Purpose of study: A clinical study was conducted to find out possible clinical factors influencing long-term therapeutic results in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) using pre-established protocols.Methods used: The authors analyzed various clinical factors affecting therapeutic results of PVP in 215 patients with 532 symptomatic osteoporotic VCFs, performed by a single operator (range of the age of fractures, 1 week to 3 years). The patients were interviewed by a third party to assess four different variables (relief of pain, change in activity, analgesic use, patient satisfaction) of treatment results. The relationship between 16 clinical factors and each different variable of the results were statistically analyzed (mean follow-up, 15 months).of findings: Pain relief was rated in 45 cases as good; in 86 cases, fair; in 72 cases, no change and in 13 cases, worse. The sooner the duration from fracture to PVP, the more severe back pain, positive bone scan, and the lower mean T score on BMD, the better pain relief. Change in activity was rated by 16 as good; by 29, fair; by 162, no change and by 7, worse. The longer the duration, the less severe back pain, negative bone scan, paravertebral leakage, the less improvement in activity. Twenty-eight rated the effect of analgesic use as good, 43 as fair, 128 as no change and 15 as worse. Women and patients with negative bone scans appeared to be less improved. With regard to patient satisfaction, 56 were very satisfied, 96 were somewhat satisfied, 39 were somewhat dissatisfied and 24 were very dissatisfied. The longer the duration, negative bone scan, the higher the mean T score and paravertebral leakage, the less patients were satisfied. There were no serious complications related to the surgical procedures.Relationship between findings and existing knowledge: PVP has been used successfully in the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs, and has become a popular management procedure. However, there are no reliable criteria for success of PVP in practice except for a few results from short-term follow-up in a small population of the patients. In our study, the efficacy of PVP was confirmed in osteoporotic VCFs, but PVP was rated lower in pain relief and satisfaction compared with the previous studies and not significant in terms of change in activity and analgesic use.Overall significance of findings: These disparities might be mainly caused by the wide range of fracture age. The favorable clinical factors appeared to be positive bone scan imaging, shorter age of fractures and severity of pain and osteoporosis. The unfavorable factors were female gender, negative bone scan, mild osteoporosis and leakage of methacrylate into the paravertebral space. Long-term therapeutic results of PVP management can be improved in terms of early return to usual activity, improvement in pain relief, analgesic use and patient satisfaction, especially in bedridden elderly patients presenting severe focal pain and severe osteoporosis. Revision of the pre-existing criteria for patient selection for PVP might be needed.Disclosures: Device or drug: polymethylmethacrylate. Status: approved.Conflict of interest: No conflicts.