Efficacy Of Gefitinib Research Articles

Gefitinib Represses JAK-STAT Signaling Activated by CRTC1-MAML2 Fusion in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Cells.

Gefitinib is well-known as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting non-smalllung- cancer (NSCLC) containing EGFR mutations. However, its effectiveness in treating mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) without such EGFR mutations suggests additional targets. The CRTC1-MAML2 (C1-M2) fusion typical for MEC has been proposed to be a gefitinib target. To test this hypothesis, we developed a set of siRNAs to down-regulate C1-M2 expression. RNA-seq and Western blot techniques were applied to analyze the effects of gefitinib and siC1-M2 on the transcriptome of and the phosphorylation of tyrosine kinases in a MEC cell line H292. Deep-sequencing transcriptome analysis revealed that gefitinib extensively inhibited transcription of genes in JAK-STAT and MAPK/ERK pathways. Both siC1-M2 and gefitinib inhibited the phosphorylation of multiple signaling kinases in these signaling pathways, indicating that gefitinib inhibited JAK-STAT and MAPK/ERK pathways activated by C1-M2 fusion. Moreover, gefitinib inhibition of EGFR and MAPK/ERK was more effective than that of AKT, JAK2 and STATs, and their dependence on C1-M2 could be uncoupled. Taken together, our results suggest that gefitinib simultaneously represses phosphorylation of multiple key signaling proteins which are activated in MEC, in part by C1-M2 fusion. Gefitinib-repressed kinase phosphorylation explains the transcriptional repression of genes in JAK-STAT and MAPK/ERK pathways. These findings provide new insights into the efficacy of gefitinib in treating mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and suggest that a combination of gefitinib and other inhibitors specifically against C1-M2 fusion could be more effective.

Therapeutic efficacy of Gefitinib in advanced NSCLC patients

Introduction: Lung cancer uprises from the respiratory epithelium cells is divided into two broad categories; Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), derived from cells exhibiting Neuro-endocrine characteristics which is highly malignant tumour. The current drug therapy of Gefitinib has little evidence for its efficacy and safety profile in Indian patients. Aim: The research was focused to assess the efficacy of Gefitinib in advanced Non-small cell lung cancer. Materials and Methods: It is a retrospective study, done during the study period January 2009 to June 2012, and the number of NSCLC patients was 25 cases. Results: Of the 25 cases, 13 (52%) were males and 12 (48%) were females. The factors affecting survival have been studied there was a significant difference in survival between male and female sex (males 7.2 months; females 10.9 months). NSCLC patients were also having pleural effusion in 15 (60%) patients; fluid was hemorrhagic in 13 cases and straw coloured in 2 cases. The mean ADA level was 18.3 IU (5-43) and the Cell count was predominantly lymphocytic. The pleural fluid cytology was positive for malignant cells in 9 cases (60%) and the pericardial effusion was present in 4 patients. Calculating the objective response rate, there was no patients with complete response, 3 (16, 7%) with partial response, 9 (50%) cases with Stable disease and 6 (33.2%) had progressive disease and the overall rate of survival was 10.9 months (range 8.2-13.6). The most common adverse effect observed was diarrhea reported in 5 cases (20%), followed by rash in 4 (16.7%) and mucositis in 4 (16.7%) of cases. Conclusion: From the current study, it’s likely that, its use may not rapidly move NSCLC from advanced late-stage disease to earlier and less-advanced stages, but it is observed as a well tolerated drug that shows significant survival advantage with minimal toxicity. Keywords: Gefitinib, Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EGFR.

The analysis of pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic impact on gefitinib efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: results from a prospective cohort study.

