Electroconvulsive Threshold Research Articles

Effects of the uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate on seizure activity, learning and brain oxidative stress parameters in mice

Patients with end-stage renal disease often have neurological disorders, with a higher incidence of memory impairment or epilepsy than in the general population. Patients undergoing hemodialysis are particularly exposed to the biological effects of uremic toxins. Indoxyl sulfate (IS) is one of the most potent uremic toxins; however, its possible effects on seizure susceptibility or memory functions have yet to be elucidated. In the current study, we focused on investigating the possible convulsant and amnesic effects of IS in recognized animal models. The study was performed on adult male Swiss mice. IS and scopolamine (SCO) were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.), and pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) was injected subcutaneously (s.c.). All substances were given as single injections. Acute IS administration (400 mg/kg) led to its accumulation in the brain. IS at doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg decreased the PTZ convulsive threshold, and at the same doses, it did not significantly affect the threshold for electroconvulsions. IS (200 and 400 mg/kg) did not impair learning in the passive avoidance test and did not increase the SCO-induced memory impairment in this test. IS increased lipid peroxidation, decreased the level of reduced glutathione, and reduced the activity of superoxide dismutase and catalase in mouse brains. Exposure to IS did not significantly change the activity of acetylcholinesterase in the brain tissue.This study shows that acute exposure to IS induces oxidative stress in the brain and potentiates PTZ-induced seizures in mice. Further studies are needed to find out whether IS-induced oxidative stress may affect epileptic seizures and/or epileptogenesis.

Trimetazidine, an Anti-Ischemic Drug, Reduces the Antielectroshock Effects of Certain First-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs.

Trimetazidine (TMZ), an anti-ischemic drug for improving cellular metabolism, is mostly administered to patients with poorly controlled ischemic heart disease (IHD). Since IHD is considered the most frequent causative factor of cardiac arrhythmias, and these often coexist with seizure disorders, we decided to investigate the effect of TMZ in the electroconvulsive threshold test (ECT) and its influence on the action of four first-generation antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test (MES) in mice. The TMZ (up to 120 mg/kg) did not affect the ECT, but applied at doses of 20–120 mg/kg it decreased the antielectroshock action of phenobarbital. The TMZ (50–120 mg/kg) reduced the effect of phenytoin, and, when administered at a dose of 120 mg/kg, it diminished the action of carbamazepine. All of these revealed interactions seem to be pharmacodynamic, since the TMZ did not affect the brain levels of antiepileptic drugs. Furthermore, the combination of TMZ with valproate (but not with other antiepileptic drugs) significantly impaired motor coordination, evaluated using the chimney test. Long-term memory, assessed with a passive-avoidance task, was not affected by either the TMZ or its combinations with antiepileptic drugs. The obtained results suggest that TMZ may not be beneficial as an add-on therapy in patients with IHD and epilepsy.

Effect of acute and chronic exposure to lovastatin on the anticonvulsant action of classical antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model

Numerous studies indicate neuroprotective activity of statins, commonly used cholesterol lowering drugs in epilepsy and several other neurological diseases. Promising anti-convulsant and neuroprotective effects of statins, attributed to their anti-excitotoxic and anti-inflammatory action were reported in several animals’ seizure models.To determine the effects of acute (single) and chronic (once daily for 7 consecutive days) administration of lovastatin on the protective activity of four classical antiepileptic drugs such as carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model.Seizure activity (maximal electroconvulsions) in mice were generated by alternating current delivered via ear-clip electrodes. Adverse-effect profile of lovastatin combinations with the tested antiepileptic drugs was assessed in the chimney test (motor performance). Total brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were evaluated with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay technique as a measure of the pharmacokinetic interaction between drugs.Lovastatin administered acutely or chronically (5–20 mg/kg) did not significantly affect the threshold for electroconvulsions in mice. Acute lovastatin (10 mg/kg) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant effect of valproate, which was accompanied with a 34% significant increase in total brain concentration of valproate. Acute lovastatin in combination with phenytoin impaired motor performance by notably decreasing the TD50 value of phenytoin. Chronic lovastatin (10 mg/kg) markedly enhanced the anticonvulsant potential of phenytoin.Acute lovastatin increased anticonvulsant action of valproate but also significantly raised level of valproate in brain after combined administration suggesting pharmacokinetic nature of interaction. The combinations of chronic lovastatin combined with phenytoin can potentially enhance the anticonvulsant potency of phenytoin.

