-marketed rapid diagnostic tests and ACT in the private sector: ten years of experience in Cambodia

Whilst some populations have recently experienced dramatic declines in malaria, the majority of those most at risk of Plasmodium falciparum malaria still lack access to effective treatment with artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) and others are already facing parasites resistant to artemisinins.In this context, there is a crucial need to improve both access to and targeting of ACT through greater availability of good quality ACT and parasitological diagnosis. This is an issue of increasing urgency notably in the private commercial sector, which, in many countries, plays an important role in the provision of malaria treatment. The Affordable Medicines Facility for malaria (AMFm) is a recent initiative that aims to increase the provision of affordable ACT in public, private and NGO sectors through a manufacturer-level subsidy. However, to date, there is little documented experience in the programmatic implementation of subsidized ACT in the private sector. Cambodia is in the unique position of having more than 10 years of experience not only in implementing subsidized ACT, but also rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) as part of a nationwide social marketing programme. The programme includes behaviour change communication and the training of private providers as well as the sale and distribution of Malarine, the recommended ACT, and Malacheck, the RDT. This paper describes and evaluates this experience by drawing on the results of household and provider surveys conducted since the start of the programme.The available evidence suggests that providers' and consumers' awareness of Malarine increased rapidly, but that of Malacheck much less so. In addition, improvements in ACT and RDT availability and uptake were relatively slow, particularly in more remote areas.The lack of standardization in the survey methods and the gaps in the data highlight the importance of establishing a clear system for monitoring and evaluation for similar initiatives. Despite these limitations, a number of important lessons can still be learnt. These include the importance of a comprehensive communications strategy and of a sustained and reliable supply of products, with attention to the geographical reach of both. Other important challenges relate to the difficulty in incentivising providers and consumers not only to choose the recommended drug, but to precede this with a confirmatory blood test and ensure that providers adhere to the test results and patients to the treatment regime. In Cambodia, this is particularly complicated due to problems inherent to the drug itself and the emergence of artemisinin resistance.

Artesunate Dose Escalation for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in a Region of Reported Artemisinin Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BackgroundThe emergence of artemisinin resistance has raised concerns that the most potent antimalarial drug may be under threat. The currently recommended daily dose of artesunate (AS) is 4 mg/kg, and is administered for 3 days together with a partner antimalarial drug. This study investigated the impact of different AS doses on clinical and parasitological responses in malaria patients from an area of known artemisinin resistance in western Cambodia.MethodsAdult patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomized into one of three 7-day AS monotherapy regimens: 2, 4 or 6 mg/kg/day (total dose 14, 28 and 42 mg/kg). Clinical, parasitological, pharmacokinetic and in vitro drug sensitivity data was collected over a 7-day inpatient period and during weekly follow-up to 42 days.Results143 patients were enrolled (n = 75, 40 and 28 to receive AS 2, 4 and 6 mg/kg/day respectively). Cure rates were high in all treatment groups at 42 days despite almost half the patients remaining parasitemic on Day 3. There was no impact of increasing AS dose on median parasite clearance times, median parasite clearance rates or on the proportion of patients remaining parasitemic on Day 3. However at the lowest dose used (2 mg/kg/d) patients with parasitemia >10,000/µL had longer median (IQR) parasite clearance times than those with parasitemia <10,000/µL (63 (48–75) vs. 84 (66–96) hours, p<0.0001). 19% of patients in the high-dose arm developed neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.0×109/L) by Day 14 and resulted in the arm being halted early.ConclusionThere is no pharmacodynamic benefit of increasing the daily dose of AS (4mg/kg) currently recommended for short-course combination treatment of uncomplicated malaria, even in regions with emerging artemisinin resistance, as long as the partner drug retains high efficacy.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00722150.

Expanding the Antimalarial Drug Arsenal—Now, But How?

The number of available and effective antimalarial drugs is quickly dwindling. This is mainly because a number of drug resistance-associated mutations in malaria parasite genes, such as crt, mdr1, dhfr/dhps, and others, have led to widespread resistance to all known classes of antimalarial compounds. Unfortunately, malaria parasites have started to exhibit some level of resistance in Southeast Asia even to the most recently introduced class of drugs, artemisinins. While there is much need, the antimalarial drug development pipeline remains woefully thin, with little chemical diversity, and there is currently no alternative to the precious artemisinins. It is difficult to predict where the next generation of antimalarial drugs will come from; however, there are six major approaches: (i) re-optimizing the use of existing antimalarials by either replacement/rotation or combination approach; (ii) repurposing drugs that are currently used to treat other infections or diseases; (iii) chemically modifying existing antimalarial compounds; (iv) exploring natural sources; (v) large-scale screening of diverse chemical libraries; and (vi) through parasite genome-based (“targeted”) discoveries. When any newly discovered effective antimalarial treatment is used by the populus, we must maintain constant vigilance for both parasite-specific and human-related factors that are likely to hamper its success. This article is neither comprehensive nor conclusive. Our purpose is to provide an overview of antimalarial drug resistance, associated parasite genetic factors (1. Introduction; 2. Emergence of artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum), and the antimalarial drug development pipeline (3. Overview of the global pipeline of antimalarial drugs), and highlight some examples of the aforementioned approaches to future antimalarial treatment. These approaches can be categorized into “short term” (4. Feasible options for now) and “long term” (5. Next generation of antimalarial treatment— Approaches and candidates). However, these two categories are interrelated, and the approaches in both should be implemented in parallel with focus on developing a successful, long-lasting antimalarial chemotherapy.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of artemisinins in pregnancy

