Efficacy Of Natalizumab Research Articles

Extending the Interval of Natalizumab Dosing: Is Efficacy Preserved?

Extending the natalizumab interval after the 24th administration could reduce the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The objective is to evaluate the noninferiority of the efficacy of an extended interval dosing (EID) compared with the standard interval dosing (SID) of natalizumab. It is an observational, multicenter (14 Italian centers), retrospective cohort study, starting from the 24th natalizumab infusion to the loss of follow-up or 2years after baseline. Patients were grouped in 2 categories according to the mean number of weeks between doses: < 5weeks, SID; ≥ 5weeks, EID. Three hundred and sixty patients were enrolled. Median dose interval (MDI) following 24th infusion was 4.7weeks, with a bimodal distribution (modes at 4 and 6weeks). Two hundred and sixteen patients were in the SID group (MDI = 4.3weeks) and 144 in the EID group (MDI 6.2weeks). Annualized relapse rate was 0.060 (95% CI = 0.033-0.087) in the SID group and 0.039 (95% CI = 0.017-0.063) in the EID group. The non-inferiority of EID versus SID was satisfied. In conclusion, there is no evidence of a reduced efficacy of natalizumab in an EID setting. This observation confirms previous results and together with the emerging evidence of a reduced risk of PML associated to an EID, supports the need of a randomized study to assess the need to change the standard of the natalizumab dosing schedule.

Switching from natalizumab to fingolimod treatment in multiple sclerosis: real life data from the Austrian MS Treatment Registry

To compare the efficacy of natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in sequential use in common and as a function of transition periods in a nationwide observational cohort using prospectively collected data from a real-life setting. We included 195 patients from the Austrian MS Treatment Registry, who had started treatment with NTZ at any time since 2006 and stayed on NTZ for at least 24months, switched afterwards within 1 year to FTY and stayed on FTY for at least another 12months. Transition periods between NTZ and FTY were grouped into three different intervals: < 3months (135 patients), 3-6months (44 patients), and 6-12months (16 patients). Estimated mean annualized relapse rates (ARR) over a mean treatment period of 44months were 0.26 for NTZ and 0.32 for FTY (p = 0.381) over 46months. In the treatment gap, differences were found concerning the relapse probability, seven (5.2%) patients in the < 3months group, six (13.6%) in thef 3-6months group, and seven (43.8%) in the 6-12months group (p < 0.001). After this treatment gap, no significant differences concerning ARR, EDSS change, EDSS progression, and regression were observed regardless the proceeding transition periods. Significantly higher efficacy of NTZ compared to FTY in sequential use was found regarding EDSS change, EDSS progression, and EDSS regression sustained for 12 and 24weeks. First, we here show an increased short-time risk for relapses during the treatment gap between NTZ and FTY therapy, dependent on the length of transition time. Second, the disease course after switching to FTY remained stable in the long-term evaluation. Therefore, switching from NTZ to FTY in a real-world setting appears efficacious and safe, but this data advocate for a short switching gap of 3months or less.

The real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. An Italian multicentre study

BackgroundBoth natalizumab and fingolimod are highly effective in the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). In the absence of head-to-head trials, some observational studies have compared their efficacy with conflicting results. ObjectivesTo investigate the efficacy of natalizumab and fingolimod in a cohort of RRMS patients in an observational, retrospective study. MethodsWe included all consecutive RRMS patients who started natalizumab or fingolimod in three MS centres with a follow-up to 24 months and analysed clinical and brain MRI data after propensity score (PS) matching. ResultsAfter 1:1 PS-matching, we retained 102 patients in both groups, with similar baseline features. After 24 months, although both drugs resulted highly effective, patients treated with natalizumab had a lower relapse risk (HR 0.59 CI 95% 0.35–1.00, p = 0.048) and higher time to first relapse. MRI-combined-unique-activity was found in 31.8% of natalizumab vs 43.2% of fingolimod treated patients (p = 0.28). We found a higher proportion of patients with confirmed regression of disability (19.2 vs 6.7%, p = 0.03) and 2-year no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3, 39.0% vs 22.0%, p = 0.04) in the natalizumab group. ConclusionsBoth drugs were highly effective in our cohort. Natalizumab proved superior in inducing regression of disability and 2-year-NEDA-3.

