Abstract Background Elderly onset inflammatory bowel disease (EOIBD) has variable characteristics in the published literature. We performed this study to report the disease characteristics, treatment exposure, and clinical outcomes of EOIBD compared to adult onset IBD (AOIBD) in Singapore. Methods This is a retrospective study involving IBD patients seen at two tertiary hospitals in Singapore from January 2020 to September 2023. Patients were identified from the Singapore National IBD registry. Those with missing data on age of IBD diagnosis were excluded. Data on baseline demographics, disease characteristics, treatment and disease-related complications were collected. EOIBD is defined as age of diagnosis ≥ 60 years old and AOIBD as those diagnosed from age 18 to 59 years old. The characteristics was compared between these two groups. Data was analysed using SPSS version 27.0. Results 1116 patients were included in the final analysis, 10.6% (n =118) were EOIBD as shown in Figure 1. 50% were male with a mean age of diagnosis at 68 years old. The comparison between EOIBD and AOIBD are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. There is a higher proportion of Crohn’s disease (CD) (45.7% vs 37.4%) in EOIBD. In terms of treatment, there is significantly lower use of thiopurines amongst EOIBD (34.5% vs 46.8%, p = 0.012). There was a trend of higher use of methotrexate among EIOBD (19.6% vs 10.6%, p = 0.067) although this was not statistically significant and this is similarly observed in the use of biologics (32.8% in EOIBD vs 27.1% in AOIBD, p = 0.205). There were no significant differences in corticosteroids (CS) exposure, CS dependence and mean number of CS courses used. There was a lower proportion of IBD-related surgery in EOIBD (12.1 vs 18.5%, p = 0.094) with EOID having a significantly lower mean number of IBD-related surgery (1.1 vs 1.6, p <0.001). Among EOIBD, there were significantly higher rates of malignancy (17% vs 6%, p <0.001) and fractures (18.1% vs 9.2%, p = 0.02); the latter despite a statistically higher mean level of vitamin D (20.9 ng/ml vs 18.3 ng/ml, p = 0.026). There were no differences in IBD-related hospitalization. Conclusion EOIBD is associated with increased rates of fractures and malignancy compared to AOIBD. Therefore, bone health and malignancy screening should be regularly performed in this group of patients to clinical outcomes.
Read full abstract