The current study is aimed to examine the impact of pharmacokinetics and gene polymorphisms of enzymes involving in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) on the efficacy of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Eligible patients with indication of gefitinib treatment were prospectively enrolled in this study. Two peripheral blood samples at baseline and before cycle 2 day 1 were collected for the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of drug ADME enzymes and trough drug concentration (Ctrough) at steady state. Thirteen SNPs were genotyped using the Sequenom Massarray system. Ctrough was determined by validated high-performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS). Fifty-eight NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study. The median of Ctrough was 175ng/mL (range from 47.8 to 470 ng/mL). The trough concentration was not associated with either objective response or progression free survival (PFS). Ctrough was significantly lower in CYP3A4 rs2242480 CC + CT genotype than in TT genotype (P=0.019) and in ABCG2 rs2231142 AA genotype than in AC + CC genotype (P=0.031). ABCB1 rs2032582 dominant model was significantly correlated with overall response rate (ORR) and patients with GG phenotype respond better than patients with GT + TT phenotypes (84.6% vs. 51.2%, P=0.032). ABCB1 rs10256836 recessive model was significantly correlated with PFS and patients with GG phenotype achieved longer PFS than patients with GC + CC phenotypes (17.40 vs. 10.33 months, P=0.040). The Ctrough of gefitinib was significantly different between CYP3A4 and ABCG2 genotypes, but not with the efficacy of gefitinib treatment. ABCB1 rs2032582 and rs10256836 polymorphisms were correlated treatment outcome. Polymorphisms analysis of ABCB1 could be a predictive biomarker for gefitinib treatment.

Berbamine Enhances the Efficacy of Gefitinib by Suppressing STAT3 Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.

BackgroundSmall molecular inhibitors such as gefitinib (Gefi), which target EGF receptor (EGFR), are considered to be a viable pathway for the selective inhibition of pancreatic cancer (PC) development. However, the large difference in Gefi response between PC patient individuals and PC cell lines severely limits the clinical efficacy of Gefi. Berbamine (BBM) is a well-known natural-derived antitumor agent. However, no study yet exists on whether BBM can enhance the sensitivity of PC cells to Gefi or its underlying mechanisms.MethodsMTS assay and clonogenic assay were used to determine whether BBM could enhance the anti-PC activity of Gefi by. Flow cytometric analysis was performed to study the cell cycle progression and rate of apoptosis after combined treatment with BBM and Gefi. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and Western blot experiments were carried out to detect the STAT3 binding affinity and the STAT3 inhibitory effect of BBM. Molecular docking and Molecular dynamic simulation were used to predicting the dominant interaction between BBM and STAT3.ResultsThis study found that BBM synergizes with Gefi to inhibit cell growth and induce cell cycle arrest and PC cell apoptosis. Mechanistically, our results showed that BBM and Gefi have synergistic inhibitory effects on STAT3 phosphorylation, but have little effect on other EGFR downstream pathways, suggesting that BBM may exert sensitization through the inhibition of STAT3. Besides, BBM has a high affinity for STAT3 and a good inhibitory effect on STAT3 activation, further indicating that BBM was a potent direct STAT3 inhibitor. Molecular modeling between STAT3 and BBM suggested that BBM formed several key hydrophilic interactions with STAT3.ConclusionOur findings suggest that the combination of BBM and Gefi could be further developed as a potential PC therapy.

IL-22 Confers EGFR-TKI Resistance in NSCLC via the AKT and ERK Signaling Pathways

Background: The efficacy of an EGFR-targeted treatment strategy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is reduced by drug resistance. IL-22 enhances tumor growth and induces chemotherapy resistance in human lung cancer cells. The present study elucidated the IL-22-induced mechanism underlying EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance in NSCLC.Methods: The plasma and tissues of patients who received EGFR-TKIs were utilized to determine the association between IL-22 expression and gefitinib efficacy. The IL-22 effect on the EGFR/ERK/AKT pathways in NSCLC HCC827 and PC-9 cells was determined using the CCK-8 assay, western blot, and flow cytometric analysis. A PC-9 xenograft model of IL-22 exposure was established. Gefitinib was administered to mice in combination with IL-22 or vehicle.Results: We showed that IL-22 expression was higher in the EGFR-TKI-resistant group compared to EGFR-TKI-sensitive group. IL-22 expression was associated with EGFR-TKI efficacy in plasma. Additional treatment of IL-22 induced gefitinib resistance and reduced apoptosis in PC-9 and HCC827 cell lines. Furthermore, we showed that the effects of IL-22 attributed to p-ERK, p-EGFR, and p-AKT up-regulation. IL-22 neutralizing antibody completely abrogated the effects of IL-22 on apoptosis and AKT/EGFR/ERK signaling. Finally, we showed that IL-22 enhanced tumor growth and induced gefitinib resistance in the PC-9 xenograft model. Moreover, compared with gefitinib alone, the combination of IL-22 and gefitinib led to an increase in Ki67-positive staining and a reduction in TUNEL staining.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that IL-22 plays a role in tumor progression and EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC. Thus, IL-22 might serve as a novel biomarker to overcome resistance of EGFR-TKI.

