Elective Total Hip Replacement Research Articles

HOW MUCH DO HIP ARTHROPLASTIES COST? THE BURDEN AND BUDGET IMPACT OF IMPLANTS AND HIP ARTHROPLASTY ON THE NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOR ENGLAND AND WALES

Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most common and cost-effective elective surgical procedures. In the National Health Service (NHS) of England and Wales a myriad of implants for THR are offered at a variety of locally negotiated prices. This study aims to estimate the total burden of elective THR to the NHS, expenditure on implants, and different scenarios of cost changes if implant selection changed for different patient groups.Using National Joint Registry (NJR) data and NHS reference costs, we estimated the number and expenditure of NHS funded primary and revision THR in the 10-year period 2008–2017 and forecasted the number and expenditure on THR over the next decade. Using NJR average NHS Trust prices for the different implant combinations we estimated the average cost of implants used in THRs and estimated the budget impact on NHS providers from switching to alternative implants.The NHS spent over £4.76 billion performing 702,381 THRs between 2008–2017. The average cost of implants was £1,260 per surgery, almost a fifth of the cost of primary THR. Providing cemented implant combinations in primary elective THRs may potentially save up to £281 million over the next 10 years, whilst keeping 10-year revision risks low.The NHS is likely to spend over £5.6 billion providing primary elective THR over the next decade. There are efficiency savings to realise in the NHS by switching to more cost-effective implant combinations available for patients undergoing primary elective THR surgery, but these will need to be balanced against the risks inherent to a change in selection of implants and surgical practice. The HIPPY programme will be conducting practice surveys, discrete choice experiments and a large randomised controlled trial of cemented, uncemented and hybrid fixation in THR for patients under 70 to answer uncertainties.

ESTIMATING THE COSTS, HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE, AND REVISION RISK IN THE YEAR AFTER ELECTIVE PRIMARY AND REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURES BY IMPLANT BEARING MATERIALS: AN ANALYSIS OF LINKED DATA FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY (NJR), HOSPITAL EPISODE STATISTICS (HES), AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES (PROMS) FOR ENGLISH PATIENTS

Implants in total hip replacement (THR) are associated with different clinical and cost-effectiveness profiles,. We estimate the costs and outcomes for NHS patients in the year after THR associated with implant bearing materials using linked routinely collected data.We linked NJR primary elective THR patients for osteoarthritis to HES and National PROMs. We estimated health care costs, health-related quality of life indices, and revision risks, in the year after primary and revision THRs overall. We used generalised linear models adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics and estimated 10-year cumulative probability of revision. We imputed utilities using chained equations for half the sample with missing PROMS.We linked 577,973 elective primary THRs and 11,812 subsequent revisions. One year after primary THR, patients with the cemented THRs using cobalt chrome or stainless steel head with HCLPE liner/cup cost the NHS, on average, £13,101 (95%CI £13,080,£13,122), had an average quality-of-life score of 0.788 (95%CI 0.787,0.788), and a 10-year revision probability of 1.9% (95%CI 1.6,2.3). Compared to the reference, patients receiving a cemented THR with delta ceramic head and HCLPE liner/cup, hybrid THR with delta ceramic head and HCLPE liner/cup, and hybrid THR with alumina head and HCLPE liner/cup had lower 1-year costs (-£572 \[95% CI -£775,-£385\], -£346 \[-£501,-£192\], -£371 \[-£574,-£168\] respectively), better quality of life (0.007 \[95% CI 0.003,0.011\], 0.013 \[0.010,0.016\], 0.009 \[0.005,0.013\] respectively), and lower 10-year revision probabilities (1.4% \[1.03,2.0\], 1.5 \[1.3,1.7\], 1.6%\[1.2,2.1\] respectively).Implant bearing materials are associated with varying mean costs and health outcomes after primary THR. Ours is the first study to derive costs and health outcomes from large, linked databases using multiple imputation methods to deal with bias. Our findings are useful for commissioning and procurement decisions and to inform a subsequent cost-effectiveness model with more granular detail on THR implant types.

