Elective Nodal Irradiation Research Articles

Salvage hypofractionated accelerated versus standard radiotherapy for the treatment of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (SHARE): the protocol of a prospective, randomized, open-label, superiority, multi-institutional trial

BackgroundWhile several phase III trials have investigated the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer, prospective data reporting the outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment setting are sparse. Therefore, this study is designed to assess the efficacy and treatment-related toxicity of hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of biochemical recurrence in men who underwent radical prostatectomy. The primary objective of this trial is to investigate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy improves biochemical control compared with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. In addition, treatment-related toxicity, quality of life, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trial (the SHARE study), patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer will be randomized to receive either hypofractionated radiotherapy (65 Gy in 2.5-Gy fractions) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (66 Gy in 2-Gy fractions). Prostate bed irradiation or elective pelvic nodal irradiation including the prostate bed will be performed using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and daily image guidance. Treatment efficacy will be assessed using the serum tumor marker prostate-specific antigen, and toxicity will be evaluated through both physician- and patient-reported outcomes. Quality of life will also be investigated.DiscussionThis study is designed to demonstrate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy is beneficial in terms of biochemical control and toxicity compared with standard salvage radiotherapy. If hypofractionated radiotherapy is shown to be superior to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, it will mean that improved biochemical control can be achieved, accompanied by greater patient convenience and more efficient use of medical resources.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03920033. Registered on 18 April 2019

Gantry-Based 5-Fraction Elective Nodal Irradiation in Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: Outcomes From 2 Prospective Studies Comparing SABR Boost With MR Dose-Painted HDR Brachytherapy Boost

Guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario recommend brachytherapy boost for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer. SABR is an emerging technique for prostate cancer, but its use in high-risk disease is limited. Efficacy, toxic effects, and quality of life (QoL) were compared in patients treated on 2 prospective protocols that used SABR boost or magnetic resonance-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with 6 to 18 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In SATURN study (study 1), patients received 40 Gy to the prostate and 25 Gy to the pelvis in 5 weekly fractions. In SPARE (study 2), patients received HDR-BT (15 Gy×1) to the prostate and ≤22.5 Gy to the magnetic resonance imaging nodule, followed by 25 Gy in 5 weekly fractions to the pelvis. All patients received between 6 and 18 months of ADT. Thirty patients (7% unfavorable intermediate risk and 93% high risk, per National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] criteria) completed study 1, and 31 patients (3% favorable intermediate risk, 47% unfavorable intermediate risk, and 50% high risk) completed treatment as per study 2. The median follow-up times were 72 and 62 months, respectively. In study 2, 6 patients had biochemical failure, and all 6 developed metastatic disease. Actuarial 5-year biochemical failure was 0% for study 1 and 18.2% for study 2 (P=.005). There was no significant difference in the worst acute or late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity. Grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity was noted in 3% of the patients in study 2 (HDR-BT boost). There was either no significant difference or minimal clinically important change in QoL. In the context of 5-fraction pelvic radiation therapy and ADT, there did not appear to be a significant difference in toxicity or QoL between SABR and HDR-BT boost. Although efficacy favored the SABR boost cohort, this should be viewed in the context of limitations and biases associated with comparing 2 sequential phase 2 studies.

1: Elective Pelvic Nodal Irradiation with a Simultaneous Hypofractionated Integrated Prostate Boost for Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer: Long Term Results from a Prospective Clinical Trial

1: Elective Pelvic Nodal Irradiation with a Simultaneous Hypofractionated Integrated Prostate Boost for Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer: Long Term Results from a Prospective Clinical Trial

ES11.02 Advances in Thoracic Radiation in SCLC

ES11.02 Advances in Thoracic Radiation in SCLC

Patterns of Regional Failure after Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with Distal Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Suggestion of the Clinical Target Volume for Elective Nodal Irradiation