Sotalol does not interfere with the antielectroshock action of selected second-generation antiepileptic drugs in mice

BackgroundDue to blocking β-receptors, and potassium KCNH2 channels, sotalol may influence seizure phenomena. In the previous study, we have shown that sotalol potentiated the antielectroshock action of phenytoin and valproate in mice.Materials and methodsAs a continuation of previous experiments, we examined the effect of sotalol on the action of four chosen second-generation antiepileptic drugs (oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, pregabalin, and topiramate) against the maximal electroshock in mice. Undesired effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor impairment) and step-through passive-avoidance task (long-term memory deficits). Finally, brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, while those of sotalol by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.ResultsSotalol at doses of up to 100 mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Applied at doses of 80–100 mg/kg, sotalol did not affect the antielectroshock action of oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, pregabalin, or topiramate. Sotalol alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory. Finally, sotalol significantly decreased the brain concentrations of lamotrigine and increased those of oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Pharmacokinetic interactions, however, did not influence the final antielectroshock effects of above-mentioned drug combinations. On the other hand, the brain concentrations of sotalol were not changed by second-generation antiepileptics used in this study.ConclusionSotalol did not reduce the antielectroshock action of four second-generation antiepileptic drugs examined in this study. Therefore, this antidepressant drug should not interfere with antiseizure effects of lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, and topiramate in patients with epilepsy. To draw final conclusions, our preclinical data should still be confirmed in other experimental models and clinical conditions.

Amiodarone Enhances Anticonvulsive Effect of Oxcarbazepine and Pregabalin in the Mouse Maximal Electroshock Model.

Accumulating experimental studies show that antiarrhythmic and antiepileptic drugs share some molecular mechanisms of action and can interact with each other. In this study, the influence of amiodarone (a class III antiarrhythmic drug) on the antiseizure action of four second-generation antiepileptic drugs was evaluated in the maximal electroshock model in mice. Amiodarone, although ineffective in the electroconvulsive threshold test, significantly potentiated the antielectroshock activity of oxcarbazepine and pregabalin. Amiodarone, given alone or in combination with oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, or topiramate, significantly disturbed long-term memory in the passive-avoidance task in mice. Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were not affected by amiodarone. However, the brain concentration of amiodarone was significantly elevated by oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and pregabalin. Additionally, oxcarbazepine and pregabalin elevated the brain concentration of desethylamiodarone, the main metabolite of amiodarone. In conclusion, potentially beneficial action of amiodarone in epilepsy patients seems to be limited by neurotoxic effects of amiodarone. Although results of this study should still be confirmed in chronic protocols of treatment, special precautions are recommended in clinical conditions. Coadministration of amiodarone, even at low therapeutic doses, with antiepileptic drugs should be carefully monitored to exclude undesired effects related to accumulation of the antiarrhythmic drug and its main metabolite, desethylamiodarone.

Acute and chronic treatment with moclobemide, a reversible MAO-inhibitor, potentiates the antielectroshock activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice

BackgroundDue to enhancing serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission, moclobemide may influence seizure phenomena. In this study, we examined the effect of both acute and chronic treatment with moclobemide on seizures and the action of first-generation antiepileptic drugs: valproate, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin. MethodsThe effect of moclobemide on seizures was assessed in the electroconvulsive threshold test, while its influence on antiepileptic drugs was estimated in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Undesired effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor impairment) and step-through passive-avoidance task (long-term memory deficits). Finally, brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. ResultsGiven acutely, moclobemide at 62.5 and 75 mg/kg increased the electroconvulsive threshold. In contrast, chronic treatment with moclobemide up to 75 mg/kg did not influence this parameter. Acute moclobemide applied at subthreshold doses (up to 50 mg/kg) enhanced the antielectroshock effects of carbamazepine, valproate and phenobarbital. Chronic moclobemide (37.5‐75 mg/kg) increased the action of all four antiepileptic drugs. All revealed interactions, except these between moclobemide and phenobarbital, seem to have pharmacokinetic nature, because the antidepressant drug, either in acute or in chronic treatment, increased the brain concentrations of respective antiepileptic drugs. In terms of undesired neurotoxic effects, acute and chronic moclobemide, antiepileptic drugs, and their combinations did not produce significant motor or long-term memory impairment. ConclusionsAcute and chronic therapy with moclobemide can increase the effectiveness of some antiepileptic drugs against the maximal electroshock test. In mice, this effect was, at least partially, due to pharmacokinetic interactions. So far as the results of experimental studies can be transferred to clinical conditions, moclobemide seems safe for the application in patients with epilepsy and depression. Possibly, in the case of certain antiepileptic drugs combined with moclobemide, their doses should be adjusted downwards.

