Elective Hand Research Articles

PHYSICIAN PERCEPTION ON COMMON HAND CONDITION, AND THEIR REFERRAL PATTERN

Background:Several hand conditions have an overlap in term of management by surgeons from different departments. They usually rely on referrals from general health providers. Suitable referral depends on the knowledge and understanding of the referring physicians to the problem and the best available treatment. Recently the number of referrals and operations of elective hand surgeries increased by more than 30%. Physician from different specialties can sometimes disagree on their perception on what is the best treatment option for the patient. Aim: to study physicians perception on common hand condition, and their referral pattern. Material and Method: The research was conducted using a survey with a sample size of 102 focusing on health care providers from King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital and they were collected by convenience sampling. The raw data was collected in an excel sheet. We used SPSS statistics 21st for quantitative data analysis. Results: The results gave us a general idea that there is a lot of difference of understanding to the hand conditions and which should be referred to where, with orthopedic being the most referred to Speciality. Conclusion: Referral for different hand and wrist conditions remains unclear to many practicing physicians at our institute. Establishment of a separate hand and wrist unit/clinic that includes all individual specializations may help improve patient care and wait timing.

Utilizing Google Trends to Track Online Interest in Elective Hand Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IntroductionElective hand surgery encompasses a large volume of orthopaedic cases annually. Carpal tunnel syndrome, ganglion cysts, and trigger digits are some of the most common pathologies treated by hand surgeons. In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, patient's interest in elective hand surgery for these conditions is uncertain. The objective of this study is to use Google Trends to track online interest in elective hand surgery in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsOnline search trends regarding elective orthopaedic hand surgery were obtained via Google Trends from November 2019 to November 2020. Three common hand pathologies in lay terms ("carpal tunnel," "‘ganglion cyst’ + ‘wrist cyst,’" and "trigger finger") and three hand surgery-specific keywords ("hand surgery," "carpal tunnel surgery," and "trigger finger surgery") were used as search terms. The search volume index (SVI) graphs for the United States for both sets of search terms were then generated from the Google Trends data and compared to the seven-day average of new COVID-19 cases per day as reported by the CDC. A separate SVI graph was then created for the search term "coronavirus” and was compared against both sets of search terms as above.ResultsSearch trends for all elective hand pathologies and surgery-specific keywords remained constant from November 2019 to the beginning of March 2020 and then decreased significantly within a one-month period following the peak in COVID-19 cases the week of March 15, 2020. Search trends for these keywords increased to baseline levels over the next few months. The search trend for "coronavirus" demonstrated a small search volume index peak of 13 during January 2020 followed by the maximum peak of 100 during the week of March 15, 2020, corresponding to the decrease in search trends of elective hand surgery at that time.ConclusionsOnline interest in elective hand surgery remained constant prior to the COVID-19 pandemic; however, there was a marked decrease in search trends of elective hand surgery with the rise in daily reported COVID-19 cases, suggesting that patient's interest in elective hand surgery decreased with the onset of the pandemic.

Is Jedi Grip efficient and effective in ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocking? A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study

BackgroundIn this prospective, randomized, controlled observer-blinded study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of a single-operator technique called the Jedi Grip and a conventional technique requiring a double operator in ultrasound–guided axillary brachial plexus blocking. MethodsNinety-two patients (ASA I–II; aged 18–65 years old) who underwent elective hand, wrist and forearm surgery were randomly assigned to Group Conventional (C) or Group Jedi (J). In both groups, axillary plexus blockade was performed by applying 5 cc of a mixture of 10 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 cc of 2% prilocaine to the ulnar, radial, median, and musculocutaneous nerves. Parameters such as the performance time and number of needle passes were recorded during the procedure. Subsequently, a blinded observer evaluated and recorded parameters related to the blockade success. The main outcome variables were the performance time and success rate (surgical anesthesia). ResultsThe block performance time of the Jedi technique was slightly longer than that of the conventional technique (220 (50), 202 (78) s, respectively) (median (IQR); p = 0.05). No significant difference was found between groups in terms of blocking success; 9 (20%) from the conventional group and 3 (6.4%) from the Jedi group were unsuccessful (p = 0.053). No differences were found in terms of arterial puncture, and no other complications occurred in either group. The motor-sensory block onset and termination times and initial analgesia requirements were similar. ConclusionThe Jedi technique may be applied safely with similar block success and performance results as the conventional technique.

