Electrolyte Decomposition Research Articles

A multi-step discharge/charge model of Li[sbnd]O2 batteries coupled with electrolyte decomposition and carbon electrode corrosion reactions

Electrolyte decomposition and electrode corrosion stand as two primary side reactions in lithium‑oxygen (LiO2) batteries during their discharge/charge cycles. In this work, a comprehensive LiO2 battery model combining multi-step lithium peroxide (Li2O2) formation, electrolyte decomposition, and electrode corrosion is proposed. Based on this model, the deposition behaviors and cycling performance of the LiO2 battery under deep discharge/charge cycles are investigated. The stop of discharge is mainly ascribed to the loss of active surface area for the battery using tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME) electrolyte, while both O2 transport limitation and active surface area loss lead to the discharge termination for battery using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) electrolyte. The incomplete decomposition of Li2O2 and lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) clogs electrode pores, leading to a continuous decline in the discharge capacity of the LiO2 battery. For the TEGDME-based battery, the undecomposed Li2CO3 gradually dominates the deposition with cycles, wherein electrode corrosion becomes the primary source of the undecomposed Li2CO3 after 3 cycles. For the DMSO-based battery, undecomposed Li2O2 is always a dominant trigger for battery discharge capacity degradation, although electrode corrosion remains a key contributor to Li2CO3 generation. Despite the DMSO-based battery exhibiting lower rates of electrolyte decomposition and electrode corrosion, it demonstrates poorer cyclic performance than the TEGDME-based battery due to the generation of more toroidal Li2O2. Moreover, when the charging cut-off voltage is reduced to 4.2 V, discharge capacity diminishes more rapidly due to the increased accumulation of undecomposed Li2O2, despite suppressed Li2CO3 deposition. Finally, the results confirm that thick electrodes lead to deteriorating cycling performance, stemming from increased discharge/charge overpotential and extended discharge/charge times, thus intensifying the side reactions.

Solvation structure and electron isolation synergy of piperidine ionic liquid additives inspires high performance lithium metal batteries

The safety concerns associated with lithium metal stand as the foremost barrier preventing widespread application of lithium metal batteries, especially due to lithium dendrite growth and gas evolution from electrolyte decomposition. This study employed N‑butyl‑N-methyl-piperidinium bis(trifluoro-methyl-sulfonyl) imide (PP14TFSI) as an additive in the electrolyte, aimed at improving the safety attributes of lithium metal batteries. The assessment conducted on the protective mechanism of the PP14TFSI additive unveiled its capability to control create robust and rapidly ion-conductive SEI by adjusting the solvation structure. Simultaneously, PP14+ intercepts free electrons, inhibiting the decomposition of DME and subsequent gas generation. Due to the synergistic effects of these two mechanisms, the rate of gas generation was reduced by half. A comprehensive investigation of lithium metal-based cells exhibited promising performance, maintaining stable cycling for 2160 h at 25 °C, 0.5 mA cm−2, displaying consistently high CE > 98.5 % in a Li||Cu cell. Moreover, at 60 °C, 2 mA cm−2, the cells maintaining stability for 240 cycles while still exhibiting relatively high CE > 98.5 %. In addition, at a low N/P ratio of 4:1, the Li-S battery maintains a high capacity of 673.4 mA h g−1 after 200 cycles, while the Li-LFP battery maintains a capacity of 131.16 mA h g−1 and capacity retention of 91.02 % after 300 cycles at 1 C. This research lays groundwork for the exploration of ionic liquids as additives in lithium metal battery electrolytes to further enhance battery safety performance.

Simulation of lithium-ion battery thermal runaway considering active material volume fraction effect

The multi-physics solver BatteryFOAM couples with the side reaction model for thermal runaway (TR) simulations, including the electrolyte decomposition (E) and solid electrolyte interface layer decomposition (SEI), and the reaction of the electrolyte with graphite intercalated lithium (NE-E) and the reaction of positive electrode active material with the electrolyte (PE-E). This solver is used to study the lithium-ion battery (LIB) TR at different conditions. The published experimental results are used to validate the effectiveness and practicability of BatteryFOAM in predicting the temperature under constat high temperature. We also discuss the reactant concentration, reaction rate, and heat release rate during the LIB TR. The influences of the external factor of the equal equivalent heat transfer (h) on the battery TR is considered, and the sequence in which the battery reaches the critical temperature rising rate (RTR, 60 K/min) and the separator failure temperature (Tsep) is predicted. The results demonstrate that overall the exothermic reaction peaks arise sequentially from SEI decomposition, PE-E reaction, NE-E reaction, and electrolyte decomposition, and NE-E reaction has three exothermic peaks induced by other three side reactions. PE-E reaction contributes more heat for fuse energy to trigger TR, but the NE-E reaction and electrolyte decomposition mainly accounts for the runaway energy. In addition, increasing SEI and electrolyte decomposition intensity is found no effect on the TR temperature. Besides, the rapid reaching to RTR is caused by the high heat release rate of positive electrode active material with electrolyte. Results further show that reducing the fNE−E within 5.0 % will significantly reduce TR risk.

