Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research Articles

Cardiorespiratory fitness fails to predict short-term postoperative mortality in patients undergoing elective open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing aids surgical risk stratification and is an established predictor of mid- to long-term survival in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Whether cardiopulmonary exercise testing also predicts 30-day mortality in this population remains to be established. Data for 109 patients (mean age 72 years) who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess risk for surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was analysed. Patients were classified according to cardiopulmonary fitness as fit (peak oxygen uptake ≥ 15ml O2.kg-1.min-1) or unfit (peak oxygen uptake less than 15ml O2.kg-1.min-1) and further stratified according to clamp position (infrarenal or suprarenal). Between-group postoperative outcomes were compared for in-hospital 30-day mortality, postoperative morbidity scale scores (day 5) and hospital length of stay. Seventy-nine patients underwent open surgery and 30 patients were treated conservatively. No deaths were recorded at 30 days post-surgery. Unfit patients with infrarenal clamping exhibited higher postoperative morbidity scale scores (64% vs 26%) and longer length of stay (four days) than fit patients (p < 0.05). Conversely, with suprarenal clamping, postoperative morbidity scale scores were similar and length of stay longer (three days) in fit compared with unfit patients (p < 0.05). Preoperative fitness level defined by peak oxygen uptake failed to identify patients at risk of 30-day mortality when undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Postoperative morbidity and length of stay in patients with suprarenal clamping was high independent of cardiopulmonary fitness. These findings suggest that cardiopulmonary exercise testing may be a useful predictor of complications following infrarenal rather than suprarenal clamping but may not be a good predictor of 30-day mortality.

One-year patient survival correlates with surgeon volume after elective open abdominal aortic surgery

ObjectiveVolume-outcome relationships in surgery have been well established. Studies have shown that high-volume surgeons provide improved outcomes in performing open abdominal aneurysm repairs. The hypothesis of this study was that high-volume surgeons provide superior short-term and midterm outcomes of elective open aortic operations compared with low-volume surgeons. MethodsWe evaluated patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, aortofemoral bypass, and aortomesenteric bypass by board-certified vascular surgeons using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2002 to 2014. The Contal and O'Quigley technique was used to estimate a cut point objectively and provided an estimate of significance. A division using average yearly volumes (averaged during 3 years) of seven or more cases and fewer than seven cases per year returned the highest Q statistic, and this grouping was used to classify high-volume and low-volume provider groups. Rates of complications during index hospitalization, length of stay, 30-day survival, 90-day survival, 1-year survival, and cause of death were analyzed using mixed effect models. ResultsIn 118 hospitals during the 13-year period, 266 board-certified vascular surgeons performed 244 aortomesenteric bypasses, 4202 aortofemoral bypasses, and 6126 abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. High-volume surgeons' rates of complications during index hospitalization, 30-day survival, 90-day survival, and 1-year survival were superior to those of low-volume surgeons. The Contal and O'Quigley technique returned an estimate of seven operations per year for optimal survival during 1 year. This cutoff is associated with an adjusted 1-year hazard ratio of 0.687 (P = .003), a 2.69% difference in 1-year all-cause survival (P = .003), and a 1.76-day reduction in the mean length of stay at index hospitalization (P < .001). Higher volume surgeons showed a 25.0%, 43.4%, 42.4%, 40.6%, and 45.0% reduction in postoperative rates of acute renal failure (P < .001), hemorrhage (P < .001), pulmonary failure (P < .001), sepsis (P < .001), and venous thromboembolism (P < .001), respectively. Abdominal abscess, acute renal failure, hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, and sepsis were associated with increased cardiovascular cause-specific mortality after open aortic operations (P < .001). ConclusionsThese data demonstrate that high-volume surgeons performing elective open aortic operations provide reduced complications and improved short-term and midterm survival compared with low-volume surgeons. Clinical and postoperative variables that are associated with increased cardiovascular cause-specific mortality are also identified. These data provide further evidence that elective open abdominal vascular surgery should be centralized to high-volume surgeons.