Partial arthroscopic trapeziectomy and stabilisation by ligamentoplasty: Outcomes in patients younger than 60 years

BackgroundThumb carpometacarpal joint (TCMJ) osteoarthritis is the fourth leading cause of referral to elective hand surgery. None of the available techniques has proved superior over the others. Some techniques carry unacceptable risks for younger patients, such as loss of strength and shortening of the thumb column after total trapeziectomy, or wear and loosening after total arthroplasty. Our objective was to assess outcomes after partial arthroscopic trapeziectomy (PAT) combined with suspensionplasty using the abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon in patients younger than 60years of age. HypothesisPAT combined with suspensionplasty using the APL tendon in patients younger than 60years would restore strength in the medium-term without further surgery. Material and methodsWe retrospectively included consecutive patients operated between 2007 and 2017, in a single centre, and aged less than 60years. All patients had isolated TCMJ osteoarthritis stage 1 to 3 according to Eaton and Glickel classification that remained symptomatic despite optimal conservative treatment. We collected pain intensity, range of motion, strength, the Nelson Hospital Score (NHS), and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. Radiographs were reviewed. ResultsWe included 27 patients, of whom 6 had surgery on both thumbs, yielding 33 thumbs for the analysis. Mean follow-up was 64.7months (range: 10.6–136.5months). Pain intensity, grip strength, and key-pinch strength were significantly improved (p<0.001), with no difference between men and women. No differences were found for the Kapandji score (p=0.2) or TCMJ hyperextension (p=0.06). At last follow-up, the mean NHS was 83.2±19.4 and the mean PRWE was 15.4±17.9. Mean sick leave duration was 5.4weeks (range: 1–24weeks). Only 2 patients, both in manual jobs, were unable to return to work. The radiographs at last follow-up showed the development of moderate TCMJ narrowing in 14 patients and evidence of scapho-trapezio-trapezoid (STT) osteoarthritis in 10 patients. No patient experienced complex regional pain syndrome or injury to the sensory branch of the radial nerve. A single patient required further surgery for persistent pain. DiscussionPatients younger than 60years who are treated with this minimally invasive technique are likely to experience sustained improvements in both strength and pain intensity. Total trapeziectomy and pyrocarbon implant has also been evaluated in younger patients, who experienced pain relief and strength gains but had lower levels of satisfaction and developed complications inherent in the implants. The short time off work and low morbidity make our technique a procedure of choice in younger patients. To build on this study, a comparison of PAT and arthroplasty would be of interest. Level of evidenceIV.

Hand surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical care best practices

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a single institution’s hand surgery clinical care guidelines at preventing the transmission of COVID-19. This is an anonymous survey study distributed to all employees within the division of hand surgery at a single quaternary-care academic medical facility. The primary outcome measure was the result of their employee surveillance and/or symptom initiated COVID-19 antibody (prior transmission) or polymerase chain reaction test (active infection) after institution of a COVID-19 exposure and transmission mitigating clinical care protocol. Employees were also asked multiple questions regarding their perceived and actual risk of exposure to COVID-19 while performing their clinical duties. Fifty-five of 69 (79.7%) hand clinic personnel employed during the COVID-19 surge from March 23, 2020 to May 18, 2020 (therapist: 15/19; consulting physicians: 11/16, nurses: 10/11; hand surgery residents: 6/6; hand surgery fellows: 4/5; physician assistant/nurse practitioners: 4/7; clinical desk operations specialists 3/4) responded to the survey. Forty-two employees were tested and all were negative for COVID-19 antibodies (42/42). Seventeen (17/55, 30.9%) employees had a known exposure to COVID-19 of which 13 of the 17 (76.5%) were from patients. Ten of these 17 (58.8%) employees were tested for COVID-19 antibodies and were negative. Twenty four of the 55 (43.6%) respondents felt they were at high risk for transmission of COVID-19. These data support ongoing care of emergent and urgent hand surgery patients during the COVID-19 surge and safe operation of an elective hand surgery practice amidst the ongoing pandemic through a multimodal approach.

Perioperative Laboratory Markers as Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Elective Hand Surgery

The purpose of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no association between perioperative laboratory markers (serum albumin and hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]) and incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after soft tissue upper extremity surgery. We analyzed patient-level data from a large, insurance-based database containing supplemental laboratory results. We identified patients undergoing soft tissue upper extremity surgery (defined as carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, wrist ganglion excision, cubital tunnel release, Dupuytren partial fasciectomy, or first dorsal compartment release) with serum albumin or HbA1c measurements within 90 days of surgery. We stratified patients into cohorts based on serum albumin concentration (<3.5 g/dL) and HbA1c (≥7%) thresholds. The primary outcome was incidence of SSI within 30 days following surgery. We constructed multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for patient demographics and baseline comorbidities using the Elixhauser comorbidity index. Patients with hypoalbuminemia experienced an SSI incidence of 3.5% compared to 0.9% in patients with normal serum albumin. In multivariable analysis, the odds ratio of SSI with hypoalbuminemia was 3.32 (95% CI, 2.32-4.65). Patients with HbA1c ≥ 7% experienced an SSI incidence of 1.1% compared to 0.7% in patients with HbA1c < 7%. Multivariable analysis revealed odds ratios for SSI of 1.47 (95% CI, 1.02-2.11) in patients with HbA1c ≥ 7% compared to those with HbA1c < 7%. Hypoalbuminemia and elevated HbA1c (in patients with diabetes) are risk factors for SSI within 30 days following soft tissue upper extremity surgery. Preoperative measurement of these laboratory markers may be a useful tool for risk stratification and identification of high-risk patients for nutritional or glycemic optimization. Prognostic II.

Patient Perceptions of COVID-19 Precautions and Their Effects on Experiences With Hand Surgery

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate patient perceptions of COVID-19 precautions and how these precautions have affected their hand and upper extremity surgery experience.MethodsWe sent an 18-item survey to 1,213 patients who underwent elective hand and upper extremity surgery at 1 academic institution from October 2020 to January 2021. The survey consisted of questions related to patient demographics, treatment delays due to COVID-19, and patient perceptions of COVID-19 precautions. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the survey responses. Responses for patients aged 18–50 and 51+ were compared using a chi-square analysis for categorical variables and a Student t-test for continuous variables.ResultsOut of 1,213 invitations, 384 survey respondents completed the survey (31.6%). Of the respondents, 16.8% reported delaying medical treatment for an average of 123.2 days because of COVID-19. The preventative measures were found to be adequate by 95% of patients. Only 2.6% of patients reported experiencing surgical delays due to preoperative COVID-19 testing or other COVID-19-related precautions. COVID-19 testing was seen as necessary by 88% of patients, and 74% did not find COVID-19 testing to be a barrier to their surgery. Patients aged 51+ were more likely to delay seeking medical treatment than younger patients (19.3% vs 9.1%, respectively). Furthermore, those that did delay seeking treatment waited longer on average than their younger counterparts (136.1 vs 72.9 days, respectively).ConclusionsIn conclusion, patients undergoing hand and upper extremity surgery typically do not find COVID-19 precautions to be a significant barrier to care and understand their importance. Despite this, many patients, particularly older ones, are delaying medical care for extended periods of time. It is important for hand surgeons to acknowledge their patients’ perspectives and work to educate patients on evolving surgical safety guidelines.Clinical relevancePatient perspectives of current COVID-19 precautions can help inform hand surgeons on areas for continued patient education.

