Efficacy Of Different Chemotherapy Regimens Research Articles

CTNI-38. SINGLE-CENTER COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ABOUT OUTCOMES OF MULTI-AGENTS CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PRIMARY CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM LYMPHOMA; R-MPV SHOWED A FAVOR RESULT

Abstract BACKGROUND Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a malignant tumor in the brain, spinal cord, and eyes. Radiotherapy may cause delayed leukoencephalopathy so that the first-line treatment is methotrexate (MTX)-based multi-agent chemotherapy. We had used the Bonn protocol based on MTX and cytarabine, but since 2020, we have adopted the R-MPV protocol. This study analyzes the outcomes of patients treated initially at our institution. METHODS AND RESULTS We reviewed 57 out of 88 newly diagnosed PCNSL patients treated with chemotherapy alone between December 2005 and January 2023. Initial treatments included the Bonn protocol in 25 patients (12 with rituximab, forming R-Bonn) and R-MPV in 26 patients. High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) was given as consolidation in 4 Bonn and 9 R-MPV patients. The Bonn protocol was completed by 20 patients (80%) with a complete response (CR) in 19 (76%). The R-MPV protocol was completed by 23 patients (88%) with CR in 22 (85%). Post-treatment outcomes were compared using survival analysis. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) had not been reached in the R-MPV group and was significantly better than 33.1 months in the Bonn protocol and 58.6 months in the R-Bonn protocol (log-rank test; p=0.0296, 0.0036). Overall survival (OS) did not show significant differences. PBSCT’s impact on outcomes suggested improvement in PFS and OS after R-MPV, but this was not statistically significant. DISCUSSION We examined the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens for PCNSL at our institution. The R-MPV protocol showed superior completion rates, response rates, and treatment efficacy. Consolidation with PBSCT may improve outcomes, though further investigation with more cases and longer observation is necessary.

Efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy for patients with BRCA1/2-mutated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer progressing on olaparib versus placebo maintenance: post-hoc analyses of the SOLO2/ENGOT Ov-21 trial

In the SOLO2 trial (ENGOT Ov-21; NCT01874353), maintenance olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and BRCA mutation significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and prolonged overall survival (OS). Following disease progression on olaparib, efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy remains unknown. We conducted a post-hoc hypothesis-generating analysis of SOLO2 data to determine the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens following RECIST disease progression in patients who received olaparib or placebo. We evaluated time to second progression (TTSP) calculated from the date of RECIST progression to the next progression/death. The study population comprised 147 patients who received chemotherapy as their first subsequent treatment after RECIST progression. Of these, 69 (47%) and 78 (53%) were originally randomized to placebo and olaparib arms, respectively. In the placebo-treated cohort, 27/69 and 42/69 received non-platinum and platinum-based chemotherapy, respectively, compared with 24/78 and 54/78, respectively, in the olaparib-treated cohort. Among patients treated with chemotherapy (N= 147), TTSP was significantly longer in the placebo than in the olaparib arm: 12.1 versus 6.9 months [hazard ratio (HR) 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-3.19]. Similar result was obtained on multivariable analysis adjusting for prognostic factors at RECIST progression (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.41-3.22). Among patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 96), TTSP was significantly longer in the placebo arm: 14.3 versus 7.0 months (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.73-4.82). Conversely, among patients treated with non-platinum-based chemotherapy (n= 51), the TTSP was comparable in the placebo and olaparib arms: 8.3 versus 6.0 months (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.86-2.90). Following progression from maintenance olaparib in the recurrent setting, the efficacy of platinum-based subsequent chemotherapy seems to be reduced in BRCA1/2-mutated patients with PSROC compared to patients not previously receiving poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The optimal strategy for patients who relapse after PARPi is an area of ongoing research.

Effect of prior immunotherapy on the efficacy of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

BackgroundThe effect of the sequential combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens administered after ICIs in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared to the same regimens administered without previous ICIs.MethodsWe retrospectively included all patients treated between 2015 and 2019 for an advanced NSCLC, receiving a salvage chemotherapy just after ICI (CAI group) comparing them to ICI naive patients (CWPI group) undergoing the same chemotherapy at Bordeaux University Hospital. The primary outcome was the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR).ResultsA total of 152 patients were included, with 34/23 (CAI/CWPI) receiving paclitaxel/bevacizumab (PB), 24/11 paclitaxel (P), 27/12 gemcitabine (G) and 6/15 pemetrexed (PE). Characteristics were comparable, except for CAI treated with PB (more patients with an ECOG PS ≤1 [p <0.001]). Median number of lines received was higher in CAI for all groups. There was no difference between CAI and CWPI for TTD, OS and ORR. However, PB was associated with a nonsignificant increase in OS in the CAI group (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.38–1.2, p = 0.17].ConclusionOur data showed no difference in TTD, OS and ORR regardless of chemotherapy, but a trend towards an increased OS with PB when given after an ICI, while patients received chemotherapy later in the CAI group. This suggests that a sequential combination of ICI followed by chemotherapy could be an interesting strategy in advanced NSCLC for selected patients.