Efficacy of gefitinib at reduced dose in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma.

As a first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of advanced non-small cell carcinoma with sensitizing EGFR mutations. Gefitinib is known to have adverse effects, which may necessitate dose reduction or even change to alternative preparation of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. There has been concern on dose reduction resulting in reduced dose gefitinib, especially on its efficacy. This was a retrospective single-center cohort study conducted in Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong that included 159 Chinese patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of lung that carried sensitizing EGFR mutations and had received gefitinib as first-line treatment. Patients who had reduced dose at 250 mg alternate day were compared with those who were able to maintain on standard dose of gefitinib at 250 mg daily. The primary end-point was progression-free survival. Among the 159 patients, 17 (10.7 %) of them were on reduced dose gefitinib, 14 among the 17 patients (82.4%) because of hepatotoxicity, and 3 (17.6%) because of cutaneous side effects. Patients on reduced dose and standard dose of gefitinib have comparable median progression-free survival. Hazard ratio was 1.121 (95% confidence interval = 0. 655-1.917, P-value = 0.678) for the reduced dose group and 3.385 for the standard dose group (95% confidence interval = 2.181-5.255) respectively (P-value < 0.001). Dose reduction in gefitinib to 250 mg alternate day in response to adverse effects was not associated with inferior outcome for patients on first-line gefitinib for advanced non-small cell carcinoma. Dose reduction is a feasible option for patients who have significant adverse effects with gefitinib.

464O - Induction gefitinib followed by standard chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced (LA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations: The LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 intergroup phase II study

464O - Induction gefitinib followed by standard chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced (LA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations: The LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 intergroup phase II study

EGFR is a Therapeutic Target in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Despite effective therapeutic strategies for treating hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, resistance to endocrine therapy that is either de novo or acquired still occurs. We investigated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a therapeutic target for overcoming endocrine resistance in HR+ breast cancer models. Using clinical data from 2,166 patients who had HR+ breast tumors and received tamoxifen, we analyzed survival rates. Levels of mRNA and protein expression were analyzed by real-time PCR and western blotting, respectively. Cell viability was analyzed by MTT assays and anchorage-independent growth by soft agar colony-formation assays. Efficacy of tamoxifen and/or gefitinib was analyzed using orthotopic xenograft mouse models. EGFR expression was significantly associated with more advanced stage and higher grade. EGFR expression was different in luminal A-like (Lum A, 1.3%) versus luminal B-like (Lum B, 11.4%) subtypes. On multivariate analyses for survival Lum B subtype EGFR+ tumors showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.22 (95% CI, 1.29-21.15, P = 0.020) for overall survival (OS) and HR of 2.91 (95% CI, 1.35-6.28, P = 0.006) for disease-free survival (DFS). Levels of EGFR inversely correlated with ER-α expression. Basal ER-α level was completely blocked by TGFA or EGF treatment. With TGFA pretreatment, ER+ breast cancer cells were resistant to 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT). Conversely, downregulation of ER-α by TGFA was reversed by gefitinib with recovered sensitivity to 4-OHT. Tumorigenicity of EGFR and ER+ breast cancer cells were significantly decreased by combined tamoxifen and gefitinib. Aberrant EGFR expression was associated with poor prognosis in ER+ breast cancers, especially the Lum B subtype. Loss of ER by EGFR activation induced tamoxifen resistance. Therefore, EGFR could be a therapeutic target for overcoming recurrence of ER+ breast cancer with high EGFR expression.