Operating room supply waste in elective hand surgery

BackgroundOperating room waste has been identified as a key component in healthcare expenditures that can be modified by surgical teams. The purpose of our study was to quantify the wasted disposable sterile supplies generated in three separate operating room settings in elective hand surgery. MethodsWe recorded the unused disposable sterile supplies wasted during 40 elective hand surgery cases over a four-month period. Four attending hand surgeons were observed for 10 cases per surgeon, each operated in only one of the following venues: a university hospital main OR, a private hospital main OR or a private practice ambulatory surgery center. Type and quantity of wasted supplies were totaled, and the costs were calculated. OR personnel were also interviewed regarding the fate of unused supplies. ResultsWaste of disposable supplies was encountered in all settings. Supplies waste was least in the ambulatory surgery center. The amount of waste generated at the university was similar to that of the private hospital. The most frequently wasted supplies were low-cost items including blue towels, sponges and drapes. Supplies were most often discarded in the trash, but some were secondarily used in or out of the OR setting. Case length did not correlate with the cost of supply waste. ConclusionsWe observed consistent disposable surgical supply waste for hand surgery procedures in the ORs we investigated. This can adversely impact health care cost. Ambulatory surgery centers offer immediate advantages in decreasing supply waste and may be preferred over main hospital ORs for simple elective hand surgery cases. However, not all hand surgeons may operate in an ambulatory center. In the training or university setting, better communication with the OR staff prior to individual cases and coordination with OR administrators to update supply needs can decrease waste. Hand surgeons must be proactive in preventing OR supply waste to reduce costs and improve efficiency.

A Qualitative Study of Patient Protection against Postoperative Opioid Addiction: A Thematic Analysis of Self-Agency.

Opioids are commonly used following outpatient surgery. However, we understand little about patients' perspectives and how patients decide on postoperative opioid use. This study seeks to investigate aspects of patients' thought processes that most impact their decisions. The authors conducted semistructured interviews with 30 adults undergoing minor elective hand surgery at one tertiary hospital. Narratives were content-coded to arrive at the authors' thematic analysis. The authors incorporated Bandura's concept of self-agency to interpret the data and develop a conceptual framework that best explained the implicit theory within participants' responses. The authors found six themes under two domains of self-agency. Participants actively sought out protective mechanisms supporting their decision on opioid use, but sometimes did so unconsciously. They would avoid opioids postoperatively because they were "tough" and wanted to evade the risk of addiction as "good citizens." They conveyed a nuanced safety against addiction because they were "not the kind" to become addicted and because they trusted the surgeons' prescribing. However, participants felt discouraged by the stigma associated with opioids. Both intentionally and unintentionally, participants integrated a strong sense of self in their decision-making processes. A robust understanding of how patients choose to take opioids for postoperative pain control is imperative to develop patient-centered strategies to treat the opioid epidemic. Effective opioid-reduction policies should consider patients as active agents who negotiate various internal and external influences in their decision-making processes. Surgeons must incorporate patients' individual goals and perspectives regarding postoperative opioid use to minimize opioid-related harm after surgery.

10 years of hand traumatology - an epidemiological, structural and economic analysis at a maximum care provider

