Elective Hardware Removal Research Articles

Open Versus Percutaneous Stabilization of Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Large Retrospective Analysis of Safety and Reoperation Rates.

Thoracolumbar fractures (TLF) requiring surgical intervention can be treated with either open or percutaneous stabilization, each with some distinct risks and benefits.There is insufficient evidence available to support one approach as superior. Patients who underwent spinal fixation for TLF between 2008 and 2020 were reviewed.Patients with one or two levels of fracture treated with either open or percutaneous stabilization were included.Exclusion criteria were more than two levels of fracture, patients requiring corpectomy, stabilization constructs that crossed the cervicothoracic or lumbosacral junction, history of previous thoracolumbar fusion at the same level, spinal neoplasm, anterior or lateral fixation, and spinal infection.Demographic, operative, and clinical data were collected for all patients. 691 patients (377 open, 314 percutaneous) met the inclusion criteria.Patients in the percutaneous cohort sustained lower estimated blood loss (73 vs 334 ml; p< 0.001) and shorter length of surgery (114 vs. 151 minutes; p< 0.001).No differences were observed in the length of hospital stay or overall reoperation rates. Asymptomatic (7.0% vs 0.8%) and symptomatic (3.5% vs 0.5%) hardware removal was more common with the percutaneous cohort, while the incidence of revision surgery due to hardware failure requiring the extension of the construct (1.9% vs 5.8%) and infection (1.9% vs 6.4%) was greater in the open group. Percutaneous stabilization for TLF was associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, lower infection rate, higher rates of elective hardware removal, and lower rates of hardware failure requiring extension of the construct compared to open stabilization.

Posterior Fixation Without Debridement for Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis and Discitis: A 10-Year Retrospective Review.

Surgical treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis, discitis, and epidural abscesses is indicated in the setting of failure of antibiotic therapy, neurological deficits, epidural abscess, or spinal instability/deformity. Historically, surgical treatment mandated aggressive debridement and spinal stabilization. However, there is growing evidence that direct debridement may not be necessary and may contribute to morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of posterior instrumentation without debridement in treating spinal infections. A retrospective medical record review was performed to identify patients treated with posterior instrumentation for spontaneous spinal infections. Success of treatment was determined based on postoperative ambulatory status, surgical complications, and need for revision surgery. Twenty-seven patients treated with posterior-only long-segmented rigid fixation without formal debridement of infected material were included. The most common indications for surgical intervention included spinal instability (67%), neurologic compromise (67%), and failure of prolonged antibiotic treatment (63%). There were no recurrent deep infections in 21 of 22 patients who had long-term follow-up. Four patients required revision surgery, and 3 additional patients requested elective hardware removal. Postoperatively, 70% were ambulatory with no assistive devices postoperatively. Vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis are challenging medical problems. Single-stage long-segment fusion without formal debridement combined with antibiotics is effective in the management of spontaneous spinal infections. The present study suggests that acute instrumentation without anterior debridement is associated with a resolution of infection and improvements in neurologic deficits in patient with spontaneous spine infections.

Resorbable Versus Titanium Hardware for Rigid Fixation of Pediatric Upper and Midfacial Fractures: Which Carries a Lower Risk Profile?

