Patient history: Age at first syncopal episode older than 35 years = 3.3 History of atrial fibrillation or flutter = 7.3 Known severe structural heart disease = 3.3 to 4.8 Dyspnea prior to syncope = 3.5 Chest pain/angina prior to syncope = 3.4 to 3.8 Cyanotic during syncope = 6.2 Diagnostic tests: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T > 42 pg/mL = 5.1 High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I > 31.3 pg/mL = 5.4 NT-proBNP ≥ 210.5 pg/mL = 47 NT-proBNP > 1966 pg/mL = 5.8 BNP > 302 pg/mL = 6.3 Multivariable evaluation: Heart disease, abnormal ECG, or both = 2.3 EGSYS score 3 or more = 2.8 to 3.3 Vasovagal score less than −2 = 1.7 to 8.6 Patient history: Age at first syncopal episode 35 years or younger = 0.13 Diagnostic tests: Normal cardiac troponin T or I = 0.15 to 0.39 Normal BNP level = 0.16 to 0.21 Multivariable evaluation: EGSYS score less than 3 = 0.12–0.17 Absence of heart disease, abnormal ECG or both = 0.20 Vasovagal score −2 or more = 0.10–0.84 Syncope or transient loss of consciousness is a common problem seen in the emergency department (ED), accounting for 1% to 1.5% of ED visits annually.1 Cardiac syncope caused by cerebral hypoperfusion secondary to cardiopulmonary events such as arrhythmia or structural heart disease, accounts for 5% to 21% of syncope events.2 Cardiac syncope is associated with an increased risk of premature death and cardiac events.3, 4 It is therefore important for emergency providers to differentiate cardiac syncope from other causes. This systematic review by Albassam et al.5 evaluated patient characteristics, physical examination findings, and diagnostic tests to identify cardiac causes of syncope. The authors searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases, selecting 11 studies that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each study included at least 10 subjects aged 12 years or older, for a total of 4,317 patients. Studies were assigned levels of evidence developed for the Rational Clinical Examination series.6 Several historical factors were associated with an increased likelihood of cardiac syncope including age at first syncopal episode 35 years or older; history of atrial fibrillation or flutter; known severe structural heart disease; dyspnea or chest pain prior to syncope; and witnessed cyanosis during syncope. An elevated cardiac troponin T or I and an elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) both modestly increased the probability of cardiac syncope. Factors that decreased the probability included age less than 35 years at first syncopal episode; normal cardiac troponin T or I; and normal BNP. Combinations of findings such as Evaluation of Guidelines in Syncope Study (EGSYS) score ≥ 3; vasovagal score < −2; and abnormal electrocardiogram, heart disease, or both were more useful when absent than when present. The results of this review should be interpreted cautiously. Included studies generally defined cardiac syncope based on cardiologist judgment. Five of 11 studies included specialty referral populations or inpatients, leading to the potential for spectrum bias. Applying these results to a general ED population might lead to additional testing or interventions in patients who have lower risk of cardiac syncope than the studied population. Misclassification may have further skewed the results as patients with unexplained syncope were excluded from several studies. Many of the clinical findings resulted from single studies. Studies often included a wide age range of patients despite the incidence of syncope, related ED visits, and serious outcomes increasing sharply after the age of 60.7 Cardiac biomarkers such as troponin or BNP testing appear to be an attractive diagnostic option, however, they did not rule in or rule out cardiac syncope. Moreover, these cardiac biomarkers were likely used to diagnose cardiac syncope leading to incorporation bias. ACEP clinical policy, appreciating these limitations, suggests a risk stratification approach focusing on patient history and physical examination to avoid unnecessary testing and hospital admissions.1 In summary, the accurate diagnosis of cardiac syncope is helpful in determining an appropriate plan of care. While no single variable can independently diagnose or exclude cardiac syncope, several clinical findings may be used cohesively to help guide health care providers.
Read full abstract