Introduction: The use of stress testing prior to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is highly variable. We examined the financial implications of this variation and its impact on postoperative cardiac events. Methods: We studied patients who underwent elective endovascular (EVAR) or open AAA repair at Vascular Quality Initiative participating centers from 2015–2019. We grouped centers into quintiles by their frequency of preoperative stress testing. We calculated rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of in-hospital myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or death, for each quintile. We applied the charges for electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and nuclear stress tests at our institution in 2019 to the study population to calculate expected charges per 1,000 patients. Results: We studied 27,978 patients who underwent EVAR (mean age: 73.5 ±8.5 years, 81.7% male) and 4,481 who underwent open AAA repair (mean age: 69.5 ±8.1 years, 75.1% male). Stratifying by quintile, stress test frequency ranged from 13.0% to 68.6% (mean: 37.9%) among EVAR patients and 15.9% to 85.0% (mean: 52.8%) among open AAA repair (Figure). The rate of MACE was 1.4% after EVAR and 10.2% after open AAA repair. MACE after EVAR increased with the frequency of stress testing and was 0.9% at 1 st quintile centers vs 1.7% at 5 th quintile centers (p-trend=0.033). There was no association between MACE and stress testing for open AAA repair (p-trend=0.192). The estimated charges for stress testing prior to EVAR was $125,806 per 1,000 patients at 1 st quintile centers, and $664,975 at 5 th quintile centers, while charges prior to open AAA repair were $153,861 per 1,000 patients at 1 st quintile centers, and $825,473 at 5 th quintile centers. Conclusions: More frequent stress testing is associated with high cost without a reduction in MACE. This lack of return on investment highlights the need for more judicious stress test use prior to AAA surgery.