Titanium associated risks have led to interest in resorbable hardware for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of pediatric facial fractures. This study aims to systematically review and compare the outcomes of titanium/resorbable hardware used for ORIF of upper/midfacial fractures to determine which hardware carries a higher complication rate in the pediatric patient. Studies published between 1990 and 2020 on the ORIF of pediatric upper/midfacial fractures were systematically reviewed. A retrospective institutional review was also conducted, and both arms were compiled for final analysis. The primary predictor value was the type of hardware used and the primary outcome was the presence of a complication. Fisher's exact test and 2-proportion 2-tailed z-test calculations were used to determine statistical significance, which was defined as a P value < .05. The low quality of published evidence precluded meta-analysis. Systematic review of 23 studies identified 659 patients, and 77 patients were identified in the institutional review. A total of 736 patients (299 resorbable, 437 titanium) were included in the final analysis. Total complication rate was 22.8%. The titanium group had a higher complication rate (27 vs 16.7%; P < .01), and more often underwent elective hardware removal (87.3 vs 0%, P < .01). In each hardware subgroup, the incidence of complications was analyzed by fracture site. In the titanium group, complication incidence was higher when treating maxillary fractures (32.8 vs 22.9%, P=.03). When comparing the 2 hardware groups by fracture site, maxillary fractures had a higher rate of complications when treated by titanium hardware compared with resorbable hardware (32.8 vs 18%, P < .01). Upper/midfacial pediatric fractures requiring ORIF, especially maxillary fractures, may be best treated with resorbable hardware. Additional hardware-specific outcomes data is encouraged.

Pediatric Mandible Reconstruction: Controversies and Considerations.

SummaryMandibular reconstruction in pediatric patients has some unique considerations. The method of reconstruction has to factor in the growth potential of the neo-mandible, the native mandible, and the donor site. The condyle is considered the main growth center of the mandible. Current literature indicates that fibula, iliac crest, and scapula osseous flaps do not have the ability to grow. Costochondral grafts exhibit growth because of the costal cartilage component, although the growth is unpredictable. Preservation of the mandibular periosteum can result in spontaneous bone regeneration. Fibula bone harvest in a child mandates close follow-up till skeletal maturity, to monitor for ankle instability and valgus deformity. Dental rehabilitation maintains occlusal relationships, which promotes normal maxillary development. Elective hardware removal should be considered to facilitate future dental implant placement and possible revision procedures. After completion of growth, if occlusion or symmetry is not satisfactory, secondary procedures can be performed, including distraction osteogenesis, orthognathic-type bone sliding operations, and segmental ostectomy.

Intraarticular Migration of Broken Patella Cerclage and Figure-of-Eight Wire

BACKGROUND: Breakage of the wire commonly follows the procedure performed for displaced patellar fractures; nevertheless, there have not been many reports about wire fragment migration. To the best of our knowledge, there were only six documented cases of wire fragment intraarticular translocation.&#x0D; CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old male patient, with a history of patella fracture 3 years ago, was treated with cerclage and figure-of-eight wiring, presented with severe restriction of knee movements for the past 4 weeks. X-ray and fluoroscopy examination showed cerclage wire had broken at multiple sites with one broken piece migrated posterior intraarticularly. This case is unique due to the size of the migrated broken cerclage wire, which was about only length 1.5 cm and diameter 1.25 mm attached to posterior lateral condyle which prevented its further migration; otherwise, it could damage neurovascular structures. This intraarticular piece of wire was removed successfully with fluoroscopy support.&#x0D; CONCLUSION: Increased time-lapse from the initial surgery, the comminution of the fragment fracture, wire shape and size, and the incorrect placement of wire are the risk factors of intraarticular migration. We should educate the patient about the risks of hardware failure and possible migration with all patients receiving bone fixation with wires, and we can offer elective hardware removal as an option.

Low rates of serious complications but high rates of hardware removal after high tibial osteotomy with Tomofix locking plate