Quantification of Charge Transport and Mass Deprivation in Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Kinetically‐Stable Low‐Temperature Lithium‐Ion Batteries

AbstractGraphite (Gr)‐based lithium‐ion batteries with admirable electrochemical performance below −20 °C are desired but are hindered by sluggish interfacial charge transport and desolvation process. Li salt dissociation via Li+‐solvent interaction enables mobile Li+ liberation and contributes to bulk ion transport, while is contradictory to fast interfacial desolvation. Designing kinetically‐stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) without compromising strong Li+‐solvent interaction is expected to compatibly improve interfacial charge transport and desolvation kinetics. However, the relationship between physicochemical features and temperature‐dependent kinetics properties of SEI remains vague. Herein, we propose four key thermodynamics parameters of SEI potentially influencing low‐temperature electrochemistry, including electron work function, Li+ transfer barrier, surface energy, and desolvation energy. Based on the above parameters, we further define a novel descriptor, separation factor of SEI (SSEI), to quantitatively depict charge (Li+/e−) transport and solvent deprivation processes at Gr/electrolyte interface. A Li3PO4‐based, inorganics‐enriched SEI derived by Li difluorophosphate (LiDFP) additive exhibits the highest SSEI (4.89×103) to enable efficient Li+ conduction, e− blocking and rapid desolvation, and as a result, much suppressed Li‐metal precipitation, electrolyte decomposition and Gr sheets exfoliation, thus improving low‐temperature battery performances. Overall, our work originally provides visualized guides to improve low‐temperature reaction kinetics/thermodynamics by constructing desirable SEI chemistry.

Quantification of Charge Transport and Mass Deprivation in Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Kinetically-Stable Low-Temperature Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Graphite (Gr)-based lithium-ion batteries with admirable electrochemical performance below -20 °C are desired but are hindered by sluggish interfacial charge transport and desolvation process. Li salt dissociation via Li+-solvent interaction enables mobile Li+ liberation and contributes to bulk ion transport, while is contradictory to fast interfacial desolvation. Designing kinetically-stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) without compromising strong Li+-solvent interaction is expected to compatibly improve interfacial charge transport and desolvation kinetics. However, the relationship between physicochemical features and temperature-dependent kinetics properties of SEI remains vague. Herein, we propose four key thermodynamics parameters of SEI potentially influencing low-temperature electrochemistry, including electron work function, Li+ transfer barrier, surface energy, and desolvation energy. Based on the above parameters, we further define a novel descriptor, separation factor of SEI (SSEI), to quantitatively depict charge (Li+/e-) transport and solvent deprivation processes at Gr/electrolyte interface. A Li3PO4-based, inorganics-enriched SEI derived by Li difluorophosphate (LiDFP) additive exhibits the highest SSEI (4.89×103) to enable efficient Li+ conduction, e- blocking and rapid desolvation, and as a result, much suppressed Li-metal precipitation, electrolyte decomposition and Gr sheets exfoliation, thus improving low-temperature battery performances. Overall, our work originally provides visualized guides to improve low-temperature reaction kinetics/thermodynamics by constructing desirable SEI chemistry.

Challenges in XPS Analysis of PEO‐LiTFSI‐based Solid Electrolytes: How to Overcome X‐ray‐Induced Photodecomposition

AbstractThe cycle life of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) batteries containing lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) is hindered by interfacial (electro)chemical electrolyte decomposition, a process traditionally examined via X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Our research presents a critical examination of X‐ray induced photodecomposition, commonly misinterpreted as (electro)chemical electrolyte decomposition, in PEO‐LiTFSI systems and those with NCM cathodes. We provide novel insights into this X‐ray induced photodecomposition process and show that it is particularly pronounced when LiTFSI is dissolved and not in its pure state. Most importantly, we reveal that cryogenic measurement conditions can almost completely mitigate this photodecomposition. This insight not only deepens the understanding of photodecomposition within XPS analyses but also provides a transformative approach to the accurate characterization of electrolyte materials in lithium batteries.

Analyzing the Effect of Electrolyte Quantity on the Aging of Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Despite a substantial impact on various economic and cell technology factors, the influence of electrolyte quantities is rarely addressed in research. This study examines the impact of varying electrolyte quantities on cell performance and aging processes using three different electrolytes: LP57 (1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate:ethyl methyl carbonate (EC:EMC 3:7 w/w), LP572 (LP57+2 wt.% vinylene carbonate (VC)) and LP57 + absVC (18.351 mg VC). Comprehensive analytical post mortem investigations revealed that continuous excessive electrolyte decomposition determines the performance of cells using LP57, leading to enhanced irreversible lithium-ion loss and interphase thickening with increasing electrolyte volume. Impedance rise due to the growth of the interphase was also identified as the cause of degrading cell performance with rising amounts of LP572, attributed to an increasingly pronounced consumption of VC rather than electrolyte aging effects. By varying the electrolyte quantity while maintaining a constant amount VC within the cell system, the differences in cell performance were minimized, and observed deteriorating effects were suppressed. This study demonstrates the sensitive interdependence of electrolyte volume and additive concentration, practically affecting aging behavior. Comprehensively understanding the characteristics of each individual electrolyte component and tailoring the electrolytes to cell-specific cell properties proves to be crucial to optimize cell performance.