Chloroquine promotes gefitinib‑induced apoptosis by inhibiting protective autophagy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Aberrant expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays vital roles in tumor development and progression. In the present study, ultraviolet irradiation induced the upregulation of EGFR in skin-derived keratinocytes, which may contribute to the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). This was supported by the high expression of EGFR in CSCC clinical samples. Treating A431 CSCC cells with gefitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, activated the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway while inducing protective autophagy. Combined application of chloroquine with gefitinib enhanced the treatment efficacy of gefitinib against CSCC by inhibiting autophagic flux. These findings demonstrated that autophagy inhibition may be an effective strategy for enhancing the sensitivity of EGFR-expressing cells to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Manipulating pro-survival autophagy by the combined application of chloroquine with gefitinib is a promising approach for improving the efficacy of EGFR inhibitors in cancer treatment. This may contribute to novel EGFR-targeted therapeutic strategies in the near future.

EP1.01-102 Efficacy and Toxicity of Erlotinib and Gefitinib in Moroccan Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutation

EP1.01-102 Efficacy and Toxicity of Erlotinib and Gefitinib in Moroccan Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutation

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the first-line EGFR-TKIs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations

ObjectivesTo compare the cost-effectiveness of first-line gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.MethodsA systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the relative efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. To assess the cost-effectiveness of these treatments, a Markov model was developed from Dutch societal perspective. The model was based on the clinical studies included in the NMA. Incremental costs per life-year (LY) and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained were estimated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted.ResultsTotal discounted per patient costs for gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib were €65,889, €64,035, €69,418, and €131,997, and mean QALYs were 1.36, 1.39, 1.52, and 2.01 per patient, respectively. Erlotinib dominated gefitinib. Afatinib versus erlotinib yielded incremental costs of €27,058/LY and €41,504/QALY gained. Osimertinib resulted in €91,726/LY and €128,343/QALY gained compared to afatinib. PSA showed that gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib had 13%, 19%, 43%, and 26% probability to be cost-effective at a threshold of €80,000/QALY. A price reduction of osimertinib of 30% is required for osimertinib to be cost-effective at a threshold of €80,000/QALY.ConclusionsOsimertinib has a better effectiveness compared to all other TKIs. However, at a Dutch threshold of €80,000/QALY, osimertinib appears not to be cost-effective.

Efficacy and Safety of Gefitinib in Patients with Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background Trials on assessing the benefits of EGFR inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients have gradually been published. Nevertheless, the benefits of gefitinib in advanced HNSCC are still unknown. Methods The Cochrane library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched from the inception dates to 17 July 2017, 18 July 2017, and 19 July 2017, respectively. The keywords “head and neck” and gefitinib were used to retrieve in articles and abstracts. An additional search for recently published randomized trials was performed from July 17, 2017, to April 18, 2018. Then we assessed the risk of bias of the included studies based on the Cochrane “Risk of Bias” tool. Quantitative analysis was carried out to evaluate the overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3-4 adverse effects by Review Manager 5.0.2 and the quality-of-life was analyzed in the included studies. Results Seven randomized controlled trials and a total number of 1287 patients were involved. There were no significant differences in OS, PFS, or ORR between gefitinib and no gefitinib group (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.22, and P=0.35; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.04, and P=0.11; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.20, and P =0.60, respectively). However, gefitinib alone was equivalent to chemotherapeutics (i.e., methotrexate; methotrexate + fluorouracil) in ORR in patients with recurrent HNSCC, and a trend of improvement in QOL in gefitinib group was showed. Toxicities revealed no differences except for diarrhea and skin toxicity (p=0.0003; p=0.03, respectively). Conclusion For patients with advanced HNSCC, gefitinib cannot prolong the OS and PFS or improve ORR, and odds of skin toxicity and diarrhea increased. However, gefitinib alone is equivalent to methotrexate or methotrexate + fluorouracil and tends to improve QOL for recurrent patients.

Combination of metformin and gefitinib as first-line therapy for nondiabetic advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial.