The purpose of this study was to analyse adverse events encountered in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) utilizing contemporary surgical techniques with the Tomofix locking plate (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) and categorize them by their severity and need for further medical/surgical management. It was hypothesized that there would be low rates of serious complications after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy utilizing an internal locking plate fixator. This study included 169 consecutive patients (200 knees) who underwent MOWHTO with a Tomofix locking plate at a single center, completing a minimum 2-year follow-up. Types of intra- and post-operative adverse events were retrospectively identified by an independent observer and categorized by their severity and further need of management. Additional surgery due to elective hardware removal was not included in the adverse event classification. There were in total 58 (29%) adverse events, the majority (13.5%) of which required no additional treatment (class 1). Class 1 events included lateral cortex hinge fractures that were observed in 8.5% (17 knees) and delayed wound healing 2% (4/200). Adverse events requiring additional or extended nonoperative management (class 2) were 9%. These included post-operative stiffness in 1% (2/200), low grade infection in 1.5% (3/200), delayed union in 5.4% (11/200), deep vein thrombosis 0.5% (1/200). One hundred and four knees (52%) underwent elective hardware removal. Serious adverse events requiring unplanned additional or revision surgery and/or long-term medical care (class 3) were the least reported (6.5%). Aseptic non-union was reported in 2.5%, deep infection requiring revision in 2% and limited hardware failure 1%. A low rate of serious complications (6.5%) requiring unplanned additional surgery (class 3) was found. The overall rate of complications following MOWHTO with Tomofix locking plate was 29% and the majority (13.5%) required no additional treatment (class 1). Lateral hinge fractures were the most common complication (8.5%) and these were associated with corrections over 12mm. However, 52% knees required a further operation for elective hardware removal. Level IV, prospective study without control group.

Variation in Implant Selection for Ankle Fractures: Identifying Cost Drivers.

Implant selection is the first opportunity for surgeons to control costs of fracture fixation. The current literature has demonstrated surgeons' poor understanding of implant costs. Our study evaluated implant cost variability for surgically treated ankle fractures and distal tibia fractures. Our hypothesis was that significant cost variation exists among providers. The goal was to identify cost drivers and determine whether specialty training is linked to implant selection. A retrospective 2010-2017 chart review was performed for 1281 patients at a Level I trauma center. Patients were excluded for skeletal immaturity, open fractures, polytrauma, and concurrent surgeries. Variables were assessed included age, sex, body mass index, OTA/AO classification, Weber classification, 1-year reoperation status, surgeon specialty, and use of syndesmotic screws, locking plates, and cannulated screws. Construct cost was determined by using electronic medical record implant model numbers cross-referenced with the chargemaster database. Statistical analysis involved intergroup comparative tests, regression analysis, and goodness-of-fit analyses. Implant cost was different among OTA patterns (P < 0.01), highest among 43C ($3771) and lowest with 44A ($819). Construct costs of OTA 43 fractures varied from $2568 to 3771, whereas OTA 44 ranged from $819 to $1474. Costs were comparable across Weber patterns (P = 0.15), with Weber B having the highest ($1494). Costs were highest among reconstructive, podiatry, and spine surgeons, with mean costs of $1804, $1404, and $1396, respectively. Traumatologist constructs had the lowest overall price ($987). A total of 433 (33.8%) procedures used locking plates with 512 (40.0%) using at least one cannulated screw. Locking plates averaged a larger total implant cost ($1947) than nonlocking plates ($1313) but had a comparable reoperation rate (18.5% vs. 17.7%, P = 0.81). Use of a cannulated screw presented a higher total cost ($2008 vs. $1435) with comparable reoperation rates (17.4% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.72). A total of 401 (31.5%) patients received syndesmotic fixation and a significantly higher reoperation rate (17.0% vs. 11.0%, P < 0.01). Overall, 199 patients underwent elective hardware removal, 23 were infected, 7 required revision, and 3 were identified with a nonunion. Our study demonstrated significant variability in implant costs for ankle fracture fixation and identified the key cost drivers as locking plates and cannulated screws. Surgical management of ankle fractures could be an ideal setting to pilot economic alignment between physicians and hospitals to drive value. Level III. Retrospective Cohort.

Does Retention of Fibula in Transfibular Approach Leads to Complication?