Regulating Li-ion solvation structure and Electrode-Electrolyte interphases via triple-functional electrolyte additive for Lithium-Metal batteries

LiPF6-based carbonate electrolytes have been widely utilized in commercial Li-ion batteries; however, they encounter significant interfacial stability challenges when implemented in high-energy–density lithium-metal batteries (LMBs). Herein, we introduce innovative N,N-diethylcyclohexanamine (NDA) as a triple-functional electrolyte additive to enhance the stability and compatibility of carbonate electrolytes. Due to the high electronegativity of amino group, NDA additive not only eliminates HF/H2O but also modifies the Li+ solvation structure, effectively reducing the electrolyte decomposition, suppressing the hydrolysis of LiPF6 and inhibiting the transition metal (TM) dissolution. Moreover, NDA facilitates the formation of Li3N-rich solid-/cathode-electrolyte interphase (SEI/CEI) layers thought preferential redox reactions at both the lithium metal anode (LMA) and Ni-rich cathode (LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, NCM811), which restrains the growth of Li dendrites, minimizes parasitic reactions, and promotes rapid Li+ transport. Therefore, the Li/NDA-added/Li symmetric cells exhibit remarkably stable cycling performance, lasting up to 630 h at 0.5 mA cm−2/0.5 mAh cm−2. Compared to the baseline cells, the Li/LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cells with 0.5 wt% NDA show higher capacity retention after 300 cycles at 1C (85.9 % vs. 49.3 %) and superior rate performance, even at 9C. These unique features of NDA present a promising solution for addressing the interfacial deterioration issue of LMBs.

The Dependence of Solid Electrolyte Interphase on the Crystal Facet of Current Collector in Li Metal Battery.

The continuous electrolyte decomposition and uncontrolled dendrite growth caused by the unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) have largely hindered the development of Li metal batteries. Here, we demonstrate that tuning the facet of current collector can regulate the composition of SEI and the subsequent Li deposition behavior using single-crystal Cu foils as an ideal platform. The theoretical and experimental studies reveal that the (100) facet of Cu possesses strong adsorption to anions, guiding more anions to participate preferentially in the inner Helmholtz plane and further promoting the formation of the stable inorganic-rich SEI. Consequently, the single-crystal Cu foils with a single [100] orientation (s-Cu(100)) achieve the dendrite-free Li deposition with enhanced Li plating/stripping reversibility. Moreover, the Li anode deposited on s-Cu(100) can stabilize the operation of an Ah-level pouch cell (350 Wh kg-1) with a low negative/positive capacity ratio (~2) and lean electrolyte (2.4 g Ah-1) for 150 cycles. Impressively, this strategy demonstrates universality in a series of electrolytes employed different anions. This work provides new insights into the correlation between the SEI and current collector, opening a universal avenue towards high-performance Li metal batteries.

The Dependence of Solid Electrolyte Interphase on the Crystal Facet of Current Collector in Li Metal Battery

AbstractThe continuous electrolyte decomposition and uncontrolled dendrite growth caused by the unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) have largely hindered the development of Li metal batteries. Here, we demonstrate that tuning the facet of current collector can regulate the composition of SEI and the subsequent Li deposition behavior using single‐crystal Cu foils as an ideal platform. The theoretical and experimental studies reveal that the (100) facet of Cu possesses strong adsorption to anions, guiding more anions to participate preferentially in the inner Helmholtz plane and further promoting the formation of the stable inorganic‐rich SEI. Consequently, the single‐crystal Cu foils with a single [100] orientation (s‐Cu(100)) achieve the dendrite‐free Li deposition with enhanced Li plating/stripping reversibility. Moreover, the Li anode deposited on s‐Cu(100) can stabilize the operation of an Ah‐level pouch cell (350 Wh kg−1) with a low negative/positive capacity ratio (~2) and lean electrolyte (2.4 g Ah−1) for 150 cycles. Impressively, this strategy demonstrates universality in a series of electrolytes employed different anions. This work provides new insights into the correlation between the SEI and current collector, opening a universal avenue towards high‐performance Li metal batteries.