Malaria in pregnancy can lead to serious maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Access to the most effective antimalarials in pregnancy is essential. Resistance to current therapies is high for all antimalarial therapies except artemisinins. Artemisinin-based combination therapy is current the first line of malaria treatment recommended by the WHO for children, adults and pregnant women in second or third trimester. Due to potential embryotoxicity of artemisinins identified in animal studies, artemisinins are not considered safe for use in first trimester of pregnancy. Artemisinins are more rapidly metabolized in pregnant women, but it is not clear whether this reduces efficacy. Most studies show very high cure rates for pregnant women. Areas for further research include the safety profile in first trimester of pregnancy, the effect of HIV infection on artemisinin use in pregnancy, the relationship between the pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy, the effect of newly emerging artemisinin resistance on treatment in pregnancy and the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy.

Dose‐Dependent Risk of Neutropenia after 7‐Day Courses of Artesunate Monotherapy in Cambodian Patients with AcutePlasmodium falciparumMalaria

Fears of emerging artemisinin resistance in western Cambodia have prompted a series of clinical trials investigating whether slow responses to antimalarial treatment can be overcome by increasing doses of drug. Patients with uncomplicated malaria were allocated 1 of 3 oral artesunate monotherapy regimens (2, 4, or 6 mg/kg/day for 7 days) and were observed for 42 days. A series of safety measures, including complete blood count on days 0, 3, 6, and 14, was implemented because of a lack of safety data for these experimental doses. After 3 doses, geometric mean absolute neutrophil counts were reduced in all groups, and 2 patients required artesunate to be discontinued because of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <1.0 × 10(3) cells/μL). Recipients of the 6 mg/kg/day dosage had significantly lower geometric mean absolute neutrophil counts than did recipients of the 2 and 4 mg/kg/day dosages at 6 and 14 days (P < .001 for each). Overall, 5 (19%) of 26 patients who received the 6 mg/kg/day dosage became neutropenic within 14 days, triggering a cohort-halting rule and ending the trial early. Pharmacokinetic data from neutropenic patients showed wide variance, with plasma clearance occurring significantly slower in neutropenic patients than in nonneutropenic patients. Artesunate remains a crucial drug for the treatment of malaria, and determining optimal dosing regimens is vital to overcome emerging resistant parasite strains along the Thai-Cambodian border. However, future experimental dosing studies must be designed with care, because the safety of such regimens can no longer be assumed. The artemisinin derivatives remain one of the safest classes of antimalarial drugs, but this study demonstrates that the dosing limit may have been reached.

Artemisinin Resistance in Cambodia: A Clinical Trial Designed to Address an Emerging Problem in Southeast Asia

Increasing rates of failure of artemisinin-based combination therapy have highlighted the possibility of emerging artemisinin resistance along the Thai-Cambodian border. We used an integrated in vivo-in vitro approach to assess the presence of artemisinin resistance in western Cambodia. This article provides additional data from a clinical trial that has been published in The New England Journal of Medicine. Ninety-four adult patients from Battambang Province, western Cambodia, who presented with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were randomized to receive high-dose artesunate therapy (4 mg/kg/day orally for 7 days) or quinine-tetracycline. Plasma concentrations of dihydroartemisinin, in vitro drug susceptibility, and molecular markers were analyzed. Cases meeting all the following criteria were classified as artemisinin resistant: failure to clear parasites within 7 days of treatment or reemergence of parasites within 28 days of follow-up; adequate plasma concentrations of dihydroartemisinin; prolonged parasite clearance; and increased in vitro drug susceptibility levels for dihydroartemisinin. Two (3.3%) of 60 artesunate-treated patients were classified as artemisinin resistant. Their parasite clearance times were prolonged (133 and 95 h, compared with a median of 52.2 h in patients who were cured). These patients had 50% inhibitory concentrations of dihydroartemisinin that were almost 10 times higher than the reference clone W2. Resistance did not appear to be mediated by the pfmdr1 copy number or selected PfATPase6 polymorphisms previously proposed to confer artemisinin resistance. Artemisinin resistance has emerged along the Thai-Cambodian border. The potentially devastating implications of spreading resistance to a drug that currently has no successor call for further studies of this emerging problem. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00479206.