Category:Ankle, Ankle Arthritis, HindfootIntroduction/Purpose:A variety of operative approaches and fixation techniques have been described for tibiotalar (TT) and tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis. In the past two decades, authors have begun to more robustly examine outcomes of the transfibular approach for TT arthrodesis and expanded its indication to include TTC fusion. The transfibular technique is broadly divided into two categories: 1) Complete excision of fibula 2) Soft tissue preservation techniques with retention of fibula. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the surgery outcomes in transfibular approach and compare the fibula excision versus fibula retention techniques and examine the factors that play into the risk.Methods:Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent TT and TTC arthrodesis through a lateral transfibular approach with minimum 1 year clinical and radiologic follow up. All other operative approach and fixation combinations for arthrodesis were excluded. Primary outcomes examined were union rate, revisions, and complications related to fibula excision versus retention group. Sixteen patients underwent TT and TTC arthrodesis with fibular retention and twelve with fibular excision techniques.Results:The overall union rate was 89%, 87% (14 of 16 ankles) for the fibula retention group, and 91% (11 of 12) for fibula excision group (P = .72). Symptomatic nonunion requiring revision arthrodesis occurred in 6% (1 of 16) of the retention group versus 8% (1 of 12) in the excision group (P = .83). There were no significant differences in individual tibiotalar or subtalar union, reoperation, superficial wound problems, infection and symptomatic hardware rates. Elective hardware removal was performed in 12%(2of 16) in fibular retention group versus 25%(3 of 12) in fibula excision group (P = .39), none of the hardware removal was related to the fibula fixation. Each group had three episodes of reoperation due to non-union, osteomyelitis and painful hardware.Conclusion:Union, reoperation rates were similar in fibula resection versus retention groups. The frequency of infection and wound complication was not significantly different in both groups, despite the wide variety of patient population and preoperative indications.

Radiological and Clinical Outcome After Reversed L-Shaped Osteotomy: A Large Retrospective Swiss Cohort Study

The objective was to report radiological and clinical outcomes after reversed L-shaped osteotomy (ReveL) for hallux valgus (HV). A retrospective cohort study was performed between January 2004 and December 2013. The primary outcome was radiological recurrence of HV (HV angle [HVA] >15°). There were various exposure and secondary outcome variables. The results showed a median follow-up of 12.0 months (N = 827). Radiological recurrence, limited patient satisfaction, complication, revision surgery, and elective hardware removal were found in 25.0%, 15.3%, 4.6%, 2.5%, and 26.7%. Median pre- to postoperative changes were highest for HVA (delta = -16.7°). Recurrence was more likely in cases with preoperative HVA ≥40° (adjusted odds ratio [ORadjusted]) 3.63, p < .001). Revisions were more likely with concomitant diseases and bilateral surgery (ORadjusted 12.53, p = .010; ORadjusted 3.35, p = .030). Hardware removal was less likely in patients ≥50 years (ORadjusted 0.67, p = .014). In conclusion, ReveL was a good surgical option for HV because of the relatively low rates of unfavorable outcomes.

The influence of the number of screws and additional surgical procedures on outcome in hallux valgus treatment

BackgroundSurgical treatment of hallux valgus (HV) is one of the major flagships of orthopedic surgeons. Due to relatively unsatisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes, the search for the best surgical technique and causes for unsatisfactory outcomes continues. The objective was to investigate associations of the number of screws and additional surgical techniques for HV with radiological and clinical outcome after reversed L-shaped osteotomy (ReveL).MethodsA retrospective cohort study of adults from a single University Hospital between 2004 and 2013 was performed. The primary exposure was the number of screws (one vs two) used for osseous fixation after ReveL. The secondary exposure was an additional surgical technique for HV (e.g., Akin osteotomy). The primary outcome was a radiological recurrence of HV (HV angle (HVA) > 15°) at last follow-up. The secondary outcomes were limited patient satisfaction, complication, revision surgery, and elective hardware removal. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated by logistic regression adjusting for confounders.ResultsThe recurrence was 45% less likely with the use of one screw, independent of age, sex, additional technique, and preoperative HVA (odds ratio (ORadjusted) = 0.55 [95% CI 0.30–0.98], p = 0.043). The recurrence was 162% more likely with an additional surgical technique for HV (ORadjusted = 2.62 [1.24–5.52], p = 0.011).ConclusionIn ReveL for HV, a single screw (instead of two screws) may be sufficient enough for a similar or even better outcome, which may also reduce costs. Additional surgical procedures for HV may be refrained from if possible. Due to limitations of a retrospective study, results may need validation with clinical trials.