AimsTo evaluate the pattern of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (DEHC) and to identify an optimal target volume for elective nodal irradiation. Materials and methodsWe analysed the medical records of DEHC patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and had LRR between 1991 and 2015. Among these patients, 30 received adjuvant chemotherapy alone, 14 underwent radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and 28 received no treatment. After reviewing computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans, the sites of LRR were identified and mapped to the corresponding locations on the representative computed tomography images. ResultsIn total, 136 LRRs were identified in 72 patients from four institutions. Local recurrences were observed at 44 sites (32.4%): tumour bed in 15, choledochojejunostomy in 25 and pancreaticojejunostomy in four. Regional recurrences were observed at 92 sites (67.6%); the most common site was the portal vein area (n = 18), followed by the para-aortic area (n = 17). Based on the mapped plots of regional recurrence, a clinical target volume covering 90% of regional recurrences was generated using the appropriate margin for the vascular structures of the portal vein, celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, left gastric artery and aorta. ConclusionsGiven the pattern of LRR, we showed that the nodal clinical target volume based on vascular structures could appropriately cover high-risk regions of nodal involvement. These findings may help physicians construct a target volume in postoperative radiotherapy for DEHC patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Elective nodal ultra hypofractionated radiation for prostate cancer: Safety and efficacy from four prospective clinical trials

Background and purposeThe role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in localized prostate cancer (PCa) is controversial. With increasing use of SBRT to the prostate, data is needed regarding the safety and efficacy of ENI using ultra-hypofractionated radiation (UHRT). Materials and methodsBetween 2013–2020, 4 prospective clinical trials of intermediate or high-risk PCa receiving dose-escalated RT to the prostate (via HDR brachytherapy or SBRT boost) and ENI using UHRT (25 Gy in 5 weekly fractions) were conducted. Primary endpoints included acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities (CTCAE v3.0/4.0), and secondary endpoints included late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities, patient-reported quality of life (EPIC) and biochemical failure (Phoenix definition). ResultsOne-hundred sixty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 98 (59%) had high-risk disease. ADT was used in 141 (85%). Median follow-up was 38 months (IQR 10–63). The worst acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities respectively were 48% and 7.5% for grade 2, and 2.7% and 0% for grade 3. Cumulative incidence of late grade 2+ genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities at 36 months were 58% and 11.3% and for late grade 3+ toxicities were 1% and 0%, respectively. No grade 4+ acute or late toxicities were observed. Bowel and sexual toxicity significantly worsened up to 1-year compared to baseline. Over time, urinary (p < 0.0001), bowel (p = 0.0018) and sexual (p < 0.0001) scores significantly improved. The 3-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 98%. ConclusionENI using UHRT is associated with low incidence of grade 3+ toxicity, while grade 1–2 acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity is common. Randomized phase 3 trials are needed.

Preliminary analysis of the benefits of different irradiation types on patients with postoperative locoregional recurrence of esophageal cell squamous carcinoma.

To explore the benefits of different types of irradiation on patients with postoperative locoregional recurrence (LRR) of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We analyzed the medical records of 344 patients with recurrent esophageal cancer (EC) at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. All patients met an inclusion criteria that included having postoperative LRR (without distant metastasis), and having received either chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy after LRR. Patients either received elective nodal irradiation (ENI) or involved field irradiation (IFI), with a stratified analysis performed on both groups. SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY USA) was then used for statistical analysis. The median overall survival time of all patients after surgery was 33 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 28.3-37.7 months]; the median overall survival time of patients after recurrence after radiotherapy was 12.8 months (95% CI: 11.3-14.3 months). There were 276 cases (80.2%) of single local recurrence after surgery, and 68 cases (19.8%) of multiple local recurrence (≥2). The results of our multivariate analysis showed that the patient's gender, log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and the number of courses of chemotherapy were all independent factors affecting the patient's prognosis (P=0.003, P<0.001, and P<0.001). The results of stratified analysis showed that patients with esophageal lesion length <5.0 cm, stage N0, ≤9 surgically dissected lymph nodes, no positive regional lymph node metastasis (LNM), and LODDS ≤0.030 could benefit from ENI treatment (X2=4.208, P=0.032; X2=6.262, P=0.012; X2=10.359, P=0.001; X2=6.327, P=0.012; X2=6.026, P=0.014); and patients with ≥16 surgically dissected lymph nodes could benefit from IFI treatment (X2=4.429, P=0.035). Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy are all effective modes of treatment for patients with postoperative LRR of EC. Patients with shorter esophageal lesions determined by preoperative esophagography, earlier postoperative pathological N staging, lower LODDS scores, and fewer surgically dissected lymph nodes might benefit more from ENI treatment than from IFI. However, patients with a larger number of lymph nodes dissected during surgery might benefit more from IFI treatment. To further confirm this study's conclusions, multiple prospective studies should be undertaken in the future.