Synchrotron Infrared Nano-Spectroscopy and Imaging of Lithium Fluoride in the Solid Electrolyte Interphase on Li-Ion Anodes

The solid electrolyte interphase layer that forms on the surface of the negative electrode in Li-ion batteries is crucial for battery cycle/calendar life, rate performance and safety. This 10's of nanometers layer is formed from the decomposition of the liquid electrolyte and its passivation properties are very sensitive to its formation and aging conditions. Despite this critical role, there is still a lack of fundamental understanding of how its structure and composition relate to its stability and passivation performance.Amongst the SEI products that form during the decomposition of liquid electrolyte, lithium fluoride (LiF) is a ubiquitous component and many attribute its presence to be a determining factor of a well passivated interface. Despite the importance, LiF’s nanostructure and distribution within the SEI layer is rarely investigated due to the lack of suitable characterization techniques. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is the main tool to identify LiF in the SEI layer, but its micron scale lateral resolution precludes any nanometer scale mapping of LiF’s distribution which limits its ability to identify the role LiF plays in the SEI layer.Recently our group has been characterizing the SEI layer of Li-ion negative electrodes with nano-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (nano-FTIR).1,2 Nano-FTIR is a scanning probe technique based in a typical atomic force microscope (AFM) in which a broadband laser illuminates a metallic tip/sample interface. The metallic tip acts as an antenna, focusing the infrared light adjacent to the interface and creating a near-field interaction. By operating in constant tapping mode and due to the nonlinearity of the near-field signal on the tip/sample distance, the corresponding backscattered light from the near-field interaction with the sample can be separated from the background with lock-in amplification. The result is IR reflection and absorption spectra with lateral resolution close to the tip radius (ca. 20 nm). This far exceeds the diffraction limited resolution of typical IR microscopy (~10’s µm) creating new opportunities for IR characterization on nanometer length scales.In this talk, we’ll discuss our recent work related to utilizing synchrotron-based nano-FTIR to characterize and image LiF in the SEI layer of Li-ion based negative electrodes. The synchrotron infrared light source allows the detection of photons out to the far-IR (322 cm-1 limit) which enables the detection of the vibrational modes of Li containing inorganic phases such as LiF, Li2O, and LiH. By comparing model thin film LiF nano-FTIR spectra with experimental spectra take from the surfaces of Cu, Si thin film, and a novel metallic glass anode, we can gauge the heterogeneity of the LiF in the SEI layer and then suggest different LiF formation mechanisms. Based on the results, we believe that nano-FTIR with a synchrotron based light source will be a key tool to unravelling the nanoscale structure of the SEI layer due to its nanoscale chemical sensitivity and nondestructive nature.This research was supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE)’s Vehicle Technologies Office under the Silicon Consortium Project directed by Brian Cunningham and managed by Anthony Burrell. This research used resources of the Advanced Light Source from beamline 2.4, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. References (1) Dopilka, A.; Gu, Y.; Larson, J. M.; Zorba, V.; Kostecki, R. Nano-FTIR Spectroscopy of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase Layer on a Thin-Film Silicon Li-Ion Anode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15 (5), 6755–6767.(2) He, X.; Larson, J. M.; Bechtel, H. A.; Kostecki, R. In Situ Infrared Nanospectroscopy of the Local Processes at the Li/Polymer Electrolyte Interface. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1), 1398.

Decomposition of Electrolyte Solutions at Positive Electrodes

Preventing the decomposition reactions of electrolyte solutions is essential for extending the lifetime of lithium-ion batteries. However, the high voltage (>4.5 V) reactivity of commonly used electrolyte solutions is still poorly understood; electrolyte decomposition at the positive electrode is generally believed to proceed via electrochemical oxidation of the organic carbonate solvent,1 while more recent work has revealed an alternative pathway involving reactive lattice oxygen species originating from the positive electrode (i.e., singlet oxygen).2 Unfortunately, we still have a limited understanding of these reactions, the products that form, and which chemical structural units in the electrolyte solution make them reactive - all of which make it challenging to assess and mitigate the impact of electrolyte decomposition on the battery’s lifetime.In this work, operando gas measurements and solution NMR were combined to study the electrochemical and chemical decomposition of widely used electrolyte salts, solvents, and additives. First, the electrochemical stability of the electrolyte components was reviewed against C65 electrodes in a standard H-cell setup: all solvents reveal little decomposition up to 5.5 V (vs Li/Li+), consistent with previous electrochemical measurements.3,4 Based on the experimentally detected soluble and gaseous products, the electrochemical decomposition mechanism is inferred. Subsequently, the chemical stability against reactive oxygen species (i.e., singlet oxygen; 1O2, peroxide anion; O2 2 −, and superoxide radical anion, O2 −) was explored. All carbonate solvents demonstrated instability against reactive oxygen species. As before, the experimentally detected gaseous and soluble products were used to infer the decomposition mechanisms. The proposed mechanisms were verified using 17O and 18O isotopic labeling for NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry measurements, respectively. The findings on the reactivity between the electrolyte components and reactive oxygen species provide a deeper understanding of electrolyte decomposition processes occurring at high voltage positive electrodes (e.g., Li-rich layered and disordered rocksalt oxides, high-voltage spinels, and polyanionic materials). Moreover, these insights will support the development of more stable electrolyte formulations, further extending the lifetime of lithium-ion batteries.(1) Imhof, R.; Novak, P. Oxidative Electrolyte Solvent Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries: An In Situ Differential Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry Investigation. J Electrochem Soc 1999, 146 (5), 1702–1706.(2) Jung, R.; Metzger, M.; Maglia, F.; Stinner, C.; Gasteiger, H. A. Oxygen Release and Its Effect on the Cycling Stability of LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 (NMC) Cathode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. J Electrochem Soc 2017, 164 (7), A1361–A1377. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0021707jes.(3) Zhang, X.; Soc, J. E.; Zhang, X.; Kostecki, R.; Richardson, T. J.; Pugh, J. K.; Ross, P. N. Electrochemical and Infrared Studies of the Reduction of Organic Carbonates Electrochemical and Infrared Studies of the Reduction of Organic Carbonates. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2001, 148 (12), A1341–A1345. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1415547.(4) Moshkovich, M.; Cojocaru, M.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Aurbach, D. The Study of the Anodic Stability of Alkyl Carbonate Solutions by in Situ FTIR Spectroscopy, EQCM, NMR and MS. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2001, 497, 84–96. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00457-5.

