Aims: To review the efficacy, safety, and outcome of Endoscopic Snare Papillectomy (ESP) compared to Surgical Resection (SR) for papillary adenomas (PA) at a single center. Methods: Between 1996 and 2003, a total of 64 patients were evaluated for possible ESP of which 43 (27 male, 16 females, mean age 46±12) with localized PA underwent ESP. 21 patients with large tumor size (> 3 cm) and/or high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma underwent SR. ESP was performed using a stiff polypectomy snare and electrocautery. Biliary sphincterotomy and stent placement were performed if ERCP revealed insufficient drainage. A pancreatic stent was placed in cases of delayed pancreatic drainage. All patients were admitted for 24 hours post-ESP. Complications were classified by the consensus criteria on ERCP complications. Follow-up ERCP was performed at 3-6 months and thereafter in cases of residual adenoma, symptoms, or elevated LFTs. Results: The presenting symptoms included jaundice in 20 patients(31%), anemia in 7(10.9%), non-specific abdominal pain in 11(17.3%), pancreatic symptoms in 1(1.6%). History of familial adenomatosis polyposis (FAP) was present in 10 patients (15.6%), leading to detection of PA via surveillance EGD. The mean tumor size in the ESP group was 1.7±0.44 cm and 4.1±2.5 cm in the SR group. ESP was assisted by submucosal saline injection in 36 cases (56%) and performed en bloc in 33 cases (52%). A pancreatic stent was inserted in 21/43 patients (48.8%) and a biliary stent was inserted in 4/43 patients (9.3%). The only 30-day complication in the ESP group was hemorrhage in one patient who subsequently died. There were 7 complications in the SR group. There were no cases of pancreatitis in either group. Neither age, presenting symptoms nor tumor size were associated with development of complications. In the ESP group, if patients had a history of FAP, their risk of minor bleeding was 44% vs. 15% for those without FAP (RR=3.02, 95% CI 1.01-8.99, p=0.073). SR patients had significantly longer hospital stays than ESP(mean 10.6±8.6 days vs. 1 day, p<0.0001). At follow-up, 3 ESP patients had recurrence, all benign FAP-associated PA (mean interval 5.4 months) and were treated endoscopically. Conclusion: Endoscopic resection of localized PA by experienced endoscopists is a good alternative to surgical resection. The recurrence rate post ESP is small and can be treated endoscopically. Patients with FAP must be enrolled in a long-term endoscopic surveillance program. Aims: To review the efficacy, safety, and outcome of Endoscopic Snare Papillectomy (ESP) compared to Surgical Resection (SR) for papillary adenomas (PA) at a single center. Methods: Between 1996 and 2003, a total of 64 patients were evaluated for possible ESP of which 43 (27 male, 16 females, mean age 46±12) with localized PA underwent ESP. 21 patients with large tumor size (> 3 cm) and/or high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma underwent SR. ESP was performed using a stiff polypectomy snare and electrocautery. Biliary sphincterotomy and stent placement were performed if ERCP revealed insufficient drainage. A pancreatic stent was placed in cases of delayed pancreatic drainage. All patients were admitted for 24 hours post-ESP. Complications were classified by the consensus criteria on ERCP complications. Follow-up ERCP was performed at 3-6 months and thereafter in cases of residual adenoma, symptoms, or elevated LFTs. Results: The presenting symptoms included jaundice in 20 patients(31%), anemia in 7(10.9%), non-specific abdominal pain in 11(17.3%), pancreatic symptoms in 1(1.6%). History of familial adenomatosis polyposis (FAP) was present in 10 patients (15.6%), leading to detection of PA via surveillance EGD. The mean tumor size in the ESP group was 1.7±0.44 cm and 4.1±2.5 cm in the SR group. ESP was assisted by submucosal saline injection in 36 cases (56%) and performed en bloc in 33 cases (52%). A pancreatic stent was inserted in 21/43 patients (48.8%) and a biliary stent was inserted in 4/43 patients (9.3%). The only 30-day complication in the ESP group was hemorrhage in one patient who subsequently died. There were 7 complications in the SR group. There were no cases of pancreatitis in either group. Neither age, presenting symptoms nor tumor size were associated with development of complications. In the ESP group, if patients had a history of FAP, their risk of minor bleeding was 44% vs. 15% for those without FAP (RR=3.02, 95% CI 1.01-8.99, p=0.073). SR patients had significantly longer hospital stays than ESP(mean 10.6±8.6 days vs. 1 day, p<0.0001). At follow-up, 3 ESP patients had recurrence, all benign FAP-associated PA (mean interval 5.4 months) and were treated endoscopically. Conclusion: Endoscopic resection of localized PA by experienced endoscopists is a good alternative to surgical resection. The recurrence rate post ESP is small and can be treated endoscopically. Patients with FAP must be enrolled in a long-term endoscopic surveillance program.
Read full abstract