Efficacy Of Janus Kinase Inhibitors Research Articles

Potential Efficacy of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of a Patient With Coexisting Peripheral and Axial Spondyloarthritis and Ulcerative Colitis.

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are effective and recommended in treating patients with coexisting spondyloarthritis (SpA) and ulcerative colitis (UC); however, the evidence of their superiority over other drugs is insufficient.1 Although Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have shown effectiveness in treating UC and psoriatic arthritis, there are no reports of treating coexisting SpA and UC with JAKi monotherapy.

Predictors of Efficacy of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Patients Affected by Ulcerative Colitis

Personalised medicine and the identification of predictors of the efficacy of specific drugs represent the ultimate goal for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) in order to break the current therapeutic ceiling. JAK inhibitors are a new class of advanced therapies, orally administered, showing a good profile of efficacy and safety in both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies. Unfortunately, to date, it is not possible to draw the ideal profile of a patient maximally benefiting from this class of drugs to guide clinicians’ therapeutic choices. Baseline clinical activities and inflammatory biomarkers, as well as their early variation after treatment initiation, emerged as the main predictors of efficacy from post hoc analyses of RCTs with tofacitinib. Similar findings were also observed in the real-life studies including mainly patients with a history of pluri-refractoriness to biological therapies. At last, a few new biomarkers have been explored, even though they have not been validated in large cohorts. This paper provides a review of the current knowledge on clinical variables and biomarkers predicting response to JAK inhibitors in UC.

Janus kinase inhibitors vs. abatacept about safety and efficacy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective nested case-control study

BackgroundInterstitial lung disease (ILD) related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is among the leading causes of death and an essential prognostic factor. There is only limited evidence for the safety of anti-rheumatic drugs for patients with RA-ILD. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) by comparing it with abatacept (ABT) in patients with RA-ILD.MethodsThis single centre, retrospective nested case–control study enrolled patients with RA-ILD treated with JAKi or ABT. To determine the safety of the two drugs for existing ILD, we compared their drug persistency, incidence rates of pulmonary complications, and change of chest computed tomography (CT) image. For their efficacy as RA treatment, disease activity scores and prednisolone (PSL)-sparing effect were compared. We performed propensity score matching to match the groups’ patient characteristics.ResultsWe studied 71 patients with RA-ILD (ABT, n = 45; JAKi, n = 26). At baseline, the JAKi group had longer disease duration, longer duration of past bDMARD or JAKi use and higher usual interstitial pneumonia rate. After propensity score matching, no significant differences in patient characteristics were found between the two groups. No significant difference in the drug persistency rate for the first 2 years (ABT, 61.9%; JAKi, 42.8%; P = 0.256) was observed between the two matched groups. The incidence rate of pulmonary complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.683). The CT score did not change after the treatment for the ABT group (Ground-glass opacities (GGO): P = 0.87; fibrosis: P = 0.78), while the GGO score significantly improved for the JAKi group (P = 0.03), although the number was limited (ABT: n = 7; JAKi: n = 8). The fibrosis score of the JAKi group did not change significantly.(P = 0.82). Regarding the efficacy for RA, a significant decrease in disease activity scores after the 1-year treatment was observed in both groups, and PSL dose was successfully tapered, although no significant differences were observed between the two drugs.ConclusionsJAKi is as safe and effective as ABT for patients with RA-ILD. JAKi can be a good treatment option for such patients.

Use of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review of Efficacy and Safety Compared to Conventional Therapies

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a complex autoimmune disorder characterized by chronic synovial inflammation, leading to progressive joint deterioration and substantial morbidity. While conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been the cornerstone of RA management, the emergence of Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment paradigm. This comprehensive review paper analyzes the efficacy, safety, and practical considerations associated with JAK inhibitors in managing RA juxtaposed with conventional therapies. Through an exploration of the mechanism of action, the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in ameliorating disease activity and improving patient outcomes is underscored. The review also addresses the safety concerns surrounding using JAK inhibitors, emphasizing the need to monitor potential adverse events. Furthermore, the paper discusses the role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and DMARDs in RA management, highlighting their limitations and benefits. Practical clinical recommendations for using JAK inhibitors are elucidated, considering their positioning as a second-line therapy for patients with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional DMARDs. Finally, the abstract emphasizes the importance of ongoing research and post-marketing surveillance to comprehensively evaluate the long-term implications of JAK inhibitors, aiming to optimize their integration within personalized treatment strategies for RA.

