Electrochemical studies on binuclear complexes can serve to get light on the function of metalloenzymes incorporating two metal ions in close proximity at the active site. Int his connection, compartmental ligands offer the opportunity to synthetize metal complexes with adjacent coordination sites differing in the donor set [1]. In previous papers [2, 3] were reported the electrochemical behaviour of mononuclear and dinuclear complexes of copper(II), nickel(II) and dioxouranium(VI) with th Schiff base ligand H 4aapen, derived from o-acetoacetylphenol and 1, 2-diaminoethane. ▪ We report now the electrochemical properties of copper(II), nickel(II) and dioxouranium(VI) complexes of the Schiff base ligand H 4fsalacen, derived from 3-formylsalicylic acid and 1, 2-diaminoethane [4]. ▪ Mononuclear Complexes The following mononuclear complexes have been taken into consideration(See next column). ▪ ▪ The cyclic voltammetric behaviour of all the complexes, both at platinum and mercury microelectrodes in DMSO solution, shows the occurrence of a cathodic process which involves a quasireversible one electron charge transfer, uncomplicated in the case of the nickel(II) and the dioxouranium(VI) complexes, while followed by a subsequent chemical reaction (the decomposition of the anion) in the case of the copper(II) complex. In any case the use of appropriate scan rates allows us the computation of the formal potentials for the reduction of the central metal ions (Table I). As an example in Fig. 1 the cyclic voltammetric response of H 2fsalacen UO 2is reported. Dinuclear Complexes Both homodinuclear and heterodinuclear complexes have been studied. ( See next page) t001 Formal Reduction Potential (V vs. ferrocenium/ferrocene) of fsalacen Complexes as a Function of the Coordination Site. Metal (M) or Metal ions in the fsalacen complex [M (N 2O 2) fsalacen]/[M (N 2O 2) fsalacen] − [M (O 2O 2) fsaleacen]/[M (O 2O 2) fsalacen] Ni(II) −1.59 UO 2(VI) −1.14 Cu(II) −0.92 Ni(II) N 2 O 2 Ni(II) O 2 O 2 −1.80 −2.05 Cu(II) N 2 O 2 Cu(II) O 2 O 2 −1.10 −1.67 a Cu(II) N 2 O 2 Ni(II) O 2 O 2 −1.42 −2.17 Ni(II) N 2 O 2 Cu(II) O 2 O 2 −2.05 −1.05 Cu(II) N 2 O 2 UO 2(VI) O 2 O 2 − −1.22 Ni(II) N 2 O 2 UO 2(VI) O 2 O 2 −1.69 −1.44 a Peak potential value at v = 0.2 s −1 ▪ The electrochemical behaviour of dinuclear complexes essentially parallels that of the corresponding mononuclear species as to the electrode mechanism; on the contrary shifts of reduction potentials occur, due to the metal-metal interaction [5]. In Fig. 2 the cyclic voltammetric behaviour of fsalacenNi N 2 O 2 UO 2 O 2 O 2 is reported as atypical example. ▪ Table I summarizes the reduction potentials of all the complexes studied. A comparison with reduction potentials of the corresponding aapen complexes indicates that fsalacen compounds are generally more easily reducible. The easiest addition of electrons to fsalacen complexes to respect with aapen complex can be explained in terms of electronic effects; in fact electron-withdrawing groups, ▪, are present in the side chains of the molecule of fsalacen ligand whereas electro-donating groups, CH 3 are present in the molecule of aapen ligand.