Adverse cardiac events after vascular surgery are prevalent despite negative results of preoperative stress testing

ObjectiveCardiac risk assessment is a critical component of vascular disease management before surgical intervention. The predictive risk reduction of a negative cardiac stress test result remains poorly defined. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative cardiac events among patients with negative stress test results vs those who did not undergo testing. MethodsWe reviewed all patients who underwent elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, suprainguinal bypass, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and infrainguinal bypass within the Vascular Study Group of New England from 2003 to 2017. We excluded patients with positive stress test results (n = 3312) and studied two mutually exclusive groups: elective surgery patients with a negative stress test result and elective surgery patients with no stress test (total n = 26,910). The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital postoperative cardiac events (dysrhythmia, heart attack, heart failure) or death. ResultsA preoperative stress test was obtained in 66.3% of open repairs, 42.8% of suprainguinal bypasses, 37.1% of EVARs, 36.0% of CEAs, and 31.2% of infrainguinal bypasses. The proportion of patients receiving a preoperative stress test varied widely across centers, from 37.1% to 80.0%. The crude odds ratio of in-hospital postoperative cardiac event or death was 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.76) for open repair and 1.52 (CI, 1.13-2.03) for suprainguinal bypass, indicating that patients with negative stress test results before these procedures were 37% and 52% more likely to suffer a postoperative event or die compared with patients selected to proceed directly to surgery without testing. Conversely, the crude odds ratio was 0.92 (CI, 0.66-1.29) for EVAR, 0.92 (CI, 0.70-1.21) for CEA, and 1.13 (CI, 0.90-1.40) for infrainguinal bypass, indicating that patients undergoing these procedures had a similar likelihood of sustaining an event whether they had a negative stress test result or proceeded directly to surgery without a stress test. ConclusionsThe use of cardiac stress testing before vascular surgery varies widely throughout New England. Whereas patients are often appropriately selected to proceed directly to surgery, a negative preoperative stress test result should not assuage the concern for an adverse outcome as these patients retain a substantial likelihood of cardiac events, especially after large-magnitude procedures.

Short-term outcomes of combined neuraxial and general anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia alone for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: retrospective population-based cohort study†

BackgroundUse of neuraxial anaesthesia for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is postulated to reduce mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to determine the 90-day outcomes after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients receiving combined general and neuraxial anaesthesia vs general anaesthesia alone. MethodsA retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted from 2003 to 2016. All patients ≥40 yr old undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were included. The propensity score was used to construct inverse probability of treatment weighted regression models to assess differences in 90-day outcomes. ResultsA total of 10 447 elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs were identified; 9003 (86%) patients received combined general and neuraxial anaesthesia and 1444 (14%) received general anaesthesia alone. Combined anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower hazards for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]=0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–0.61) and major adverse cardiovascular events (HR=0.72; 95% CI, 0.60–0.86). Combined patients were at lower odds for acute kidney injury (odds ratio [OR]=0.66; 95% CI, 0.49–0.89), respiratory failure (OR=0.41; 95% CI, 0.36–0.47), and limb complications (OR=0.30; 95% CI, 0.25–0.37), with higher odds of being discharged home (OR=1.32; 95% CI, 1.15–1.51). Combined anaesthesia was also associated with significant mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital length of stay benefits. ConclusionsCombined general and neuraxial anaesthesia in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with reduced 90-day mortality and morbidity. Neuraxial anaesthesia should be considered as a routine adjunct to general anaesthesia for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