Real-world comparative study of the efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study.

This multicentre, retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, peficitinib and upadacitinib in real-world clinical settings after minimizing selection bias and adjusting the confounding patient characteristics. The 622 patients were selected from the ANSWER cohort database and treated with tofacitinib (TOF), baricitinib (BAR), peficitinib (PEF) or upadacitinib (UPA). The patient's background was matched using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) among four treatment groups. The values of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) after drug initiation and the remission or low disease activity (LDA) rates of CDAI at 6 months after drug initiation were compared among the four groups. Further, the predictive factor for TOF and BAR efficacy was analysed. The retention and discontinuation rates until 6 months after drug initiations were not significantly different among the four JAK inhibitors treatment groups. Mean CDAI value, CDAI remission rate, and CDAI-LDA rate at 6 months after drug initiation were not significantly different among treatment groups. Baseline CDAI (TOFA: OR 1.09, P < 0.001; BARI: OR 1.07, P < 0.001), baseline CRP (TOFA: OR 1.32, P = 0.049), baseline glucocorticoid dose (BARI: OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38, P = 0.035), a number of previous biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs) (BARI: OR 1.36, P = 0.004) were predictive factors for resistance to CDAI-LDA achievement to JAK inhibitor treatment. The efficacy and safety of TOF, BAR, PEF and UPA were not significantly different for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in adult patients with alopecia areata

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder resulting in localized hair loss due to targeting hair follicle epithelium. The authors aimed to summarize the existing literature on patients with AA who underwent treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and discuss the current evidence regarding their efficacy and safety. An extensive scientific literature search was conducted between January 1, 2017, and April 16, 2023, using a recognized medical and scientific database. The extracted data were synthesized and analyzed, focusing on the effect of JAKis in reducing hair loss in adult patients with AA. The evidence suggests that oral JAKis such as tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, and Baricitinib show promise in treating AA regarding both efficacy and safety. The group of drugs JAKis are a good treatment option even in severe clinical conditions of AA, further investigation should be taken to consideration including dosage and treatment duration.

JAK-STAT inhibitors in Immune mediated diseases: An Overview.

For any biological response, transmission of extracellular signals to the nucleus is required for DNA transcription and gene expression. In that respect, cytokines/chemokines are well-known inflammatory agents which play a critical role in signalling pathways by activating the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) signalling proteins (Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription) which are a group of intracellular kinase molecules. Cytokines are a category of small proteins (∼5-25 kDa) that play a major role in cell signalling and are major drivers of an autoimmune response. Here we will discuss the role of Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription kinase cascades in the inflammatory-proliferative cascades of autoimmune disease and about the recent progress in the development of oral synthetic Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and their therapeutic efficacies in dermatologic and systemic autoimmune diseases. Therapeutic efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors is now well established in the treatment of array of autoimmune and inflammatory disease: spondylarthritis with a special focus on psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and its dermatologic manifestations (psoriasis) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), atopic dermatitis (AD), alopecia areata (AA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In addition to the first-generation Janus kinase inhibitors several new-generation Janus kinase inhibitors are currently being evaluated. It is expected that these Janus kinase inhibitors likely have higher potency and less adverse effects as compared to their predecessors. Here we have discussed: (1) the functional significance of the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription kinase cascades in the inflammatory-proliferative processes of autoimmune diseases and its cellular/molecular mechanisms and (2) progress in the development of oral synthetic Janus kinase inhibitors and their therapeutic efficacies in several systemic and cutaneous autoimmune diseases.

