Elastic Zone Stiffness Research Articles

Role of intra-lamellar collagen and hyaluronan nanostructures in annulus fibrosus on lumbar spine biomechanics: insights from molecular mechanics-finite element-based multiscale analyses.

Annulus fibrosus' (AF) ability to transmit multi-directional spinal motion is contributed by a combination of chemical interactions among biomolecular constituents-collagen type I (COL-I), collagen type II (COL-II), and proteoglycans (aggrecan and hyaluronan)-and mechanical interactions at multiple length scales. However, the mechanistic role of such interactions on spinal motion is unclear. The present work employs a molecular mechanics-finite element (FE) multiscale approach to investigate the mechanistic role of molecular-scale collagen and hyaluronan nanostructures in AF, on spinal motion. For this, an FE model of the lumbar segment is developed wherein a multiscale model of AF collagen fiber, developed from COL-I, COL-II, and hyaluronan using the molecular dynamics-cohesive finite element multiscale method, is incorporated. Analyses show AF collagen fibers primarily contribute to axial rotation (AR) motion, owing to angle-ply orientation. Maximum fiber strain values of 2.45% in AR, observed at the outer annulus, are 25% lower than the reported values. This indicates native collagen fibers are softer, attributed to the softer non-fibrillar matrix and higher interfibrillar sliding. Additionally, elastic zone stiffness of 8.61 Nm/° is observed to be 20% higher than the reported range, suggesting native AF lamellae exhibit lower stiffness, resulting from inter-collagen fiber bundle sliding. The presented study has further implications towards the hierarchy-driven designing of AF-substitute materials.

Evaluation of lumbar spinal fusion utilizing recombinant human platelet derived growth factor-B chain homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) combined with a bovine collagen/β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) matrix in an ovine model.

Background contextWhile the clinical effectiveness of recombinant human Platelet Derived Growth Factor‐B chain homodimer combined with collagen and β‐tricalcium phosphate (rhPDGF‐BB + collagen/β‐TCP) treatment for indications involving hindfoot and ankle is well‐established, it is not approved for use in spinal interbody fusion, and the use of autograft remains the gold standard.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the effects of rhPDGF‐BB + collagen/β‐TCP treatment on lumbar spine interbody fusion in an ovine model to those of autograft bone and collagen/β‐TCP treatments using biomechanical, radiographic, and histological assessment techniques.Study designThirty‐two skeletally mature Columbian Rambouillet sheep were used to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rhPDGF‐BB + collagen/β‐TCP matrix in a lumbar spinal fusion model. Interbody polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages contained either autograft, rhPDGF‐BB + collagen/β‐TCP, collagen/β‐TCP matrix, or left empty.MethodsAnimals were sacrificed 8‐ or 16‐weeks post‐surgery. Spinal fusion was evaluated via post‐sacrifice biomechanical, micro‐computed tomography (μCT), and histological analysis. Outcomes were statistically compared using a two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with an alpha value of 0.05 and a Tukey post‐hoc test.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between groups within treatment timepoints for flexion‐extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation range of motion, neutral zone, neutral zone stiffness, or elastic zone stiffness. μCT bone volume fraction was significantly greater between treatment groups independent of timepoint where Autograft and rhPDGF‐BB + collagen/β‐TCP treatments demonstrated significantly greater bone volume fraction as compared to collagen/β‐TCP (P = .026 and P = .038, respectively) and Empty cage treatments (P = .002 and P = .003, respectively). μCT mean bone density fraction was most improved in rhPDGF‐BB + collagen/β‐TCP specimens at the 8 week and 16‐week timepoints as compared to all other treatment groups. There were no statistically significant differences in histomorphometric measurements of bone, soft tissue, or empty space between rhPDGF‐BB + collagen/β‐TCP and autograft treatments.ConclusionsThe results of this study indicate that the use of rhPDGF‐BB combined with collagen/β‐TCP promotes spinal fusion comparable to that of autograft bone.Clinical significanceThe data indicate that rhPDGF‐BB combined with collagen/β‐TCP promotes spinal fusion comparably to autograft bone treatment and may offer a viable alternative in large animal spinal fusion. Future prospective clinical studies are necessary to fully understand the role of rhPDGF‐BB combined with collagen/β‐TCP in human spinal fusion healing.