Fixed angle plate fixation of comminuted patellar fractures

IntroductionComminuted patella fractures are uncommon and difficult fractures to manage. Multiple treatment modalities have been suggested, with little clinical data to support practice. Recent biomechanical and technical investigations have described successful plate fixation of comminuted patella fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiographic, clinical and functional outcome of comminuted patella fractures treated with a fixed angle locking plates. We believe stable fixation, which results in successful fracture union and functional recovery, can be achieved with this technique. Materials and methodsA retrospective review was performed at a single regional academic Level 1 trauma hospital. All comminuted patella fractures treated with a fixed angle locking plate (AO/OTA 34C2 and C3) over a six-year period were evaluated. Thirty-six patients were identified. Average length of follow up was 154 weeks (range 12–297 weeks). Twenty patients were available for functional outcome scoring. Primary outcome measures were: Knee Outcome Score (KOS), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LES) and goniometer measured knee range of motion. Secondary outcomes evaluated the need for additional screw or cerclage fixation, reoperation for any reason, bothersome hardware, infection and nonunion. ResultsAverage KOS = 57.2 (20–74), average LES = 58.9 (15–80). Median extension = 0° (full extension), median flexion = 130°. Supplemental screws were used in 17/36 cases; cerclage used in 2/36 cases. Hardware irritation was noted in 4/20 patients, no patient requested elective hardware removal, one patient had failure of fixation and no nonunions were identified. ConclusionFixed angle plate stabilization of comminuted patella fractures is a viable technique for fracture fixation. Good to excellent return of knee function and low complication rates, including need for hardware removal, can be expected.

Treatment of Pediatric and Adolescent Pelvic Ring Injuries With Percutaneous Screw Placement.

Pediatric and adolescent pelvic ring injuries are frequently treated without surgery. In patients with unstable injuries to the pelvic ring, surgical stabilization aids in resuscitation, provides pain relief, and allows for mobilization. Percutaneous pelvic screw fixation is commonly performed in adult patients for unstable pelvic ring injuries, but a paucity of literature exists regarding their use in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study is to review the use, outcome, and management of percutaneous posterior pelvic screws in pediatric patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected orthopaedic trauma database was performed over a 7-year period at a regional level-1 trauma center. All patients between the ages of 7 and 17 who sustained an injury to the pelvic ring and were treated with percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring were identified. We evaluated the frequency of this technique in the described patient population, incidence of nerve injury, infection, loss of fixation, and need for hardware removal. A total of 238 pediatric patients who sustained a pelvic ring injury were initially identified; following application of study criteria, 67 (28.1%) patients were included in the study. Additional anterior ring fixation was performed in 33 (49.2%) patients. There were no iatrogenic nerve injuries, no infections, and surgical blood loss was <50 mL in all cases. Clinical and radiographic follow-up averaged 33 weeks. No loss of reduction was observed. Eight patients (13%) reported persistent low back pain at last follow-up. Elective hardware removal was performed in 3 patients. The majority of pediatric pelvic ring injuries can be treated without surgery. In the setting of instability, percutaneous pelvic screw fixation can be performed safely. A computed tomography scan is used to evaluate the available osseous pathways for screws and intraoperative fluoroscopy is used to safely perform this technique. Screw removal should be discussed in select patients. Level IV.