The Impact of Proximal Clamp Location on Peri-Operative Outcomes Following Open Surgical Repair of Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requires an aortic cross clamp location above at least one renal artery. This study investigated the impact of clamp location on peri-operative outcomes using a United States based nationwide clinical registry. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targetted vascular module was used to identify all elective open juxtarenal AAA repairs (2011-2017). Outcomes were compared between clamping above one vs. above both renal arteries, and above one or both renal arteries vs. supracoeliac clamping. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality and secondary outcomes included post-operative renal dysfunction (creatinine increase≥177μmol/L or new dialysis) and unplanned re-operations. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to perform risk adjusted analyses. A total of 615 repairs were identified, with a clamp location above one renal artery in 42%, above both renal arteries in 40%, and supracoeliac in 18% of cases. Procedures with a clamp location above one vs. above both renal arteries showed no difference in mortality (3.5% vs. 2.1%, p=.34) or renal dysfunction (6.9% vs. 4.9%, p=.34). In contrast, supracoeliac clamping compared with clamping above one or both renal arteries was associated with a higher mortality rate (8.0% vs. 2.8%, p=.023), renal dysfunction (12% vs. 6.0%, p=.017), and unplanned re-operations (24% vs. 10%, p<.001). In the multivariable adjusted models, outcomes were similar between clamping above both vs. above one renal artery, while supracoeliac clamping vs. clamping above one or both renal arteries was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.3-8.8; p=.013) and unplanned re-operation (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.4-4.1; p=.002). Although there is no difference between clamping above one vs. both renal arteries during open juxtarenal AAA repair, a supracoeliac clamp location is associated with worse peri-operative outcomes. Surgeons should avoid supracoeliac clamping when clamping above one or both renal arteries is technically possible.

Act Guided Heparin Administration in Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Results of A Pilot Study

Introduction: Almost all vascular surgeons use a bolus of 5 000 IU of unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, its dose-response and elimination curves are non-linear, and display a high inter-patient variability. The activated clotting time (ACT) is an established method to measure the level of anticoagulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of arterial thrombo-embolic complications (ATEC) and bleeding complications in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA), in which a bolus of 5 000 IU of UFH was compared to an ACT guided additional UFH dose protocol. Methods: All consecutive patients that underwent primary elective open AAA repair were included from a multicentre (1 academic and 2 peripheral hospitals) prospective study on ACT guided heparinization (MANCO: Measuring the ACT during non-cardiac arterial procedures, Clin. Trials.gov NCT 03426293). ACT measurements were performed as a bedside point-of-care test. During the first part of the study patients received a bolus of 5 000 IU. During the second part of the study patients received an initial bolus of 5 000 IU or 100 IU/kg and additional UFH dosages were administered, with a target ACT of 200 - 250 sec. The primary study endpoints were ATEC (graft thrombosis, embolism, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, minor and major stroke, pulmonary embolism, bowel ischemia) detected during the procedure or during 30 day follow-up or during the same admission of the primary procedure, bleeding complications and mortality during 30 day follow-up. The secondary study endpoints were all other complications, the level of periprocedural anticoagulation as measured by the ACT and the additional and total UFH dosages administered. Results: 46 primary elective open AAA procedures were included, 18 patients in the standard dose group and 28 patients in the additional dose group. In the standard dose group 28% of patients reached an ACT of 200 sec. compared to 100% in the additional dose group. In the additional dose group the mean total periprocedural UFH dose administered was 9874 ± 2909 IU. ATEC occurred in 27.8% of patients in the standard dose group versus 14.3% in the additional dose group (P= 0.26). Bleeding complications did not increase in the additional dose group (38.9 versus 35.7%, P= 0.83). In both groups no patient died during 30 day follow-up. Conclusion: A standard dose of 5000 IU UFH leads to inadequate levels of heparinisation. Higher dosing of UFH aimed at an ACT of 200 sec. is safe, does not lead to increased bleeding, and potentially leads to a reduction in ATEC. A randomized controlled trial is needed to provide evidence on potential reduction in thrombo-embolic complications. Disclosure: Grant of Medtronic to perform the ACT measurements.

Impact of Frailty on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Frailty is a global state that does not relate directly to comorbidities and is prevalent among patients with vascular disease. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a rapid assessment tool to identify vulnerable and frail patients. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether the preoperative CFS score could be used to independently predict mortality and morbidity after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. We retrospectively reviewed our institutional National Vascular Registry (NVR) data to identify all patients who underwent an elective open juxta or infrarenal AAA repair between January 2014 and December 2018. The NVR data set included preoperative risk factors, imaging findings, intraprocedural variables, and postprocedural outcomes. A total of 184 patients were assessed using the CFS before they underwent elective open AAA repair. Among 26 (14%) individuals categorized as vulnerable using the CFS, there was no significant difference in age or preoperative cardiac and respiratory testing compared with nonfrail patients. However, vulnerable patients were significantly more likely to have a longer length of stay (12.2days vs. 8.8days, P-value 0.044), suffer from respiratory complications (35% vs. 15%, P-value 0.022) and renal failure (23% vs. 6%, P-value 0.013), or die (23% vs. 2%, P-value 0.0003). The regression analysis identified a vulnerable frailty score to be the only significant predictor of mortality (odds ratio=36.7, P<0.001), all other factors were not shown to be independent predictors. The CFS is a practical tool for assessing preoperative frailty among patients undergoing elective open AAA repair and can be used to predict mortality and morbidity after surgery.