Biomechanical effects of a titanium intervertebral cage as a stand-alone device, and in combination with locking plates in the canine caudal cervical spine.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the change in ex vivo biomechanical properties of the canine cervical spine, due to an intervertebral cage, both as a stand‐alone device and in combination with plates.Study DesignExperimental ex vivo study.AnimalsCervical spinal segments (C5‐C7) from eight canine cadavers.MethodsThe range of motion (ROM) and elastic zone stiffness (EZS) of the spines were determined with a four‐point bending device in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation for four conditions: native, discectomy, cage (at C6‐C7), and cage with plates (at C6‐C7). The disc height index (DHI) for each condition was determined using radiography.ResultsDiscectomy resulted in overall increased ROM (p < .01) and EZS (p < .05) and decreased DHI (p < .005) when compared to the native condition. Placement of the cage increased DHI (p < .001) and restored total ROM during flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, and EZS during flexion/extension to the level of the native spine. Application of the plates further reduced the total ROM during flexion/extension (p < .001) and lateral bending (p < .001), but restored ROM in extension and EZS during lateral bending. No implant failure, subsidence, or significant cage migration occurred during loading.ConclusionAn anchorless intervertebral cage used as a stand‐alone device was able to restore the disc height and spinal stability to the level of the native cervical spine, whereas the addition of plates further reduced the spinal unit mobility.Clinical SignificanceThis study implies that the intervertebral cage may be used as a stand‐alone device in the spinal unit fixation in the canine cervical spine.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Growing Rod with Sliding Pedicle Screw System for Early-Onset Scoliosis.

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) remains a challenging condition for which current nonfusion surgeries require iterative lengthening surgeries. A growing rod with sliding pedicle screw system (GRSPSS) was developed to treat spinal deformities without repeated operative lengthening. This study was performed to evaluate whether GRSPSS had similar stability as a conventional pedicle screw system to maintain deformity correction. A serial-linkage robotic manipulator with a six-axis load cell positioned on the end-effector was utilized to evaluate the mechanical stability of the GRSPSS versus conventional fixed scoliosis instrumentation. Ten skeletally mature thoracic female Katahdin sheep spines (T4-L1) were subjected to 2.5 Nm of flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in 2° increments for each state. The overall range of motion (ROM), apical segment ROM, and stiffness were calculated and reported. A two-tailed paired t-test was used to detect significant differences (p < 0.05) between the fixed group and GRSPSS fixation. There were no significant differences in overall range of motion (ROM), apical segment ROM, or stiffness for FE or LB between the GRSPSS group and fixed group. In AR, the GRSPSS group showed increased ROM compared to the fixed group for the overall spine (36.0° versus 19.2°, p < 0.01) and for the instrumented T8-T10 segments (7.0° versus 2.9°, p=0.02). Similarly, the fixed rod elastic zone (EZ) stiffness was significantly greater than the GRSPSS EZ stiffness (0.29 N/m versus 0.17 N/m, p < 0.001). The space around the rod allows for the increased AR observed with the GRSPSS fusion technique and is necessary for axial growth. The GRSPSS fusion model shows equivalent flexion and LB stability to current fusion models and represents a stable fusion technique and may allow for longitudinal growth during childhood.

Influence of follower load application on moment-rotation parameters and intradiscal pressure in the cervical spine

The objective of this study was to implement a follower load (FL) device within a robotic (universal force-moment sensor) testing system and utilize the system to explore the effect of FL on multi-segment cervical spine moment-rotation parameters and intradiscal pressure (IDP) at C45 and C56. Twelve fresh-frozen human cervical specimens (C3-C7) were biomechanically tested in a robotic testing system to a pure moment target of 2.0 Nm for flexion and extension (FE) with no compression and with 100 N of FL. Application of FL was accomplished by loading the specimens with bilateral cables passing through cable guides inserted into the vertebral bodies and attached to load controlled linear actuators. FL significantly increased neutral zone (NZ) stiffness and NZ width but resulted in no change in the range of motion (ROM) or elastic zone stiffness. C45 and C56 IDP measured in the neutral position were significantly increased with application of FL. The change in IDP with increasing flexion rotation was not significantly affected by the application of FL, whereas the change in IDP with increasing extension rotation was significantly reduced by the application of FL. Application of FL did not appear to affect the specimen’s quantity of motion (ROM) but did affect the quality (the shape of the curve). Regarding IDP, the effects of adding FL compression approximates the effect of the patient going from supine to a seated position (FL compression increased the IDP in the neutral position). The change in IDP with increasing flexion rotation was not affected by the application of FL, but the change in IDP with increasing extension rotation was, however, significantly reduced by the application of FL.