Quantifying Mixed Redox and Parasitic Processes in Li-Rich Disordered Rocksalt Li-Ion Battery Cathodes

Li-ion battery demand is expected to increase dramatically as the transportation and power generation sectors become electrified. To address the expense and scarcity of cobalt and nickel used in current layered cathodes, alternative transition metals must be explored. Disordered rocksalt (DRX) cathodes can be fully comprised of affordable, earth-abundant metals such as manganese and titanium and have shown high practical capacity but currently suffer from poor capacity retention and voltage fade [1]. Many researchers have attributed this to O redox, and the subsequent formation of deleterious reactive oxygen species, which can occur in DRX cathodes at states-of-charge as low as 40% [2,3]. Recently, researchers have increased the Mn content in DRX cathodes, with the intent of increasing Mn redox and suppressing O redox [4]. Furthermore, these Mn-rich DRX cathodes undergo a beneficial phase transformation upon electrochemical cycling, increasing capacity and almost eliminating voltage fade [4]. Yet, the redox contributions of Mn and O in these Mn-rich cathodes, especially after this phase transformation, are not understood.Here we decouple capacity contributions from Mn-redox, O-redox, and parasitic processes (e.g. electrolyte decomposition) for Mn-rich DRX using a combination of operando gas measurements and inductively coupled plasma – optimal emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Mn-rich DRX cathodes were cycled to various states of charge in coin cells and the resulting Mn and O oxidation state were determined via titration mass spectrometry (TiMS) using oxalic acid and triflic acid, respectively. To account for lattice O2 loss, differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) was used on select cells. To account for Mn dissolution during cycling, ICP-OES was used to quantify the amount of Mn remaining in the cathode as a function of cycle number. The results of this study provide insight into the various redox processes and interfacial degradation that occurs in DRX cathodes, thereby informing future design to improve high-voltage stability of these promising materials.[1]: Raphaële J. Clément et al 2020 Energy Environ. Sci. 2 345[2]: Tzu-Yang Huang et al 2023 Adv. Energy Mater. 13 2300241[3]: Roland Jung et al 2017 J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 A1361[4]: Zijian Cai et al 2023 Nat. Energy 1