FJVIS 20. Elevated Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Mortality After Elective Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

FJVIS 20. Elevated Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Mortality After Elective Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Tranexamic acid in open aortic aneurysm surgery: a randomised clinical trial

BackgroundBleeding and transfusions affect mortality in aortic surgery. Although tranexamic acid significantly reduced bleeding in multiple settings, its role in major vascular surgery was never studied. The aim of this study was to determine if tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. MethodsA total of 100 patients undergoing elective open AAA repair were randomised to receive tranexamic acid (a loading dose of 500 mg and a continuous infusion of 250 mg h−1) or placebo. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss, and the secondary outcomes were the number of patients receiving red blood cells, occurrence of thromboembolic events, and mortality. Data were analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. ResultsFifty patients were randomised into each group. Median (inter-quartile range) intraoperative blood loss was 400 (300–1050) ml in the tranexamic acid group vs 500 (360–1000) ml in the placebo group (P=0.44). Transfusion rate was seven/50 (14%) in the tranexamic group vs 12/50 (24%) in the placebo group (P=0.20). No thrombosis was recorded. In a post hoc analysis, postoperative blood loss was reduced in the tranexamic group both at 4 h (60 [40–80] ml vs 100 [60–140] ml, P<0.001) and 24 h (180 [120–275] vs 275 [190–395] ml, P=0.003) after surgery. At 1 yr, three patients were dead, all in the placebo group (P=0.24) and all after 28 days. ConclusionsTranexamic acid did not reduce intraoperative blood loss or blood transfusions in open AAA repair, although it may reduce postoperative blood loss without increasing adverse effects. Clinical trial registrationNCT02335359.

Elevated Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Mortality after Elective Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

King, Alexander H. MS; Harth, Karem C. MD; Kumins, Norman H. MD, FACS; Wong, Virginia MD, FACS; Zidar, David A. MD, PhD; Kashyap, Vikram S. MD, FACS; Cho, Jae-Sung MD, FACS Author Information

Combined Neuraxial and General Anesthesia Significantly Improves Perioperative Outcomes Following Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Combined Neuraxial and General Anesthesia Significantly Improves Perioperative Outcomes Following Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Red blood cell transfusion associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BackgroundRed blood cell (RBC) transfusions are associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The aim of this analysis was to examine the association between RBC transfusions and long-term survival for patients undergoing elective open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with up to 15 years of follow-up.MethodsProspective cohort study using data from The Danish Vascular Registry from 2000–2015. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital complications. Transfused patients were divided into subgroups based on received RBC transfusions (1, 2–3, 4–5 or > 5). Using Cox regression multi-adjusted analysis, non-transfused patients were compared to transfused patients (1, 2–3, 4–5, >5 transfusions) for both primary and secondary endpoints.ResultsThere were 3 876 patients included with a mean survival of 9.1 years. There were 801 patients who did not receive transfusions. Overall 30-day mortality was 3.1% (121 patients) and 3.6% (112) for all transfused patients. For the five subgroups 30-day mortality was: No transfusions 1.1% (9 patients), 1 RBC 1.2% (4 patients), 2–3 RBC 2.2% (26 patients), 4–5 RBC 1.9% (14 patients) and > 5 RBC 7.9% (68 patients). After receiving RBCs, the hazard ratio for death was 1.54 (95% CI 1.27–1.85) compared to non-transfused patients. There was a significant increase in mortality when receiving 2–3 RBC: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.07–1.62), 4–5 RBC: 1.64 (1.32–2.03) and >5 RBC: 1.96 (1.27–1.85) in a multi-adjusted model.ConclusionThere is a dose-dependent association between RBC transfusions received during elective AAA repair and an increase in short- and long-term mortality. Approximately 25% of included patients had preoperative anemia. These findings should raise awareness regarding potentially unnecessary and harmful RBC transfusions.