Radiation therapy with elective lymph node irradiation for breast cancer: dosimetric study and impact on cardiovascular risk and second neoplasms.

The aim of this study was to perform dosimetric analysis of radiotherapy (RT) plans with or without elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and estimate whether the increase in mean doses (MDs) in the heart and lungs with ENI may lead to late side effects that may surpass the benefits of treatment. The dosimetric analysis of 30 treatment plans was done with or without ENI. The planning and dose-volume histograms were analyzed, and the impact on the mortality of cardiovascular and lung cancer was estimated based on the correlation of the dosimetric data with data from population studies. RT with ENI increased the doses in the lungs and heterogeneity in the plans compared to breast-exclusive RT. When the increase in MDs is correlated with the increase of late side-effect risks, the most important effect of ENI is the increased risk of lung cancer, especially in patients who smoke (average increase in absolute risk=1.38%). The increase in the absolute risk of cardiovascular diseases was below 0.1% in the all the situations analyzed. ENI increases the heterogeneity and the doses at the lungs. When recommending ENI, the risks and benefits must be taken into account, considering the oncology factors and the plan of each patient. Special attention must be given to patients who smoke as ENI may lead to a significant increase in MD in the lung and the increased risk of radiation-induced lung cancer may surpass the benefits from this treatment.

Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With or Without Hypofractionated Elective Nodal Irradiation

Pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is limited to gross tumor without elective coverage for subclinical disease. Given a better understanding of recurrence patterns, we hypothesized that the addition of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) to pancreatic SBRT would be tolerable and would decrease locoregional progression. We conducted a retrospective 1:2 propensity-matched cohort study to compare toxicity and locoregional progression among patients treated with pancreatic SBRT with or without ENI. In the SBRT+ENI cohort, an elective target volume was delineated per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines and treated to 25 Gy in 5 fractions alongside 40 Gy in 5 fractions to gross disease. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of locoregional progression, with death as a competing risk. Among 135 candidate controls treated with SBRT alone, 100 were propensity-matched to 50 patients treated with SBRT+ENI. All patients completed SBRT. Median potential radiographic follow-up was 28 months. The incidence of late and serious acute toxicity was similar between matched cohorts. However, SBRT+ENI was associated with a statistically significant increase in acute grade 1 to 2 nausea (60% vs 20%, P < .001). The 24-month cumulative incidences of locoregional progression with and without ENI were 22.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0%-35.1%) versus 44.6% (95% CI, 34.8%-54.4%; multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.87; P = .021). This was stable in sensitivity analyses of uniform prescription dose, multiagent chemotherapy, and resectability. There were fewer peripancreatic (0% vs 7%), porta hepatis (2% vs 7%), and peri-aortic/aortocaval (5% vs 12%) recurrences after SBRT+ENI, but no difference in survival. Pancreatic SBRT+ENI was tolerable and did not increase late or serious acute toxicity relative to a matched cohort undergoing SBRT alone, but did increase acute grade 1 to 2 nausea. The addition of ENI to SBRT was associated with decreased locoregional progression but not improved survival. Further studies are warranted to determine whether ENI offers meaningful benefit.