A Thermal Tanks-in-Series Model for Simulating over-Discharge Cycling in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Energy storage will play a crucial role in the transition to clean and renewable sources of energy production to meet future consumption demands.1 Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries are widely adopted due to their high energy density, low self-discharge rate and fast charging capabilities for applications like electric vehicles and grid storage.2 Li-ion batteries for high voltage operations, where several cells are connected in series, can experience inadvertent over-discharge due to differences between cells3,4. These differences can arise due to many reasons including changes in internal resistance and deviation in electrochemical degradation that can cause divergence of cell open circuit potentials. Over-discharge is a condition when the manufacturer recommended lower voltage limit is crossed while discharging4, which results in various side effects such as electrolyte decomposition, capacity degradation, cathode morphology change and possible internal short circuit3,5. Increase in anode potential during over-discharge leads to copper dissolution from the anode current collector and subsequent plating within cell components. The Solid Electrolyte Interface (SEI) can decompose during excessive deintercalation and reform during charging, reducing the lithium inventory. Excessive heat generation during cycle life testing after occurrences of over-discharges has been found in some cases to lead to temperatures >150 °C6,7.Temperature plays a key role in the electrochemical performance of individual cells, affecting the diffusivities of ions, kinetics of reactions and rate of degradation of the battery. A physics-based modeling approach coupled with a thermal model can be employed to understand the effect of over-discharge on the electrochemical behavior of Li-ion batteries and provides insights into the interplay of various degradation mechanisms that cause capacity fade.The Thermal Tank-In-Series9,10(TTiS) model is a systematically volume-averaged form of the standard pseudo-2-dimensional (p2D)11 model with energy balance equations for the current collectors, cathode, separator and anode. This reduces the number of equations in the model and improves computational speed while maintaining accuracy, as it is sensitive to changes in the battery’s state of charge (SOC) and cell temperature, which helps predict the overpotential changes to the cell electrodes and thermodynamics.We use the TTiS model to identify the dominant fade mechanisms in 3 sets of experimental cycling and temperature data for the: i) normal operating window (2.5V – 4.2V), ii) 5 initial cycles of over-discharge (1.5V – 4.2V) followed by normal operation until 20% capacity fade and iii) 5 cycles of periodic over-discharge every 20 cycles, until 20% capacity fade. Analysis on the effect of C-rate, ambient temperature and voltage window of operation will facilitate understanding the temperature behavior and overpotentials in a cell sandwich. Key considerations required in extending a model to simulate over-discharge will also be examined. References S.P. S. Badwal, S. S. Giddey, C. Munnings, A. I. Bhatt, and A. F. Hollenkamp, Frontiers in Chemistry, 2, 28 (2014).G. Pistoia. Lithium-Ion Batteries: Advances and Applications. First ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014).R. Guo, L. Lu., M. Ouyang, X. Feng. Sci Rep 6, 30248 (2016).G.Zhang, X. Wei, S. Chen, J. Zhu, G. Han, and H. Dai. J. Power Sources, 521, 230990. (2022).C. Fear, D. Juarez-Robles, J. A. Jeevarajan, and P. P. Mukherjee, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165, A1639–A1647 (2018).D. Juarez-Robles, Purdue Univ. Ph.D. Thesis (2019).H. Maleki and J. N. Howard, J. Power Sources, 160, 1395–1402 (2006).H. Liu, Z. Wei, W. He, and J. Zhao, Energy Convers. Manag., 150, 304–330 (2017).A. Subramaniam, S. Kolluri, S. Santhanagopalan, and V. R. Subramanian, J. Electrochem. Soc., 167, 113506 (2020).A. Subramaniam, S. Kolluri, C. D. Parke, M. Pathak, S. Santhanagopalan, and V. R. Subramanian, J. Electrochem. Soc., 167, 013534 (2020).M. Doyle, T. F. Fuller, and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, 1526 (1993)

Ion Conduction Mechanism and Interfacial Stability in Fluorine Containing Lithium Argyrodite Electrolytes for Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries (SSLSBs) hold great potential as a safe and energy-dense storage technology for wide variety of applications. Among solid-state electrolytes, halogen-doped lithium argyrodites have become an attractive category. This is attributed to their notable features, including high lithium-ion conductivity (~10-3 S/cm), favorable elastic stiffness (~ 30 GPa), and low flammability, making them promising candidates for enhancing the performance of SSLSBs.Despite their potential, SSLSBs based on sulfide faces challenges due to a limited atomic-scale understanding of ion-conduction, charge transport, structural evolution, and interfacial reactions such as dendrite growth, electrolyte decomposition. Here we employ a combination of density functional theory calculations, and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations to address this challenge for fluorinated argyrodites. Specifically, using accurate materials modeling, we design fluorine-containing argyrodite electrolytes that simultaneously offer enhanced (a) Li-ion conduction facilitated by unique Li-disorder induced by fluorine and other halogen co-dopants, and (b) stability against Li-anode owing to formation of a stable solid-electrolyte interface containing conductive species (Li3P), alongside LiCl and LiF. We will discuss these results in the context of accelerating design of novel solid-state electrolytes for long-lived, stable, and high-energy density SSLSBs.

The Effects of Temperature and Fluoroethylene Carbonate Concentration on the Formation of the Graphite SEI and Its Impact on the Full-Cell Performance

