The elastic springback during the manufacturing process of stamped car body components causes dimensional deviations. To compensate these deviations, the common approach is to modify the tool surfaces in the opposite direction of the deviations – this is called springback compensation. In the procedure of springback compensation various issues must be solved. To achieve the main goal of a dimensionally accurate part, it must be ensured that, on the one hand the distance normal to the sheet surface between the springback part and the target geometry is within a specified dimensional tolerance. On the other hand, it must be ensured that the surface areas and characteristic lengths of the springback part and that of the target geometry match as closely as possible. In the past, approaches/methods, such as the physical compensation method and the physical scaling approach, have been presented which can successfully counteract these problems. Furthermore, in a multi-stage process in subsequent operations a stable part position must be achieved and unwanted plastic deformations must be avoided during blankholder closing. Therefore, different compensation strategies have been presented, which can fulfil these requirements. However, in the publication of these methods, the problems were always considered individually. This paper shows how all the named requirements can be achieved by combining the individual methods in springback compensation.
Read full abstract