Surgically positioned paravertebral catheters and postoperative analgesia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveTo compare postoperative morphine equivalent intake after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair among analgesic modalities: systemic analgesia (SA) only with no regional anesthesia, surgically positioned paravertebral catheter (PVC), and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective open AAA at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Demographics, morphine equivalents, methods of analgesia administration, and outcomes data were collected on all patients from 2005 to 2016. Total morphine equivalent (MEQ) on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, and 3 were compared among patients with SA, PVC, and TEA. A multivariable zero-inflated log-linear regression was used to determine the association between analgesic modality and MEQ. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine associations between analgesic modality and postoperative pain, rates of discharge from intensive care within 1 day and opioid-related adverse events. ResultsThe study cohort included 355 patients: 177 retroperitoneal and 178 transperitoneal repairs; 173 patients underwent SA, 117 PVC, and 65 TEA. On POD1, median MEQs were 984 (interquartile range [IQR], 342-1525) for SA, 89 (33-246) for PVC, and 49 (0-90) for TEA. On POD2, the median MEQs were 105 (IQR, 57-210) for SA, 45 (15-99) for PVC, and 30 (0-64) for TEA. On POD3, the median MEQs were 45 (IQR, 15-120) for SA, 30 (0-60) for PVC, and 10 (0-45) for TEA. On multivariable log-linear regression, compared with SA, PVC and TEA were associated with increased odds of receiving no opioids on POD1 (odds ratio [OR], 66.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.49-255.57; and OR, 214.68; 95% CI, 60.20-766.38; respectively), POD 2 (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 3.61-13.46; and OR, 28.73; 95% CI, 15.68-52.62; respectively), and POD 3 (OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 2.72-5.67; and OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 3.20-6.86; respectively). If patients did receive opioids, compared with SA, PVC and TEA were associated with decreased consumption on POD1 (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.18-0.27; and RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.12-0.20; respectively), POD2 (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.42-0.58; and RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.56; respectively), and POD3 (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.93; and RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.93; respectively). Compared with SA, PVC was associated with earlier discharge from intensive care (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.17-6.45) and TEA was not (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.56-2.2). Compared with TEA, PVC was not associated with increased rate of opioid-related adverse events (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.08-2.44). ConclusionsPVC and TEA are associated with decreased MEQ compared with SA. PVC is associated with earlier discharge from intensive care compared with SA and similar rates of opioid-related adverse events compared with TEA. Paravertebral analgesia appears to be a safe and effective analgesic modality in patients undergoing retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aneurysm repair.

The effect of the duration of preoperative smoking cessation timing on outcomes after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and lower extremity bypass