9035 Background: Several lines of evidence suggested a role for metformin in sensitizing diabetic NSCLC patients to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, data regarding its effects on non-diabetic populations remained scarce. We hereby examined metformin’s first-line use alongside gefitinib in EGFR mutation positive (EGFRm) patients without diabetes. Methods: In this trial (NCT01864681), 224 non-diabetic patients with treatment naïve stage IIIB-IV EGFRm NSCLC were randomly assigned at 1:1 to receive gefitinib plus metformin or placebo. Gefitinib was administered at 250 mg once daily, while metformin/placebo was initiated at 500 mg once daily and then escalated to 1000 mg twice daily over 2 weeks. Dose reduction was permitted for metformin/placebo in case of intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Serum levels of interleukin-6 were also subjected to exploratory analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups. The median duration of follow-up was 19.15 (IQR 12.99-28.44) months. The estimated 1-year PFS rate was 41.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.0-52.2) in the metformin group versus 42.9% (95% CI 32.6-52.7) in the placebo group (p = 0.6268). Metformin did not increase median PFS (10.3 months vs. 11.4 months), median OS (22.0 months vs. 27.5 months), or ORR (66.0% vs. 66.7%) over placebo. No significant treatment group differences in terms of PFS were detected across subgroups either, including those with elevated levels of interleukin-6. Metformin plus gefitinib shared a similar safety profile with the control group, except for a remarkably higher incidence of diarrhea (78.38% vs. 43.24%). Conclusions: Our study did not show enhanced gefitinib efficacy upon addition of metformin and hence does not support its concurrent use with first-line EGFR-TKI therapy in non-diabetic EGFRm NSCLC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01864681.

Schizandrin A enhances the efficacy of gefitinib by suppressing IKKβ/NF-κB signaling in non-small cell lung cancer

The emergence of resistance to EGF receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapy is a significant challenge for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). During the past few years, a correlation between EGFR TKIs resistance and dysregulation of IKKβ/NF-κB signaling has been increasingly suggested. However, few studies have focused on the effects of combining IKK/NF-κB and EGFR inhibitors to overcome EGFR TKIs resistance. In this study, we discovered that Schizandrin A (Sch A), a lignin compound isolated from Schisandra chinesnesis, could synergize with the EGFR receptor inhibitor Gefitinib to inhibit cell growth, induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of HCC827/GR cells. Sch A effectively suppressed the phosphorylation of IKKβ and IκBα, as well as the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65, and showed high and selective affinity for IKKβ in surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments, indicating that Sch A was a selective IKKβ inhibitor. Molecular modeling between IKKβ and Sch A suggested that Sch A formed key hydrophobic interactions with IKKβ, which may contribute to its potent IKKβ inhibitory effect. These findings suggest a novel approach to improve poor clinical outcomes in EGFR TKIs therapy, by combining it with Sch A.

Metformin enhances gefitinib efficacy by interfering with interactions between tumor-associated macrophages and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play an important role in drug resistance in many tumors, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, how TAMs interact with HNSCC cells to induce drug resistance, especially under hypoxic conditions, is unclear. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of TAM-induced gefitinib resistance in HNSCC cells and sought for novel therapeutic strategies. The effects of hypoxia-treated HNSCC cells on the migration and polarization of macrophages were analyzed. Recombinant cytokine proteins and neutralizing antibodies were used as controls. In addition, we assessed the cytotoxic effects of gefitinib on HNSCC cells treated with M2-type macrophage conditioned medium, and carried out a cytokine antibody array analysis, thereby revealing the key factor CCL15. The relationship between serum CCL15 expression levels and prognosis in HNSCC patients was analyzed. In addition, we performed bioinformatic analyses to pursue the mechanisms of CCL15-induced gefitinib resistance. Finally, metformin was used to evaluate the sensitizing effects of gefitinib treatment on HNSCC cells in vitro and in vivo. We found that HNSCC cells recruited macrophages by secreting VEGF and polarized the macrophages to the M2 phenotype through IL-6. Conversely, we found that M2-type TAMs promoted HNSCC cell resistance to gefitinib through paracrine CCL15 signaling. The serum CCL15 levels in HNSCC patients showed a significant correlation with patient prognosis. Furthermore, we found that M2-type TAMs could suppress the sensitivity of HNSCC cells to gefitinib through the CCL15-CCR1-NF-κB pathway. In addition, we found that metformin not only inhibited CCL15 expression in M2-type TAMs enhanced by hypoxia, but also suppressed CCR1 surface expression in HNSCC cells. Encouragingly, we found that metformin sensitized HNSCC cells to gefitinib treatment in vitro and in vivo. Based on our data we conclude that we have identified a novel interaction between M2-type TAMs and HNSCC cells that contributes to gefitinib resistance. We also found that metformin inhibited the cross-talk between macrophages and tumor cells, thereby eliciting therapeutic effects both in vitro and in vivo.