Natalizumab Treatment for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The Experience From Saudi Arabia.

Natalizumab is the first targeted humanized monoclonal antibody to be approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Natalizumab appears to be more effective than current first-line disease-modifying therapies. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the outcome of Saudi patients with active RRMS treated with natalizumab and compare the results with other outcomes in the Gulf and international trials. We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study involving 32 patients with RRMS at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The inclusion criteria included all patients diagnosed with RRMS according to the revised McDonald criteria who are currently receiving or received natalizumab treatment in the past for a minimum of 6 months. The mean baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 4.50 ± 1.80 (range, 1.5-6; median, 5), whereas the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale at the follow-up was 4.02 ± 2.08 (range, 1-6; median, 4.25) (P = 0.3274). The mean annualized relapse rate was significantly reduced from 2.41 ± 2.48 at baseline to 0.16 ± 0.37 at the last follow-up (P < 0.0001). Twenty-seven patients (84.4%) had no relapses since the treatment with natalizumab was started, whereas 5 patients (15.6%) had only 1 relapse. In addition to clinically measurable improvement, radiological improvement was observed through magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging activity was significantly improved at follow-up magnetic resonance imaging studies when compared with baseline. Our single-center study in Saudi Arabia provides further support for the efficacy of natalizumab in the clinical practice setting. The sharp decrease in relapse rate and progression of disability following the initiation of natalizumab treatment was similar to other observational studies conducted in different countries across the globe. Natalizumab was a satisfactory therapy for the management of our MS population, both from the patients' and the physicians' perspectives.

Efficacy and safety of natalizumab extended interval dosing

ObjectiveIt is postulated that extending the dosing interval of natalizumab (NTZ) from 4 to 5–8 weeks might decrease the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of extended interval dosing (EID) on the therapeutic efficacy of natalizumab. MethodsWe reviewed 85 patients treated at two MS centers in the Middle East with natalizumab for at least 6 months using EID. Patients were shifted after an initial treatment period at standard interval dosing (SID) to an EID ranging from 5–8 weeks. ResultsThe mean treatment duration on SID and EID was 15.4 ± 11.9 and 11.8 ± 7.0 months, respectively. By the end of SID and EID treatment 95.3% and 93.9% of patients were free of relapses (P = 0.41) with an annualized relapse rate (ARR) of 0.0006 and 0.001 respectively (P = 0.42). The mean EDSS at the end of SID and EID periods was 2.56 ± 1.62 and 2.59 ± 1.61 respectively (P = 0.84). A total of 97.6% and 94.7% of patients had no enhancing lesions on MRI during the SID and EID periods respectively (P = 0.18). There were no cases of PML and the rate of infections was lower during the EID period. ConclusionIn patients treated with natalizumab, shifting from SID to EID has no negative effect on efficacy as evidenced by relapse rate, disability progression and MRI activity.

67 - Phase II Trial of Natalizumab (Tysabri®) with Corticosteroids as Initial Treatment of Gastrointestinal Acute Graft Versus Host Disease