Nebivolol attenuates the anticonvulsant action of carbamazepine and phenobarbital against the maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

BackgroundDue to co-occurrence of seizures and cardiovascular disorders, nebivolol, a widely used selective β1-blocker with vasodilatory properties, may be co-administered with antiepileptic drugs. Therefore, we wanted to assess interactions between nebivolol and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital in the screening model of tonic–clonic convulsions.MethodsSeizure experiments were conducted in the electroconvulsive threshold and maximal electroshock tests in mice. The chimney test served as a method of assessing motor coordination, whereas long-term memory was evaluated in the computerized step-through passive-avoidance task. To exclude or confirm pharmacokinetic interactions, we measured brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs using the fluorescence polarization immunoassay.ResultsIt was shown that nebivolol applied at doses 0.5–15 mg/kg did not raise the threshold for electroconvulsions. However, nebivolol at the dose of 15 mg/kg reduced the anti-electroshock properties of carbamazepine. The effect of valproate, phenytoin, and phenobarbital remained unchanged by combination with the β-blocker. Nebivolol significantly decreased the brain concentration of valproate, but did not affect concentrations of remaining antiepileptic drugs. Therefore, contribution of pharmacokinetic interactions to the final effect of the nebivolol/carbamazepine combination seems not probable. Nebivolol alone and in combinations with antiepileptic drugs did not impair motor performance in mice. Nebivolol alone did not affect long-term memory of animals, and did not potentiate memory impairment induced by valproate and carbamazepine.ConclusionsThis study indicates that nebivolol attenuated effectiveness of some antiepileptic drugs. In case the results are confirmed in clinical settings, this β-blocker should be used with caution in epileptic patients.

Dronedarone (a multichannel blocker) enhances the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, but not that of lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice

Accumulating experimental evidence indicates that some recently licensed antiarrhythmic drugs, including dronedarone (a multichannel blocker) play a crucial role in initiation of seizures in both, in vivo and in vitro studies. Some of these antiarrhythmic drugs elevate the threshold for maximal electroconvulsions and enhance the anticonvulsant potency of classical antiepileptic drugs in preclinical studies.This study was aimed at determining the influence of dronedarone (an antiarrhythmic drug) on the anticonvulsant potency of four novel antiepileptic drugs (lacosamide, lamotrigine, pregabalin and topiramate) in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure model in mice. To exclude any potential pharmacokinetic contribution of dronedarone to the observed interactions, total brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured.Dronedarone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, by reducing its ED50 value from 7.67 mg/kg to 4.19 mg/kg (P < 0.05), in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. On the contrary, dronedarone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the anticonvulsant properties of lacosamide, pregabalin or topiramate in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. Measurement of total brain concentrations of lamotrigine revealed that dronedarone did not significantly alter total brain concentrations of lamotrigine in experimental animals. Additionally, the combination of dronedarone with pregabalin significantly impaired motor coordination in animals subjected to the chimney test. In contrast, the combinations of other studied antiepileptic drugs with dronedarone had no negative influence on motor coordination in mice.It is advisable to combine dronedarone with lamotrigine to enhance the anticonvulsant potency of the latter drug. The combinations of dronedarone with lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate resulted in neutral interactions in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. However, a special caution is advised to patients receiving both, pregabalin and dronedarone due to some possible adverse effects that might occur with respect to motor coordination.

New derivative of 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione (TP427) potentiates the anticonvulsant action of valproate, but not that of carbamazepine, phenytoin or phenobarbital in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model.