GLRX inhibition enhances the effects of geftinib in EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC cells through FoxM1 signaling pathway

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of lung cancer. Gefitinib is one of the most accepted therapies against NSCLC in those carrying EGFR mutations, but it is only effective in approximately 20% of patients with NSCLC. Thus, alternative therapeutic interventions are urgently needed to overcome gefitinib resistance. Glutaredoxin (GLRX) plays a key role in oxidative stress. However, whether GLRX inhibition could enhance gefitinib efficacy in the gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells is unknown. In this study, we aimed to determine whether combined inhibition of GLRX could enhance growth-inhibitory effects of gefitinib in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells. Real-time PCR and western blotting were used to examine the mRNA and protein levels of GLRX in gefitinib-sensitive PC9 and HCC827 and -resistant human lung adenocarcinoma PC9R, HCC827R, and H1975 cells. Cell Counting Kit-8, flow cytometry, JC-1 staining, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) assays were used to evaluate cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, mitochondrial membrane potential, and ROS generation, respectively. Mouse tumor xenografts were used to assess the effect of GLRX in vivo. We found that GLRX was upregulated in gefitinib-resistant PC9R, HCC827R, and H1975 cells. GLRX inhibition enhanced the effects of geftinib in gefitinib-resistant cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo and promoted apoptosis and cell cycle arrest via the EGFR/Forkhead Box M1 (FoxM1) signaling pathway, indicating that combined inhibition of GLRX could enhance growth-inhibitory effects of gefitinib in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells. Our results suggest that GLRX inhibition enhances the effects of geftinib in EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC cells. Thus, GLRX may represent a therapeutic target for increasing the efficiency of gefitinib treatment.

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy Versus Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;A Network Meta-Analysis&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;

Recent randomized control trials have revealed the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy and cetuximab plus chemotherapy on the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but little is known about the differences between them lacking of direct evidences. Randomized control trials were selected by formal search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and trials registers on the Internet. This systematic review and meta-analysis is reported in accordance with the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement and was registered at International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. 14 trails were identified finally, with 8 studies about gefitinib plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone and 6 studies about cetuximab plus chemotherapy plus vs chemotherapy alone. For overall survival and progression-free survival, the relative HRs of gefitinib plus chemotherapy vs cetuximab plus chemotherapy were 0.96 (0.81-1.13, p=0.583) and 0.69 (0.45-1.05, p=0.080) on first-line treatment and 1.60 (1.01-2.54, p=0.044) and 0.83 (0.61-1.15, p=0.267) on second-line treatment. For objective response rate and one-year survival rate on first-line treatment, the relative RRs of gefitinib plus chemotherapy vs cetuximab plus chemotherapy were 0.89 (0.69-1.15, p=0.395) and 0.84 (0.72-0.98, p=0.026). For adverse events, the risk of relative RR of leukopenia all grades was 0.73 (0.58-0.91, p=0.006), while other events didn’t exhibit significant differences. Subgroup analysis found that comparing to cetuximab plus chemotherapy, gefitinib plus chemotherapy appeared a better improvement in one-year survival rate of USA advanced NSCLC population [RR=0.83 (0.70-0.99, p=0.042)]. It concluded that, on the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy are superior to cetuximab plus chemotherapy on first-line treatment, while the latter may be a better choice as well when it occurs to second-line treatment.