Predicting the clinical efficacy of JAK inhibitor treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis based on Fas+ T cell subsets.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune disease. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for the treatment of RA; however, the impact of JAKi on immune cells remains inconclusive. This study investigated the response of immune cells to JAKi treatment to identify biomarkers by which to evaluate and predict clinical outcomes. Blood samples were collected from RA patients before and after JAKi treatment for the analysis of immunophenotypes. Our results revealed that JAKi mainly inhibited Fas+ T cell subsets. The percentage changes of Th Fas+ and Naive Th Fas+ cells were positively correlated with the 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) values. Following treatment, moderate response (MR) RA patients presented a decrease in the number of Naive Th Fas+ cells (p = 0.0001). Initial percentages of 14 T cell and 20 B cell subsets were correlated with percentage changes in DAS28-ESR. Overall, 16 cell subsets presented significant differences between the non-response (NR) and MR groups. Excluding the multicollinearity of the immune cells, we constructed a JAKi treatment response prediction index (JRPI) using 5 subsets of T/B cells, the results of which were strongly correlated with percentage changes in DAS28-ESR (receiver operating characteristic curve of 1). Note that the NR group was clearly distinguished from the MR group (p = 0.0167). In conclusion, the efficacy of JAKi can be attributed mainly to the suppression of Fas+ T cell subsets. A positive correlation was shown between the therapeutic efficacy of JAKi and the percentage changes in both Th Fas+ cells and Naive Th Fas+ cells. Furthermore, the proposed JRPI could potentially be used as an indicator to predict the efficacy of JAKi prior to treatment in RA patients. These findings may contribute to the development of personalized treatment strategies for RA patients using JAKi.

E022 Effect of upadacitinib in a patient with primary Sjogren syndrome: a case report

Abstract Background/Aims Primary Sjogren syndrome (pSS) is a chronic autoimmune multi-system disease characterized by inflammation of exocrine glands, particularly the lacrimal and salivary glands, as well as multiple extra-glandular involvements. Treatment is often challenging, and until now, no disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been approved for this condition. There is a lack of data about the efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in pSS. Here we report a patient with pSS successfully responding to upadacitinib. Methods A 68-year-old woman presented with pain in multiple joints for 16 years with intermittent use of NSAIDs. She had no low back pain and no self or family history of psoriasis or red eye. She denied dry mouth but required frequent water drinking during meals to aid swallowing and occasionally used artificial tears. MTX was started for her two-month articular flare and positive rheumatoid factor (RF). MTX caused severe vomiting and hyponatremia, and she was hospitalized. After the correction of hyponatremia, she was put on tofacitinib. We reevaluated the case when she came to us. She had grade 2-3 tenderness of most peripheral joints and was bedridden. Immunological parameters revealed RF 127 IU/ml (reference value &amp;lt;14), anti SSA antibody 147 U/ml (normal &amp;lt;3.2), anti SSB antibody 149 U/ml (reference value &amp;lt;8) and anti CCP antibody; ANA, anti-ds-DNA Ab were negative. There was no erosion on the X-ray hands. Schirmer's test was positive (3 mm bilaterally). Unstimulated salivary flow after five minutes was 0.04 ml/min (≤0.1 ml/min indicates salivary hypofunction). She fulfilled the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, and we diagnosed her with primary Sjogren syndrome. Hydroxychloroquine was initiated, but she discontinued it for anorexia. Considering her age, she was switched to upadacitinib, as European Medicines Agency restricted the use of tofacitinib beyond 65 years. Results Her EULAR Sjogren Syndrome's Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) was six at baseline, indicating moderate disease activity. Her joint pain improved significantly within two months with infrequent use of pilocarpine in the sixth month. Six months after treatment with upadacitinib, ESSDAI came down to 2; the Patient's Global Assessment score was 02 and achieved STAR (Sjogren's Tool for Assessing Response) response 7 (STAR responder if score ≥5). Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first case report on the efficacy of upadacitinib in pSS. Further high-quality clinical trials are required to confirm the benefit of upadacitinib in pSS. Disclosure M. Momen Majumder: None. S. Haq: None.

Efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) is a new therapeutic class in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Four molecules are approved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe. Recently, questions have raised about adverse events. In this context, a synthesis of the efficacy data of JAKis in RA is of use. We performed a literature review based on published articles about efficacy of JAKis in RA, including clinical trials, registries, retrospective and prospective cohorts as well as database analysis. Based on the phase III clinical trials, JAKis are effective in comparison to placebo, methotrexate and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Based on registries, cohorts and post hoc analysis of phase III clinical trials, several parameters might modulate the efficacy of JAKis: the serological status, a short duration of the disease or the presence of poor prognostic factors. Preliminary data suggest that early ultrasonographic evaluation might help to predict the medium-term progression. Some clinical, biological and imaging parameters seem to influence the response to JAKis and should be evaluated in larger studies. In addition to factors that might influence the efficacy of JAKis, the safety profile and risk factors should be considered before initiating JAKis in a patient.

Why Do We Need JAK Inhibitors in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multifactorial autoimmune disease with complex pathogenesis characterized by the imbalance of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Janus kinases (JAKs), intracellular non-receptor tyrosine kinases, are essential for signal pathways of many cytokines. The JAK signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathways consist of four JAK kinases and seven STATs family members. The dysregulation of JAK-STAT pathways represents an important process in the pathogenesis of SLE. Thus, the use of therapies that target specific signaling pathways would be a challenge in SLE. It is well known that JAK inhibitors have real potential for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, but their efficacy in the treatment of SLE remains to be determined. JAK inhibitors are currently being investigated in phase II and III trials and are considered to become the next stage in SLE therapy. In this review, we report the current data regarding the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in SLE. The development of clinically useful kinase inhibitors might improve upon traditional therapeutic strategies.

Are Janus kinase inhibitors safe and effective in treating the key clinical domains of psoriatic arthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), is a complex inflammatory arthropathy with a heterogenous spectrum of disease presentation. Despite the vast therapeutic armamentarium, disease control in a considerable proportion of patients is suboptimal. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), in the management of key clinical domains of PsA including peripheral arthritis, psoriasis, enthesitis and dactylitis. Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of JAKi in PsA were identified by a systematic literature search using EMBASE, PubMed and CENTRAL. All included studies underwent meta-analysis. A total of 5 RCTs were included. Patients were randomized to tofacitinib (n=474), filgotinib (n=65), upadacitinib (n=1281) or placebo (n=937). JAKi treatment was associated with superior efficacy across all primary outcome measures vs placebo: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 (risk ratio [RR] 2.10, [95% CI 1.86-2.37], P< .00001, I2=19%); ACR 50 (RR 3.43, [95% CI 2.37-4.96], P< .00001, I2=66%); ACR 70 (RR 4.57, [95% CI 1.83-11.44], P= .001, I2=82%); Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (RR 2.96, [95% CI 2.44-3.58], P< .00001, I2=0%); enthesitis resolution (RR 1.82, [95% CI 1.56-2.12], P< .00001, I2=0%); and dactylitis resolution (RR 1.85, [95% CI 1.57-2.16], P< .00001, I2=0%). JAKi were associated with an overall increased risk of adverse events (RR 1.14, [95% CI 1.07-1.21], P= .0001, I2=0%) with increased risk of infection (RR1.23, [95% CI 1.08-1.39], P= .001, I2=0%) vs placebo. This pooled analysis demonstrates the efficacy of JAKi in treating key clinical domains of PsA. However, they are associated with an increased risk of adverse events, including infection. Further studies are required to corroborate these findings and further elucidate the safety profile.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies and Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of systemic treatments with dupilumab, tralokinumab and Janus kinase inhibitors for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library. All randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults were included. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with atopic dermatitis achieving 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score after dupilumab, tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors. Nineteen studies totalling 6,444 patients were included. In monotherapy studies, upadacitinib 30 mg once daily had the numerically highest efficacy regarding EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90. In combination therapy studies with topical corticosteroids, dupilumab 300 mg once every other week had highest efficacy regarding EASI-50, and abrocitinib 200 mg once daily had the highest score regarding EASI-75 and EASI-90. Analysis provided evidence that dupilumab, tralokinumab and Janus kinase inhibitors all had an acceptable efficacy profile and resulted in clinically relevant improvements in EASI score. Furthermore, upadacitinib and abrocitinib seem to have great potential to treat patients with atopic dermatitis. However, further studies are needed to determine the long-term efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, peficitinib, solcitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib and deucravacitinib in plaque psoriasis - A network meta-analysis.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are novel treatment approaches for psoriasis. However, there is no direct comparison of JAK inhibitors in plaque psoriasis. In order to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in psoriasis, we conducted a network meta-analysis using eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The efficacy of JAK inhibitors was evaluated using a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) from baseline, and the proportion of patients achieving the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) response. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) was also assessed. A total of eight RCTs with tofacitinib, peficitinib, solcitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib and deucravacitinib were included. A total of 3612 participants who were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were analysed. Overall, JAK inhibitors showed superior PASI75 response over placebo at both 8 and 12 weeks. Among all included JAK inhibitors, tofacitinib 15 mg twice a day (BID) had the highest probability of achieving PASI75 at both 8 and 12 weeks (SUCRA = 0.938 and 0.937, separately), followed by tofacitinib 10 mg BID (SUCRA = 0.905 and 0.908, separately) and deucravacitinib 12 mg once daily (QD) (SUCRA = 0.874 and 0.837, separately). A similar finding was observed for PGA response. Safety assessment showed that all JAK inhibitors had non-inferior safety compared with placebo, except for deucravacitinib 6 mg BID and 12 mg QD. Tofacitinib 2 mg BID was the first-ranked drug for safety profile followed by deucravacitinib 3 mg QD, and tofacitinib 5 mg BID. When comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety, tofacitinib (2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg BID) was superior to other included JAK inhibitors with satisfying PASI75 and PGA response, as well as relatively low incidence of AEs. Our study confirmed that JAK inhibitors had promising treatment efficacy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Tofacitinib showed superior efficacy and safety over peficitinib, solcitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib and deucravacitinib.