Treatment tactics of new NET G3 subgroup in first line of therapy

Considering the fact that the group of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) grade 3 is heterogenous, in the year of 2017 a new subgroup of welldifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors grade 3 (NETs G3) was described. NETs G3 are tumors with more favorable prognosis and less sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy regimens than NECs, they also have peculiar morphogenetical qualities: lower ki‑67 index (mean 35.0 %), higher somatostatin receptors expression, absence of DAXX/ATRX/MEN 1 genes mutation, p53 expression in the absence of TP53 mutation. Nowadays treatment standard for NETs G3 subgroup is still remain unclear due to lack of prospective clinical trials. At the same time taking in note historical retrospective data, NETs G3 should be treated in line with NETs G1/G2 and only patients with higher ki‑67 index can be treated as NECs with platinum-based chemotherapy. In our non-randomised phase II prospective trial, we accessed the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in combination with somatostatin analogues in new NETs G3 subgroup. 153 patients with IHC-confirmed neuroendocrine neoplasm diagnose were included: NETs G3 n = 53 mean ki‑67 36.4 % [21.0–60.0 %], NETs G2 n = 50 mean ki‑67 15.7 % [2.1–20.0 %], NECs n = 50 mean ki‑67 69.0 % [38.0–96.0 %]). Patients from NETs G3 subgroup received 4 chemotherapy regimens: Aranose (n = 19), Aranose (arabinopiranosilmethyl nitrosocarbamide, ALK, – cytostatic drug with a chemical structure similar to Streptozotocin and Nitrosomethylurea, approved in Russian Federation for melanoma and welldifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors treatment), XELOX (n = 8), TemCAP (n = 11), EP/EC (n = 10). mPFS in Aranose-subgroup was 19.3 ± 5.9 months (95 % CI: 7.7–30.8), in XELOX – 10.8 ± 3.6 months (3.7–17.8), in TemCAP – 14.8 ± 4.2 months (6.6–23.1) and in platinum-based regimens – 4.4 ± 1.9 months (0.6–8.2) (p = 0.01). DCR in Aranose subgroup was 73.6 % and ORR – 36.8 %, PDR – 21.1 %, in XELOX subgroup ORR was 62.5 %, SDR was 50.0 % and PDR – 25.0 %, in TemCAP subgroup DCR was 63.6 %, ORR – 9.1 %, PDR – 18.2 % and in platinum-based regimens SDR was 40.0 %, PDR – 50.0 % (p = 0.05).

Comparing efficacy and side effects of two systemic chemotherapy regimens for eye-preserving therapy in children with retinoblastoma.

Eye-preserving therapy in retinoblastoma comprises systemic chemotherapy, but studies analyzing the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens are scarce. The efficacy and side effects of two different eye-preserving chemotherapy regimens containing either vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin (VEC) or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin (CyVEC) were compared in a prospective non-interventional observational study including children diagnosed with retinoblastoma between 2013 and 2019 in Germany and Austria. Event-free eye survival (EFES) and overall eye survival (OES) of all 164 eyes treated with both regimens and risk factors were investigated. The EFES after VEC (2-year EFES 72.3%) was higher than after CyVEC (2-year EFES 50.4%) (plogrank <.001). The OES did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups (plogrank =.77; 2-year OES VEC: 82.1% vs. CyVEC: 84.8%). Advanced International Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) group was prognostic for a lower EFES (plogrank <.0001; 2-year EFES ICRB A/B/C 71.3% vs. ICRB D/E 43.0%) and OES (plogrank <.0001; 2-year OES ICRB A/B/C 93.1% vs. ICRB D/E 61.5%). The multivariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis older than 12months and ICRB A/B/C were associated with better EFES. No second malignancies or ototoxicities were reported after a follow-up of median 3.1years after diagnosis of retinoblastoma (range 0.1-6.9years). Despite omitting cyclophosphamide, the EFES was higher after VEC chemotherapy that contains higher doses of carboplatin compared to CyVEC. The major risk factor for enucleation was advanced ICRB tumor grouping. Randomized clinical trials on efficacy and side effects of eye-preserving chemotherapy are required to tailor treatment protocols for retinoblastoma patients.