Hand surgery in Germany has been subject to structural changes that strongly affect the balance between medicine and economics. On the one hand there is a shift of elective hand surgery from the inpatient to the outpatient sector. On the other hand - so our observations - emergency hand trauma cases are more concentrated in bigger hospitals. Given this background there is a lack of statistical data on the management of hand trauma care and treatment of patients with hand injuries. This article discusses a 10-year-analysis of hand traumatological cases treated at a maximum care hospital regarding epidemiological, structural and economic aspects. Using a database query using ICD codes, inpatient hand trauma cases were identified between 2009-2018 and analyzed with regard to epidemiological and economic indicators (age, gender, comorbidities, case-mix-index (CMI), revenue, length of stay, length of surgery) using PIVOT tables. Patients under the age of 16 years, forearm fractures and intensive care patients were excluded. In the study period the typical hand surgical trauma patient was male with an average age of 44 years. The Patient-Clinical-Complexity-Level (PCCL) was 0 in 80 % of all cases. The proportion of work-related injuries averaged around 25 %. The three top diagnose related groups (DRG) were the I32F (18.5 %), X01B (11.3 %) and the I32A (7.2 %). A striking point was the massive increase in the overall number of trauma cases over the years from approx. 300 cases in 2009 to over 1000 cases per year in 2018 with a shift of the main workload to on-call and night-shift hours away from core working times. In the study period 4 of 5 others hospitals located in a distance of 100 km reduced and stopped treatment of emergency hand cases. The average length of a hospital stay was approx. 4-5 days, the average cut/suture time less than 60 minutes and the average CMI 1.23. Those cases generate an average proceed of € 4370 in 2018, whereby the cases generated by the work-related injuries averaged € 387 less. On the assumption that the number of emergency hand trauma cases did not really increase in the study period we think that there was a concentration of such cases in a few centres still providing extensive treatment for hand injuries while in smaller hospitals care for emergency hand trauma cases is progressively reduced. However, hand injuries may be worth a second thought for economic reasons because they can create reasonable revenues with rather little effort.If a critical number of patients is exceeded, costs of service provisions can be significantly amortized by the proceed generated by treatment. In those hospitals still taking care for acute hand injuries the workload especially in standby duty increased. What may have a negative input on the numbers of treated elective hand surgery cases.

Digit Necrosis After Hand Surgery in Pregnancy: A Case Report

Digital blocks are routinely used for excision of lesions. We describe a unique presentation of digit necrosis after excisional biopsy with digital block and finger tourniquet in a pregnant patient with a history of ulcerative colitis. The patient had a history of a long-standing painful dorsal PIP joint mass and was scheduled for excision under local anaesthetic. On the day of the procedure, she disclosed that she was pregnant in the second trimester. After extensive discussion of risks and benefits between the patient and the surgeon, the decision was made to proceed with an excisional biopsy of the lesion because of its impact on her quality of life. Twelve hours after the procedure, she presented to the emergency department with blistering and severe pain to the digit. Doppler ultrasound showed flow through both digital arteries and the digit appeared viable. Over the coming days her pain continued to worsen and on post-operative day 3, she was admitted to hospital for attempted salvage of the digit using conservative methods. Her digit went on to demarcate at the level of the middle phalanx. Five weeks after her initial procedure, the patient underwent partial amputation of the small finger at the level of the DIP joint and 2-stage groin flap for soft tissue coverage. We discuss the effects of pregnancy and ulcerative colitis on thromboembolic events, and review the literature on digital blocks, digital tourniquet use and management of early digit necrosis. This case highlights the importance of delaying elective hand procedures in pregnant patients, especially if they have additional comorbidities such as pro-thrombotic diseases like inflammatory bowel disease.

Variety of hand surgery cases during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences from seven countries

<b>Objectives:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the practice of hand surgery in the world. The aim of this study is to learn and describe the variety of operated hand surgery cases between countries during the pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> Eight authors from seven countries collected data of hand surgery patients that they operated on within a 1-month study period. Age, gender, diagnosis, procedure, mechanism of injury, object causing injury, place of injury occurrence, type of anesthesia, and COVID-19 screening were recorded for emergency patients. We also noted the reasons for elective surgeries during the pandemic. <b>Results:</b> A total of 124 operated emergency patients and 19 elective patients from all 8 hand surgeons in 7 countries were reported within the study period. Fractures were found in 33.1% of 124 emergency patients, soft-tissue injuries in 39.5% of patients, combined fracture and soft-tissue injuries in 25% of patients, and infection in 3 patients. The most frequent mechanism of injury was the blunt mechanism (49.2%). Home and workplace injuries were 44.4% and 30.6% of emergency cases, respectively. Turkey presented the highest number of emergency patients (71 patients). Most injuries occurred in workplaces (49.3%) and homes (42.3%), with the predominance of penetrating mechanism of injury (47.9%). Excluding Turkey the other six countries were grouped, home and road injuries were the highest (47.2% and 37.7%, respectively). Elective hand surgeries were performed in only four countries. Implant removal (seven patients) was the most frequently performed. No patient was diagnosed with COVID-19. <b>Conclusions:</b> Hand surgery cases during the pandemic differed between institutions represented in this study, due to differences in restriction policies, demographics, and types of hospital. The surgical resources for possible outbreaks in the future must be prepared accordingly.