Pathological relevance and treatment perspective of JAK targeting in systemic lupus erythematosus

ABSTRACT Introduction The pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) involves abnormalities in both acquired and innate immune system, which is mediated by numerous cytokines. Janus kinase (JAK) plays important roles in the signaling pathways of those cytokines and is an attractive therapeutic target for SLE. Currently, multiple clinical trials using JAK inhibitors with different selectivities for JAK family proteins are being conducted in SLE. Area covered In this article, we provide an overview of the pathological relevance of JAK and the clinical implications of JAK inhibitors in SLE based on recent reports. Expert opinion JAK inhibitors have the potential to modulate various immune networks through a variety of mechanisms, potentially regulating the complex immunopathogenesis in SLE. SLE is a clinically and immunologically heterogeneous disease; therefore, precision medicine is required to maximize the efficacy of JAK inhibitors. Further studies are needed to determine their risk-benefit ratio and selection of the most appropriate patients for JAK inhibitors.

Tofacitinib as a pragmatic treatment choice for alopecia areata: A retrospective review.

Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune-mediated hair loss disease for which targeted immune treatments including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, for example, tofacitinib, are emerging. More literature is needed on the safety and efficacy of JAK inhibitors, and treatment has the potential to be cost prohibitive. This study was conducted to measure safety and efficacy outcomes of off-label use of tofacitinib in AA. A secondary outcome was analysis of payment methods. We reviewed 35 AA patients treated with tofacitinib in a specialty hair disease clinic between January 2013 and July 2019 for outcomes, adverse events, and feasibility of treatment. No serious adverse events were experienced. 83.9% of patients experienced clinically significant scalp regrowth, and 32.3% experienced near total/total regrowth. Though this study was confined to retrospective analysis, the results showed that tofacitinib was safe, effective, and practical for this cohort of 35 AA patients.

Efficacy and safety of topical Janus kinase and phosphodiesterase inhibitor-4 inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A network meta-analysis.