Comparison of acute outcomes from elective total hip replacements and after fragility femoral neck fractures in nonagenarians

BackgroundHip hemiarthroplasty has traditionally been used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures in older, frailer patients whilst total hip replacements (THR) have been reserved for younger and fitter patients. However, not all elderly patients are frail, and some may be able to tolerate and benefit from an acute THR. Nonagenarians are a particularly heterogenous subpopulation of the elderly, with varying degrees of independence. Since THRs are performed electively as a routine treatment for osteoarthritis in the elderly, its safety is well established in the older patient. The aim of this study was to compare the safety of emergency THR to elective THR in nonagenarians.MethodsA retrospective 10-year cohort study was conducted using data submitted to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) across three hospitals in one large NHS Trust. Data was collected from 126 nonagenarians who underwent THRs between 1st January 2010 – 31st December 2020 and was categorised into emergency THR and elective THR groups. Mortality rates were compared between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were also compared including postoperative complications (dislocations, revision surgeries, and periprosthetic fracture), length of stay in hospital, and discharge destination.ResultsThere was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups, with 1-year mortality rates of 11.4% and 12.1% reported for emergency and elective patients respectively (p = 0.848). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication rate and discharge destination. Patients who had emergency THR spent 5.56 days longer in hospital compared to elective patients (p = 0.015).ConclusionThere is no increased risk of 1-year mortality in emergency THR compared to elective THR, in a nonagenarian population. Therefore, nonagenarians presenting with a hip fracture who would have been considered for a THR if presenting on an elective basis should not be precluded from an emergency THR on safety grounds.Trial registrationNot necessary as this was deemed not to be clinical research, and was considered to be a service evaluation.

The functional and psychological impact of delayed hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 89,996 patients

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the impact of presurgical waiting times on pre-/post-operative joint specific pain and function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and perspectives of patients awaiting primary elective total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacements. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception until 30th January 2023 (CRD42022288128). Secondary literature and unpublished datasets containing paediatric, non-elective, partial, or revision replacement populations were excluded. PRISMA 2020 reporting and GRADE certainty of evidence guidelines were followed. Residual maximum likelihood meta-analysis and linear meta-regression was performed to elucidate the influence of presurgical waiting time. Twenty-six studies were eligible for systematic review and sixteen for meta-analysis, capturing 89,996 patients (60.6% female, mean age 67.4 years) between 2001 and 2022. A significant deterioration in joint function (mean difference (MD):0.0575%; 95% CI 0.0064, 0.1086; p = 0.028(4d.p.); I2 = 73.1%) and HRQOL (MD: 0.05%; 95% CI − 0.0001.0009; p = 0.011(4 d.p.); I2 = 80.6%) was identified per additional day of waiting. Despite qualitative evidence, meta-analysis could not observe a relationship with postoperative outcome data. Patient responses to delayed THR and TKR surgery were unanimously negative. Immediate action should seek to reduce the increased patient anxiety and significant reductions in pre-operative joint functionality and HRQOL associated with prolonged pre-surgical waiting time, whilst mitigating any potential deleterious post-operative effects.

Direct anterior approach with conventional instruments versus robotic posterolateral approach in elective total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a case-control study.

The purpose of this study is to compare peri-operative and short-term outcomes in patients who underwent elective total hip replacement (THA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with direct anterior approach (DAA) versus a pair-matched cohort of patients who underwent robotic-assisted THA with posterolateral approach. Data from consecutive patients who underwent elective hip replacement from 2021 to 2023 for primary OA were retrospectively retrieved and divided into two groups: the DAA group, who underwent THA with the DAA approach using conventional instruments, and the robotic posterolateral (R-PL group), who underwent robot arm-assisted THA with the posterolateral approach. Comparative assessed outcomes were: operative time, radiographical implant positioning, intake of rescue analgesics, blood loss, transfusion rate, leg length discrepancy and functional outcomes (Harris hip score and forgotten joint score). A total of 100 pair-matched patients were retrieved with a mean age of 66.7 ± 10.7 (range: 32-85) years and a mean follow-up of 12.8 ± 3.6 (range: 7-24) months. No differences in patients' characteristics were detected. Patients in the R-PL group required less rescue tramadol (p > 0.001), ketorolac (p = 0.028) and acetaminophen (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the operative time between (MD = 5.0min; p = 0.071). Patients in the DAA group had significantly lower Hb levels at day 1 (p = 0.002) without significant differences in transfusion rate (p = 0.283). Patients in the R-PL group had shorter length of stay (LOS) with a mean difference of 1.8days [p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.3]. No difference in clinical outcomes was found [leg length discrepancy (LLD), p = 0.572; HHS, p = 0.558; forgotten joint score (FJS), p = 0.629]. No radiographical differences were measured in cup inclination (MD = 2.0°, p = 0.069), malpositioning [odd ratio (OR) = 0.2; p = 0.141], stem alignment (OR = 0.3; p = 0.485) and stem sizing (OR = 1.5; p = 1.000). There was no difference in complication rate except for lateral femoral cutaneous nerve damage, which was higher in DAA group (p < 0.001). R-PL and DAA THA had comparable short-term clinical and radiological outcomes along with similar complication rates. The R-PL group showed significantly lower Hb drop, rescue analgesic consumption and shorter LOS. This is a preliminary study and no strong recommendation can be provided. Further prospective randomized trials are requested to further investigate the cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery in THA. Level IV, case-control study.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Oxycodone Hydrochloride and Fentanyl for Post-operative Pain Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Triple-Blind Trial.

