In this paper, an ejector created by the constant rate of the momentum change method (CRMC ejector) was experimentally studied and compared with the widely used constant pressure method (CPM ejector) under the same ejector area ratio. The influence of the boiler temperature, evaporator temperature, and primary nozzle size on the ability to improve the performance of the CRMC ejector was examined. The results indicated that at the same ejector area ratio, the CRMC ejector always performed a higher mass entrainment ratio than the CPM ejector. However, the critical condenser pressure was similar. The average percent improvement of the entrainment ratio via the CRMC ejector was approximately 20%. Based on the photograph taken from the transparent ejector, a compression shock wave was still found in the flow process of the CRMC ejector. This shows that an improvement potential of the CRMC ejector does not concern the compression shock wave as proposed in the design theory. The key to improvement was believed to be its ability to mitigate the momentum loss during the mixing process. In such a case, some simulation works based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were employed for explanation. This can also confirm that the compression shock wave via CRMC ejector is still found. In addition, this paper compared the experimental results with the theoretical results obtained from 1-D theory and CRMC theory to alternatively discuss that an improvement potential of the CRMC ejector was mainly the cause of a lower mixing loss.