Pemetrexed/carboplatin plus gefitinib as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Background:First-line treatments for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have been evaluated in various clinical trials. However, it remains unclear which is the optimal treatment.Methods:A Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to assess the efficacy and safety profile of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, osimertinib, erlotinib plus bevacizumab and pemetrexed/carboplatin, or pemetrexed alone plus gefitinib. Literature was sourced from electronic databases. Data regarding objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), treatment-related adverse event grades 3–5 (TRAE 3–5), specific TRAEs [diarrhea, rash, and elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT)] were extracted. The regimens were then ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).Results:A total of 19 studies involving 4607 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients were analyzed. In regards to efficacy, pemetrexed/carboplatin (PC) plus gefitinib was superior in ORR and OS to chemotherapy and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). All the TKI-based regimens had equivalent DCR and PFS. Patients with the L858R mutation treated with PC plus gefitinib achieved a better outcome than most EGFR TKI-related groups (except osimertinib) in the PFS subgroup. In regards to safety, no statistical significance for TRAEs was observed among the eight treatments. In regards to SUCRA, PC plus gefitinib ranked first in terms of PFS, OS, and TRAE grades 3–5.Conclusions:Pemetrexed/carboplatin plus gefitinib is a promising treatment option for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in the first-line setting.

Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of a Phase III randomized trial to compare the benefit of gefitinib versus pemetrexed/carboplatin for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Background:> In an open-label, Phase III randomized study, gefitinib was found to be superior to pemetrexed-platinum in terms of progression-free survival in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. In this analysis, we have assessed the efficacy of gefitinib over pemetrexed-platinum using quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) of treatment analysis method. Methods: The overall survival in each arm was partitioned into the following three health states: time spent in Grade 2 or above toxicity after randomization and before progression (TOX state), time spent after randomization and before progression without Grade 2 or above toxicity (TWiST state), and time spent after progression (REL state). The mean Q-TWiST was calculated for each arm using utility coefficients of 0.65 for TOX, 0.71 for TWiST, and 0.67 for REL states. The difference in Q-TWiST and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference were calculated using a nonparametric bootstrap.P= 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean TOX duration (37.6 vs. 16.2 days,P Conclusion: The mean Q-TWiST of patients in the gefitinib arm was similar to that of patients in the pemetrexed-carboplatin arm. These results challenge the superiority of sequencing gefitinib followed by chemotherapy over pemetrexed-carboplatin followed by gefitinib in terms of Q-TWiST.

A multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial of combination methotrexate and gefitinib versus methotrexate alone to treat tubal ectopic pregnancies (GEM3): trial protocol

BackgroundTubal ectopic pregnancy (tEP) is the most common life-threatening condition in gynaecology. Treatment options include surgery and medical management. Stable women with tEPs with pre-treatment serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels < 1000 IU/L respond well to outpatient medical treatment with intramuscular methotrexate. However, tEPs with hCG > 1000 IU/L can take significant time to resolve with methotrexate and require multiple outpatient monitoring visits. In pre-clinical studies, we found that tEP implantation sites express high levels of epidermal growth factor receptor. In early-phase trials, we found that combination therapy with gefitinib, an orally active epidermal growth factor receptor antagonist, and methotrexate resolved tEPs without the need for surgery in over 70% of cases, did not cause significant toxicities, and was well tolerated. We describe the protocol of a randomised trial to assess the efficacy of combination gefitinib and methotrexate, versus methotrexate alone, in reducing the need for surgical intervention for tEPs.Methods and analysisWe propose to undertake a multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial (around 70 sites across the UK) and recruit 328 women with tEPs (with pre-treatment serum hCG of 1000–5000 IU/L). Women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio by a secure online system to receive a single dose of intramuscular methotrexate (50 mg/m2) and either oral gefitinib or matched placebo (250 mg) daily for 7 days. Participants and healthcare providers will remain blinded to treatment allocation throughout the trial. The primary outcome is the need for surgical intervention for tEP. Secondary outcomes are the need for further methotrexate treatment, time to resolution of the tEP (serum hCG ≤ 15 IU/L), number of hospital visits associated with treatment (until resolution or scheduled/emergency surgery), and the return of menses by 3 months after resolution. We will also assess adverse events and reactions until day of resolution or surgery, and participant-reported acceptability at 3 months.DiscussionA medical intervention that reduces the need for surgery and resolves tEP faster would be a favourable treatment alternative. If effective, we believe that gefitinib and methotrexate could become standard care for stable tEPs.Trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN67795930. Registered 15 September 2016.