1314P Preliminary results of sequential combination of immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The potential effect of the sequential combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remains unclear. We evaluated the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens administered after ICI in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared to the same regimens administered without previous ICI.

Efficacy of various types of chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions.

e21155 Background: Approximately 4% of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)−mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions. These mutations confer intrinsic resistance to available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), as they result in steric hindrance of the drug-binding pocket. Studies have shown that chemotherapy is superior to currently approved EGFR TKIs as a first-line or second-line treatment for EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions. Nevertheless, the difference in the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions remains unclear. Methods: Data from advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions from an independent cohort (Jenn-Yu Wu, 2019) was used to analyze the objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of different chemotherapy regimens. Results: Thirty-five advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions treated with chemotherapy were used to analyze, of which 7 received gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC), 22 received pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PC), and 6 received taxol plus cisplatin (TC). ORRs were 31.82% for the patients received PC, 14.29% for GC, and 16.67% for TC. DCRs were 72.73% for the patients received PC, 42.86% for GC, and 16.67% for TC. Median PFS was numerically longer in patients who received PC chemotherapy (6.10 m; 95 % CI: 3.46–8.75) than GC (4.20 m; 95 %CI: 2.40–6.00; P = 0.14) or TC (3.40 m; 95 %CI: 1.96–4.84; P = 0.06). Median OS was significantly longer in patients who received PC chemotherapy (22.20 m; 95 % CI: 8.87–35.53) than GC (9.00 m; 95 %CI: 7.46–10.54; P = 0.04), and numerically longer than patients who received TC (8.10 m; 95 %CI: 0.00–22.62; P = 0.19). Conclusions: These results suggest that pemetrexed plus cisplatin may be the preferred chemotherapy for patients harboring EGFR exon 20 in-frame insertions, but further validation is needed in large clinical studies.

Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Patients with Locally Advanced Synchronous Esophageal and Head/Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Curative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and head/neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are very common cancers worldwide, and there is higher incidence of synchronous ESCC/NSCC in Taiwan. The aim of the current study was to investigate the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with locally advanced synchronous ESCC/HNSCC who received curative concurrent chemoradiotheapy (CCRT). A total of 75 patients were identified and assigned to one of two groups: 45 patients receiving cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regime in one group and 30 patients receiving a weekly cisplatin regime in the other. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis of the ESCC or HNSCC to the date of death from any cause or the most recent follow-up. Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to estimate OS and differences between the two groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the analysis of OS between the cisplatin/5-FU and the weekly cisplatin groups. However, patients that interrupted their CCRT were found to have worse OS compared to those without interruptions (5.4 months versus 18.8 months, p = 0.002). In subgroup analysis, patients without interruptions of CCRT had a better OS than those with interruptions in the cisplatin/5-FU group (13.0 months versus 5.4 months, p = 0.041) as well as in the weekly cisplatin group (21.4 months versus 5.0 months, p = 0.017). Interruption of CCRT was the only independently poor prognostic factor of OS in the univariate and multivariate (hazard ratio 0.18, p < 0.001) analyses. Most interruption of CCRT resulted from adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs. Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between these two groups, lower incidence of adverse events was mentioned in the weekly cisplatin group. Our study suggests that interruption of CCRT is an independently poor prognostic factor of OS, and that completion of CCRT without interruption is more important than the choice of chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with synchronous ESCC/HNSCC.

First-line platinum-based chemotherapy and survival outcomes in locally advanced or metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma

ObjectivesPulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare subtype of primary lung cancer. Due to the lack of prospective studies, the optimal first-line chemotherapy regimens and survival outcomes remain unclear. Materials and methodsThis real-world, retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with unresectable pulmonary LELC. The survival outcomes, prognosis, and comparative efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens were investigated. ResultsIn total, 127 patients were included in the analyses. The first-line chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine plus platinum (GP, n = 19 [15.0%]), taxanes plus platinum (TP, n = 70 [55.1%]) and pemetrexed plus platinum (AP, n = 38 [30.0%]). 25 (19.7%) patients underwent palliative thoracic radiotherapy. 60 (47.2%) patients had detectable baseline Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA. For the entire cohort, objective response was obtained in 41 patients (32.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.6–8.8) and 36.7 months (95% CI, 30.9–42.5), respectively. Among the three chemotherapy regimens, GP achieved the highest response rate (GP, 63.2% vs. TP, 30.0% vs. AP, 21.1%; p = 0.005). Median PFS in the GP group (8.8 months) was also significantly longer than that in the TP group (7.9 months) and AP group (6.4 months) (p = 0.031). In the multivariate model, cycles of first-line chemotherapy (p < 0.001), palliative thoracic radiotherapy (p < 0.001), and chemotherapy regimens (p = 0.031) remained independent prognostic factors for PFS; while cycles of first-line chemotherapy (p = 0.002), baseline EBV DNA (p = 0.033) and palliative thoracic radiotherapy (p = 0.041) were significantly associated with OS. ConclusionGemcitabine-based chemotherapy and palliative thoracic radiotherapy are active in pulmonary LELC. These data provide added evidence for the similarity between pulmonary LELC and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in endemic area. Randomized controlled studies are needed to further define the standard-of-care for patients with advanced pulmonary LELC.

ARTIST 2: Interim results of a phase III trial involving adjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy after D2-gastrectomy in stage II/III gastric cancer (GC).

4001 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy have been the standard of care in GC for years, supported by randomized trials. We compared the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens and chemoradiotherapy in patients with D2-resected, stage II/III, node-positive GC. Methods: From Feb 2013 through Nov 2018, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, patients with pathologically-staged II or III, node-positive, D2-resected GC, to receive adjuvant S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off) for one year, S-1 (2-weeks-on/1-week-off) plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (SOX) for six months, or SOX plus chemoradiotherapy 45 Gy (SOXRT). Randomization was stratified according to the type of surgery (total or subtotal gastrectomy), stage (II or III), and Lauren histologic classification (diffuse or intestinal). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). A total of 900 patients had to be enrolled to demonstrate superiority of SOX or SOXRT to S-1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.667), with 90% power at a two-sided significance level of 5%. Results: A total of 538 patients were included for this interim efficacy analysis. Median age was 58 years, men constituted 65%, and stage II and III were 31% and 69%, respectively. Baseline tumor and patient characteristics were balanced between treatment arms. Adverse events were as anticipated in each arm, generally well-tolerated and manageable. DFS in the control arm (S-1) were significantly shorter than in SOX and SOXRT arms (stratified HR for recurrence): S-1 vs. SOX, 0.617 (P = 0.016) and S-1 vs. SOXRT, 0.686 (P = 0.057). The DFS at 3-years was found to be 65%, 78% and 73% in S-1, SOX and SOXRT arms, respectively. No difference in DFS between SOX and SOXRT was found (HR 0.910, P = 0.667). Based on the results after the observation of 145 recurrence events at the cutoff date of Dec 27, 2018, the independent data monitoring committee considered the results sufficient to meet the endpoint of the trial and recommended early stopping of the trial. Conclusions: In patients with curatively D2-resected, stage II/III, node-positive GC, adjuvant SOX or SOXRT was effective in prolonging DFS, when compared to S-1 monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT0176146.

The Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Comparative effectiveness of different chemotherapy regimens of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in adults: a network meta-analysis.

BackgroundCombined chemotherapy is the cornerstone treatment for patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The objective of our study was to perform a network meta-analysis of the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in adults with advanced-stage HL.Materials and methodsWe searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in titles/abstracts in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The search was last updated on April 3, 2018. RCTs that assessed the effectiveness of one of the following treatments were included: doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD); four cycles of increased dose of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPescalated) followed by two or four cycles of standard dose of BEACOPP (4× BEACOPPescalated + 2 or 4× BEACOPPbaseline); brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD); doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechlorethamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone combined with radiation therapy (Stanford V); mechlorethamine (cyclophosphamide), vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (M[C] OPP); sequential or alternating chemotherapy regimens with ABVD as the footstone (eg, COPP/ABVD or mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [MOPP]/ABVD); eight cycles of BEACOPPescalated; hybrid MOPP/ABV; and M[C]EC (M[C]OPP with epidoxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine [EBV], and lomustine, doxorubicin, and vindesine [CAD]).ResultsOverall, we screened 3,564 citations and deemed 18 reports of 16 trials eligible and included them in our network meta-analysis. A total of 11,928 participants were randomly assigned to one of the 12 combinations of chemotherapy regimens, of which 11,476 participants were analyzed. For the overall survival (OS), no differences were observed within any interventions when the ABVD regimen was used as the reference treatment. Similarly, relative to A+AVD, 8× BEACOPPescalated and 6× BEACOPPescalated also showed no differences (HR =1.07, 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.58–1.95; HR =0.62, 95% CrI: 0.16–1.83; and HR =0.71, 95% CrI: 0.30–1.72, respectively). In terms of complete remission (CR), enough evidence exists to support a maximum clinical treatment effect for 6× BEACOPPescalated (OR =1.88, 95% CrI: 1.20–2.96; and OR =3.43, 95% CrI: 1.87–6.24).ConclusionWhen compared across the 12 combined chemotherapy regimens, six cycles of BEACOPPescalated may be the optimal treatment for patients with advanced-stage HL.

Efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: A network meta-analysis.

We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine + S-1 (tegafur), Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin + irinotecan + fluorouracil + leucovorin), Gemcitabine + oxaliplatin, Gemcitabine + irinotecan, Gemcitabine + Exatecan, Gemcitabine + pemetrexed, Gemcitabine + 5-FU, and S-1 in treating advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). The odds radios (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were evaluated by a combination of direct evidence and indirect evidence. In total twenty studies were included in this paper. For short-term efficacy, the overall response rate (ORR) was lower for patients treated with Gemcitabine compared with Gemcitabine + S-1, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, Gemcitabine + irinotecan and S-1. The ORR for FOLFIRINOX was higher compared with Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine and Gemcitabine + Cisplatin. The disease control rate (DCR) for Gemcitabine was lower compared with Gemcitabine + S-1, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, and FOLFIRINOX. For long-term efficacy, the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate for FOLFIRINOX was higher compared with Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, Gemcitabine + irinotecan, Gemcitabine + Exatecan, and Gemcitabine + pemetrexed. The SUCRA revealed that FOLFIRINOX was relatively better in both short- and long-term efficacy, while Gemcitabine was relatively poorer. In both short- and long-term efficacy, FOLFIRINOX had the best short- and long-term efficacy among the 12 chemotherapy regimens while efficacy of Gemcitabine was relatively poorer in the treatment of advanced or metastatic PC.

Short-term efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.

ObjectiveA network meta-analysis was performed to compare the short-term efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsRandomized controlled trials of different chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer were included in this study. Network meta-analysis combined direct evidence and indirect evidence to evaluate the odds ratio and draw surface under the cumulative ranking curves of different chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer.ResultsThe results of surface under the cumulative ranking curves showed that S-1 and capecitabine regimens were better than fluorouracil. As for multi-drug combination regimens, the disease control rate of cisplatin + capecitabine, docetaxel + cisplatin + fluorouracil and etoposide + cisplatin + capecitabine regimens were relatively better, while fluorouracil + adriamycin + mitomycin regimen was relatively poorer when compared with cisplatin + fluorouracil regimen. Additionally, the overall response ratio of cisplatin + capecitabine, paclitaxel + fluorouracil, docetaxel + cisplatin + fluorouracil and etoposide + cisplatin + fluorouracil regimens were relatively better, while the disease control rate of fluorouracil + adriamycin + mitomycin regimen was relatively poorer when compared with cisplatin + fluorouracil regimen. Furthermore, the results of cluster analysis demonstrated that cisplatin + capecitabine, etoposide + cisplatin + capecitabine, S-1 + paclitaxel and S-1 + irinotecan chemotherapy regimens had better disease control rate and overall response ratio for advanced gastric cancer patients.ConclusionThis network meta-analysis clearly showed that multi-drug combination chemotherapy regimens based on capecitabine and S-1 might be the best chemotherapy regimen for advanced gastric cancer.