SP-0705 Elective nodal irradiation still part of the standard treatment in head and neck cancer

SP-0705 Elective nodal irradiation still part of the standard treatment in head and neck cancer

Elective pelvic nodal irradiation with a simultaneous hypofractionated integrated prostate boost for localized high risk prostate cancer: Long term results from a prospective clinical trial

BackgroundTo report on long-term results of elective pelvic nodal irradiation (EPNI) and a simultaneous hypofractionated prostate boost for high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and methodsThis was a prospective single-arm study. Patients with high-risk disease (cT3, PSA >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score 8–10) were eligible. Patients received 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes with a simultaneous intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost of 22.5 Gy to the prostate (total dose 67.5 Gy in 25 fractions), with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 2–3 years. The primary endpoint was biochemical failure. Secondary endpoints included distant metastases and overall survival. Multivariable analysis was performed to look for predictive factors. Late toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v3.0. Results230 patients enrolled. Median follow-up was 11.2 years (IQR 8.1–12.9). At 10 years, cumulative incidence of biochemical failure was 33.4%, distant metastasis was 16.5%, and overall survival was 76.3%. On multivariable analysis, PSA nadir ≥0.05 ng/mL was associated with biochemical failure (HR 6.8, 95% CI 4–11.8, p < 0.001) and distant metastases (HR 7.5, 95% CI 3.9–14.5, p < 0.0001). PSA nadir ≥0.1 ng/mL (HR 5.2, 95% 2.2–12, p = 0.0001) and ADT use ≤12 months (versus >24 months) (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3–3.9, p = 0.004) were associated with worse survival. The 5-year cumulative incidence of any late grade ≥3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was 2.3% and 7.5%, respectively. ConclusionEPNI and a simultaneous hypofractionated prostate boost combined with long-term ADT for high-risk prostate cancer resulted in acceptable 10-year biochemical control and survival with low grade ≥3 toxicity.

Impact of radiotherapy protocol adherence in NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation: RTQA results of the PET-Plan trial

IntroductionThe success of intensification and personalisation of the curative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is strongly associated with the precision in radiotherapy. Here, we evaluate the impact of radiotherapy protocol adherence in a prospective multicentre trial. MethodsIn the open-label, randomised, controlled PET-Plan trial, patients with inoperable NSCLC were randomized at a 1:1 ratio regarding the target volume delineation informed by 1F-FDG PET and CT plus elective nodal irradiation (arm A) or target volumes informed by PET alone (arm B) and received iso-toxically dose-escalated concurrent chemoradiation. The prospectively organised quality assurance program (RTQA) included individual case review by predefined criteria. For evaluation, protocol adherence was scored as per protocol (pP), with minor (miD), intermediate (inD) and major (maD) deviations. In order to exclude biases through patients who discontinued treatment, patients who received ≥60 Gy were additionally analysed. ResultsBetween 05/2009–11/2016, 205 patients were randomized, 204 patients started treatment according to protocol of which 31 (15%) patients had maD. Patients with maD had an inferior overall survival (OS) (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8–4.4, p < 0.0001) and a higher risk of loco-regional progression (HR 5.7, 95% CI 2.7–11.1, p < 0.0001). These results were significant also in the subgroup of patients receiving ≥ 60 Gy. Patients with maD concerning normal tissue delineation and/or dose constraints had a worse OS (p = 0.006) although no higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 toxicities. ConclusionsNon-adherence to the radiotherapy protocol was associated with an inferior OS and loco-regional control. These results underline the importance of RTQA.

Long-Term Outcomes of Olfactory Neuroblastoma: MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience and Review of the Literature.