To assess the effects of 5-(3-chlorobenzyl)-4-hexyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione (TP427) on the protective anticonvulsant action of four classical antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate) in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice, an isobolographic transformation of data was used. Electrically-induced tonic-clonic seizures were experimentally evoked in adult male albino Swiss mice. The anticonvulsant effects of TP427, when used singly, were determined by the calculation of the threshold increasing the dose by 20% (TID20 value). The influence of TP427 on the anticonvulsant potency of four various classical antiepileptic drugs was determined with a subthreshold method. Types of interactions between drugs were determined using the isobolographic transformation of data. Additionally, total brain antiepileptic drug concentrations were measured. TP427, when administered separately, significantly increased the threshold for electroconvulsions. The experimentally determined TID20 value for TP427 was 11.71 mg/kg. Moreover, TP427 (10 mg/kg) significantly increased the anticonvulsant activity of valproate (p < 0.01), but not that of carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model. Isobolographic transformation of data confirmed that the interaction between TP427 and valproate was synergistic. Pharmacokinetic study revealed that TP427 increased total brain valproate concentrations, and had no impact on total brain concentrations of carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin in mice. The synergistic interaction between TP427 and valproate in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model might occur favorable for epilepsy patients in future. The combinations of TP427 with carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin were additive in the mouse tonic-clonic seizure model and also deserves clinical attention.

Safranal carried by nanostructured lipid vehicles inhibits generalized epilepsy in mice.

Safranal, a main component of Crocus sativus, is suggested to have neuroprotective effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of safranal and nanostructured lipid vehicle (NLV) carried safranal in acute and chronic experimental mice models of epilepsy. In PILO acute seizure model, safranal dose-dependently extended latency to generalized seizure, decreased the highest seizure stages and the number of generalized seizures. Moreover, NLV carried safranal further enhanced the anti-seizure effect, which is comparable to the action of sodium valproate. Meanwhile, NLV carried safranal reduced and delayed the electroencephalogram spectra power after pilocarpine injection. In histological aspect, safranal dose-dependently reduced the loss of neurons induced by seizure and NLV system further improved this protection at the same dose. In MES acute model, safranal markedly increased the electroconvulsive threshold, where NLV further improved its effect. In PTZ chronic seizure model, NLV carried safranal significantly delayed the kindling rate of progress and the time it took to reach generalized seizures as compared to NLV control group. In conclusion, this study indicates that safranal inhibits generalized seizure in acute and chronic epilepsy models in mice and NLV can enhance this effect. So, NLV carried safranal may have potential value in treatment of generalized epilepsy.

Amiodarone, a multi-channel blocker, enhances anticonvulsive effect of carbamazepine in the mouse maximal electroshock model

Cardiac arrhythmia may occur in the course of epilepsy. Simultaneous therapy of the two diseases might be complicated by drug interactions since antiarrhythmic and antiepileptic agents share some molecular targets. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic drug working as a multi-channel blocker, on the protective activity of four classical antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Amiodarone at doses up to 75 mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold in mice. Acute amiodarone at the dose of 75 mg/kg significantly potentiated the anticonvulsive effect of carbamazepine, but not that of valproate, phenytoin or phenobarbital in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. The antiarrhythmic agent and its combinations with antiepileptic drugs did not impair motor performance or long-term memory in mice, except for the combination of amiodarone and phenobarbital. Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were not changed. Despite favourable impact of amiodarone on the anticonvulsive action of carbamazepine in the maximal electroshock, co-administration of the two drugs should be carefully monitored in clinical conditions. Further studies are necessary to evaluate effects of chronic treatment with amiodarone on seizure activity and the action of antiepileptic drugs.

Adenosine receptor agonists differentially affect the anticonvulsant action of carbamazepine and valproate against maximal electroshock test-induced seizures in mice