Retrospective study on the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens concurrently combined with intensity modulated radiation therapyin treatment of Ⅲ-Ⅳa stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Objective:To compare the near and long term efficacy and safety of paclitaxel(TAX) plus cisplatin(DDP) (TP regimen) and DDP plus 5-FU(PF regimen) concurrently combined with IMRT in treatment of patients with advanced NPC.Method: A retrospective analysis on 108 advanced NPC cases from January 2010 to December 2012 was conducted. The patients were divided into TP group(57 cases) and PF group(51 cases) according to therapy regimen. TP group received IMRT combined with TP therapy, and PF group received IMRT combined with PF regimen, two groups were both used 4 cycles of chemotherapy, toxicity reactions during concurrent radiochemotherapy were noted. Two months after treatment, near clinical efficacies of the two groups were determined, and then, a three years followingup was conducted, during which recurrence ratio, metastasis ratio, local control ratio and survival rate were analyzed. Result: Two months after treatment, the total effective ratio of TP group(84.2% vs.76.5%) was higher than PF group,however, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Gastrointestinal reaction(70.2% vs.66.7%), marrow inhibition(75.4% vs.82.4%), liver function damage(12.3% vs.13.7%), radioactive oral and pharyngeal injury(91.2% vs.98.0%)， hearing damage(15.8% vs.15.7%) in the two groups during chemoradiotherapy had no significant differences(P>0.05). During followingup, the recurrence and metastasis ratio in TP group(33.3% vs.47.1%) was lower than PF group(χ²=2.116,P=0.146). TP group with The local control rate(73.7% vs.68.5%) and survival rate(84.2% vs.78.4%) after three years treatment in TP group were higher than PF group(χ²=0.336,P=0.562；χ²=0.596,P=0.440). Conclusion: IMRT concurrently combined with TP and PF respectively are both effective methods for treatment of advanced NPC. In this study, IMPT plus TP concurrent chemoradiotherapy has a certain superiority in near and long term clinical treatment efficacy and safety.

Bortezomib-Based Chemotherapy Regimens Can Inmprove The Complete Remission In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients With Bcl-2 and Survivin Overexpression

Compared with the traditional chemotherapeutic agents, Bortezomib-based chemotherapy regimens can increase the complete remission and improve the prognosis significantly in the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Molecular markers which can predict the chemotherapeutic efficacy and safety could help the physicians to make the right decisions and benefit the patients, and it has been one of most interesting research fields in MM. It has been reported that Survivin and Bcl-2 was involved in the adverse clinical events and therapeutic resistance, respectively. In order to investigate the relationship between the Survivin and Bcl-2 expression and the different regimens therapeutic efficacy, we retrospectively studied the proteins expression in the bone marrow biopsy specimens by inmmunohistochemistry and the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in the newly diagnosed MM in a single center of Tongji Hospital. Total 59 newly diagnosed MM were admitted into this study. The positive expression rate for Survivin and Bcl-2 was 35.3%（n=21）and 73.5%（n=43）, respectively. The protein expression had no relationship with the Durie-Salmon and International Staging System stratification, which suggested that Survivin and Bcl-2 were not responsible for the clinical manifestations. Bortezomib-based regimens (n=22) could effectively decrease the tumor burden and achieve response (CR+PR: 67.5% ). The non-bortezomib regimens (n=37), containing VAD(T), MP(T), TAD, were effective in the absent of Survivn and Bcl-2 expression(n=7; CR+PR 62.5% ). When Survivin and Bcl-2 were single or double positive (n=30), the newly diagnosed MM patients had no response for non-bortezomib regimens with none reaching complete remission or partial remission (p=0.0088). According to this study, we recommend the newly diagnosed MM which were Survivin and Bcl-2 single or double positive by inmmunohistochemistry received the regimens containing bortezomib for anti-myeloma therapy. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Role of Consolidation Treatment in Locally Advanced Unresectable NSCLC

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy remains the standard-of-care treatment in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Most regimens include low doses of radiosensitizing agents. Because of concern for the presence of micrometastatic disease and the high rate of systemic failure, many trials have addressed the role of additional consolidation chemotherapy. Only a few of these studies have been performed in a randomized setting on a large number of patients, and the rest are smaller phase I and phase II trials that explore the safety and efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens. More recently, targeted agents have also been evaluated in such regimens, although molecular and histologic markers have not been fully incorporated in these studies. In this review, we discuss these trials and compare the different sequences and regimens of systemic doses of chemotherapy when delivered in addition to concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Population based study of prognostic factors and treatment in adult Burkitt lymphoma: a Swedish Lymphoma Registry study

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a rare neoplasm constituting 1–2% of adult lymphomas. Our aims in this study were to establish prognostic factors for overall survival in adult BL and evaluate the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in a population based setting. The study population was collected from the Swedish Lymphoma Registry 2000–2010. During this period, 156 adult patients with BL were identified. In multivariate analysis, age and performance status (PS) were significant adverse prognostic factors for overall survival. A modified prognostic index, based on: age >40 years, PS >1, and lactate dehydrogenase > upper limit of normal (ULN) was proposed. Patients with a score of 0–1, 2, and 3 were found to have a 2-year survival of 91.2%, 58.4%, and 27.5%, respectively. High-intensity regimens were associated with more favorable overall survival. Rituximab addition was not significantly associated with improvement in survival. A modified prognostic index may be valuable for adult BL, as proposed.