ObjectiveSmoking has been associated with poor postoperative outcomes across various surgical procedures. However, the effect of quitting smoking preoperatively for elective operations is unclear. Our goal was to assess the temporal effect of smoking cessation before elective lower extremity bypass (LEB) and open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair on perioperative outcomes. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative was reviewed for all patients with a documented smoking history and who underwent an elective LEB or open AAA repair from 2010 to 2017. Patients were then categorized into three groups: long-term smoking cessation (LTSC; defined as quitting smoking ≥8 weeks before surgery), short-term smoking cessation (STSC; defined as quitting smoking < 8 weeks before surgery), and current smokers (CS). Patient and procedure details were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis for crude and propensity-matched data were used to compare outcomes among groups. ResultsWe identified 15,950 patients with a documented smoking history who underwent an elective LEB (43.3% LTSC, 2.2% STSC, 54.5% CS) and 5215 patients who underwent an elective open AAA repair (42.9% LTSC, 2.4% STSC, 54.7% CS). LTSC patients compared with STSC and CS, respectively, were more often obese, diabetic, on aspirin, on a statin, had coronary artery disease, and had congestive heart failure, but were less likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (all P < .05). Perioperative outcomes demonstrated significant differences comparing LTSC with STSC and CS for myocardial infarction (3.4% vs 1.4% vs 1.4%), dysrhythmia (4.2% vs 2.5% vs 2.7%), 30-day mortality (1.6% vs .3% vs .9%), in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 0% vs 0.5%; all P < .001) and congestive heart failure (1.8% vs .8% vs 1.5%; P = .003). There was no difference in outcomes after analysis of propensity-matched data for LTSC or STSC on any postoperative outcomes for LEB. For open AAA repair, LTSC compared with CS patients, respectively, were older, more often male, obese, on a statin, diabetic, and less frequently had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .05 for all). Perioperative outcomes demonstrated differences in pulmonary complications when comparing LTSC with STSC and CS (9.5% vs 8.0% vs 12.5%; P = .002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LTSC patients compared with CS were less likely to experience pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.79; P < .001). Propensity-matched multivariate analysis confirmed that LTSC remained significantly less likely to encounter pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.74; P = .001). ConclusionsIn our propensity-matched, risk-adjusted cohort, LTSC and STSC were not associated with perioperative outcomes after elective LEB. LTSC was associated with a significantly decreased odds of pulmonary complications after elective open AAA repair. STSC was not associated with perioperative outcomes after elective open AAA repair. If time permits, a longer period of smoking cessation should be attempted before elective open AAA repair.

Variation in center-level frailty burden and the impact of frailty on long-term survival in patients undergoing elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveFrailty is increasingly recognized as a key determinant in predicting postoperative outcomes. Centers that see more frail patients may not be captured in risk adjustment, potentially accounting for poorer outcomes in hospital comparisons. We aimed to (1) determine the effect of frailty on long-term mortality in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and (2) evaluate the variability in frailty burden among centers in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database. MethodsPatients undergoing elective open and endovascular AAA repair (2003-2017) were identified, and those with complete data on component variables of the VQI-derived Risk Analysis Index (VQI-RAI) and centers with ≥10 AAA repairs were included. VQI-RAI characteristics are sex, age, body mass index, renal failure, congestive heart failure, dyspnea, preoperative ambulation, and functional status. Frailty was defined as VQI-RAI ≥35 based on prior work in surgical patients using other quality improvement databases. This corresponds to the top 12% of patients at risk in the VQI. Center-level VQI-RAI differences were assessed by analysis of variance test. Relationships between frailty and survival were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test for open and endovascular procedures. Multivariable hierarchical Cox proportional hazards regression models were calculated with random intercepts for center, controlling for frailty, race, insurance, AAA diameter, procedure type, AAA case mix, and year. ResultsA total of 15,803 patients from 185 centers were included. Mean VQI-RAI scores were 27.6 (standard deviation, 5.9; range, 4-56) and varied significantly across centers (F = 2.41, P < .001). The percentage of frail patients per center ranged from 0% to 40.0%. In multivariable analysis, frailty was independently associated with long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 2.88; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-3.2) after accounting for covariates and center-level variance. Open AAA repair was not associated with long-term mortality after adjusting for frailty (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.13). There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of frail patients compared with nonfrail patients who were discharged to a rehabilitation facility or nursing home after both open (40.5% vs 17.8%; P < .0001) and endovascular repair (17.7% vs 4.6%; P < .0001). ConclusionsThere is considerable variability of preoperative frailty among VQI centers performing elective AAA repair. Adjusting for center-level variation, frailty but not procedure type had a significant association with long-term mortality; however, frailty and procedure type were both associated with nonhome discharge. Routine measurement of frailty preoperatively by centers to identify high-risk patients may help mitigate procedural and long-term outcomes and improve shared decision-making regarding AAA repair.

