Spermatic Vein Embolization Research Articles

Spermatic vein embolization as a treatment for symptomatic varicocele.

Varicocele is a relatively common condition in men that causes pain in approximately 10% of cases. There have been few studies to date assessing the improvements in both pain and quality of life parameters associated with spermatic vein embolization (SVE) as a treatment for patients with symptomatic varicocele, so we aimed to assess this. A review was carried out of consecutive SVE procedures performed at our institution from 2013-2019. Only patients with painful varicocele were included after other causes of testicular pain were excluded. The technique employed was a combination of distal coil embolization of the spermatic vein with 4-6 mm coils at the level of the inguinal canal, as well as sclerotherapy to prevent reflux of sclerosant. Furthermore, a prospective validated Pain Impact Questionnaire-6 (PIQ-6) was performed to assess for improvement in quality of life. A matched pair Student two-tailed t-test was used to compare mean scores pre- and post-treatment, with 95% confidence intervals presented as T scores and their associated p-values. Over six years, 62 SVE procedures were performed for symptomatic varicocele. Success rate was 95%, with a median followup of nine months. Two patients had a failed procedure on two occasions requiring subsequent surgical ligation. There was one clinically significant recurrence. All components of PIQ-6 score showed a statistically significant reduction post-SVE, most noticeably pain severity and impact on leisure activities. SVE is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for symptomatic varicocele, improving pain and quality of life.

Totally Extraperitoneal Herniorrhaphy (TEP) after Ipsilateral Spermatic Vein Embolization: A Case Report

Introduction: Both totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy (TEP) and spermatic vein embolization are minimal invasive techniques gaining in popularity in the treatment of inguinal hernia and varicocele respectively. A previous spermatic vein embolization makes a TEP more difficult because of fibrotic changes of the spermatic vein. This is to our knowledge the first case report describing these difficulties and changes after spermatic vein embolization. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 37 year old male who presented with an uncomplicated left sided inguinal hernia and ipsilateral varicocele. He first underwent a percutaneous left spermatic vein embolization for a grade 3 varicocele and later a TEP for the inguinal hernia. Reduction of the peritoneum and proper mesh placement were complicated due to fibrotic changes of the spermatic vein. Due to the dissection and resection of the embolized spermatic vein there was minor blood loss, increased operating room time and postoperative pain was more then average. Conclusions: In case of a concomitant inguinal hernia and ipsilateral varicocele requiring embolization we propose to treat these diseases concomitantly or first treat the inguinal hernia and embolising the varicocele after repair of the hernia.

Embolization of left spermatic vein in non-obstructive azoospermic men with varicocele: role of FSH to predict the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment.

Varicocele repair in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was occasionally associated to ejaculated spermatozoa independently from clinical and laboratory measures. We performed a prospective study in infertile men affected by NOA and left side varicocele to find whether or not the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after varicocele repair is predicted by baseline measures. Patients with NOA and grade II, or grade III left side varicocele were submitted to hormone analysis and to scrotal color Doppler ultrasound (CDU). Azoospermia was confirmed in 23 patients aged 25-47 years who were than submitted to varicocele repair through a retrograde internal spermatic vein embolization. Patients were re-evaluated after 6 months. Six months after varicocele repair 12 patients (52.2 %) were still azoospermic (Group 1) while 11 patients (47.8 %) reported ejaculated spermatozoa (Group 2) [sperm count: 1.3 × 10(6)/mL; 0.5 × 10(6)/mL-1.6 × 10(6)/mL (median 25th-75th centiles)]. Serum baseline FSH was lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (p = 0.012), while no differences between groups were revealed for all other clinical and laboratory parameters. ROC analysis indicated that baseline FSH level predicted the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment [AUC = 0.811; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 0.6-0.9; p = 0.0029]. A cut-off level of FSH <10.06 mIU/mL identified 82.0 % of cases with ejaculated spermatozoa with a specificity of 81.8 % and a sensitivity of 83.3 %. Selected patients with NOA may show ejaculated spermatozoa after a non-invasive repair of a left side varicocele, therefore avoiding testicular sperm extraction. Baseline serum FSH was a valuable predictor for ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment.