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare sinonasal malignant neoplasm that is known to develop late recurrence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with ONB and to determine the factors associated with prognosis. Retrospective study. A retrospective review of the medical records of 139 patients diagnosed with ONB at MD Anderson Cancer Center was performed between 1991 and 2016. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to assess survival. Median follow-up time was 75 months. Overall, 129 patients (92.8%) had surgery as part of their treatment and 82 (58.9%) patients received postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Endoscopic approaches were utilized for 72 patients, 69.4% of whom had pure endoscopic endonasal approaches. Five-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were 85.6% and 93.4%, respectively. Recurrence rate was 39.6% with a median time to recurrence of 42 months. Among the 31 patients who received elective nodal irradiation (ENI), two patients developed neck recurrence (6.4%) compared with 20 who developed neck recurrence when ENI was omitted (34.4%) (P=.003). Advanced Kadish stage, orbital invasion, intracranial invasion, and presence of cervical lymphadenopathy at the time of presentation were significantly associated with poor survival. ONB has an excellent survival. Surgical resection with PORT when indicated is the mainstay of treatment. Endoscopic approaches can be used as a good tool. Elective neck irradiation reduces the risk of nodal recurrence among patients with clinically N0 neck. Despite the excellent survival, recurrence rate remains high and delayed, highlighting the need for long-term surveillance. Level 4 Laryngoscope, 132:290-297, 2022.

Retropharyngeal lymph node-sparing radiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma

PurposeIn radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, it is crucial to define the appropriate treatment volume to determine treatment outcome and toxicity. We examined the feasibility of omitting elective high retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) irradiation in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.Materials and MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 189 patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with definitive or postoperative radiation therapy between 2009 and 2016. Of them, 144 (76.2%) underwent ipsilateral RPLN irradiation up to the superior border of the C1 vertebral body, while the other 45 (23.8%) were irradiated up to the transverse process of the C1 vertebra. High RPLN-treated and spared group were propensity matched based on key clinical variables.ResultsDuring the follow-up period, only three patients (one in the high RPLN-treated group and two in the high RPLN-spared group) developed RPLN recurrence. There were no significant between-group differences in 5-year locoregional failure-free survival (82.8% vs. 90.6%; p = 0.14), distant metastasis-free survival (93.1% vs. 93.3%; p = 0.98) and RPLN failure-free survival (99.3% vs. 95.0%; p = 0.09). In the matched groups, high RPLN-spared patients received a lower mean ipsilateral parotid gland dose (mean, 20.8 Gy vs. 29.9 Gy; p < 0.001) and had a lower incidence of chronic xerostomia (grade 0, 43.5% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.023) at 1 year after radiotherapy compared with high RPLN-treated patients.ConclusionOmission of ipsilateral high RPLN irradiation seems safe, and reduces the incidence of chronic xerostomia in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

Acute radiation-induced oesophagitis has been associated with adverse events such as weight loss, substantial effect on quality of life, and reduced survival.1 Concurrent chemotherapy given with hyperfractionated radiation therapy has been associated with an increased incidence of acute oesophageal toxicity.2 Several dosimetric parameters and high doses have been associated with an increased risk of acute oesophagitis.1 However, radiotherapy technical developments (eg, use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and omission of elective nodal irradiation) allow a reduced dose to the organs at risk, including the oesophagus.

Para-Aortic Nodal Radiation in the Definitive Management of Node-Positive Cervical Cancer.

ObjectivesTo investigate the safety and outcomes of elective para-aortic (PA) nodal irradiation utilizing modern treatment techniques for patients with node positive cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with pelvic lymph node positive cervical cancer who received radiation were included. All patients received radiation therapy (RT) to either a traditional pelvic field or an extended field to electively cover the PA nodes. Factors associated with survival were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model, and toxicities between groups were compared with a chi-square test.Results96 patients were identified with a mean follow up of 40 months. The incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 31% in the elective PA nodal RT group and 15% in the pelvic field group (Chi-square p = 0.067. There was no significant difference in rates of grade ≥ 3 acute or late toxicities between the two groups (p>0.05). The KM estimated 5-year OS was not statistically different for those receiving elective PA nodal irradiation compared to a pelvic only field, 54% vs. 73% respectively (log-rank p = 0.11).ConclusionsElective PA nodal RT can safely be delivered utilizing modern planning techniques without a significant increase in severe (grade ≥ 3) acute or late toxicities, at the cost of a possible small increase in non-severe (grade 2) acute toxicities. In this series there was no survival benefit observed with the receipt of elective PA nodal RT, however, this benefit may have been obscured by the higher risk features of this population. While prospective randomized trials utilizing a risk adapted approach to elective PA nodal coverage are the only way to fully evaluate the benefit of elective PA nodal coverage, these trials are unlikely to be performed and instead we must rely on interpretation of results of risk adapted approaches like those used in ongoing clinical trials and retrospective data.