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Growth-Friendly Rod Construct

BackgroundDistraction-type rods mechanically stabilize the thorax and improve lung growth and function by applying distraction forces at the rib, spine, pelvis, or a combination of locations. However, the amount of stability the rods provide and the amount the thorax needs is unknown. MethodsFive freshly frozen and thawed cadaveric thoracic spine specimens were tested for lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation in displacement control (1°/sec) to a load limit of ±5 Nm for five cycles after which a growth-friendly unilateral rod was placed in a simulated rib-to-lumbar attachment along the right side. The specimens were tested again in the same modes of bending. From the seven Optotrak Orthopedic Research Pin markers (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) inserted into the top potting to denote T1, and the right pedicles at T2, T4, T5, T8, T9, and T11 and the Standard Needle Tip Pressure Transducers (Gaeltech, Isle of Skye, Scotland) inserted into the T4/T5 and T8/T9 discs, motion, stiffness, and pressure data were calculated. Parameters from the third cycle of the intact case and the construct case were compared using two-tailed paired t tests with 0.05 as the level of significance. ResultsWith the construct attached, the T1–T4 segment showed a 30% increase in neutral zone stiffness during extension (p = .001); the T8–T12 segment experienced a 63% reduction in the in-plane range of motion during flexion (p = .04); and the T8/T9 spinal motion unit had a significant decrease of 24% in elastic zone stiffness during left axial rotation (p = .04). ConclusionsIt is clear the device as tested here does not produce large biomechanical changes, but the balance between providing desired changes while preventing complications remains difficult.

Effect of a titanium cage as a stand-alone device on biomechanical stability in the lumbosacral spine of canine cadavers

Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis is a common disease in dogs characterised by intervertebral disc herniation, loss of disc height and stenosis. Decompressive dorsal laminectomy and partial discectomy can cause spinal instability and worsen foraminal stenosis. Pedicle screw and rod fixation (PSRF) with an intervertebral body cage allows for distraction and restoration of disc height and restores foraminal apertures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ex vivo biomechanical properties of a titanium intervertebral cage alone and in combination with PSRF in the lumbosacral spine of dogs. The range of motion, neutral zone, neutral zone stiffness and elastic zone stiffness of the lumbosacral joint (L7-S1) of nine canine cadavers were determined in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation for four conditions: (1) native (unmodified) spine; (2) dorsal laminectomy and discectomy; (3) stand-alone cage; and (4) cage in combination with PSRF. The intervertebral disc height decreased after dorsal laminectomy, but increased after insertion of the cage. Insertion of the stand-alone cage decreased the range of motion and neutral zone compared to the laminectomy-discectomy and increased neutral zone stiffness in all directions. The range of motion further decreased after PSRF. From a biomechanical point of view, the use of a stand-alone intervertebral cage is a potential alternative to dorsal fixation of the lumbosacral junction, since it increases spinal stability and restores disc height.

Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage

Researchers have reported on the importance of the rib cage in maintaining mechanical stability in the thoracic spine and on the validity of a compressive follower preload. However, dynamic mechanical testing using both the rib cage and follower load has never been studied. An in vitro biomechanical study of human cadaveric thoracic specimens with rib cage intact in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation under varying compressive follower preloads was performed. The objective was to characterize the motion and stiffness of the thoracic spine with intact rib cage and follower preload. The hypotheses tested for all modes of bending were (i) range of motion, elastic zone, and neutral zone will be reduced with a follower load, and (ii) neutral and elastic zone stiffness will be increased with a follower load. Eight human cadaveric thoracic spine specimen (T1–T12) with intact rib cage were subjected to 5Nm pure moments in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation under follower loads of 0–400N. Range of motion, elastic and neutral zones, and elastic and neutral zone stiffness values were calculated for functional spinal units and segments within the entire thoracic section. Combined segmental range of motion decreased by an average of 34% with follower load for every mode. Application of a follower load with intact rib cage impacts the motion and stiffness of the human cadaveric thoracic spine. Researchers should consider including both aspects to better represent the physiologic implications of human motion and improve clinically relevant biomechanical thoracic spine testing.

Mechanical Contribution of the Rib Cage in the Human Cadaveric Thoracic Spine.

