Abstract In order to evaluate the progress of a health service, certain criteria (indices) should be established and monitored. If any health center wishes to compare its situation with others, a valid instrument for measuring morbidity is required, and the criteria must be in conformity with national and/or international standards. This paper details methods of producing health indices from medical diagnoses. It is based on experience in a health service for students. Three systems are offered to cover centers with and without computer facilities: 1) a minimum for student health services; 2) the “minima” requested by the World Health Organization; 3) a classification of conditions of special interest in student health. It is strongly recommended that the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) of the World Health Organization be accepted as the local and international basis for these diagnostic categories. “Epidemic Non-A, Non-B Hepatitis in Nepal: Recovery of a Possible Etiologic Agent and Transmission Studies in Marmosets,” MARK A. KANE, et al. An epidemic of non-A, non-B hepatitis occurred in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, during 1981–1982, with approximately 7.6% of households and 1.4% of individuals affected. Cases occurred preponderantly in the 15- to 34-year-old age group (70%), with most cases (75%) occurring in males. A high mortality rate (21%) occurred in pregnant women admitted to the hospital. No single water source was implicated, but epidemic peaks occurred during monsoon rains, and multiple opportunities for enteric transmission existed. One of eight patient stools examined by immune electron microscopy revealed aggregated, antibody-coated, 27-nm viruslike particles when convalescent serum samples were used as sources of antibody. Inoculation of two chimpanzees and four marmosets with a suspension of this stool resulted in elevated liver enzyme activity in three marmosets. Fecal excretion of 27-nm particles during the acute phase of disease (with temporally coincident antigen activity by radioimmunoassay) was observed in one marmoset, which also developed convalescent antibody against the particles in the original inoculum. (Journal of the American Medical Association 1984;252:3140–3145.) “High-dose Vitamin C Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Cancer who Have Had No Prior Chemotherapy; A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison,” CHARLES G. MOERTEL, et al. It has been claimed that high-dose vitamin C is beneficial in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer, especially patients who have had no prior chemotherapy. In a double-blind study 100 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with either high-dose vitamin C (10 g daily) or placebo. Overall, these patients were in very good general condition, with minimal symptoms. None had received any previous treatment with cytotoxic drugs. Vitamin C therapy showed no advantage over placebo therapy with regard to either the interval between the beginning of treatment and disease progression or patient survival. Among patients with measurable disease, none had objective improvement. On the basis of this and our previous randomized study, it can be concluded that high-dose vitamin C therapy is not effective against advanced malignant disease regardless of whether the patient has had any prior chemotherapy. (New England Journal of Medicine 1985;312:137–41.)
Read full abstract