Increased risk for complications following removal of hardware in patients with liver disease, pilon or pelvic fractures: A regression analysis

PurposeIndications for removing orthopedic hardware on an elective basis varies widely. Although viewed as a relatively benign procedure, there is a lack of data regarding overall complication rates after fracture fixation. The purpose of this study is to determine the overall short-term complication rate for elective removal of orthopedic hardware after fracture fixation and to identify associated risk factors. Materials and methodsAdult patients indicated for elective hardware removal after fracture fixation between July 2012 and July 2016 were screened for inclusion. Inclusion criteria included patients with hardware related pain and/or impaired cosmesis with complete medical and radiographic records and at least 3-month follow-up. Exclusion criteria were those patients indicated for hardware removal for a diagnosis of malunion, non-union, and/or infection. Data collected included patient age, gender, anatomic location of hardware removed, body mass index, ASA score, and comorbidities. Overall complications, as well as complications requiring revision surgery were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20.0, and included univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Results391 patients (418 procedures) were included for analysis. Overall complication rates were 8.4%, with a 3.6% revision surgery rate. Univariate regression analysis revealed that patients who had liver disease were at significant risk for complication (p=0.001) and revision surgery (p=0.036). Multivariate regression analysis showed that: 1) patients who had liver disease were at significant risk of overall complication (p=0.001) and revision surgery (p=0.039); 2) Removal of hardware following fixation for a pilon had significantly increased risk for complication (p=0.012), but not revision surgery (p=0.43); and 3) Removal of hardware for pelvic fixation had a significantly increased risk for revision surgery (p=0.017). ConclusionsRemoval of hardware following fracture fixation is not a risk-free procedure. Patients with liver disease are at increased risk for complications, including increased risk for needing revision surgery following hardware removal. Patients having hardware removed following fixation for pilon fractures also are at increased risk for complication, although they may not require a return trip to the operating room. Finally, removal of pelvic hardware is associated with a higher return to the operating room.

An alternative technique for greater tuberosity fractures: use of the mesh plate.

Isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fractures (AO 11-A1) tend to occur in the younger patient population and are poorly managed by most precontoured proximal humerus locking plates. The goal of this study was to identify and assess an alternative treatment strategy for greater tuberosity fractures. A retrospective review of all cases of isolated greater tuberosity fractures treated with a 2.4/2.7 mesh plate (Synthes) between 2010 and 2015 was conducted. Patient demographics, operative reports, and clinical notes were reviewed. The time to radiographic union was assessed. Clinical outcomes were retrieved from patients at their follow-up visits or via mailed Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaires. Ten patients with isolated GT fractures treated with mesh plating were identified with an average age of 47.1years. The average radiographic follow-up was 7.2months and the average clinical follow-up was 8.0months. The mean time to union was 8.5weeks. Two patients underwent elective hardware removal. The mean DASH at final follow-up was 28.2 (±22.4), while the mean DASH work was 13.6 (±19.1). We have identified a viable alternative treatment option for the surgical management of isolated greater tuberosity fractures using a mesh plate that can be contoured to the patient's anatomy. Surgeons should be aware of this option for select patients.

Economic impact of syndesmosis hardware removal

Ankle syndesmosis injuries are commonly seen with 5–10% of sprains and 10% of ankle fractures involving injury to the ankle syndesmosis. Anatomic reduction has been shown to be the most important predictor of clinical outcomes. Optimal surgical management has been a subject of debate in the literature. The method of fixation, number of screws, screw size, and number of cortices are all controversial. Postoperative hardware removal has also been widely debated in the literature. Some surgeons advocate for elective hardware removal prior to resuming full weightbearing. Returning to the operating room for elective hardware removal results in increased cost to the patient, potential for infection or complication(s), and missed work days for the patient. Suture button devices and bioabsorbable screw fixation present other options, but cortical screw fixation remains the gold standard. This retrospective review was designed to evaluate the economic impact of a second operative procedure for elective removal of 3.5mm cortical syndesmosis screws. Two hundred and two patients with ICD-9 code for “open treatment of distal tibiofibular joint (syndesmosis) disruption” were identified. The medical records were reviewed for those who underwent elective syndesmosis hardware removal. The primary outcome measurements included total hospital billing charges and total hospital billing collection. Secondary outcome measurements included average individual patient operative costs and average operating room time. Fifty-six patients were included in the study. Our institution billed a total of $188,271 (USD) and collected $106,284 (55%). The average individual patient operating room cost was $3579. The average operating room time was 67.9min. To the best of our knowledge, no study has previously provided cost associated with syndesmosis hardware removal. Our study shows elective syndesmosis hardware removal places substantial economic burden on both the patient and the healthcare system.

