It is very impressive to read the most recently published reproduction of Leonardo da Vinci’s friction experiments [1]. In Table 1 of this paper, the authors reported measured average values of static friction coefficient for various roughness levels of three types of wood surfaces. These values are between 0.25 and 0.29 for rough (Ra [ 3000 nm) surfaces, and they increase up to 0.72 for smooth (Ra = 200 nm) surfaces. Moreover, the lowest friction coefficient value of 0.25 is in agreement with da Vinci’s friction experiments from 500 years ago. In these experiments, da Vinci also found that the friction coefficient is independent of the apparent contact area and the applied load. An interesting question is whether such effects of surface roughness on friction coefficient can be predicted by a theoretical model. A first hint in this direction was probably provided by Greenwood and Williamson [2] in 1966. In this seminal paper, a model (known as the GW model) for the elastic contact of rough surfaces is provided, showing that the real contact area is independent of the apparent contact area and is linearly proportional to the applied load. A plasticity index having the general form w = (E/H)(r/r), which was first introduced in the GW model, provides a measure of the plasticity level of the rough surface contact. In this index, E and H indicate modulus of elasticity and hardness, respectively, while r and r represent, respectively, standard deviation of asperity heights and average tip curvature of the asperities of the rough surface contact. The softer and rougher the rough surface is, the larger the plasticity index is. The first attempt to theoretically predict static friction of contacting rough surfaces was probably made by Chang et al. in 1988 [3]. In this model, it was shown that at low to moderate values of the plasticity index the static friction coefficient l decreases with increasing applied load, but it becomes practically independent of the applied load as the plasticity index becomes large enough. Due to the oversimplifying assumptions made in this first crude model, the values of the static friction coefficient were severely underestimated already at w = 2.5. The model of Ref. [3] has been gradually improved over the years by refining its original assumptions [4] and gaining further insight on how to handle a single spherical asperity under combined normal and tangential loading [5]. The static friction coefficient model of Ref. [5] was further validated experimentally in Ref. [6]. Finally, based on the above improvements, Cohen et al. [7] presented a static friction model to cover plasticity index values up to w = 8, and more recently, Li et al. [8] extended this model up to w = 32. The results of Ref. [8] are shown in Fig. 1 in solid lines (in comparison with those from Ref. [7] in dashed line). An empirical relation of the static friction coefficient l as a function of the dimensionless applied load and plasticity index that was offered in [8] is given by Eq. (1) in the form