Contralateral neck failure in oral tongue cancer: Outcomes from two centers using predefined treatment criteria.

The objective was to determine the incidence of, and factors associated with contralateral neck failure (CNF) in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC). Consecutive patients with OTSCC between 2007 and 2016 were included. The predefined policy of the contralateral neck included neck dissection (ND) where the primary tumor extended/crossed midline or the contralateral neck was involved; and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) where the primary tumor was ≤1 cm from midline/2cm from tip. This study included 258 patients. ND was ipsilateral 169 (66%) and bilateral 33 (13%). Fifty-five patients (21%) received ENI to the undissected contralateral neck. CNF occurred in 19 patients (7%) and was similar by treatment received. Utilizing this approach, we observed higher rates of CNF with increasing N classification, perineural invasion, extracapsular extension, and depth of invasion ≥6 mm. Using our institutional policy of treatment to the contralateral neck, a low rate of CNF (≤10%) was observed.

Chemoradiotherapy by intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost in locally advanced or oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer\u2014a\xa0two center experience

PurposeIntegrating moderate hypofractionation to the macroscopic tumor with elective nodal irradiation while sparing the organs at risk (OAR) in chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.MethodsFrom 2010–2018, treatment, patient and tumor characteristics of 138 patients from two radiation therapy centers were assessed. Chemoradiotherapy by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the primary tumor and macroscopic lymph node metastases was used.ResultsA total of 124 (90%) patients received concurrent chemotherapy. 106 (76%) patients had UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) stage ≥IIIB and 21 (15%) patients had an oligometastatic disease (UICC stage IV). Median SIB and elective total dose was 61.6 and 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, respectively. Furthermore, 64 patients (46%) had an additional sequential boost to the primary tumor after the SIB-IMRT main series: median 6.6 Gy in median 3 fractions. The median cumulative mean lung dose was 15.6 Gy (range 6.2–29.5 Gy). Median follow-up and radiological follow-up for all patients was 18.0 months (range 0.6–86.9) and 16.0 months (range 0.2–86.9), respectively. Actuarial local control rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 80.4, 68.4 and 57.8%. Median overall survival and progression-free survival was 30.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.5–36.4) and 12.1 months (95% CI 8.2–16.0), respectively. Treatment-related toxicity was moderate. Radiation-induced pneumonitis grade 2 and grade 3 occurred in 13 (9.8%) and 3 (2.3%) patients.ConclusionsChemoradiotherapy using SIB-IMRT showed promising local tumor control rates and acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced and in part oligometastatic lung cancer. The SIB concept, resulting in a relatively low mean lung dose, was associated with low numbers of clinically relevant pneumonitis. The overall survival appears promising in the presence of a majority of patients with UICC stage ≥IIIB disease.

Involved-Field Irradiation in Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results From the ESO-Shanghai 1 Trial.