Abstract Background: Graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) is caused by allorecognition of host antigens by tissue-specific donor lymphocytes. We have previously demonstrated that α4s7 integrin is upregulated on both naive and memory T cell subsets in patients who subsequently developed intestinal acute GVHD (Chen, BMT 2013). This integrin interacts with endothelial cell adhesion molecules and mediates homing of lymphocytes to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Natalizumab (Tysabri®, Biogen Inc.) is a selective adhesion molecule inhibitor, acting directly against the α4 subunit of α4 integrins. Given the poor outcomes of GI GVHD when treated with corticosteroids alone, we initiated a phase II study to determine the safety and efficacy of natalizumab in combination with corticosteroids for the initial treatment of acute GI GVHD. Methods: Subjects with new-onset, acute GVHD of the lower GI tract were eligible to participate. Other organ involvement was permitted but not required. Biopsy confirmation of GI GVHD and exclusion of infectious causes of diarrhea were required. Natalizumab was given at a dose of 300 mg IV, with a second dose permitted 4 weeks later in the event of an incomplete response. An initial corticosteroid dose of 2 mg/kg of methylprednisolone was suggested, but dosing and dose reductions were at the discretion of the treating physician. Steroids could be initiated up to 7 days prior to the initiation of natalizumab while biopsy and infectious disease specimens were being analyzed. The primary endpoint was GVHD-free survival rate 56 days from enrollment. Secondary endpoints included response rates at day 28 and 56, steroid dose at days 28, 56, 100, 180 and 365, incidence of systemic infections at day 56 and 180, and overall survival. Results: 18 subjects were enrolled and received at least one dose of natalizumab. Subjects had a median age of 63.5 years, and 12 were male. Fifteen had a non-myeloablative transplant, 12 had a matched unrelated donor, and all had received PBSCs. All subjects had newly diagnosed acute GI GVHD at time of enrollment; 4 had concomitant cutaneous and 1 had concomitant hepatic involvement. Stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 GI involvement was noted in 7, 4, 4, and 3 subjects respectively, corresponding to overall grade II GVHD in 7 and grade III in 11 subjects. Sixteen patients had data for response assessment. The day 56 GVHD-free survival rate was 37.5%. The overall response rate (PR+CR) for GI GVHD at day 28 and day 56 was 75% and 62.5% respectively. All surviving subjects except one achieved steroid dose reduction by day 56, with a median reduction of 61.6%. Three patients experienced treatment-related toxicity possibly related to natalizumab; one subject had grade 2 hepatic toxicity, one had grade 4 encephalopathy, and one developed hepatic failure. Three subjects have developed chronic GVHD. Four subjects had documented infections with bacteria (2), yeast (1), and viral pathogens (1- polyomavirus). Six subjects had measurable JC viremia prior to initiation of natalizumab and 8 subjects had measurable JC viremia at day 56, although only 1 subject had a viral load greater than 1000 copies/ml. No subject has developed JC-associated disease. Seven subjects have died. Causes of death include GVHD (2), disease relapse (2), and organ failure (3). With a median follow-up of 180 days, the 6 month overall survival was 52% (95% CI 25-74%). Conclusion: Natalizumab in combination with corticosteroids as initial treatment of acute gastrointestinal GVHD is feasible and well tolerated. These early results suggest a higher rate of response at day 56 than is typically observed with steroids alone. Inhibition of T-cell homing to the GI tract may improve GI GVHD response and potentially mitigate progression of acute GVHD. Disclosures Koreth: Kadmon Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Prometheus Labs: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Armand: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Sequenta/Adaptive: Research Funding; Merck & Co., Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Sigma Tau: Research Funding. Antin: Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cutler: Pfizer: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy.

Efficacy of alemtuzumab and natalizumab in the treatment of different stages of multiple sclerosis patients.

Background:Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease, in which the insulating covers of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord are demyelinated. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of alemtuzumab and natalizumab in the treatment of different stages of MS patients.Methods:A total of 585 patients diagnosed with MS and hospitalized were included and analyzed after which they were divided into the primary progressive MS A and B groups, the relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) C and D groups, and the secondary progressive MS E and F groups. Patients in A, C, and E groups were administered alemtuzumab while those in B, D, and F groups were administered natalizumab for the treatment. The expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores and the EDSS difference were calculated before and after treatment. The number of head magnetic resonance imaging enhanced lesions in the patients, recurrence time and recurrence rate were measured before and after treatment.Results:The EDSS score of the RRMS group was significantly lower than that of the primary progressive MS group and the secondary progressive MS group. After 12 months of treatment, the EDSS score of RRMS patients treated with natalizumab was significantly lower compared with the patients with alemtuzumab, and the difference before and after treatment was significantly higher than alemtuzumab. The recurrence rate of the RRMS-D group was significantly lower than the RRMS-C group. After 12 months of treatment, compared with the RRMS-C group, a significant reduction was observed in the number of head magnetic resonance imaging enhanced lesions and longer recurrence time in the RRMS-D group.Conclusion:The efficacy of natalizumab was better than alemtuzumab in the treatment of patients in the RRMS group, while there was no significant difference among other stages of MS patients, which provided the theoretical basis and clinical guidance for the treatment of different stages of MS.

NEDA-3 status including cortical lesions in the comparative evaluation of natalizumab versus fingolimod efficacy in multiple sclerosis.