SummaryBackground.Adenosine is regarded as an endogenous anticonvulsant and its agonists have been proved to affect the anticonvulsant activity of a number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in animal models of seizures.Aim.To evaluate effects of adenosine agonists on carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) in mouse model of generalized tonic-clonic convulsions.Methods.The following adenosine receptor agonists were used: A1– cyclohexyladenosine, A2A– CGS 21 680, A3– N6-benzyl-NECA and A1(preferentially) and A2– 2-chloroadenosine. Their possible anticonvulsant effects were studied in a threshold electroconvulsive test for maximal electroconvulsions. The protective activity of AEDs alone or in combinations with adenosine agonists was evaluated in the form of their respective ED50values necessary to protect 50% of mice against tonic extension of the hind limbs, following maximal electroshock, delivered through ear electrodes. The specificity of interactions between AEDs and adenosine agonists was challenged with an adenosine receptor A1and A2antagonist, aminophylline (5 mg/kg). The effects of AEDs alone or with adenosine agonists were tested for the occurrence of adverse effects (AE) (impairment of motor coordination) in a chimney test. All combinations with an enhancement the protective activity of CBZ or VPA were verified with the free plasma or brain concentration of these AED.Results.Adenosine receptor agonists (cycloheksyladenosine up to 4 mg/kg; CGS 21 680 – 8 mg/kg; N6-benzyl-NECA – 1 mg/kg; 2-chloroadenosine – 2 mg/kg) did not significantly affect the threshold for maximal electroconvulsions. Cycloheksyladenosine (1 mg/kg), N6-benzyl-NECA (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) and 2-chloroadenosine (1 mg/kg) potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ. Valproate’s protective action was enhanced by one adenosine agonist – cycloheksyladenosine (1 mg/kg). Only the combination of CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg) was resistant to aminophylline (5 mg/kg). Pharmacokinetic interactions were evident in case of the combination of CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg) and resulted in an increased free plasma concentration of this CBZ. Interestingly, total brain concentration of CBZ confirmed the pharmacokinetic interaction as regards CBZ + N6-benzyl-NECA (1 mg/kg).Conclusion.The best profile was shown by the combination of CBZ + 2-chloroadenosine which involved no AE or a pharmacokinetic interaction. The remaining positive combinations in terms of anticonvulsant activity were associated with general profound AE and pharmacokinetic interactions in some of them.

Interactions of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor, with antiepileptic drugs in the test of maximal electroshock in mice

Experimental studies showed that certain angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists can decrease seizure severity in rodents. Additionally, some of these blockers of the renin-angiotensin system have been documented to enhance the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced seizures. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor and a novel antihypertensive drug, on the protective action of numerous antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, valproate, clonazepam, phenobarbital, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, topiramate and pregabalin) in the test of maximal electroshock in mice. The examined drugs were administered intraperitoneally. Aliskiren up to a dose of 75mg/kg did not affect the threshold for electroconvulsions, however, aliskiren (75mg/kg) enhanced the anticonvulsant action of clonazepam and valproate. Following aliskiren treatment, a higher brain concentration of valproate was noted, suggesting a pharmacokinetic interaction. In the rota-rod test, the concomitant treatment with aliskiren (50 or 75mg/kg) and clonazepam (22.6mg/kg) impaired motor coordination while clonazepam (22.6mg/kg) alone showed strong tendency towards this impairment. The combination of aliskiren (75mg/kg) with phenobarbital (25.5mg/kg) caused long-term memory deficits in the passive avoidance task. This study shows that there are no negative interactions between aliskiren and the examined antiepileptic drugs as concerns their anticonvulsant activity. Aliskiren even potentiated the anticonvulsant action of clonazepam and valproate against maximal electroshock. The impact of aliskiren alone on seizure activity or on the anticonvulsant and adverse activity of antiepileptic drugs needs further evaluation in other animal models of seizures.

An experimental study to investigate the effects of venlafaxine and escitalopram on anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice

Background: Depression is a common psychiatric comorbidity in patients with epilepsy which remains often untreated, due to concern of antidepressant induced seizures. The safety status of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in epileptics is controversial.Methods: Phase I acute effect of venlafaxine and escitalopram on the seizure threshold was studied. Phase II, the acute effects of test ADDs on the effective dose of AEDs viz valproate, phenobarbitone and phenytoin were studied in maximal electroshock (MES). Phase III- same study design as in phase II except that AEDs and ADDs were administered daily for 28 days.Results: Venlafaxine raised the electroconvulsive threshold in a dose dependant manner in phase I, however it was significant at a dose of 25mg/kg. In phase II, a significant reduction in ED50 of valproate was observed when it was co-administered with venlafaxine at dose of 12.5 and 25mg/kg, whereas ED50 of phenobarbitone was significantly reduced at a dose of 25mg/kg. Chronic administration of venlafaxine at 12.5mg/kg daily reduced ED50 of valproate. At 25mg/kg daily ED50 of all the three studied AEDs was reduced, Escitalopram 8mg/kg significantly raised the electroconvulsive threshold value in phase 1, Escitalopram administered in the dose of 8mg/kg reduced the ed50 value of valproate. Escitalopram given in dose of 4 and 8mg/kg reduced the ED50 value of valproate.Conclusions: From this finding, it may be concluded that venlafaxine and escitalopram administered either alone or in combination with AEDs acutely or chronically, exhibit anticonvulsant action.