Monitoring for Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance to artemisinin and artesunate in Binh Phuoc Province, Vietnam: 1998-2009

BackgroundArtemisinin derivatives have been used for malaria treatment in Vietnam since 1989. Reported malaria cases have decreased from 1,672,000 with 4,650 deaths in 1991, to 91,635 with 43 deaths in 2006. Current national guidelines recommend artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), although artesunate is still available as monotherapy through the private sector. Recent reports suggest that effectiveness of ACT and artesunate monotherapy has declined in western Cambodia. This study examined Plasmodium falciparum resistance patterns over 10 years in southwest Vietnam in infected patients treated with artemisinin compounds.MethodsThe study was conducted in two communes in Phuoc Long district, Binh Phuoc province, 100 km west of the Cambodian border. This was chosen as a likely site for emerging artemisinin resistance because of the high prevalence of P. falciparum malaria, and the length of time that artemisinin had been in use. In vivo and in vitro monitoring of P. falciparum susceptibility to anti-malarial drugs was conducted in 1998, 2001, 2004/5, and 2008/9. Patients with confirmed P. falciparum malaria received therapy with 5 or 7 days of artemisinin (1998 and 2001 respectively) or 7 days of artesunateResultsIn the four surveys, 270 patients were recruited and treated. The mean parasite clearance times differed between 1998, 2001 and 2004/5 (1.8, 2.3 and 2.1 days, P < 0.01) but not between 1998 and 2008/2009. The mean parasite clearance times were correlated with parasite density at day 0 (r = 0.4; P < 0.001). Treatment failure rates after PCR adjustment were 13.8%, 2.9%, 1.2%, and 0% respectively. Susceptibility of P. falciparum to artemisinin in in vitro tests was stable during the period, except for a rise in EC90 and EC99 in 2001.ConclusionsThis study showed stable levels of P. falciparum sensitivity to artemisinin compounds in the two sites over a ten-year period. The introduction of ACT in this area in 2003 may have protected against the development of artemisinin resistance. Adherence to the latest WHO and Vietnamese guidelines, which recommend ACT as first-line therapy in all malarious areas, and continued monitoring along the Vietnam-Cambodia border will be essential to prevent the spread of artemisinin resistance in Vietnam.

Anticancer agents against malaria: time to revisit?

The emergence of artemisinin resistance could adversely impact the current strategy for malaria treatment; thus, new drugs are urgently needed. A possible approach to developing new antimalarials is to find new uses for old drugs. Some anticancer agents such as methotrexate and trimetrexate are active against malaria. However, they are commonly perceived to be toxic and thus not suitable for malaria treatment. In this opinion article, we examine how the toxicity of anticancer agents is just a matter of dose or ‘only dose makes the poison’, as coined in Paracelsus’ law. Thus, the opportunity exists to discover new antimalarials using the anticancer pharmacopoeia.

Improving Surveillance for Antimalarial Drug Resistance

GLOBAL MALARIA CONTROL EFFORTS DEPEND INcreasingly on artemisinin derivatives because of resistance to other antimalarial drugs. Emergence of artemisinin resistance could be devastating for individuals with malaria, unless timely detection by surveillance systems allows evaluation of new treatments and interventions to counter the spread of resistance. However, instead of drug resistance monitoring, major sponsors of malaria control programs emphasize other essential antimalarial strategies far more strongly. These sponsors understandably seek immediate public health results with proven antimalarial interventions, but rapid and widespread deployment of artemisinin derivatives, with insufficient attention to drug resistance, could undermine these gains. Developing an early warning system for resistance to artemisinin and other antimalarial drugs should be an urgent priority of malaria control programs and their sponsors.

Molecular monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin in Tanzania

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are recommended for use against uncomplicated malaria in areas of multi-drug resistant malaria, such as sub-Saharan Africa. However, their long-term usefulness in these high transmission areas remains unclear. It has been suggested that documentation of the S769N PfATPase6 mutations may indicate an emergence of artemisinin resistance of Plasmodium falciparum in the field. The present study assessed PfATPase6 mutations (S769N and A623E) in 615 asymptomatic P. falciparum infections in Tanzania but no mutant genotype was detected. This observation suggests that resistance to artemisinin has not yet been selected in Tanzania, supporting the Ministry of Health's decision to adopt artemether+lumefantrine as first-line malaria treatment. The findings recommend further studies to assess PfATPase6 mutations in sentinel sites and verify their usefulness in monitoring emergency of ACT resistance.