Reviewed by: Hallowed Stewards: Solon and the Sacred Treasurers of Ancient Athens by William S. Bubelis P. J. Rhodes William S. Bubelis. Hallowed Stewards: Solon and the Sacred Treasurers of Ancient Athens. Societas: Historical Studies in Classical Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016. xv + 272 pp. Cloth, $75. This book (which has grown out of the author's Chicago Ph.D. thesis) ranges more widely than its sub-title suggests and is concerned with sacred property in Athens and those who administered it, not only in the time of Solon, but from then to the end of the classical period. The Introduction begins with the mid-sixth-century altar dedicated by the tamias Chaerion and suggests that Solon's law on the tamiai of Athena was the starting-point for a development, through the creation of new forms of "sacred" property, by which nearly half of Athens' officials and a considerable proportion of its wealth came to be concerned with "handling public resources for religious ends." For the purposes of this book, "sacred treasurers" are all officials with significant authority over some kind of sacred property—tamiai, hieropoioi and the like, in contrast to priests. In Chapter 1, Bubelis interprets Solon's law on the appointment of the tamiai by lot from the pentakosiomedimnoi, reported in Ath. Pol. 8.1 (cf. 47.1), as "a trade-off in which he subordinated certain elite interests to those of the polis in return for assuring the elite that to be a tamias would remain their exclusive privilege." After discussing Ath. Pol. and Aristotle's Politics, he argues that the two-stage appointment of Ath. Pol. 8.1 applied in fact only to the tamiai and that the archons were appointed by simple election until the law on the tamiai was used as a model for the appointment of the archons in 487/6 (Ath. Pol. 22.5). Restriction of the office of tamias to the new class of pentakosiomedimnoi would confine eligibility to a greatly limited circle, and Bubelis sees Poll. 8.129–31 as referring to an indemnity which tamiai had to deposit with the Areopagus when appointed, and which it would return to them if it judged them guilt-free when they left office. Chapter 2 turns to other measures of Solon. The sacrificial calendar published at the end of the fifth century was not a reproduction of an earlier master calendar but was a compilation from different sources, updated in some respects such as the costs of victims, and was limited to what was to be sacrificed on which occasions, the costs and the resulting perquisites. Solon did not compile such a calendar, but he did enact laws which included provision for sacrifices and for their funding. Bubelis seizes on the recent elimination by M. Nelson (CQ n.s. 56 [2006], 309–12) of stelai as another source of material mentioned in Lys. 30.17, and he suggests that the rubrics in the inscribed calendar referred, in some cases [End Page 555] obliquely, to laws of Solon detailing the duties of particular officials. The basileus, and the other archons with their paredroi, will have been among the officials with relevant duties. Chapter 3 returns to Chaerion's altar and to sixth-century dedications by treasurers and other officials as signs that such positions were valued. Office-holders will have needed to appeal to the voters who elected them, and Bubelis interprets the hospitality of Cimon in the fifth century (e.g. Ath. Pol. 27.3) as the provision of ritual banquets ("There is no direct evidence for a festival context, though it seems necessary on a priori grounds," 100 n. 25). Under the Pisistratid tyranny cooperation was rewarded with office while those who refused to cooperate would suffer for it. Bubelis thinks that under the tyranny celebration of electoral victory would have been considered inappropriate, but elections still occurred, voters still needed to be wooed, and religious observances and the resources devoted to them were increased (he interprets Thuc. 6.54.5 to mean that the Pisistratids' tax was "for the purpose of funding religion": 109). After the fall of the tyranny competition and patronage...