Sotalol enhances the anticonvulsant action of valproate and diphenylhydantoin in the mouse maximal electroshock model.

Sotalol as a drug blocking β-receptors and potassium KCNH2 channels may interact with different substances that affect seizures. Herein, we present interactions between sotalol and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital. Effects of sotalol and antiepileptics alone on seizures were determined in the electroconvulsive threshold test, while interactions between sotalol and antiepileptic drugs were estimated in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Motor coordination and long-term memory were evaluated, respectively, in the chimney test and passive-avoidance task. Brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Sotalol at doses up to 100mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Applied at doses 60-100mg/kg, sotalol potentiated the antielectroshock action of valproate, while at doses 80-100mg/kg that of phenytoin. Sotalol (up to 100mg/kg) did not affect the action of carbamazepine or phenobarbital in the maximal electroshock. Sotalol alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory in mice. Finally, sotalol did not change brain concentration of valproate and phenytoin, so pharmacokinetic interactions between the drugs are not probable. As far as obtained data may be extrapolated into clinical conditions, sotalol may be considered as an arrhythmic drug that does not reduce the action of classical antiepileptic drugs and thereby can be used in epileptic patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Influence of picolinic acid on seizure susceptibility in mice.

The mechanism of drug resistance in epilepsy remains unknown. Picolinic acid (PIC) is an endogenous metabolite of the kynurenine pathway and a chelating agent added to dietary supplements. Both inhibitory and excitatory properties of PIC were reported. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of exogenously applied PIC upon the electroconvulsive threshold and the activity of chemical convulsants in eight models of epilepsy in mice. All experiments were performed on adult male Swiss albino mice. Electroconvulsions were induced through ear clip electrodes. The electroconvulsive threshold (current strength necessary to induce tonic seizures in 50% of the tested group - CS50) was estimated for control animals and animals pretreated with PIC. To determine the possible convulsant activity of PIC, it was administered subcutaneously or intracerebroventricularly in increasing doses to calculate the CD50 values (doses of convulsants necessary to produce seizures in 50% of the animals). Chemical convulsions were induced by challenging the animals with increasing doses of convulsant to calculate the CD50 values. The following convulsants were used: 4-aminopyridine, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, bicuculline, N-methyl-d-aspartate, nicotine, pentylenetrazole, pilocarpine hydrochloride and strychnine nitrate. PIC significantly decreased the electroconvulsive threshold and, after intracerebroventricular injection, but not subcutaneous, produced convulsions. Of the studied convulsants, only the activity of pilocarpine hydrochloride was significantly enhanced by PIC. PIC enhances seizure activity and potentially may play a role in the pathogenesis of drug resistant epilepsy. Future studies should focus on the interactions between PIC and antiepileptic drugs.

Influence of caffeine on the protective activity of gabapentin and topiramate in a mouse model of generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Caffeine may interact with classical antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), reducing their anticonvulsant effects in basic seizure models. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether intraperitoneal caffeine (acute or chronic for 15 days) could attenuate the anticonvulsant effect of some newer AEDs: gabapentin (GBP) and topiramate (TPM) against electroconvulsions in mice. Maximal electroshock (MES)-induced mouse seizure model was used for the estimation of the anticonvulsant activity of TPM whilst the protective activity of GBP was evaluated in the threshold test for maximal (tonic) convulsions. Adverse effects were evaluated by measurement of long-term memory (the step-through passive avoidance task) and motor coordination (chimney test). Plasma AED concentrations were also measured to determinate any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed effects. Caffeine (both acute and chronic at 23.1 and 46.2mg/kg) significantly reduced the protective effects of TPM against MES. As regards GBP, caffeine (acutely at 46.2mg/kg and chronically at 23.1 or 46.2mg/kg) significantly diminished the GBP-induced increases in the electroconvulsive threshold. In addition, caffeine did not affect the free plasma concentrations of TPM or GBP. Acute and chronic caffeine (23.1 and 46.2mg/kg) enhanced the impairment of motor coordination in mice pretreated with GBP whilst an opposite effect was observed in TPM injected mice and pretreated with chronic caffeine at 46.2mg/kg. The results indicate that newer AEDs, GBP or TPM behave in the exactly same way as classical antiepileptics in mice challenged with caffeine. This hazardous effect of caffeine is not subject to tolerance.