Long-term Survival and Cardiovascular Morbidity after Elective Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with and without Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Propensity-Adjusted Analysis

Epidemiological data indicate decreased risk for development and growth of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), but DM also goes with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the effects of DM on mortality and CV morbidity after elective open AAA repair. This is a nationwide observational cohort study of patients registered in the Swedish Vascular Registry and the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Comparison of mortality and CV morbidity after elective open AAA repair in 397 patients with and 1709 without DM with propensity score-adjusted analysis, during median 4.51years of follow-up for patients with DM and 4.59years for those without. In adjusted analysis, diabetic patients showed higher rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (relative risk [RR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.36; P=0.03) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, RR 1.28, CI 1.04-1.58; P=0.02) during follow-up, whereas there were no differences in total (RR 0.98, CI 0.75-1.29; P=0.91) or CV (RR 0.30, CI 0.07-1.26; P=0.10) mortality or stroke (RR 1.06, CI 0.67-1.67; P=0.80). Among diabetic patients, higher HbA1c was related to a higher risk for AMI during follow-up (RR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.08; P=0.02). Patients with DM had higher rates of AMI and MACE after elective open AAA repair than those without DM, whereas neither total nor CV mortality differed between groups. Putative beneficial effects of DM on the aortic wall might not be relevant after open surgery including thrombus removal and aneurysmorrhaphy.

Changes in the sublingual microcirculation following aortic surgery under balanced or total intravenous anaesthesia: a prospective observational study

BackgroundIn vascular surgery with aortic cross-clamping, ischemia/reperfusion injury induces systemic haemodynamic and microcirculatory disturbances. Different anaesthetic regimens may have a varying impact on tissue perfusion. The aim of this study was to explore changes in microvascular perfusion in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair under balanced or total intravenous anaesthesia.MethodsProspective observational study. Patients undergoing elective open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair received balanced (desflurane + remifentanil, n = 20) or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA, propofol + remifentanil using target-controlled infusion, n = 20) according to the clinician’s decision. A goal-directed haemodynamic management was applied in all patients. Measurements were obtained before anaesthesia induction (baseline) and at end-surgery and included haemodynamics, arterial/venous blood gases, sublingual microvascular flow and density (incident dark field illumination imaging), peripheral muscle tissue oxygenation and microcirculatory reactivity (thenar near infrared spectroscopy with a vascular occlusion test).ResultsThe two groups did not differ for baseline characteristics, mean aortic-clamping time and requirement of vasoactive agents during surgery. Changes in mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance index, haemoglobin and blood lactate levels were similar between the two groups, while the cardiac index increased at end-surgery in patients undergoing balanced anaesthesia. The sublingual microcirculation was globally unaltered in the TIVA group at end-surgery, while patients undergoing balanced anaesthesia showed an increase in the total and perfused small vessel densities (from 16.6 ± 4.2 to 19.1 ± 5.4 mm/mm2, p < 0.05). Changes in microvascular density were negatively correlated with changes in the systemic vascular resistance index. The area of reactive hyperaemia during the VOT increased in the balanced anaesthesia group (from 14.8 ± 8.1 to 25.6 ± 14.8%*min, p < 0.05). At end-surgery, the tissue haemoglobin index in the TIVA group was lower than that in the balanced anaesthesia group.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a goal-directed hemodynamic management, indices of sublingual or peripheral microvascular perfusion/oxygenation were globally preserved with both balanced anaesthesia and TIVA. Patients undergoing balanced anaesthesia showed microvascular recruitment at end-surgery.Trial registrationNCT03510793, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, date of registration April 27th 2018, retrospectively registered.

Association of coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial disease in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Introduction: Open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is one of the commonest aortic surgeries performed in tertiary care vascular centres. As association of coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is high in these patients, need for cardiac risk stratification with or without coronary intervention prior to surgery and its effect on long term survival benefit have been debated. In our institution, all patients who undergo elective aortic aneurysm surgery undergo diagnostic coronary angiogram. Intervention (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery) was performed prior to surgery, if patient was symptomatic/ had multiple critical occlusions in coronary vessels. We also looked into the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in these patients. Methods: Single centre retrospective study. 199 patients who underwent elective aortic aneurysm repair in the last 10 years were studied. Data was collected from electronic and hospital medical records and analysed. Results: Significant CAD was seen in 105 patients (52.7%) out of which 40 patients (20.1%) underwent preoperative intervention while 65 patients (32.7%) underwent surgery without the same. Prevalence of significant CAD in AAA was high (52.7%) whereas PAD was seen in 26 patients (13.1%). Conclusion: We suggest it worthwhile to assess the coronary status in these patients preoperatively for risk stratification. Prophylactic coronary revascularization should be individualized and can prevent post-operative adverse cardiac events. Medical treatment for concomitant CAD with no obvious inducible ischemia does not confer unfavorable outcomes. Presence of PAD should not be overlooked and should be identified and intervened in the same setting if critical to decrease the morbidity.