Topical Janus kinase (JAK) and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors are novel treatment approaches for atopic dermatitis (AD). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK and PDE4 inhibitors for AD treatment. The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until June 2021 for eligible studies of AD patients treated with topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors. Baseline and follow-up data were extracted. Efficacy of JAK inhibitors was evaluated using Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) achieving "clear" or "almost clear", with 2 points or more improvement from baseline at the end of treatment, referred to as "IGA response"). A Bayesian multiple treatment network meta-analysis with fixed effects was performed. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% credibility interval (CrI) were used for comparing the efficacy of JAK and PDE4 inhibitors with placebo for AD. A total of 10 randomized controlled trials of topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors with 4689 patients were included for analysis. A total of three topical JAK inhibitors and two topical PDE4 inhibitors were included. Compared with placebo, all JAK and PDE4 inhibitors had higher IGA response at 4weeks of treatment. Notably, with similar safety profile, tofacitinib 2% b.i.d., ruxolitinib 1.5% b.i.d., and delgocitinib 3% b.i.d. showed favorable IGA response compared with topical tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Ranking analysis suggested that among all included JAK and PDE4 inhibitors, tofacitinib 2% b.i.d. had the highest probability of achieving IGA response (SUCRA=0.880). Besides, JAK and PDE4 inhibitors showed non-inferior safety profile with placebo. This study confirmed that topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors had promising treatment efficacy and safety for AD patients. Tofacitinib 2% b.i.d., ruxolitinib 1.5% b.i.d. and delgocitinib 3% b.i.d. showed superior efficacy over other JAK and PDE4 inhibitors.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib Versus Tofacitinib and Baricitinib for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IntroductionPeficitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is approved for clinical use in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, but head-to-head comparisons versus other JAK inhibitors are lacking. We indirectly compared peficitinib, tofacitinib, and baricitinib for rheumatoid arthritis treatment.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and congress archives up until February 12, 2019, for randomized controlled trials of peficitinib, tofacitinib, and baricitinib. Efficacy (American College of Rheumatology responses, disease activity scores, modified total Sharp score, Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI]) and safety outcomes were compared using a Bayesian network meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) consensus was followed for reporting results. A network meta-regression assessed the impact on outcomes of proportions of patients receiving concomitant methotrexate or of Asian ethnicity.ResultsThe network meta-analysis included 21 randomized controlled trials. At 12 weeks, all evaluable efficacy outcomes were comparable or improved with peficitinib 150 mg and 100 mg once daily, versus baricitinib 2 and 4 mg once daily and tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily. At 24 weeks, efficacy outcomes were comparable or improved for each peficitinib dose versus baricitinib and tofacitinib. Risk of adverse events and serious adverse events at 12 weeks were similar with peficitinib 100 and 150 mg versus baricitinib and tofacitinib. The proportion of patients receiving concomitant methotrexate had no effect on any outcome analyzed, but Asian ethnicity had a positive effect on multiple efficacy outcomes.ConclusionsPeficitinib had comparable efficacy versus tofacitinib and baricitinib for reduction in disease activity as measured by SDAI, and for reduction in progression of joint damage as measured radiographically. No notable differences in safety outcomes were observed. Further studies are required to better characterize the impact of ethnicity on the efficacy of JAK inhibitors.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00284-1.

Janus kinase inhibitors for treating active ankylosing spondylitis: ameta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We conducted aBayesian network meta-analysis using direct and indirect data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and examined the safety and efficacy of JAK inhibitors in active AS patients exhibiting inadequate response or intolerance to two or more non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). RCTs included atotal of 406patients (203 experimental subjects and 203 controls) from three studies on upadacitinib, filgotinib, and tofacitinib. Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% improvement (ASAS20), ASAS40, and ASAS5/6 responses were significantly higher in the JAK inhibitor group than in the placebo group. Other efficacy outcomes, such as ASAS partial remission, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scores, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were also significantly higher in the JAK inhibitor group compared to the placebo group. The JAK inhibitors significantly improved disease activity (ASAS partial remission, BASDAI50, ASDAS), function (BASFI), and MRI outcomes (SPARCC MRI spine). However, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), and the rate of withdrawal attributed to AEs did not differ between the JAK inhibitor and placebo groups. JAK inhibitors were effective in active AS patients exhibiting an inadequate response or intolerance to two or more NSAIDs, without the risk of SAEs; this suggests that based on our data, studies are warranted to further investigate the use of JAK inhibitors for treating AS.

Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic literature research

ObjectivesReview of efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs).MethodsA systematic literature research (SLR) of all publications on JAK inhibitors (JAKi) treatment published until March...