Propafenone enhances the anticonvulsant action of classical antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock model.

Antiarrhythmic and antiepileptic drugs share some mechanisms of actions. Therefore, possibility of interactions between these in epileptic patients with cardiac arrhythmias is quite considerable. Herein, we attempted to assess interactions between propafenone and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital. Effects of propafenone on seizures were determined in the electroconvulsive threshold test in mice. Interactions between propafenone and antiepileptic drugs were estimated in the model of maximal electroshock. Motor coordination was evaluated in the chimney test, while long-term memory in the passive-avoidance task. Brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Propafenone up to 50mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold, significantly enhancing this parameter at doses of 60-90mg/kg. Applied at its subthreshold doses, propafenone potentiated the antielectroshock action of all four tested classical antiepileptics: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Propafenone alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory in mice. Propafenone did not change brain concentration of phenytoin and phenobarbital; however, it significantly decreased brain levels of carbamazepine and increased those of valproate. Propafenone exhibits its own anticonvulsant effect and enhances the action of classical antiepileptic drugs against electrically induced convulsions in mice. Further investigations are required to determine the effect of propafenone on antiepileptic therapy in humans.

Evaluation of anticonvulsant and antinociceptive properties of new N-Mannich bases derived from pyrrolidine-2,5-dione and 3-methylpyrrolidine-2,5-dione.

The aim of the present experiments was to examine anticonvulsant activity of new pyrrolidine-2,5-dione and 3-methylpyrrolidine-2,5-dione derivatives in animal models of epilepsy. In addition, the possible collateral antinociceptive activity was assessed. Anticonvulsant activity was investigated in the electroconvulsive threshold (MEST) test and the pilocarpine-induced seizure models in mice. Antinociceptive activity was examined in the hot plate and the formalin tests in mice. Considering the drug safety evaluation, the Vibrio harveyi test was used to estimate anti/mutagenic activity. To determine the plausible mechanism of anticonvulsant action, for two chosen compounds (12 and 23), in vitro binding assays were carried out. All of the tested compounds revealed significant anticonvulsant activity in the MEST test. Compounds 12 and 23 displayed anticonvulsant effect also in pilocarpine-induced seizures. Four of the tested compounds (12, 13, 15, and 24) revealed analgesic activity in the hot plate test as well as in the first phase of the formalin test, and all of them were active in the second phase of the formalin test. The possible mechanism of action of compounds 12 and 23 is the influence on the neuronal voltage-sensitive sodium and L-type calcium channels. The obtained results indicate that in the group of pyrrolidine-2,5-diones, new anticonvulsants with collateral analgesic properties can be found.

Influence of MPEP (a selective mGluR5 antagonist) on the anticonvulsant action of novel antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP — a selective antagonist for the glutamate metabotropic receptor subtype mGluR5) on the protective action of some novel antiepileptic drugs (lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin and topiramate) against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured to determine whether MPEP altered pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs. Intraperitoneal injection of 1.5 and 2mg/kg of MPEP significantly elevated the threshold for electroconvulsions in mice, whereas MPEP at a dose of 1mg/kg considerably enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of pregabalin and topiramate, but not that of lamotrigine or oxcarbazepine in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Pharmacokinetic results revealed that MPEP (1mg/kg) did not alter total brain concentrations of pregabalin and topiramate, and the observed effect in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model was pharmacodynamic in nature. Collectively, our preclinical data suggest that MPEP may be a safe and beneficial adjunct to the therapeutic effects of antiepileptic drugs in human patients.