Extending the cycle-life of state-of-the-art lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) is, amongst other aspects, predicated on optimizing the properties of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), such as its stability and resistance.[1] It is formed at the negative electrode during the first cycles by electrolyte decomposition and acts as a passivating layer between the electrode surface and the electrolyte.[2,3] Since the SEI formation is accompanied by an irreversible loss of cyclable lithium, its stability during cycling is crucial for improving the charge/discharge efficiency of LiBs. Furthermore, the arising resistance associated with the SEI formation, predominantly depending on the SEI thickness, its chemical composition, and its lithium-ion conductivity, all impact the rate performance of the anode.[4] Two of the most crucial factors impacting SEI formation are temperature and electrolyte composition (i.e., using electrolyte additives).[5] Additives are added to the electrolyte to inhibit the predominant reduction of other electrolyte constituents and thereby form an SEI with improved stability during cycling.[1,6,7] One of the most prominent additives for LiBs is fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), which is preferentially reduced compared to common carbonate solvents (e.g., ethylene carbonate, ethyl methyl carbonate) due to its higher reduction potential.[7] In this study, we investigated the influence of the formation temperature between 10 and 60 °C, as well as the concentration of FEC (2 and 20 %wt in EC:EMC 3:7 wt/wt with 1 M LiPF6, Gotion, USA) on the characteristics of a synthetic graphite (SMG-A5, Resonac, Japan) anode, both in SMG/Li half-cells and in Ni-rich NCM/SMG full cells.We quantified the first-cycle irreversible capacity loss (ICL) in SMG/Li half cells with a lithium reference electrode after two 0.1 C formation cycles and compared the FEC containing electrolytes to the baseline- (LP-57) and an LP-572 (1 M LiPF6 in EC:EMC 3:7 wt/wt + 2 %wt vinylene carbonate (VC), Gotion, USA) electrolyte. Employing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in an SMG/Li half-cell setup with a µ-reference electrode and a free-standing graphite electrode,[8,9] we could further quantify the intercalation resistance (R Int, representing the sum of the charge-transfer and the SEI resistance) after an identical formation protocol at 40 % SOC. Both quantities, the ICL and R Int, increase with increasing formation temperature and higher FEC content.The impact of an increasing R Int on the rate performance was tested in Ni-rich NCM/SMG full cells with a lithium reference electrode, revealing a decreased rate capability and higher susceptibility for lithium plating for cells that were formed at higher temperatures and contained 20 %wt FEC. Additionally, the cycling stability of Ni-rich NCM/SMG full cells at 25 °C was assessed in coin cells. Despite an increased ICL and R Int after formation, cells that were formed at elevated temperatures and contained 20 %wt FEC showed enhanced cycling stability compared to those that were formed at a lower temperature and contained less FEC.Finally, on-line electrochemical mass spectrometry (OEMS) was employed to quantify the evolved gases during the formation of a Ni-rich NCM/SMG full cell containing either of the FEC-containing electrolytes at different temperatures. In accordance with an increased ICL and R Int, a higher formation temperature, as well as a higher FEC content, gave rise to a more pronounced gas evolution during formation.

Electrochemical Lithium Intercalation & Exfoliation in 2D TMDs and Its in-Situ Studies

We developed a lithium ion battery intercalation & exfoliation method with detailed experimental procedures for the mass production of 11 two dimensional TMDs and inorganic nanosheets, such as MoS2, WS2, TiS2, TaS2, ZrS2, graphene, h-BN, NbSe2, WSe2, Sb2Se3 and Bi2Te3, among them 3 TMDs achieved mono- or double layer yield > 90%. This method involves the electrochemical intercalation of lithium ions into layered inorganic materials and a mild sonication process. The Li insertion can be monitored and finely controlled in the battery testing system, so that the galvanostatic discharge process is stopped at a proper Li content to avoid decomposition of the intercalated compounds. The intercalation strategy can also be used to tune 2D TMDs’ physical and chemical properties for various applications. For example, we developed a one-step covalent functionalization method on MoS2 nanosheets for membrane fabrication, which exhibited excellent water desalination performance. For lithium intercalation mechanism, the state-of-the-art In-Situ Liquid Phase TEM is an ideal technique for identifying the phase changes during intercalation process. With self-designed electrochemical liquid cell utilized, we can directly vapture the dynamic electrochemical lithiation and delithiation of electrode in a commercial LiPF6/EC/DEC electrolyte, such as LiF nanocrystal formation, lithium metal dendritic growth, electrolyte decomposition, and solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) formation. Combining with other in-situ techniques, such as in-situ XAS, XRD and Raman, etc, the underlying lithium intercalation mechanism in TMDs were further investigated, which render us a comprehensive understanding of the intrinsic correlation between the intercalation process and TMDs.

Effect of Chemical Doping on Ion Transport in Sulfide Solid Electrolytes

Rechargeable solid-state batteries (SSBs) offer tremendous promise as a safe and energy-dense storage technology for use in electric transportation, robotics, and portable electronics. Lithium argyrodites (e.g., Li7PS6, and its halogen-doped derivatives) have emerged as a lucrative class of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) for SSBs owing to their high Li-ion conductivity (~10-3 S/cm), good elastic stiffness (~30 GPa), and low flammability. Meanwhile, sulfide-based solid electrolytes such as Na3SbS4 (NSS) also showcase substantial potential for SSBs with their high theoretical specific capacity, enhanced safety, and abundance of resources. Despite their promise, both lithium and sodium-based SSBs remain far from commercialization due to lack of atomic-scale understanding of ion-conduction, charge transport, structural evolution, and interfacial reactions (e.g., dendrite growth, electrolyte decomposition etc.). Here we employ a combination of density functional theory calculations, ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, and nudged elastic band calculations to understand ion transport mechanism in chemically doped lithium argyrodites and NSS.In lithium-based systems, using accurate materials modeling, we design fluorine-containing argyrodite electrolytes that offers enhanced Li-ion conduction facilitated by unique Li-disorder induced by fluorine and other halogen co-dopants. Our results show the opening up of new pathways for Li inter-cage hops in these fluorine -containing argyrodite electrolytes which increases the Li-ion conductivity. In the case of sodium-based systems, we focus on atomic-scale mechanisms underlying Na-ion conduction in the presence of cation dopants. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations reveal the significant impact of cation dopants on NSS, where the introduction of charge-compensating Na-vacancies enhances Na-ion conduction. The size of the cation dopant is found to be a critical factor, with examples such as Ca-doped NSS (rCa2+ / rNa+ = 0.98) showing a conductivity approximately 10 times that of pristine NSS, while larger Ba2+ as a dopant (rBa2+ / rNa+ = 1.35) hinders Na-ion hops due to local strain, resulting in a Na-ion conductivity ~5 times that of NSS. We will discuss these results in the context of accelerating design of novel solid-state electrolytes for long-lived, stable, and high-energy density SSBs.