Background:Cortical lesions (CLs) are typical of multiple sclerosis (MS) and have been recently incorporated in MS diagnostic criteria. Thus, the ‘no evidence of disease activity’ (NEDA) definition should now include CLs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the NEDA3 + CL status in natalizumab- or fingolimod-treated relapsing remitting MS (RMS) patients.Methods:Natalizumab- or fingolimod-treated RMS patients were enrolled in a 2-year longitudinal study based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations performed respectively biannually and annually. CLs were detected by double inversion recovery. The NEDA3 + CL condition was evaluated at baseline (T0) and at the end of the first (T1) and second (T2) year.Results:Of the 137 RMS patients included in the study, 86 were propensity-matched. At T2, the annualized relapse rate was lower on natalizumab (p = 0.021), but the effect on white matter lesions (p = 0.29) and the proportion of NEDA-3 patients (p = 0.14) were similar in the two treatment arms. At T2, 11.6% natalizumab- and 62.8% fingolimod-treated patients had new CLs (p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of natalizumab-treated patients (55.8% versus 11.6%, p < 0.001) achieved the NEDA3 + CL status (hazard ratio 5.2, p < 0.001).Conclusion:The incorporation of CLs in the NEDA-3 definition highlighted the higher efficacy of natalizumab versus fingolimod in suppressing disease activity in RMS patients.

Real-life clinical use of natalizumab and fingolimod in Austria.

To compare the efficacy of natalizumab or fingolimod in a nationwide observational cohort using prospectively collected data. We included all patients starting treatment with natalizumab or fingolimod documented in the Austrian MS Treatment Registry (AMSTR) from 2011 and staying on therapy for at least 24months. We used propensity scores for several matching methods and as a covariate in multivariate models to correct for the bias of this non-randomized registry study. The study cohort includes 588 patients with RRMS. Ten patients did not produce a propensity score in the common support region, thus leaving 578 cases for final analyses, 332 in the fingolimod and 246 in the natalizumab group. Mean annualized relapse rates (ARR) during the 24months observation period were 0.19 under fingolimod and 0.12 under natalizumab treatment (P=.005). No statistical significant differences were found analysing the log-transformed ARR, probability for experiencing a relapse, EDSS progression and EDSS regression. The hazard ratio for switching treatment from fingolimod comparing with natalizumab was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.247-0.523), P<.001. The generalized linear model (GLM) for relapse count as Poisson distributed dependent variable and propensity score as covariate showed a statistically significant reduction for the mean relapse count in the natalizumab group compared with fingolimod. This effect was smaller in the analyses of log-transformed ARR with propensity score matching, loosing statistical significance although showing the same direction for the effect. We assume that the GLM was the more sensitive model analysing this question.

The use of natalizumab for multiple sclerosis.

Natalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that acts as an α4 integrin antagonist to prevent leukocyte trafficking into the central nervous system. It is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Natalizumab demonstrated high efficacy in Phase III trials by reducing the annualized relapse rate, preventing multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion accumulation on magnetic resonance imaging, and decreasing the probability of sustained progression of disability. The leading safety concern with natalizumab is its association with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare brain infection typically seen only in severely immunocompromised patients caused by reactivation of the John Cunningham virus (JCV). Careful analysis of risk factors for PML in natalizumab-treated MS patients, specifi-cally the presence of anti-JCV antibodies, has led to risk mitigation strategies to improve safety. Additional biomarkers are under investigation to further aid risk stratification. Natalizumab’s high efficacy and favorable tolerability profile have led to a broad use by MS physicians, as both first-and second-line treatments. This review discusses the natalizumab efficacy, safety, and tolerability and finishes with pragmatic considerations regarding its use in clinical practice.