Is the standard retention of syndesmotic positioning screws after ankle fracture fixation safe and feasible? A retrospective cohort study in 140 consecutive patients at a North American trauma centre

Unstable ankle injuries with associated disruption of the distal-fibular syndesmosis are typically managed by adjunctive placement of temporary syndesmotic positioning screws. The widespread notion that positioning screws must be removed by default after healing of the syndesmosis remains a topic of debate which lacks scientific support. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that syndesmotic positioning screws are safely retained per protocol in asymptomatic patients. A retrospective analysis of an institutional prospective database was performed during a 5-year time-window at an academic level 1 trauma centre in the United States. All ankle fractures requiring surgical fixation were included in the analysis. The primary outcome parameter consisted of the rate of elective hardware removal for syndesmotic positioning screws within 6 months after surgical fixation. A total of 496 consecutive patients with 496 isolated ankle fractures managed by surgical fixation were included in this study. Of these, 140 injuries were managed by placement of syndesmotic positioning screws. Within 6 months follow-up, 17.1% of all syndesmotic screws were found to be radiographically broken, and 13.6% of syndesmotic screws revealed radiographic signs of loosening. Only 2 patients (1.4%) required the elective removal of symptomatic positioning screws within 6 months of surgical fracture fixation. Despite the high rate of radiographic complications related to breaking or loosening of syndesmotic screws in almost one third of all cases, more than 98% of all patients remain asymptomatic and do not require a scheduled hardware removal. The routine removal of syndesmotic positioning screws does not appear to be justified from a patient safety perspective.

The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures.

Objectives: Modern implants for proximal femur fracture treatment have clearly improved clinical results. However, complications, including cut-out and loss of reduction, requiring revision surgery still occur. A major challenge in these cases is a loss of bone stock due to the existing implant, which is usually exacerbated by osteoporosis. A potential solution is the augmentation of implants, for example, of the femoral neck blade using bone cement.Materials and Methods: Ten patients (five loosening of femoral neck implant, two pseudarthrosis, two implant failures and one acute fracture) were included. The initial hardware was removed and a PFNA augmented was implanted. The perforated femoral neck blade was augmented using polymethyl methacrylate cement. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a mean of 5.4 months (SD ±4.34). The main outcome parameters were fracture healing and implant-related complications.Results: Technical handling was uneventful in all cases. No cement leakage into the joint occurred in any of the cases. The mean amount of cement injected was 5.3 ml. The fracture healed during follow-up in all cases except two patients who died from causes unrelated to the procedure and prior to complete consolidation. Problem-free elective hardware removal of the PFNA augmented was performed in two cases.Discussion: The PFNA augmented is a potential implant for joint-preserving revision surgery in proximal femur fractures. The augmentation improves implant anchorage in the impaired bone stock. In this preliminary series, no negative biological side effects of the cement (i.e. osteonecrosis) were observed.