Impact of COVID-19 on hand surgery in Italy: A comparison between the Northern and the Southern regions

The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency and elective hand surgery in four Italian regions that had either a high (Lombardy and Piemonte) or a low (Sicilia and Puglia) COVID-19 case load to discuss problems and to elaborate strategies to improve treatment pathways. A panel of hand surgeons from these different regions compared and discussed data from the centers they work in. The COVID-19 pandemic had an enormous impact on both elective and emergency surgery in Italy, not only in highly affected regions but also – and paradoxically even at a higher extent – in regions with a low COVID-19 case load. A durable and flexible redesign of hand surgery activities should be promoted, while changing and hopefully increasing human resources and enhancing administrative support. Telematics must also be implemented, especially for delivering rehabilitation therapy.

The Patient Perspective on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Elective Hand Surgery: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have traditionally been used for research purposes, but are now being used to evaluate outcomes from the patient's perspective and inform ongoing management and quality of care. We used quantitative and qualitative approaches to evaluate the short-version Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) with regard to patient preference and measurement of patient goals and their responsiveness after treatment. Patients 18 years or older undergoing elective hand surgery received the QuickDASH and PSFS questionnaires before and at 6 weeks after surgery. Two additional questions intended to elicit patients' preferences regarding the QuickDASH and PSFS were included. Responsiveness was measured by change in pre- to postoperative score. We analyzed patients' responses to the 2 additional questions to identify themes in PROM preferences. Results from the quantitative and qualitative analyses were combined into a convergent mixed-methods (eg, quantitative and qualitative) analysis. Thirty-eight patients completed preoperative questionnaires; 25 (66%) completed postoperative questionnaires. Seventeen patients (77%) preferred the PSFS, 3 (14%) had no preference, 2 (9%) preferred the QuickDASH. The average change from pre- to postoperative QuickDASH was -10 (SD, 20), and that of the PSFS was -27 (SD, 26). Ten patients (40%) reported QuickDASH score changes above the minimal clinically importance difference (MCID), 17 patients (68%) reported PSFS score changes above the MCID. Content analysis revealed 4 themes in preference for a PROM: instrument simplicity (ease of instrument understanding and completion), personalized assessment (individualization and relevance), goal directed (having measurable aims or objectives), distinct items (concrete or specific instrument items or functions). Most patients felt the PSFS better measured their goals because it is a simple, personalized instrument with distinct domains. Whereas standardized PROMs may better compare across populations, physicians, or conditions, employing PROMs that address patient-specific goals may better assess aspects of care most important to patients. A combination of these 2 types of PROMs can be used to assess outcomes and inform quality of care.

Patient-Related Risk Factors Associated With Surgical Site Complications After Elective Hand Surgery.