Left-sided grade 3 varicocele may affect the biological function of the epididymis

Objective.Varicocele is present in approximately 30–40% of men evaluated for infertility and in 10–20% of the general male population, but the association between varicocele, compromised semen quality and male infertility remains unclear. This indicates that varicocele may impair spermatogenesis or in some other way mitigate sperm quality. Better understanding of criteria for the selection of men who will benefit from varicocele repair would improve the clinical management of men with impaired semen quality and varicocele. Material and methods. To further understand the effect of varicocele repair by embolization in men with grade 3 varicocele, 50 men referred for infertility with varicocele were evaluated before and after embolization. Results.There was a significant improvement in total sperm count (25.5 ± 4.7 million to 78 ± 11 million, p < 0.001) and sperm motility (slowly and rapidly progressive) (31.5 ± 2.9% to 45 ± 2.5%, p < 0.001) after spermatic vein embolization, comparing baseline to 3 month post-treatment follow-up data. Furthermore, alpha-glucosidase (specific epididymis-derived protein) increased from 61.7 ± 5.7 U to 84.7 ± 7.0 U (p < 0.05) and sperm droplets decreased from 14.2 ± 1.5% to 11.0 ± 1.0% (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The results indicate improved epididymal function and suggest that left-sided grade 3 varicocele may affect the epididymis in addition to effects on the testis.

Technical aspects of embolization of internal spermatic vein in varicocele treatment

Varicocele is one of the most common causes of infertility in men. A large number of varicocele patients are asymptomatic and discovered after examination by physician because of infertility. This paper reviews the most recent data available on the management of varicocele. It will discuss the advantages and limitations associated with each treatment modality for varicocele. The most common therapeutic methods are surgical ligation and embolization of internal spermatic veins. Embolization of internal spermatic veins is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on outpatient basis, under local anesthesia, the recovery period of patients is short, and the risk of complications is minimal. The use of embolization can provide a safe and effective approach aiming to eliminate varicocele, preserve testicular function and increase fertility.

Alternate indications for varicocele repair: non-obstructive azoospermia, pain, androgen deficiency and progressive testicular dysfunction

Varicocele repair is indicated for infertile men with clinical varicoceles. Some men with scrotal pain, low testosterone, non-obstructive azoospermia, and who are at risk for testicular dysfunction may also benefit from varicocelectomy.

Varicocele Repair in Patients With Nonobstructive Azoospermia: A Meta-Analysis

Multiple small case series have reported sperm in the ejaculate and spontaneous pregnancies in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocele repair. We hypothesized that men with favorable testicular histopathology on testis biopsy such as maturation arrest or hypospermatogenesis would have a higher probability of success than those with more ablative pathology, eg Sertoli-cell-only. A review of the literature on varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia was performed and 11 publications from the previous 20 years were evaluated. Histopathological data were presented in 8 publications, and were categorized as Sertoli-cell-only, maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis. Maturation arrest was further differentiated by 4 publications. Early maturation arrest was defined as maturation ending at the secondary spermatocyte and late maturation arrest was defined as maturation ending at the spermatid without spermatozoa present. Success after repair was defined as having sperm in the ejaculate or spontaneous pregnancy. A total of 233 patients were analyzed. After varicocele repair 91 (39.1%) patients had motile sperm in the ejaculate and 14 spontaneous pregnancies were reported. Success rates in patients with maturation arrest (42.1%) or hypospermatogenesis (54.5%) were significantly higher than in those with Sertoli-cell-only (11.3%, p <0.001 in both groups). Patients with late maturation arrest had a higher probability of success (45.8%) than those with early maturation arrest (0%, p = 0.007). Infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia can have improvement in semen analysis and achieve spontaneous pregnancy after repair of clinical varicoceles. This meta-analysis demonstrates that men with late maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis have a higher probability of success and, therefore, histopathology should be considered before varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.

Induction of Spermatogenesis in Azoospermic Men After Internal Spermatic Vein Embolization for the Treatment of Varicocele

Induction of Spermatogenesis in Azoospermic Men After Internal Spermatic Vein Embolization for the Treatment of Varicocele

Pain experience during internal spermatic vein embolization for varicocele: comparison of two cyanoacrylate glues

The purpose of this study was to evaluate possible pain sensation differences in patients after retrograde varicocele embolization either with n-butyl-(2)-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) or with n-butyl-(2)-cyanoacrylate + methacryloxysulfolane (NBCA-MS). Transcatheter varicocele embolization was performed in 64 consecutive patients (62 left, two bilateral). Embolization was done with NBCA (n=32) or NBCA-MS (n=32). Immediately after the procedure, patients were asked to evaluate pain during embolization using a visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was done with Student's t test. Mean pain score on VAS was 3.23 (range: 0-8) for NBCA and 3.28 (range 0-9) for NBCA-MS. This difference was not significant (P=0.932). Independently of the type of glue, no difference in pain sensation (P value 0.421) was found between patients younger than 18 (n=29) and patients older than 18 years of age (n=35) (younger than18, mean 3.52; older than 18, mean 3.05). No difference in mean pain experience level (P=0.323) was seen in 11 patients with vessel wall perforation (23.4%) during the procedure (3.89; range: 0-8.5) in comparison with those without perforation (mean pain sensation level: 3.13; range: 0-9). No difference in pain experience was found after transcatheter varicocele embolization either with NBCA or NBCA-MS. Age and vessel wall perforation have no influence on pain sensation independently of the type of glue.

Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after internal spermatic vein embolization for the treatment of varicocele

To evaluate the improvement in semen quality and pregnancy rate after internal spermatic vein (ISV) embolization in men with nonobstructive azoospermia virtual azoospermia, or extremely severe oligoteratoasthenoazoospermia (OTA). A prospective cohort of 101 azoospermic or severe oligoteratoasthenospermic men of mean (+/-SD) age 34.1+/-7.7 years who underwent ISV between September 1998 and June 2003 were evaluated for semen characteristics, endocrinology profile, and conception rate. Significant improvement was noted in mean sperm concentration, motility, and morphology in 83 men (82%). Mean sperm concentration increased from 0.22+/-0.30 x 10(6)/ml total sperm in the ejaculate to 9.28+/-1.2 x 10(6)/ml after embolization (P < 0.001); mean sperm motility rose from 8.78+/-1.59 to 29.56+/-2.0% (P < 0.001), and mean sperm morphology rose from 3.79+/-0.74 to 13.72+/-1.37% (P < 0.005). Pregnancy was achieved in 34 cases (34%), 20 (20%) unassisted and 14 (14%) assisted. Based on our findings, the following statements can be made: (i) Varicocele may cause any variation of severity in OTA, including azoospermia. (ii) Since male fertility is preserved with only one testis, OTA, azoospermia or virtual azoospermia represent bilateral testicular dysfunction. (iii) Treatment of bilateral varicocele may reverse testicular dysfunction and improve spermatognesis and testosterone production in men with extremely severe OTA and induce sperm production in men with azoospermia and virtual azoospermia. (iv) If azoospermia is not too long-standing, the treatment of varicocele may significantly improve spermatogenesis and renew sperm production. (v) Adequate treatment may spare in > 50% of azoospermic patients the need for testicular sperm extraction as preparation for ICSI. (vi) Since achievement of pregnancy in IVF units is higher when spermatogenesis is better, the treatment of varicocele (bilateral) is an effective medical adjunct for the IVF units prior to the treatment. We recommend that infertile men with azoospermia or virtual azoospermia or extremely severe OTA be evaluated for varicocele, with special attention to its bilateral nature.

Elevation of serum testosterone and free testosterone after embolization of the internal spermatic vein for the treatment of varicocele in infertile men.

To evaluate the effect of internal spermatic vein (ISV) embolization on levels of serum testosterone and free testosterone and on spermatogenesis. The files of 83 infertile men treated for varicocele were reviewed for changes in serum testosterone, free testosterone and spermatogenesis after ISV embolization. Mean serum testosterone concentration rose after embolization by 43%, from 12.07 +/- 6.07 nmol/l to 17.22 +/- 8.43 nmol/l (P<0.001). Mean serum free testosterone concentration rose by 72%, from 5.93 +/- 2.44 nmol/l to 10.21 +/- 7.69 nmol/l (P<0.001). Mean sperm concentration increased from 7.49 +/- 1.73 x 10(6)/ml to 18.14 +/- 2.36 x 10(6)/ml (P<0.001); mean sperm motility increased from 21.74 +/- 2.47 to 34.47 +/- 2.27% (P<0.001); and mean sperm morphology increased from 6.63 +/- 1.07 to 13.08 +/- 1.44% (P<0.001). ISV embolization apparently induces an increase in both serum testosterone and free testosterone concentrations and in sperm parameters in infertile patient with varicocele, regardless of the size of the varicocele.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION MAY MISS THE DIAGNOSIS OF BILATERAL VARICOCELE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 4 DIAGNOSTIC MODALITIES

