831 Background: Systemic treatment of metastatic appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) has been challenging due to a lack of well-established AA chemotherapy regimens and historical reliance on colorectal cancer (CRC) protocols. In the United States, but less commonly in Europe, bevacizumab is frequently incorporated in treatment of AA given its approved use for CRC. However, previously there have been no studies evaluating if there is a survival benefit attributable to bevacizumab in patients with AA. Methods: The Palantir Foundry system was used to extract data from the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) electronic medical record for patients with biopsy-proven AA who received chemotherapy at MDA from 2015 to 2024. Only patients with complete staging and histopathology data were included in the analysis. Results: We identified 203 patients with AA who received chemotherapy at MDA and had complete tumor data. Of these, 43% (n=87) received bevacizumab at some point in their treatment. Patients who received bevacizumab were demographically similar to patients who received non-bevacizumab chemotherapy in terms of age at diagnosis, race, and sex; mucinous histology was more frequent in the bevacizumab cohort (52%, n=45 vs. 39%, n=45 in non-bevacizumab cohort). The 87 patients who received bevacizumab were treated with 1-6 lines of therapy per patient (mean = 1.57). The most frequently used bevacizumab-containing regimens were FOLFOX + bevacizumab (34%, n=46), FOLRIRI + bevacizumab (29%, n=40), 5-FU + bevacizumab (15%, n=21), and atezolizumab + bevacizumab (11%, n=15), with less common irinotecan + bevacizumab, TAS-102 + bevacizumab, and FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab. Three regimens containing bevacizumab were discontinued due to complications: one instance of hand-foot syndrome attributed to xeloda, one instance of cardiomyopathy attributed to immunotherapy, and one bowel perforation with abdominal wall abscess attributed to bevacizumab. To determine if bevacizumab was associated with overall survival (OS) benefit we performed Kaplan-Meier analysis, with OS calculated from start of first line chemotherapy to death, in patients with metastatic AA who received either 5-FU doublet therapy alone or 5-FU doublet therapy with bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab trended toward better OS (median 52 vs 25 months for doublet therapy alone, HR: 0.53, p= 0.059). The effect of bevacizumab was particularly notable in patients with signet ring cell histology; where bevacizumab use was associated with significantly longer OS (median OS 50 vs 14 months for doublet therapy alone, HR: 0.24, p= 0.034). Conclusions: Bevacizumab is frequently added to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of AA. These retrospective data suggest an OS benefit to adding bevacizumab to doublet chemotherapy, particularly in the case of signet ring cell histology.
Read full abstract