Total hip replacement (THR) is frequently associated with intense post-surgical pain. Effective pain management is of crucial importance to improving patient's condition and increasing his/her satisfaction in the post-operative time. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect and safety of oxycodone and fentanyl after THR. Seventy-two cases scheduled for elective THR were included in this randomized, triple-blind trial. The patients were equally randomized into 2 groups: Fentanyl group (50 ug of fentanyl) and oxycodone group (oxycodone 4 mg). Drugs were received 20 min prior to the end of the operation. Post-operative visual analog scale (VAS) measurements at rest and movement at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and in the ward, 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h post-operatively exhibited a significantly reduced value in the oxycodone group compared to the fentanyl group (P-value < 0.05). Time to first rescue for analgesia was delayed significantly in the oxycodone compared to the fentanyl group (P-value < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption (ug) in the 1st post-operative 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h decreased significantly in the oxycodone group compared to the fentanyl group (P-value < 0.001). Post-operative nausea, vomiting, headache, and pruritus were matched between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). A bolus dose of 4 mg of oxycodone provided superior analgesic efficacy than 50 ug fentanyl as evidenced by significantly lower pain score, delayed onset to first request for analgesia, and the smaller amount of fentanyl consumption at 12, 24, and 48 h post-total hip arthroplasty compared to fentanyl. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the 2 groups.

Individual Factors Modifying Postoperative Pain Management in Elective Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement Surgery.

Total hip and knee replacements are the most common orthopedic procedures performed due to osteoarthritis. Pain is an intrinsic symptom accompanying osteoarthritis, persisting long before surgery, and continuing during the preoperative and postoperative periods. Appropriate pain management after surgery determines the comfort, duration, and cost of hospitalization, as well as the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation. Individual differences in pain perception and tolerance in orthopedic patients remain an important research topic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of analgesic requirements (morphine, acetaminophen, and ketoprofen), including individual pain threshold and tolerance, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and beliefs about pain control in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty using a multilevel regression model (N = 147, 85 women, 62 men, 107 after hip replacement, and 40 after knee replacement). Results: Higher pain tolerance was associated with a lower dose of morphine per kg after surgery. Patients undergoing hip surgery received a lower dose of ketoprofen than patients undergoing knee surgery. The more the patient believed in personal pain control, the stronger the negative relationship between pain tolerance and morphine requirement. The lowest doses were given to patients with the highest pain tolerance and the greatest belief in personal control. Factors such as belief in pain control and pain tolerance should be considered in comprehensive postoperative pain management in orthopedic patients to reduce opioid doses and, thus, side effects.

The True Dislocation Incidence following Elective Total Hip Replacement in Sweden: How Does It Relate to the Revision Rate?