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of involved-field irradiation in definitive chemoradiation therapy for locoregional esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patterns in recurrence and elective nodal failure were analyzed in patients from the previously published ESO-Shanghai 1 trial, who received definitive chemoradiation therapy with involved-field irradiation to 61.2 Gy in 34 fractions using intensity modulated radiation therapy planning. Nodal regions were delineated using the lymph node map from the sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Elective nodal failure was defined as recurrence in the regional nodal area outside the planning target volume. Extensive elective nodal failure, defined as an extensive nodal area regardless of tumor location, was calculated for additional analysis. The incidental (ie, mean) irradiation dose of each node and each region was evaluated. With a median follow-up of 48.7 months among survivors, the 3-year actuarial rate for overall survival was 53.6%, and the median overall survival was 44.8 months (95% confidence interval, 34.6-55.0). Of the 436 patients included in this study, 258 patients (59.2%) experienced treatment failure. Elective nodal failure was experienced by 37 patients (8.5%), 7 (1.6%) of whom encountered nodal-only failure. The 3-year actuarial rates of elective nodal control and elective nodal-only control were 89.7% and 97.9%, respectively. The median incidental dose of these nodes was 33.2 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 1.3-50.7 Gy). The median distance of each node to the planning target volume was 1.4 cm (IQR, 0.6-4.9 cm). Extensive elective nodal failure was experienced by 51 patients (11.6%), and 20 (4.6%) patients had nodal-only failure. The 3-year extensive elective nodal control and extensive elective nodal control-only rates were 86.0% and 94.3%, respectively. The median incidental dose of these nodes was 23.2 Gy (IQR, 1.1-53.5 Gy). The median distance of each node to the planning target volume was 2.0 cm (IQR, 0.6-5.5 cm). Involved-field irradiation can achieve a low rate of isolated nodal failure and a satisfactory survival outcome. The use of elective nodal irradiation may be unnecessary in definitive chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of locoregional esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Association between percentage of positive biopsy cores and risk of pelvic lymph node involvement in prostate cancer.

205 Background: Commonly used tools for predicting the risk of pelvic lymph node involvement (LNI) in prostate cancer often do not incorporate information on the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPB). To better inform the use of elective nodal irradiation in the definitive treatment of prostate cancer, we examined the association between PPB and risk of pathologic pelvic LNI in men with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: We identified 109,577 men from the National Cancer Database who were diagnosed in 2010-2015 with cN0M0 prostate cancer, had 6-24 cores sampled at biopsy, and underwent RP with pathologic nodal evaluation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between PPB and the likelihood of having ≥1 positive pelvic lymph node, adjusting for other known clinicopathologic prognostic variables. Results: Overall, 4.0% (4,340) of the cohort was found to have pelvic LNI at the time of RP. Higher PPB was associated with an increased risk of pelvic LNI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.75 for 25.1-50.0% PPB, 2.63 for 50.1-75.0% PPB, and 4.49 for 75.1-100.0% PPB vs. ≤25.0% PPB, all P&lt;0.001). Notably, men with Gleason 8 disease and ≤25.0% PPB only had a 3.6% risk of pelvic LNI, whereas men with Gleason 9-10 disease and 75.1-100.0% PPB had a 32.6% risk (Table). Other factors associated with the likelihood of pelvic LNI included a higher biopsy Gleason score (AOR 1.43 for Gleason 8 and 2.84 for Gleason 9-10 vs. Gleason 4+3, both P&lt;0.001), more advanced clinical tumor stage (AOR 1.48 for cT2, 1.97 for cT3, and 3.87 for cT4 vs. cT1, all P&lt;0.001), and a higher PSA (AOR 1.90 for 10.0-19.9 ng/mL, 2.40 for 20.0-39.9 ng/mL, and 2.60 for ≥40.0 ng/mL vs. &lt;10.0 ng/mL, all P&lt;0.001), but not more advanced age (AOR 0.98 for &gt;62 years [median] vs. ≤62 years, P=0.59) or black vs. white race (AOR 0.99, P=0.92). Conclusions: There was a statistically significant and clinically relevant association between increasing PPB and a higher risk of pelvic LNI. As the ongoing RTOG 0924 randomized trial matures, clinicians should consider incorporating information on PPB in determining which patients with prostate cancer may benefit from receiving radiation therapy to the pelvic lymph nodes. [Table: see text]