Long-term natalizumab treatment is associated with sustained improvements in quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) patients experience lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than the general population. In clinical trials, natalizumab significantly improved HRQoL and reduced relapse rates and disability progression in patients with relapsing MS. In a 1-year analysis of patients included in the current study, HRQoL improvement occurred within 3 months of natalizumab initiation and continued for 1 year thereafter. However, natalizumab’s long-term efficacy in improving HRQoL has not been studied.MethodsIn this longitudinal, observational, single-arm US study, HRQoL and treatment satisfaction were evaluated in MS patients receiving intravenous natalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks in clinical settings. Patients completed surveys at baseline and every 6 months for 3 years and reported the following measures: Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication.ResultsIn this study, 120 patients completed ≥3 years of natalizumab treatment. Significant HRQoL improvements were evident from baseline to year 3 by increases in SF-12v2 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary scores (P<0.01) and decreases in MSIS-29 physical and psychological scores (P<0.0001). Patients with less physical disability (baseline Disease Steps [DS] 0–2) had significant improvement from baseline to year 3 in SF-12v2 PCS (P<0.05) and MSIS-29 physical scores (P<0.05). Physical HRQoL outcomes in patients with baseline DS 3–6 remained stable over 3 years. Treatment satisfaction increased significantly from baseline to year 1 (P<0.0001) and was maintained in the following 2 years.ConclusionPatients reported physical and psychological HRQoL improvements over 3 years of natalizumab treatment, supporting the long-term efficacy of natalizumab in real-world settings. Lower baseline disease activity and earlier treatment were related to better outcomes, indicating the importance of starting natalizumab early in the disease course. Treatment satisfaction increased after natalizumab initiation and remained high over 3 years of treatment.

Natalizumab stabilizes physical, cognitive, MRI, and OCT markers of disease activity: A prospective, non-randomized pilot study.

Natalizumab is an effective therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS). Its effectiveness has been demonstrated in several clinical and imaging studies. The objective of this study was to further demonstrate the efficacy of natalizumab using a comprehensive battery of clinical and imaging markers in the same cohort of patients followed longitudinally, hence capturing the multi-faceted nature of the MS disease process. A prospective, open-label, pilot study of 20 MS patients treated with natalizumab was conducted. High resolution MRI, Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scans were obtained at baseline, 48, and 96 weeks. 15 patients completed the study. Natalizumab treatment decreased Expanded Disability Status Scale score (EDSS) and no change in SDMT, Brain Parenchymal Fraction (BPF), or any of the OCT markers of retinal degeneration was observed. Thalamic and whole brain volume as assessed by Percentage Brain Volume Change (PBVC) showed continuous deterioration. Higher baseline T2 lesion load correlated with increased rate of PBVC at 96-weeks (r = 0.566, R2 = 0.320, p = 0.035) and thalamic volume loss (r = -0.586, R2 = 0.344, p = 0.027). Most patients, 93%, achieved no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at 2 years, likely due to early disease duration and lower initial baseline lesion load. This study further demonstrates stabilization of clinical and imaging markers of disease activity during natalizumab treatment.

Efficacy of Natalizumab and Fingolimod in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Real World Clinical Setting: a 2-year follow-up (P6.377)

Efficacy of Natalizumab and Fingolimod in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Real World Clinical Setting: a 2-year follow-up (P6.377)

Safety and efficacy of natalizumab in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (ACTION): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial

In animal models of acute ischaemic stroke, blocking of the leukocyte-endothelium adhesion by antagonism of α4 integrin reduces infarct volumes and improves outcomes. We assessed the effect of one dose of natalizumab, an antibody against the leukocyte adhesion molecule α4 integrin, in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. In this double-blind, phase 2 study, patients with acute ischaemic stroke (aged 18-85 years) from 30 US and European clinical sites were randomly assigned (1:1) to 300 mg intravenous natalizumab or placebo with stratification by treatment window and baseline infarct size. Patients, investigators, and study staff were masked to treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was the change in infarct volume from baseline to day 5 and was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints were the change in infarct volume from baseline to day 30, and from 24 h to days 5 and 30; the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline, 24 h, and at days 5 (or discharge), 30, and 90; and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index (BI) at days 5 (or discharge), 30, and 90. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01955707. Between Dec 16, 2013, and April 9, 2015, 161 patients were randomly assigned to natalizumab (n=79) or placebo (n=82). Natalizumab did not reduce infarct volume growth from baseline to day 5 compared with placebo (median absolute growth 28 mL [range -8 to 303] vs 22 mL [-11 to 328]; relative growth ratio 1·09 [90% CI 0·91-1·30], p=0·78) or to day 30 (4 mL [-43 to 121] vs 4 mL [-28 to 180]; 1·05 [0·88-1·27], p=0·68), from 24 h to day 5 (8 mL [-30 to 177] vs 7 mL [-13 to 204]; 1·00 [0·89-1·12], p=0·49), and from 24 h to day 30 (-5 mL [-93 to 81] vs -5 mL [-48 to 48]; 0·98 [0·87-1·11], p=0·40). No difference was noted between the natalizumab and placebo groups in the NIHSS (score ≤1 or ≥8 point improvement) from baseline at 24 h, day 5 (or discharge), day 30 (27 [35%] vs 36 [44%]; odds ratio 0·69 [90% CI 0·39-1·21], p=0·86), and day 90 (36 [47%] vs 37 [46%]; 1·10 [0·63-1·93], p=0·39). More patients in the natalizumab group than in the placebo group had mRS scores of 0 or 1 at day 30 (13 [18%] vs seven [9%]; odds ratio 2·88 [90% CI 1·20-6·93], p=0·024) and day 90 (18 [25%] vs 16 [21%]; 1·48 [0·74-2·98], p=0·18); and BI (score ≥95) at day 90 (34 [44%] vs 26 [33%]; 1·91 [1·07-3·41], p=0·033) but not significantly at day 5 or day 30 (26 [34%] vs 26 [32%]; 1·13 [0·63-2·00], p=0·37). Natalizumab and placebo groups had similar incidences of adverse events (77 [99%] of 78 patients vs 81 [99%] of 82 patients), serious adverse events (36 [46%] vs 38 [46%]), and deaths (14 [18%] vs 13 [16%]). Two patients in the natalizumab group died because of adverse events assessed as related to treatment by the investigator (pneumonia, and septic shock and multiorgan failure). Natalizumab administered up to 9 h after stroke onset did not reduce infarct growth. Treatment-associated benefits on functional outcomes might warrant further investigation. Biogen.

Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab in Japanese Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Open-Label Extension Study of a Phase 2 Trial.

IntroductionThe efficacy of natalizumab was evaluated in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in a 24-week, phase 2 bridging study. An open-label, 2-year extension study from this trial was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of natalizumab treatment in Japanese patients.MethodsA total of 97 patients (43 previously on placebo; 54 previously on natalizumab) who had completed the bridging study were treated with 300 mg natalizumab every 4 weeks. Multiple sclerosis relapses, changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and adverse events were assessed at regular intervals. Anti-natalizumab and anti-JC virus (JCV) antibodies were measured.ResultsAfter 2 years of natalizumab treatment, the mean adjusted annualized relapse rate was 0.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18–0.52) among previously-on-placebo patients and 0.13 (95% CI: 0.05–0.29) among previously-on-natalizumab patients. The mean change in EDSS score from baseline to week 120 was −0.03 among previously-on-placebo patients and −0.18 among previously-on-natalizumab patients. In both groups, >90% of patients experienced ≥1 adverse event. Two previously-on-placebo patients developed persistently positive anti-natalizumab antibodies. Approximately 65% of all patients tested positive for anti-JCV antibodies at open-label treatment initiation. No deaths or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy cases were reported.ConclusionsThe efficacy and safety findings from this 2-year open-label extension study are comparable to and confirm the results of other clinical trials of natalizumab conducted in non-Asian patient populations, and provide longer-term evidence of efficacy and safety in Japanese patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01416155.FundingBiogen.

The Efficacy of Natalizumab versus Fingolimod for Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review, Indirect Evidence from Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials and Meta-Analysis of Observational Head-to-Head Trials.