An in vitro biomechanical human cadaveric study of T1-T12 thoracic specimens was performed with 4 conditions (with and without rib cage, instrumented and uninstrumented) in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The objective was to understand the influence of the rib cage on motion and stiffness parameters of the human cadaveric thoracic spine. Hypotheses tested for overall motion in all modes of bending for both uninstrumented and instrumented specimens were (i) in-plane range of motion and neutral and elastic zones will be greater without the rib cage, (ii) neutral and elastic zone stiffness values will be different for specimens without the rib cage, and (iii) out-of-plane rotations will be different for specimens without the rib cage. The rib cage is presumed to provide significant stability to the thoracic spine, but no studies have been conducted to determine the influence of the rib cage in both uninstrumented and instrumented conditions in the full thoracic human cadaveric specimens. Seven human cadaveric spine specimens (T1-T12) with 4 conditions (with and without rib cage, instrumented and uninstrumented) were subjected to 5 N·m pure moments in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Range of motion, neutral and elastic zones, neutral and elastic zone stiffness values, and out-of-plane rotations were calculated for the overall specimen. In-plane range of motion was significantly higher without a rib cage for most modes of bending. Out-of-plane motions were also influenced by the rib cage. Neutral zone stiffness was significantly higher with a rib cage present. Testing without a rib cage yields different motion and stiffness measures, directly impacting the translation of research results to clinical interpretation. Researchers should consider these differences when evaluating the mechanical impact of surgical procedures or instrumentation in cadaveric or computational models. 5.

Needle puncture in rabbit functional spinal units alters rotational biomechanics.

An in vitro biomechanical study for rabbit lumbar functional spinal units (FSUs) using a robot-based spine testing system. To elucidate the effect of annular puncture with a 16 G needle on mechanical properties in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. Needle puncture of the intervertebral disk has been shown to alter mechanical properties of the disk in compression, torsion, and bending. The effect of needle puncture in FSUs, where intact spinal ligaments and facet joints may mitigate or amplify these changes in the disk, on spinal motion segment stability subject to physiological rotations remains unknown. Rabbit FSUs were tested using a robot testing system whose force/moment and position precision were assessed to demonstrate system capability. Flexibility testing methods were developed by load-to-failure testing in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. Subsequent testing methods were used to examine a 16 G needle disk puncture and No. 11 blade disk stab (positive control for mechanical disruption). Flexibility testing was used to assess segmental range-of-motion (degrees), neutral zone stiffness (N m/degrees) and width (degrees and N m), and elastic zone stiffness before and after annular injury. The robot-based system was capable of performing flexibility testing on FSUs-mean precision of force/moment measurements and robot system movements were <3% and 1%, respectively, of moment-rotation target values. Flexibility moment targets were 0.3 N m for flexion and axial rotation and 0.15 N m for extension and lateral bending. Needle puncture caused significant (P<0.05) changes only in flexion/extension range-of-motion and neutral zone stiffness and width (N m) compared with preintervention. No. 11 blade-stab significantly increased range-of-motion in all motions, decreased neutral zone stiffness and width (N m) in flexion/extension, and increased elastic zone stiffness in flexion and lateral bending. These findings suggest that disk puncture and stab can destabilize FSUs in primary rotations.

In vitro evaluation of a lateral expandable cage and its comparison with a static device for lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical investigation