Understanding Organic Components of Solid Electrolyte Interphase on the Lithium Metal Anode

Lithium ion batteries have become the dominant form of energy storage used in consumer electronics and, recently, electric vehicles. However, high costs have prevented widespread deployment of lithium ion batteries for applications other than portable electronics, and the safety issues associated with liquid organic electrolytes remain to be addressed. In order to enable the greater utilization of electric vehicles, allow for grid scale energy storage, and meet the demands of new electronic applications, new materials for high energy density batteries must be developed. High capacity electrode materials like lithium metal have the potential to facilitate these technologies, but lithium metal electrodes are presently limited by significant side reactions, poor quality deposition, and the potential to form hazardous dendrites. Therefore, it is important to develop a clear understanding of the surface reactivity and growth behavior of the lithium metal at the interface with the electrolyte in order to enable stable long-term cycling.The products that form as a result of electrolyte decomposition reactions at the electrode interface are known to be extremely important in determining the final cell performance, yet characterizing the organic components of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) proves to be challenging with typical techniques. In this presentation we will discuss a combination of in operando and ex situ techniques developed in efforts to more comprehensively characterize the reaction intermediates and organic SEI products of electrolyte reduction reactions. Specifically, we employ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to identify radical intermediates and clarify electrolyte reduction mechanisms. Furthermore, SEI product formation with respect to electrochemical potential and time will be described using data obtained from in operando ATR-FTIR. ATR-FTIR is a powerful method for characterizing organic species, but typical materials such as Ge, Si, and ZnSe react with lithium metal during deposition. In this talk, the development of a diamond based operando cell and its application to the characterization of organosulfur and fluorinated electrolytes will be discussed. With the understanding developed from these two techniques we provide new insights into the formation and chemical nature of SEI components that promote stable cycling of lithium metal electrodes.

Intergranular Shielding of Ultrafine-Grained Ni-Rich Layered Cathode for Advanced Lithium-Ion Batteries

To achieve carbon neutrality on a global scale, fuel-powered vehicles are being steadily phased out over environmentally recommended electrified vehicles (EVs) with low greenhouse gas emissions. In a battery, the cathode is among the foremost components, as it predominantly determines the LIB’s performance and price. However, since current fleet of layered oxide NCM and NCA cathodes have a relatively lower Ni content, they can extract only a limited amount of reversible capacity (210 mAh∙g-1), restricting the driving range of EVs. To achieve higher energy densities, many studies have focused on increasing the average fraction of Ni in NCM or NCA cathodes to more than 90%. However, the extraction of large amounts of lithium ions is seriously compromised by the rapid deterioration of both cycle life and thermal safety. Recent studies on X-doped cathodes (X = B, Nb, Ta, Sb, W, and Mo) have offered promising results by engineering their geometric microstructural configurations to suppress intergranular cracking.1,2 This approach has proven its potential to improve the electrochemical cycling performance of Ni-rich NCA, NCM(A), and NM cathodes. However, prolonged exposure of the Ni-enriched (Ni ≥ 95%) cathode to the electrolyte generally results in continuous oxidative decomposition of electrolytes and subsequent cathode structural transformation, rendering the cathode unsuitable for applications requiring long battery life.3 Herein, we propose a highly stabilized Ni-enriched (Ni ≥ 95%) layered cathode by adopting a multi-stage engineering strategy, i.e., the construction of an ultrafine-scaled microstructure and subsequent intergranular shielding of the refined grains. The formation of an F induced protective layer at the intergranular boundaries of the ultrafine grains in Li[Ni0.95Co0.04Mo0.01]O2 (denoted as Mo1-NC96) noticeably improved both the structural and chemical stability of the cathode, with a limited degree of structural degradation and gas evolution. Reference s : [1] U.-H. Kim, G.-T. Park, B.-K. Son, G.W. Nam, J. Liu, L.-Y. Kuo, P. Kaghazchi, C.S. Yoon, Y.-K. Sun, Nat. Energy, 5 (2020) 860-869.[2] G.-T. Park, B. Namkoong, S.-B. Kim, J. Liu, C.S. Yoon, Y.-K. Sun, Nat. Energy, 7 (2022) 946-954.[3] F. Kong, C. Liang, L. Wang, Y. Zheng, S. Perananthan, R.C. Longo, J.P. Ferraris, M. Kim, K. Cho, Adv. Energy Mater., 9 (2019) 1802586.