BackgroundAlthough Fingolimod (FGD) and Natalizumab (NTZ) appear to be effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), they have never been directly compared in a randomized clinical trial (RCT).Methods and FindingsWe evaluated the comparative efficacy of FGD vs. NTZ using a meta-analytical approach. Data from placebo-controlled RCTs was used for indirect comparisons and observational data was utilized for head-to-head comparisons. We identified 3 RCTs (2498 patients) and 5 observational studies (2576 patients). NTZ was associated with a greater reduction in the 2-year annualized relapse rate (ARR; SMDindirect = -0.24;95% CI: from -0.44 to -0.04; p = 0.005) and with the probability of no disease activity at 2 years (ORindirect:1.82, 95% CI: from 1.05 to 3.15) compared to FGD, while no differences between the two therapies were found in the proportion of patients who remained relapse-free (ORindirect = 1.20;95% CI: from 0.84 to 1.71) and those with disability progression (ORindirect = 0.76;95% CI: from 0.48 to 1.21) at 2 years. In the analysis of observational data, we found no significant differences between NTZ and FGD in the 2-year ARR (SMD = -0.05; 95% CI: from -0.26 to 0.16), and 2-year disability progression (OR:1.08;95% CI: from 0.77 to 1.52). However, NTZ-treated patients were more likely to remain relapse-free at 2-years compared to FGD (OR: 2.19;95% CI: from 1.15 to 4.18; p = z0.020).ConclusionsIndirect analyses of RCT data and head-to-head comparisons of observational findings indicate that NTZ may be more effective than FGD in terms of disease activity reduction in patients with RRMS. However, head-to-head RCTs are required to independently confirm this preliminary observation.

Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study.

Editors' Note: In WriteClick this week, in reference to “Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study,” Drs. Bhatia and Puri comment that they would be more interested in clinical considerations such as safety, compliance, and disability reduction with natalizumab as opposed to the already well-supported conclusion that natalizumab is superior to fingolimod in preventing relapses. Drs. Lanzillo and Moccia question the statistical methodology used in the same article. Authors Laplaud and Foucher reply to both and defend their statistics but agree that a prospective randomized trial comparing the 2 treatments is needed. —Megan Alcauskas, MD, and Robert C. Griggs, MD We read with interest the multicenter observational study by Barbin et al.1 comparing the efficacy of natalizumab and fingolimod, both licensed as second-line therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) in Europe.2,3 However, we are concerned …

Natalizumab: a new therapy for acute ischemic stroke?

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Natalizumab, a well-characterized treatment for multiple sclerosis, is a humanized antibody against alpha-4 integrin (CD49d) that mitigates the transmigration of leukocytes across the endothelium. Although numerous experimental studies have evaluated the efficacy of anti-CD49d antibody treatment for ischemic stroke, discrepancies in their results have raised concerns about the benefits of this approach.Areas covered: This article reviews the main experimental studies on the blockage of CD49d and identifies the potential underlying causes for their inconclusive results. Despite these divergences and the difficulties in translation of experimental studies, a phase II clinical trial has recently been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of natalizumab in stroke patients (ACTION trial). Preliminary results of the trial are also discussed here, together with a general overview of the emerged importance of the neuroprotective strategies based on the mitigation of post-stroke neuroinflammation.Expert commentary: Despite natalizumab showing positive effects on functional outcome similar to what was found in experimental models, a better understanding of how this happens without reducing the infarct volume requires further research. Therefore, new clinical trials are needed to confirm its neuroprotectant role in ischemic stroke.

A comparison of multiple sclerosis clinical disease activity between patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod

Background: Natalizumab and fingolimod were approved for treatment of active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Denmark in 2006 and 2011, respectively. There have been no randomized head-to-head studies comparing the two drugs. Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of natalizumab and fingolimod. Methods: Data on all Danish RRMS patients who started their first second-line treatment with natalizumab or fingolimod from July 2011 to March 2015 were prospectively recorded in the Danish Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Treatment Register. The two treatment arms were 1:1 propensity score matched by baseline covariates using ‘nearest neighbour’ method. Results: Propensity score matching left 928 of 1309 RRMS cases, 464 in each treatment group. The on-treatment annualized relapse rate was 0.296 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26–0.34) for natalizumab and 0.307 (95% CI: 0.27–0.35) for fingolimod. The adjusted relapse rate ratio was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.74–1.17; p = 0.53). Mean time to first relapse was 2.55 and 2.56 years, respectively (p = 0.76). There was no difference in change of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Conclusion: We found no differences in clinical disease activity between natalizumab- and fingolimod-treated RRMS patients in this real-life observational study. However, the lack of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for the propensity score matching may conceal a higher efficacy of natalizumab.

Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab after Switching from Other Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs): Data from the Tysabri® Observational Program (TOP) (P2.069)

Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab after Switching from Other Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs): Data from the Tysabri® Observational Program (TOP) (P2.069)