Through in vitro biomechanical testing, the authors compared the performance of a vertically expandable lateral lumbar interbody cage (EC) under two different torque-controlled expansions (1.5 and 3.0 Nm) and with respect to an equivalent lateral lumbar static cage (SC) with and without pedicle screw fixation. Eleven cadaveric human L2-3 segments were evaluated under the following conditions: 1) intact; 2) discectomy; 3) EC under 1.50 Nm of torque expansion (EC-1.5Nm); 4) EC under 3.00 Nm of torque expansion (EC-3.0Nm); 5) SC; and 6) SC with a bilateral pedicle screw system (SC+BPSS). Load-displacement behavior was evaluated for each condition using a combination of 100 N of axial preload and 7.5 Nm of torque in flexion and extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). Range of motion (ROM), neutral zone stiffness (NZS), and elastic zone stiffness (EZS) were statistically compared among conditions using post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank comparisons after Friedman tests, with a significance level of 0.05. Additionally, any cage height difference between interbody devices was evaluated. When radiographic subsidence was observed, the specimen's data were not considered for the analysis. The final cage height in the EC-1.5Nm condition (12.1 ± 0.9 mm) was smaller (p < 0.001) than that in the EC-3.0Nm (13.9 ± 1.1 mm) and SC (13.4 ± 0.8 mm) conditions. All instrumentation reduced (p < 0.01) ROM with respect to the injury and increased (p ≤ 0.01) NZS in flexion, extension, and LB as well as EZS in flexion, LB, and AR. When comparing the torque expansions, the EC-3.0Nm condition had smaller (p < 0.01) FE and AR ROM and greater (p ≤ 0.04) flexion NZS, extension EZS, and AR EZS. The SC condition performed equivalently (p ≥ 0.10) to both EC conditions in terms of ROM, NZS, and EZS, except for EZS in AR, in which a marginal (p = 0.05) difference was observed with respect to the EC-3.0Nm condition. The SC+BPSS was the most rigid construct in terms of ROM and stiffness, except for 1) LB ROM, in which it was comparable (p = 0.08) with that of the EC-1.5Nm condition; 2) AR NZS, in which it was comparable (p > 0.66, Friedman test) with that of all other constructs; and 3) AR EZS, in which it was comparable with that of the EC-1.5Nm (p = 0.56) and SC (p = 0.08) conditions. A 3.0-Nm torque expansion of a lateral interbody cage provides greater immediate stability in FE and AR than a 1.5-Nm torque expansion. Moreover, the expandable device provides stability comparable with that of an equivalent (in size, shape, and bone-interface material) SC. Specifically, the SC+BPSS construct was the most stable in FE motion. Even though an EC may seem a better option given the minimal tissue disruption during its implantation, there may be a greater chance of endplate collapse by over-distracting the disc space because of the minimal haptic feedback from the expansion.

Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine

In this paper the authors evaluate through in vitro biomechanical testing the performance of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone device, after lumbar decompression surgery, and as supplemental fixation to expandable cages in a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) construct. Nine L3-4 human cadaveric spines were biomechanically tested under the following conditions: 1) intact/control; 2) L3-4 left hemilaminotomy with partial discectomy (injury); 3) interspinous spacer (ISS); 4) bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS); 5) bilateral hemilaminectomy, discectomy, and expandable posterior interbody cages with ISS (PLIF-ISS); and 6) PLIF-BPSS. Each test consisted of 100 N of axial preload with ± 7.5 Nm of torque in flexion-extension, right/left lateral bending, and right/left axial rotation. Significant changes in range of motion (ROM), neutral zone stiffness (NZS), elastic zone stiffness (EZS), and energy loss (EL) were explored among conditions using nonparametric Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank comparisons (p ≤ 0.05). The injury increased ROM in flexion (p = 0.01), left bending (p = 0.03), and right/left rotation (p < 0.01) and also decreased NZS in flexion (p = 0.01) and extension (p < 0.01). Both the ISS and BPSS reduced flexion-extension ROM and increased flexion-extension stiffness (NZS and EZS) with respect to the injury and intact conditions (p < 0.05), but the ISS condition provided greater resistance than BPSS in extension for ROM, NZS, and EZS (p < 0.01). The BPSS increased the rigidity (ROM, NZS, and EZS) of the intact model in lateral bending and axial rotation (p ≤ 0.01), except in EZS for left rotation (p = 0.23, Friedman test). The incorporation of posterior cages marginally increased (p = 0.05) the EZS of the BPSS construct in flexion but these interbody devices provided significant stability to the ISS construct in lateral bending and axial rotation for ROM (p = 0.02), in lateral bending for NZS (p = 0.02), and in flexion/axial rotation for EZS (p ≤ 0.03); however, both PLIF constructs demonstrated equivalent ROM and stiffness (p ≥ 0.16), except in lateral bending where the PLIF-BPSS was more stable (p = 0.02). In terms of EL, the injury increased EL in flexion-extension (p = 0.02), the ISS increased EL for lateral bending and axial rotation (p ≤ 0.03), and the BPSS decreased EL in lateral bending (p = 0.02), with respect to the intact condition. The PLIF-ISS decreased lateral bending EL with respect to the ISS condition (p = 0.02), but not enough to be smaller or, at least, equivalent, to that of the PLIF-BPSS construct (p = 0.02). The ISS may be a suitable device to provide immediate flexion-extension balance after a unilateral laminotomy, but the BPSS provides greater immediate stability in lateral bending and axial rotation motions. Both PLIF constructs performed equivalently in flexion-extension and axial rotation, but the PLIF-BPSS construct is more resistant to lateral bending motions. Further biomechanical and clinical evidence is required to strongly support the recommendation of a stand-alone interspinous fusion device or as supplemental fixation to expandable posterior interbody cages.