Introduction Better electrolytes are being extensively explored to improve the performance and safety of lithium-ion batteries. One of the challenges in developing new electrolytes is to avoid the co-intercalation of lithium ions (Li⁺) and solvents into graphite negative electrodes during charging. In this reaction, solvated Li⁺ intercalates between the graphite layers without de-solvation, leading to lower capacities and poor reversibility. Previous works showed that the solvent co-intercalation could be suppressed by employing highly concentrated electrolytes1,2, weakly coordinating solvents3, or adopting proper co-solvents.1 However, a quantitative and experimental factor that dominates the Li⁺ intercalation behavior has yet to be identified. In this study, we focused on Li+ chemical potential (μ Li⁺) in electrolytes as a novel descriptor. We show how the μ Li⁺ is related to the Li⁺ intercalation behavior at graphite electrodes. Experimental Electrolytes with various concentrations of lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) were prepared using 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), 1,2-diethoxyethane (DEE), or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), all of which easily co-intercalate into graphite electrodes. Li⁺ intercalation behavior was categorized as follows: only Li+ intercalates into graphite (noted as Li-GIC), both Li+ and solvated Li⁺ intercalates into graphite (noted as incomplete Li-GIC), and solvated Li⁺ intercalates into graphite (noted as Li-solv-GIC). The Li⁺ intercalation behavior was judged from charge-discharge curves observed in graphite|Li coin cells. To quantify the μ Li⁺, we used lithium electrode potential (E Li) with reference to the redox potential of ferrocene (Fc/Fc+) using a previously reported method by our group.4 Results and discussion E Li (and μ Li⁺) and Li⁺ intercalation behavior in various electrolytes. In all electrolytes, the E Li (and μ Li⁺) increased with increasing salt concentration, which is consistent with the previous study.4 We found that the Li⁺ intercalation behavior depended on the E Li (and μ Li⁺); solvent co-intercalation was mainly observed in the electrolytes with E Li < -3.25 V vs. Fc/Fc+, whereas only Li⁺ tended to intercalate into graphite by suppressing solvent co-intercalation in electrolytes with E Li > -3.25 V vs. Fc/Fc+. Therefore, the obtained trend suggests that μ Li⁺ could be a quantitative descriptor of the Li⁺ intercalation behavior at graphite electrodes. Acknowledgment A part of this study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Transformative Research Areas (B) (23H03824, 23H03827). Reference (1) Yamada, Y. et al., J. Phys. Chem. C, 114, 11680–11685 (2010). (2) Yamada, Y. et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6, 10892–10899 (2014). (3) Li, Z. et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 11, 19996–20010 (2023). (4) Ko, S. et al., Nat. Energy, 7, 1217-1224 (2022) Figure 1
Read full abstract