Efficacy Of Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

In vitro-irradiated cancer vaccine enhances anti-tumor efficacy of radiotherapy and PD-L1 blockade in a syngeneic murine breast cancer model

Background and PurposeLocal radiotherapy (RT) exerts immunostimulatory effects by inducing immunogenic cell death. However, it remains unknown whether in vitro–irradiated tumor cells can elicit anti-tumor responses and enhance the efficacy of local RT and immune checkpoint inhibitors when injected in vivo. Methods and MaterialsWe tested the “in vitro–irradiated cancer vaccine (ICV)”, wherein tumor cells killed by varying doses of irradiation and their supernatants are intravenously injected. We examined the efficacy of combining local RT (24 Gy in three fractions), PD-L1 blockade, and the ICV in a murine breast cancer model. The immune cell profiles were analyzed via flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. The cytokine levels were measured by multiplex immunoassays. ResultsThe ICV significantly increased the effector memory phenotype and interferon-γ production capacity in splenic CD8+ T cells. The in vitro–irradiated products contained immune response-related molecules. When combined with local RT and PD-L1 blockade, the ICV significantly delayed the growth of irradiated and non-irradiated tumors. The triple combination therapy increased the proportions of CD8+ T cells and effector memory CD8+ T cells while decreasing the proportion of CTLA-4+ exhausted CD8+ T cells within tumor microenvironment. Additionally, plasma level of interferon-γ and proliferation of effector T cells in the spleen and tumor-draining lymph nodes were significantly increased by the triple combination therapy. ConclusionsThe ICV enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of local RT and PD-L1 blockade by augmenting anti-tumor immune responses. Our findings suggest a therapeutic potential of in vitro–irradiation products of tumor cells.

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have shown promising potential in cervical cancer immunotherapy. However, its therapeutic efficacy remains to be further evaluated. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICI therapies in cervical cancer through a meta-analysis of relevant studies. Methods: Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were systematically searched for studies on the efficacy and safety of ICI therapy in cervical cancer to 19 January 2024. Outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the Europe Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) scores and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for analysis. Results: Seven studies involving a total of 2514 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. ICI therapies significantly extended OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (0.60, 0.77); p < 0.0001] and PFS [HR = 0.69, 95% CI (0.61, 0.78); p < 0.0001]. There was no significant difference between ICI therapies and conventional therapies in ORR [HR = 1.29, 95% CI (0.86, 1.94); p = 0.16], in QLQ-C30 score [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.09, 95% CI (–0.36, 0.54); p = 0.48], and in grade 3 or worse AEs [HR = 0.96, 95% CI (0.88, 1.05); p = 0.28]. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of these findings. Conclusions: ICI therapies improve OS and PFS in cervical cancer patients with a safety profile comparable to conventional therapies. Nevertheless, further studies and randomized clinical trials are necessary to validate these results.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

The clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments in treating individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain controversial. We aimed to review the literature to comprehensively investigate the individual and comparative clinical outcomes of various ICI-based treatment strategies in this population. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we used single-arm, pairwise, and network meta-analytical approaches. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and relevant international conference proceedings from database inception to Jan 31, 2024, without language restrictions, to identify eligible clinical trials that assessed ICI-based treatments for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on EGFR-TKIs. Studies considered eligible were published and unpublished phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical trials enrolling participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had progressed after at least one EGFR-TKI treatment, and that evaluated ICI-based treatment strategies on at least one of the clinical outcomes of interest. The primary outcome analysed was progression-free survival. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021292626. 17 single-arm trials and 15 randomised controlled trials, involving 2886 participants and seven ICI-based treatment strategies (ICI monotherapy, ICI plus chemotherapy [ICI-chemo], ICI plus antiangiogenesis [ICI-antiangio], ICI plus antiangiogenesis plus chemotherapy [ICI-antiangio-chemo], dual ICIs [ICI-ICI], dual ICIs plus chemotherapy [ICI-ICI-chemo], and ICI plus EGFR-TKI [ICI-TKI]), were included. Three of these strategies-ICI monotherapy, ICI-antiangio-chemo, and ICI-chemo-had sufficient data across the included studies to perform a pairwise meta-analysis. The pairwise meta-analysis showed that, compared with chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy led to shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·73 [95% CI 1·30-2·29], I2=0%), whereas ICI-antiangio-chemo (HR 0·54 [0·44-0·67], I2=0%) and ICI-chemo (HR 0·77 [0·67-0·88], I2=0%) prolonged progression-free survival. The network meta-analysis showed that ICI-antiangio-chemo yielded the best progression-free survival results, with substantial benefits over ICI-chemo (HR 0·71 [95% credible interval 0·59-0·85]), ICI monotherapy (HR 0·30 [0·22-0·41]), and non-ICI treatment strategies including antiangio-chemo (HR 0·76 [0·58-1·00]) and chemotherapy alone (HR 0·54 [0·45-0·64]). ICI-antiangio-chemo was associated with higher risks of both any-grade and grade 3 or worse adverse events over ICI-chemo and chemotherapy in the network meta-analysis. For individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on EGFR-TKIs, ICI-antiangio-chemo was identified as the optimal treatment option. The toxicity of this treatment was acceptable but needs careful attention. ICI-chemo showed appreciably greater efficacy than the standard-of-care chemotherapy. These findings clarified the roles of ICI-based treatment strategies in this difficult-to-treat refractory population, potentially complementing recent guidelines. None.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with bevacizumab in MSS/pMMR advanced colorectal cancer after first-line treatment failure.