(1) Background: The true dislocation incidence following THA is difficult to ascertain in population-based cohorts. In this study, we explored the cumulative dislocation incidence (CDI), the relationship between the incidence of dislocation and revision surgery, patient- and surgery-related factors in patients dislocating once or multiple times, and differences between patients being revised for dislocation or not. (2) Methods: We designed an observational longitudinal cohort study linking registers. All patients with a full dataset who underwent an elective unilateral THA between 1999 and 2014 were included. The CDI and the time from the index THA to the first dislocation or to revision were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, giving cumulative dislocation and revision incidences at different time points. (3) Results: 136,810 patients undergoing elective unilateral THA were available for the analysis. The 30-day CDI was estimated at 0.9% (0.9-1.0). The revision rate for dislocation throughout the study period remained much lower. A total of 51.2% (CI 49.6-52.8) suffered a further dislocation within 1 year. Only 10.9% of the patients with a dislocation within the first year postoperatively underwent a revision for dislocation. (4) Discussion: The CDI after elective THA was expectedly considerably higher than the revision incidence. Further studies investigating differences between single and multiple dislocators and the criteria by which patients are offered revision surgery following dislocation are urgently needed.

TRAINING IN HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: ARE THEY DOING ENOUGH?

Orthopaedic surgery is a practical surgical specialization field, the exit exam for registrars remains written and oral. Despite logbook evaluation and surgical work-based assessments, the question remains: can registrars perform elective surgery upon qualification? In South Africa, obstacles to elective surgical training include the trauma workload, financial constraints, fellowships and the Covid pandemic. In hip and knee arthroplasty, new approaches like the direct anterior approach (DAA) and robotic-assisted knee surgery also contributed to the dilution of cases available for registrar training. There are concerns that orthopaedic registrars do not perform enough cases to achieve surgical proficiency.Review of the last 4 years of registrar logbooks in hip and knee arthroplasty surgery performed in a single tertiary academic hospital in South Africa. We included all primary total hip replacements (THR), total knee replacements (TKR) and hemiarthroplasties (HA) done for neck of femur (NOF) fractures between 1 April 2019 and 30 March 2023. Differentiation between registrar assisting, registrar performing with consultant supervision and registrar performing independent surgery was done.990 hip arthroplasties (472 Primary THR, 216 NOF THR, 302 NOF HA) and 316 Primary TKR were performed during the study period. In primary elective THR the posterior approach was dominant and used in 76% of cases. In NOF THA the DAA was dominant used in 98% of cases. Primary TKR robotic-assisted technologies was used in 27% (n=94) cases. Registrars as the primary surgeon were the highest in NOF THA at 70% of cases and the lowest performing TKR at 25%. During 3-month rotations, an average registrar performed 12 (2 TKR and 10 THR) and assisted in 35 (10 TKR and 25 THR) cases.Despite the large number of arthroplasties operations being performed over the last 4-year period, the surgical cases done by registrars are below, the proposed minimal cases to provide surgical proficiency during their training period.

Retention of Urine after Elective Total Hip and Knee Replacement Surgeries - A Literature review

Urinary retention postoperatively is alarming complication that happened after elective hip and knee replacement surgeries. This literature review examined the incidence, risk factors, and management of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in elective total hip and knee replacement surgery over the last five years.

The Accuracy of Digital Preoperative Templating in Primary Total Hip Replacements.

Background​ Digital templating is an essential part of preoperative planning in elective total hip replacement (THR) surgery. The goals of templating are to predict femoral and acetabular implant sizes, to assess leg length, offset, and implant positioning. Templating markers such as the KingMark device (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) have been developed to improve the accuracy. Although templating is commonly used in many centres, there are challenges related to the accuracy of the process, such as true magnification ideal positioning of the pelvis and hips/body habit (obesity). Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of preoperative templating in THR patients, and to assess the difference between templating performed with and without the KingMark device. Methods​ Our retrospective study included 642 consecutive patients who had primary THR at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital in the UK. Four hundred fifty-three (71%) of patients had the KingMark device on their templated radiographs. Patients who had hybrid total hip replacements using an uncemented acetabular component and cemented femoral component were included in the study. Digital templating was done using TraumaCad software (Brainlab). Analysis of the accuracy of predicting component size has been evaluated by comparing preoperative planned sizes with implanted sizes as documented by the surgeons and labels attached to the operative note. ​ ​Results​ The templated size corresponded to the actual femoral implant used in approximately 65.2% of cases. When femoral prostheses within one size above or below the templated size were included,​the accuracy of preoperative templating rose to 97.2%. Regarding the uncemented acetabular component, the templated size corresponded to the actual acetabular implant used in 46.3% of cases. When acetabular cup within one size above or below the templated size were included, the accuracy of preoperative templating rose to 87.5%. Similarly, there was minimal difference between the predicted templated sizes using the KingMark device compared to templating performed without it. ​Conclusions​ Preoperative templating is an essential part in optimizing the outcome of THRs. Templating allows the surgeon to estimate the size of the components to be used. It also provides a starting point, from which the surgeon can proceed from, and saves valuable intraoperative time by assessing the level of the femoral neck osteotomy and the degree of lateral rasping. Multiple factors affect the accuracy of preoperative templating including the patient BMI, external rotation of the hip and surgeon's experience. Although there are different methods of templating, digital templating with 2D radiographs is likely the most cost-effective and efficient process available at this time.