We evaluated the sensitivity of 3 noninvasive methods for detecting left and right varicoceles. Three noninvasive methods for the detection of varicocele in the left and right internal spermatic veins were evaluated in 214 infertile men, namely, physical examination, scrotal contact thermography and ultrasound Doppler. Venography was used as the reference diagnosis. Varicocele was detected in 195 patients (91.1%), on the left side in 37 (19%), on the right side in 3 (1.5%) and bilaterally in 155 (79.5%). Scrotal contact thermography using varicoscreen proved to be the most accurate method. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value were 98.9%, 66.6%, 98.5% and 100%, respectively, for left varicocele, and 95.6%, 91.6%, 94.9% and 98%, respectively, for right varicocele. Doppler sonography was associated with the highest number of false-positive results. Accuracy in evaluating retrograde flow was lowest for both sides for physical examination and highest for the combination of Doppler sonography and contact thermography, with a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of 100%, 33.3%, 99.0% and 98.9%, respectively, for the left side, and 97.4%, 58.3%, 90.3% and 91.1%, respectively, for the right side. In 165 (85%) of the 195 patients who underwent internal spermatic vein embolization sperm parameters were improved. The present study yielded 2 major findings. Thermography is more sensitive and accurate for the detection of varicocele than Doppler ultrasound and physical examination, and it can be used for screening as a single modality in infertile men. Doppler ultrasound and thermography are complementary and their combined use yields the highest sensitivity and accuracy.

Selective Spermatic Venography and Varicocele Embolization in Men with Circumaortic Left Renal Veins

The presence of variant venous anatomy may increase the technical difficulty of percutaneous varicocele embolization. The authors review their experience performing venography of the left spermatic vein and varicocele embolization in 18 men with circumaortic left renal veins. Selective catheterization of the left spermatic vein was achieved in all but one patient, and all patients with positive venographic results underwent successful embolization. The site of the confluence of the left spermatic vein and the renal vein was variable and it was necessary to use jugular and femoral venous approaches to achieve selective left spermatic vein catheterization. Familiarity with anatomic variations associated with circumaortic renal veins and with embolization techniques from jugular and femoral venous routes facilitates percutaneous varicocele embolization in patients with this variant.

Congenital Anomalies of the Inferior Vena Cava and Left Renal Vein: Evaluation with Spiral CT

To determine with spiral computed tomography (CT) the incidence and caval location of left renal vein (LRV) variants that may affect inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, spermatic vein embolization, and adrenal or renal venous sampling. Contrast material-enhanced spiral CT scans of 1,014 patients were evaluated for the incidence and configuration of LRV variants and for the distribution of the entrances of these veins into the IVC. In this series, variants detected were as follows: one azygos continuation of the IVC (0.1%), three bilateral IVCs (0.3%), and 102 LRV variants (10%) including 38 retroaortic renal veins (3.7%) and 64 circumaortic venous rings (6.3%). In the retroaortic renal vein group, the distance between the entrance of the LRV into the IVC and the confluence of the iliac veins was +62.5 mm +/- 8.7. In the circumaortic venous ring group, the distance between the entrances of the retroaortic and preaortic limbs into the IVC was -39.0 mm +/- 17.4; the distance between the entrance of the left retroaortic limb into the IVC and the confluence of the iliac veins was +63.2 mm +/- 17.1. Detailed knowledge of these anomalies is crucial for IVC filter placement, spermatic vein embolization, and adrenal or renal venous sampling.

Spermatic vein embolization with hot contrast material: fertility results.

Spermatic venography with hot contrast material embolization was undertaken in 81 patients with varicoceles and infertility. Long-term follow-up information was available in 91% of the patients, and there was an overall conception rate of 40.5%. Embolization with hot contrast material was easily performed without special embolization devices and proved to be a safe and effective technique.

Management of male infertility: roles of contact thermography, spermatic venography, and embolization

The leading cause of male infertility is the presence of varicocele. Recently, selective spermatic vein embolization during spermatic venography has afforded a simple, nonoperative treatment. In this study, liquid crystal contact thermography was employed before spermatic venography and after embolization or surgery. Pretreatment thermographic results were in agreement with venography in 15 of 17 cases as 13 were considered positive and two negative by both methods. Thermography further served to document objectively the immediate physiologic effectiveness of either therapy in controlling spermatic vein reflux into the pampiniform plexus. It therefore provides a noninvasive means of evaluating treatment success or recurrence at an early stage. Preliminary thermographic evidence indicates that embolization is a highly effective treatment of reflux. Thermography can also function as a useful, noninvasive screening technique to aid in selecting patients for spermatic venography and embolization therapy.

Deep spermatic vein embolization with a straight catheter

Since Tulioch [1 ] showed that there is a probable relation between vanicocele and decreased male fertility, treatment of varicoceles in patients with fertility problems has become accepted [2]. Transcatheter occlusion of the spermatic vein with Gianturco coils is often used [3]. To be effective, these coils must be placed deeply in the spermatic vein, an often difficult maneuver as the usually used curved catheter may impact the vein wall or induce spasm. We report a technique that facilitates catheter replacement deep into the spermatic vein using a straight catheter.