Delayed bone healing following high tibial osteotomy related to increased implant stiffness in locked plating

IntroductionAsymmetrical callus formation and incomplete bone formation underneath stiff locking plates have been reported recently in clinical and experimental fracture healing studies. After similar effects were observed in the outcome of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) patients, a retrospective study was performed to quantify the frequency and level of such incomplete healing cases. Material and methodsTwenty-three patients treated with medial open wedge HTO and locking plate (Tomofix™) for posttraumatic or congenital genu varum were investigated. No bone grafts were applied to fill the osteotomy gap. The median correction angle was 8° (5–18°). Elective hardware removal was performed after a median of 19.5 months (12–58 months) following an uneventful clinical course. The most recent postoperative X-ray available (median 21 months; 13–56 months) was evaluated for consolidation of the osteotomy. We performed an in vitro biomechanical experiment using the same HTO on a loaded cadaver knee joint to compare interfragmentary movements (IFMs) when using regular locking screws with the Tomofix™ plate and screws that enabled dynamic stabilisation of this plate. ResultsFifteen patients (65%) displayed incomplete consolidation of the osteotomy underneath the locking plate (10.9% of the osteotomy length) and cortical deficiency. The time to implant removal for these patients of 27 months was longer than the 21 months for the patients with a complete osteotomy gap healing. The biomechanical experiment demonstrated that very low IFMs and corresponding interfragmentary strain occur underneath the plate when using regular locking screws. Replacement with dynamic screws resulted in an increased IFM. Discussion and conclusionsThese results support the hypothesis that low bone formation underneath locking plates is induced by increased stiffness. This high stiffness situation could be altered by replacing the standard screws with dynamic screws which allow for a movement of 0.35mm perpendicular to the screw axis. This resulted in an approximately threefold increase in the IFM and may be a potential concept to avoid incomplete bone healing under stiff plate fixations.

Volar Plate Position and Flexor Tendon Rupture Following Distal Radius Fracture Fixation

To determine whether there were differences between plate position in patients who had postoperative flexor tendon ruptures following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures and those who did not. Three blinded reviewers measured the volar plate prominence and position on the lateral radiographs of 8 patients treated for flexor tendon ruptures and 17 matched control patients without ruptures following distal radius fracture fixation. We graded plate prominence using the Soong grading system, and we measured the distances between the plate and both the volar critical line and the volar rim of the distal radius. A higher Soong grade was associated with flexor tendon rupture. Patients with ruptures had plates that were more prominent volarly and more distal than matched controls without ruptures. Plate prominence projecting greater than 2.0 mm volar to the critical line had a sensitivity of 0.88, a specificity of 0.82, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.70 and 0.93, respectively, for tendon ruptures. Plate position distal to 3.0 mm from the volar rim had a sensitivity of 0.88, a specificity of 0.94, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.88 and 0.94, respectively, for tendon ruptures. We identified plate positions associated with attritional flexor tendon rupture following distal radius fracture fixation with volar plates. To decrease rupture risk, we recommend considering elective hardware removal after union in symptomatic patients with plate prominence greater than 2.0 mm volar to the critical line or plate position within 3.0 mm of the volar rim. Therapeutic III.

Hardware Related Pain and Hardware Removal after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures

Objectives: To assess the incidence of hardware related pain after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) after ankle fractures through functional outcomes scores in patients with or without hardware related pain. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Regional trauma center. Patients: One hundred and seventy six patients undergoing ORIF of an ankle fracture with a minimal follow up of 18 months were sent questionnaires. In total, 80 responding patients were available for analysis. Main Outcome Measurements: Visual Analog Pain Score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Results: In seventeen patients (21%), the hardware was removed because of pain. In another seventeen patients (21%), the hardware was not removed, but pain was reported. Patients with hardware related pain had significantly worse functional outcome scores than patients without hardware related pain. After elective hardware removal, pain reduction was achieved in 71 % of the patients. Mean Visual Analog Score was 7.0 before and 3.9 after elective hardware removal for pain. Conclusions: Hardware related pain is a significant issue after ORIF of ankle fractures. Patients with hardware related pain have significantly worse functional outcome scores. Although pain reduction is achieved in 71% of the patients after elective hardware removal, a substantial number of patients have persistent complaints. Patients should be well informed about the expectations and risks of elective hardware removal.