Excision of trochanteric bursa during total hip replacement: Does it reduce the incidence of post-operative trochanteric bursitis?

Trochanteric bursitis is a common complication following total hip replacement (THR), and it is associated with high level of disability and poor quality of life. Excision of the trochanteric bursa prophylactically during THR could reduce the occurrence of post-operative trochanteric bursitis. To evaluate whether synchronous trochanteric bursectomy at the time of THR affects the incidence of post-operative trochanteric bursitis. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the secondary care setting at a large district general hospital. Between January 2010 and December 2020, 954 patients underwent elective primary THR by two contemporary arthroplasty surgeons, one excising the bursa and the other not (at the time of THR). All patients received the same post-operative rehabilitation and were followed up for 1 year. We reviewed all cases of trochanteric bursitis over this 11-year period to determine the incidence of post-THR bursitis. Two proportion Z-test was used to compare incidences of trochanteric bursitis between groups. 554 patients underwent synchronous trochanteric bursectomy at the time of THR whereas 400 patients did not. A total of 5 patients (incidence 0.5%) developed trochanteric bursitis following THR; 4 of whom had undergone bursectomy as part of their surgical approach, 1 who had not. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z value 1.00, 95%CI: -0.4% to 1.3%, P = 0.32). There were also 8 other patients who had both trochanteric bursitis and hip osteoarthritis prior to their THR; all of whom were treated with THR and synchronous trochanteric bursectomy, and 7 had resolution of their lateral buttock pains but 1 did not. Synchronous trochanteric bursectomy during THR does not materially affect the incidence of post-operative bursitis. However, it is successful at treating patients with known trochanteric bursitis and osteoarthritis requiring THR.

Using days alive and out of hospital to measure surgical outcomes in New Zealand: a cross-sectional study

ObjectivesTo measure differences at various deciles in days alive and out of hospital to 90 days (DAOH90) and explore its utility for identifying outliers of performance among district health boards...

Effective VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin after elective THR or TKR: a retrospective observational study.

Orthopedic patients are at the highest risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nowadays, with VTE prophylaxis as a routine in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR), fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) is rare and the rates of symptomatic VTE within 3 months dropped to 1.3%-10%, compared with the rates of 50%-70% before VTE prophylaxis implementation. In this study, we aim to evaluate the VTE prophylaxis and incidence in patients who underwent THR and TKR in Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António (CHUdSA). We included 483 patients who underwent elective THR or TKR in CHUdSA from March 2019 to February 2020 and who were under enoxaparin as a VTE prophylaxis drug. All data related to prescribed enoxaparin were collected from the nationwide common electronic drug prescription system (PEM). Of the 483 eligible patients, 192 (39.75%) underwent elective THR and 291 (60.25%) underwent TKR. Enoxaparin was prescribed for 31.86 ± 5.98 and 30.28 ± 5.97 days, on average, for the THR and TKR groups, respectively (P = .005). Patients completed, on average, 29.38 ± 8.12 days and 28.20 ± 7.32 days of VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin in the THR and TKR groups, respectively (P = .098). The incidence of VTE was approximately 3.13% and 0.69% in the THR and TKR groups, respectively (P = .064). In CHUdSA, we usually prescribe enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for up to 35 days for VTE prophylaxis after THR or TKR. High therapeutic compliance rates resulted in very few events.