The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors associated with an increased rate of surgical site complications after elective hand surgery. This study is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent elective hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow surgery over a 10-year period at a single institution. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and information regarding patient demographics, past medical and social history, perioperative laboratory values, procedures performed, and surgical complications was collected. Surgical site complications included surgical site infections, seromas or hematomas, and delayed wound healing or wound dehiscence. A univariate analysis was then performed to identify potential risk factors, which were then included in a multivariate regression analysis. A total of 3261 patients who underwent elective hand surgery and met the above inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. The mean age was 57 years, with 65% female and 35% male patients. The overall surgical complication rate was 2.2%. Univariate analysis of patient factors identified male sex; number of procedures >1; history of drug, alcohol, or smoking use; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III and IV; and serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL to be significantly associated with complications. However, multivariate regression analysis identified that only ASA class III and IV (odds ratio = 3.27) was significantly associated with surgical complications. Patients classified as ASA class III or IV were identified to be at a significantly increased risk of complications following elective hand surgery. Health factors which triage patients into these 2 groups may represent potentially modifiable factors to mitigate perioperative risk in the elective hand surgery population.

The Impact of Smoking on Early Postoperative Complications in Hand Surgery

Smoking is a prevalent modifiable risk factor that has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes across numerous surgical specialties. We examined the impact of smoking on 30-day complications in patients undergoing hand surgery procedures. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data sets were queried for patients who underwent common hand surgery procedures from 2011 to 2016. Cohorts were divided into smoking and nonsmoking and compared in terms of demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to control for demographic characteristics and comorbidities in assessing the association between smoking and postoperative infections as well as other major and minor complications. We identified a cohort of 48,370 patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent certain outpatient and inpatient hospital facility-based hand surgery procedures from 2011 to 2016. Up to 22% of these patients reported active smoking. Compared with nonsmokers, smokers were more likely to be younger and male and to have a lower body mass index. In addition, they were more likely to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and to report dyspnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Multivariable logistic regression identified an independent association between smoking and major complications. Smoking was not significantly associated with minor complications. When regrouped by complication type, smoking was associated with infectious and wound healing complications. In subgroup analysis, smokers undergoing elective hand surgery had increased odds of wound healing complications but not major, minor, or infectious complications. Smokers may be at a significantly higher odds of certain complications compared with nonsmokers. For patients undergoing the elective procedures evaluated in this study, perioperative smoking may increase the risk of wound-healing complications. Prognostic II.

Emergency Department Utilization After Outpatient Hand Surgery.

The purpose of this study was to identify the utilization rate and most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department (ED) after elective outpatient hand surgery and to determine preoperative risk factors for these ED visits. Patients who underwent elective hand surgery at an ambulatory surgery center between 2014 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated using the New York and Florida State Databases. The primary outcome was all-cause 7- and 30-day ED utilization rates. Reasons for presentation to the ED were recorded and manually stratified. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of ED utilization. From 2014 to 2015, 212,506 procedures were identified; the 7- and 30-day ED visit rates were 1.8% and 4.4%, respectively. Postoperative pain was the most common cause of an ED visit after outpatient hand surgery at 7 days (25.4%) and 30 days (16.1%) postoperatively. Overall, 98% of patients presenting to the ED for postoperative pain were subsequently discharged home. After controlling for confounding, comorbid congestive heart failure, chronic lung disease, diabetes, renal failure, schizophrenia, and depression were independent risk factors for an ED visit at up to 30 days postoperatively. Those with Medicare insurance were 94% more likely to present to the ED within 30 days than those with private health insurance, whereas those with Medicaid were more than three times as likely to present to the ED as those with private insurance. ED utilization after outpatient hand surgery is low, with postoperative pain being the most common cause of an ED visit at all time points. Nearly 98% of patients presenting to the ED for postoperative pain are subsequently discharged home. Level III, Retrospective Cohort.

