Today, the most important challenge for hydrogen production is the use of suitable energy source for sustainable production. The dual use of nuclear power plants allows them to expand into other markets by eliminating greenhouse gas emissions from processes such as hydrogen production. The significance of this matter especially in countries with ongoing new nuclear power plants is high and shows the future need for nuclear fission technology. In this paper, an economic assessment of hydrogen production in the second and third units of the Bushehr nuclear power plant (BNPP) with the Hydrogen Economy Evaluation Program (HEEP) is carried out and a comparison of CO2 emission in nuclear and non-nuclear methods of hydrogen production is presented. Most nuclear reactors, including Advanced Pressurized WaterReactor (APWR), High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR), and Water-Water EnergeticReactor (WWER), can be used as a source of thermal and electrical energy for the process of hydrogen production. In this research, hydrogen production processes based on the Conventional Electrolysis (CE), High Temperature Steam Electrolysis (HTSE), and Sulfur-Iodine (SI) Process using different storage and transportation options are compared to choose the cost-effective method for coupling with the WWER1000 reactor. Hydrogen production, thermal energy, and electricity costs have been calculated and explained in detail. The results showed that the cost-effective option for hydrogen production is using the High Temperature Steam Electrolysis (HTSE) method, Compressed Gas (CG) storage, and pipeline transportation, by 2.88 $/kg. Also, applying this method to produce hydrogen, the nuclear power plant thermal efficiency, and the hydrogen plant efficiency are kept in the best possible conditions by 51.98% and 58.21%, respectively.
Read full abstract