Patient compliance with the implementation of a decolonization strategy for Staphylococcus aureus in hip and knee replacements

A preoperative, in-community antimicrobial decolonization protocol combining chlorohexidine gluconate (CHG) sponges and mupirocin ointment to reduce surgical site infections amongst hip and knee replacement patients has been adopted in Alberta, Canada. Patient compliance with the protocol is essential for effectiveness. It is, therefore, important to understand patterns, and reasons why, patients do, and do not, comply. A descriptive survey of patients having elective total hip or knee replacement at seven clinics in Alberta was conducted to determine patient compliance and reasons for noncompliance. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were computed. Patient compliance was assessed in 3,427 patients. There were no differences in compliance based on the baseline protocols and enhanced protocols, but there was a difference based on clinic location. The odds of compliance with three CHG sponges were 4.47 times higher in rural versus urban clinics (P<.001). The most common reason for noncompliance for patients instructed to use 3 CHG sponges was "patient forgot". Compliance did not change when enhanced protocols were introduced; however, compliance differed by clinic location. Reasons for noncompliance included "sponges not provided", "patient forgot", and "surgery date moved". Results may inform clinics on areas where improvements could be made to increase patient compliance.

THE RISK OF EARLY REVISION SURGERY AFTER TRAINEE-LED PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Primary total hip replacement (THR) is a successful and common operation which orthopaedic trainees must demonstrate competence in prior to completion of training. This study aimed to determine the impact of operating surgeon grade and level of supervision on the incidence of 1-year patient mortality and all-cause revision following elective primary THR in a large UK training centre.National Joint Registry (NJR) data for all elective primary THR performed in a single University Teaching Hospital from 2005–2020 were used, with analysis performed on the 15-year dataset divided into 5-year temporal periods (B1 2005–2010, B2 2010–2015, B3 2015–2020). Outcome measures were mortality and revision surgery at one year, in relation to lead surgeon grade, and level of supervision for trainee-led operations.9999 eligible primary THR were undertaken, of which 5526 (55.3%) were consultant led (CL), and 4473 (44.7%) trainees led (TL). Of TL, 2404 (53.7%) were non-consultant supervised (TU), and 2069 (46.3%) consultant supervised (TS). The incidence of 1-year patient mortality was 2.05% (n=205), and all-cause revision was 1.11% (n=111). There was no difference in 1-year mortality between TL (n=82, 1.8%) and CL (n=123, 2.2%) operations (p=0.20, OR 0.78, CI 0.55–1.10). The incidence of 1-year revision was not different for TL (n=56, 1.3%) and CL (n=55, 1.0%) operations (p=0.15, OR 1.37, CI 0.89–2.09). Overall, there was no temporal change for either outcome measure between TL or CL operations. A significant increase in revision within 1-year was observed in B3 between TU (n=17, 2.7%) compared to CL (n=17, 1.0%) operations (p=0.005, OR 2.81, CI 1.35–5.87).We found no difference in 1-year mortality or 1-year all-cause revision rate between trainee-led primary THR and consultant-led operations over the entire fifteen-year period. However, unsupervised trainee led THR in the most recent 5-year block (2015–2020) has a significantly increased risk of early revision, mainly due to instability and prosthetic joint infection. This suggests that modern surgical training is having a detrimental effect on THR patient outcomes. More research is needed to understand the reasons if this trend is to be reversed.

Predicting Factors for Requiring Routine Postoperative Blood Analysis in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

Background Minimising unnecessary expenditure is essential to cope with high demands on the health sector. A set of full blood count, electrolyte, creatinine and urea tests cost £12 in the National Health Service (NHS). Identifying selected patientsrequiring postoperative blood tests following primary knee and hip arthroplasty will avoid unnecessarytests and help to reduce expenditure. The aim of our study is to propose criteria for requesting postoperative blood tests that are safe and do not miss patients. Materials and methods We prospectively evaluated 126 patients (72 in the total knee replacement (TKR) group and 54 in the total hip replacement (THR) group) who underwent either an elective primary THR or a TKR. The mean patient age was 71 years. Patient demographics as well as in-patient events throughout each patient's hospital stay were recorded. Hospital readmissions were also monitored for up to 90 days postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) with paired t-tests / Wilcox and mixed measures analysis of variance. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of patients requiring a postoperative blood test. Results Analysis of our data identified the following as risk factors for requiring postoperative full blood count tests, including pre-operative Hb of ≤ 110 g/L, cardiac disease, clinical features of anaemia postoperatively and intraoperative blood loss of > 500 mL. The additional risk factors identified for requiring postoperative electrolyte and urea tests are deranged pre-operative electrolytes and clinical signs or symptoms of electrolyte/renal disturbance such as anuria. No patient was readmitted within 90 days of discharge. Conclusion Overall, applying the criteria we have devised would have saved 74 blood tests in the cohort of 126 patients. This provides an odds ratio of 14.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.77-110, p=0.012) of an abnormal result in the patients that would have been tested, compared to those that would not have been tested.