Is it safe to restart elective day-case surgery? Lessons learned from upper limb ambulatory trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has impacted on the provision of elective and trauma orthopaedic surgery worldwide with millions of operations cancelled. The risk of patients developing COVID-19 after undergoing ambulatory procedures in hospitals is unknown. This paper aims to investigate the risk of developing COVID-19 from day-case and overnight stay upper limb procedures during the peak of the pandemic in London, and to discuss the implications for the safe management of elective hand and upper limb patients in the coming months. Methods56 patients underwent emergency trauma upper limb procedures as a day case or with a single overnight stay from 1st March to May 31, 2020 at two central London hospitals that were also key players in the pan-London COVID response. Data was collected retrospectively from clinical and theatre records. Patients were contacted post-operatively and answered a structured questionnaire, including whether patients had experienced any of the symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 in the 14 days prior or 30 days following surgery. ResultsOf 56 patients, one patient reported COVID-19 symptoms, which were minor and did not require hospitalisation. Five patients experienced minor post-operative complications such as stiffness and scar hypersensitivity; one patient had a superficial wound infection. The mean age was 46 years (20–90) with 68% patients ASA I, 25% ASA II and 4% ASA III. 9% had LA, 30% a regional block and 61% had a GA. The most common operation was a distal radius open reduction and internal fixation. The average time spent in hospital was 11 h (3–34 h) and 12 patients required an overnight stay. The median length of face-to-face follow up was 38.5 days. ConclusionOur study suggests that, with appropriate precautions, elective upper limb ambulatory surgery can be safely restarted with a low risk of contracting COVID-19 or its complications.

The Influence of Cost Information on Treatment Choice: A Mixed-Methods Study

To test the null hypothesis that exposure to societal cost information does not affect choice of treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We enrolled 304 participants using the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform to complete a survey in which participants were given the choice between carpal tunnel release (CTR) or a less-expensive option (orthosis wear) in a hypothetical mild CTS scenario. Patients were randomized to receive information about the societal cost of CTR (cost cohort) or no cost information (control). The primary outcome was the probability of choosing CTR measured on a 6-point ordinal scale. We employed qualitative content analysis to evaluate participants' rationale for their choice. We also explored agreement with various attitudes toward health care costs on an ordinal scale. Participants in the cost cohort exhibited a greater probability of choosing surgery than those in the control cohort. The relative risk of choosing surgery after exposure to societal cost information was 1.43 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.85). Among participants who had not previously been diagnosed with CTS (n= 232), the relative risk of choosing surgery after exposure to societal cost information was 1.55 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.06). Lack of personal monetary responsibility frequently emerged as a theme in those in the cost cohort who chose surgery. The majority (94%) of participants expressed at least some agreement that health care cost is a major problem whereas only 58% indicated that they consider the country's health care costs when making treatment decisions. Participants who received societal cost information were more likely to choose the more expensive treatment option (CTR) for mild CTS. Exposure to societal cost information may influence patient decision making in elective hand surgery. A complete understanding of this influence is required prior to implementing processes toward greater cost transparency for diagnostic/treatment options. Sharing out-of-pocket costs with patients may be a beneficial approach because discussing societal cost information alone will likely not improve value of care.

Prophylactic Antibiotics Prior to Hand Surgery in Patients with Prosthetic Joints.

Background: To determine the prevalence of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after elective clean hand surgery in order to determine whether prophylactic antibiotics are warranted in patients who have previously undergone total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Methods: All patients undergoing elective clean hand surgery between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively cross-referenced with patients who had previously undergone a TJA at the same urban academic medical center. Inclusion criteria were any patients who underwent clean hand surgery during the study period who were an adult between the ages of 30 and 90, had a previous TJA, and did not have a previous history of a PJI. All charts were reviewed to collect data on patient demographics, co-morbidities, the type of TJA and hand surgery performed, whether prophylactic antibiotics were used prior to the hand surgery, and whether a PJI occurred within 3 months of the hand surgery. Results: Total of 331 patients (181 females and 150 males) were identified over the 6-year period that met inclusion criteria. In total, 13% of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics prior to their hand surgery and 87% had not. Only 1 case of a PJI occurred within 3 months of a hand surgery. No relationship was identified between the PJI and the hand surgery, nor the need for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Conclusions: Incidence of PJI after clean hand surgery is very low. We do not recommend the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing clean elective hand surgery with a history of prior TJA in order to prophylax against a PJI.