Predicting Postoperative Destination Through Preoperative Evaluation in Elective Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BackgroundThere are limited data guiding preoperative counseling on the need for discharge to facility after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAR). This study aims to determine the preoperative predictors for nonhome discharge (NHD) following OAR. Materials and methodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Vascular Procedure Targeted database was queried for elective OAR, 2011-2015. The primary endpoint was NHD. Complex surgery was defined as high operative time. Multivariable logistic regression identified preoperative factors predictive of NHD. ResultsOverall 510 patients were included; 87 (17.1%) required NHD. Baseline characteristics differed: NHD were more frequently female, partially dependent, older, had history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bleeding disorder, and anemia. After risk adjustment, age≥70 y (odds ratio [OR]: 12.48, confidence interval [CI]: 2.89-53.99; P = 0.001), partial dependence (OR: 8.17, CI: 1.39-47.84; P = 0.02), female sex (OR: 1.88, CI: 1.10-3.20; P = 0.02), history of bleeding disorder (OR: 2.65, CI: 1.14-6.15; P = 0.02), and high operative time (OR: 1.84, CI: 1.03-3.26; P = 0.04) were independent predictors of NHD. On unadjusted analysis, NHD was not associated with increased major postdischarge complications (OR: 1.52, CI: 0.48-4.78; P = 0.47 P = 0.47) or unplanned readmission (OR: 0.74, CI: 0.25-2.16; P = 0.58) ConclusionsNHD following OAR can be predicted using preoperative factors including age, functional status, sex, history of bleeding disorder, and complex repair. NHD was not associated with more major postdischarge complications or unplanned readmission. A better understanding of patients at risk for NHD will allow for better preoperative counseling and will help to set appropriate expectations.

Preoperative frailty assessment predicts loss of independence after vascular surgery

ObjectiveFrailty, a clinical syndrome associated with loss of metabolic reserves, is prevalent among patients who present to vascular surgery clinics for evaluation. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a rapid assessment method shown to be highly specific for identifying frail patients. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether the preoperative CFS score could be used to predict loss of independence after major vascular procedures. MethodsWe identified all patients living independently at home who were prospectively assessed using the CFS before undergoing an elective major vascular surgery procedure (admitted for >24 hours) at an academic medical center between December 2015 and December 2017. Patient- and procedure-level clinical data were obtained from our institutional Vascular Quality Initiative registry database. The composite outcome of discharge to a nonhome location or 30-day mortality was evaluated using bivariate and multivariate regression models. ResultsA total of 134 independent patients were assessed using the CFS before they underwent elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (8%), endovascular aneurysm repair (26%), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (6%), suprainguinal bypass (6%), infrainguinal bypass (16%), carotid endarterectomy (19%), or peripheral vascular intervention (20%). Among 39 (29%) individuals categorized as being frail using the CFS, there was no significant difference in age or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status compared with nonfrail patients. However, frail patients were significantly more likely to need mobility assistance after surgery (62% frail vs 22% nonfrail; P < .01) and to be discharged to a nonhome location (22% frail vs 6% nonfrail; P = .01) or to die within 30 days after surgery (8% frail vs 0% nonfrail; P < .01). Preoperative frailty was associated with a >12-fold higher risk (odds ratio, 12.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.17-66.96; P < .01) of 30-day mortality or loss of independence, independent of the vascular procedure undertaken. ConclusionsThe CFS is a practical tool for assessing preoperative frailty among patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery and can be used to predict likelihood of requiring discharge to a nursing facility or death after surgery. The identification of frail patients before major surgery can help manage postoperative expectations and optimize transitions of care.