Patient Pathway Comparison for Total Hip Replacement in the United States and Germany — Why the Payment Model Matters

Summary As developed countries are faced with both the challenge of rising health care costs and the quest for improved medical outcomes, cross-global learnings can illuminate advances in medical best practices as well as the incentive system that leads to reduced costs and improved patient outcomes. Using the example of elective primary total hip replacements (THRs) for osteoarthritis — one of the most common elective surgical procedures in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries — the authors illustrate differences in clinical and financial practices between a capitation-based payment model used by Kaiser Permanente, a private, integrated health system in the United States, and a fee-for-service model used by the AOK Federation, a not-for-profit health insurance system that comprises 11 public health insurance plans with about 27 million insurees that is representative of Germany’s public health care system. The authors also shed some light on the different incentive structures and how they contribute to Kaiser Permanente achieving significantly better medical outcomes while using notably fewer resources than its counterparts in Germany. Applying Kaiser Permanente’s clinical practices for its patients with THRs, Germany would be able to increase quality of care and reduce the number of inpatient hospital days by more than 1.5 million as well as the number of postacute care inpatient days by 3.5 million per annum.

Functional Ability, Psychological Factors, and Rehabilitation Outcomes After Elective Total Hip Replacement.

Background. The role of positive psychological factors in acute rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) is unclear. Purpose. (a) Examine the trajectory of functional ability among older adults after THR from presurgery to discharge from acute rehabilitation and (b) determine which physical and psychological factors at admission would predict functional ability at discharge and length of stay in rehabilitation. Methods. This prospective cohort study included 30 participants (age M = 76.20 years) from an inpatient geriatric rehabilitation center. They completed the Geriatric Depression Scale and Positive Affect questionnaire. The FIM® Motor domain of Functional Independent Measure (mFIM) was recorded presurgery, at admission, and upon discharge. Findings. Functional ability improved at discharge; however, the presurgery functional ability was not regained. Positive affect explained the length of stay in rehabilitation above and beyond the presurgery mFIM. Implications. Occupational therapists should improve ways to enhance self-care and positive affect in acute rehabilitation.

Nursing interventions reduce postoperative urinary retention in fast-track total hip arthroplasty: A pilot study

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication of spinal anesthesia that occurs in 10-80% of patients after total hip replacement (THR). Bladder catheterization carries risks for urinary tract infections, mechanical urethral trauma, urethral inflammation and subsequent strictures, pain, discomfort, an increased length of hospital stay, and a loss of patient dignity. We investigated whether simple postoperative nurse-driven intervention protocols, including the sound of running tap water, followed by caffeinated hot beverages (tea or coffee) and pouring warm saline on the perineal area, could reduce POUR and the need for bladder catheterization. This pilot study included 60 patients undergoing elective fast-track THR with spinal anesthesia and early patient ambulation. Patients with postoperative voiding difficulties received nursing interventions, including hearing running tap water, ingesting caffeinated beverages (tea and coffee), and warm saline poured over the perineal area. If voiding difficulties continued, bladder distention was examined by ultrasound. Catheterization was performed if the volume exceeded 500 mL or if distension caused discomfort or pain. Seven patients (11%) were excluded from the study due to prophylactic preoperative catheterization. Among the 53 included patients, 27 (51%) experienced spontaneous voiding difficulties and received nursing interventions, which induced voiding in 24 patients (45%, p = 0.0027), while 3 (6%) required catheterization. Simple nursing interventions reduced the need for bladder catheterization after fast-track THR.