To investigate the effects of a PD-1 inhibitor combined with a bevacizumab monoclonal antibody on tumor immune cells in patients with first-line treatment failure in MSS/pMMR advanced colorectal cancer. Control group consisted of 50 patients treated with the FOLFIRI combined with Bevacizumab regimen. The experimental group consisted of 60 patients treated with the Sintilimab combined with Bevacizumab regimen. By comparing the expression levels of CD8+ T lymphocytes, TAMs, and CAFs before and after treatment, short-term efficacy after treatment, and adverse drug reactions between the two groups, we comprehensively evaluated the impact of Sintilimab combined with Bevacizumab on patients with MSS/pMMR advanced colorectal cancer who failed first-line treatment. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes, TAMs, and CAFs before and after treatment between the two groups (P<0.05);Immunohistochemical scoring of CD8+ T lymphocytes, TAMs, and CAFs showed significant differences between the groups post-treatment (P<0.05). The experimental group demonstrated statistically significant differences in immunohistochemical scoring of CD8+ T lymphocytes, TAMs, and CAFs before and after treatment (P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups of tumors (P<0.05). The experimental group had greater PFS, mPFS, ORR, and DCR than did the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of drug-related adverse reactions after treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). The results of the Cox proportional hazards model analysis indicate that age, gender, and group are independent risk factors affecting MSS/pMMR advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with second-line therapy in this study. Patients aged ≤60 years, male patients, and those in the experimental group showed better treatment responses in this study. By administering immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with bevacizumab to patients with advanced colorectal cancer with MSS/pMMR disease for whom first-line treatment failed, not only did the patients' prognosis improve, but the adverse drug reactions were also safe and controllable.

1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-3-acetyl-rac-glycerol treatment inhibits abnormal tumor growth by regulating neutrophil infiltration in a non-small cell lung carcinoma mouse model

Excessive neutrophil infiltration into the tumor microenvironment (TME) is an important factor that contributes to tumor overgrowth and limited immunotherapy efficacy. Neutrophils activate various receptors involved in tumor progression, while suppressing the infiltration and activity of cytotoxic T cells and creating optimal conditions for tumor growth. Therefore, the appropriate control of neutrophil infiltration is an effective strategy for tumor treatment.In the present study, 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-3-acetyl-rac-glycerol (PLAG) inhibited tumor overgrowth by suppressing excessive neutrophil infiltration, resulting in >74.97 % reduction in tumor size in a Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC-1) mouse model. All subjects in the positive control group died during the 90-day survival period, whereas only four subjects in the PLAG treatment group survived. PLAG had a significantly higher tumor growth inhibitory effect and survival rate than other neutrophil infiltration-targeting inhibitors (e.g., Navarixin, lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus G6D antibody [aLy6G]). The ability of PLAG to regulate neutrophil infiltration and inhibit tumor growth depends on thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP). In tumors lacking TXNIP expression, PLAG failed to control neutrophil infiltration and infiltration-related factor release, and the inhibitory effect of PLAG on tumor growth was reduced. PLAG-mediated inhibition of neutrophil infiltration enhances the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), increasing the antitumor efficacy and survival rate by 30 %.In conclusion, PLAG could be a novel alternative to anti-tumor drugs that effectively targets excessive neutrophil infiltration into cancer tissues.

Efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitor in gynecologic cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Over the past decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown dramatic efficacy in improving survival rates in multiple malignancies. Recently, gynecological cancer patients also showed to respond favorably to ICI treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of ICI therapy in gynecological cancers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by retrieving literature from multiple electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The protocol used in this study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022369529). We included a total of 12 trials involving 8 therapies and 8,034 patients. ICI group demonstrated a longer OS (HR: 0.807; 95% CI: 0.719, 0.907; p = 0.000) and greater PFS improvement (HR: 0.809; 95% CI: 0.673, 0.973; p = 0.024) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events [RR: 0.968; 95%CI: 0.936, 1.001; p = 0.061], but a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) was observed in the ICI group (RR: 3.093; 95%CI: 1.933, 4.798; p = 0.000). Although the mean changes of QOL score from baseline was not significantly different between both groups (SMD: 0.048; 95% CI: -0.106, 0.202; p = 0.542), the time to definitive QOL deterioration was longer in the ICI group (HR: 0.508; 95% CI: 0.461, 0.560; p = 0.000). Despite having a higher incidence of IRAE, ICI was shown to improve survival rates and QOL of patients. Thus, it should be considered as a new standard of care for gynecologic cancers, especially in advanced stages.

The role of the gut microbiome in modulating immunotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer.

This systematic literature review and meta-analysis provide an overview of the critical role of gut microbiota in modulating the efficacy of immunotherapy for colorectal cancer. Gut microbes influence host immune responses through multiple mechanisms including modulation of immune cell activity, metabolite action, and immune tolerance. The ability of specific gut microbes to improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been linked to their ability to improve gut barrier function, modulate immune cell activity, and produce key immunomodulatory metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids. In addition, the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota are strongly associated with the efficacy of immunotherapies, demonstrating the potential to improve therapeutic response by modifying the gut microbiota. This paper also discusses the prospect of manipulating the gut microbiota through strategies such as fecal microbial transplantation, probiotic supplementation, and dietary modifications to optimize the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Prognostic value of immuno-nutritional status in patients with cancer treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors.

226 Background: The treatment efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may relate to tumor factors or host factors, such as systemic inflammation status or nutritional status. In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of immuno-nutritional status in cancer patients treated by ICIs, and develop nomogram models for predicting overall survival (OS). Methods: We used Chang Gung Research Database to retrospectively evaluate cancer patients who received ICIs during January 2015 to December 2021. Patients had double cancer or received only one cycle of ICI were excluded. All patients were divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. The training cohort was used to analyze the risk factors and develop nomogram models. The models were validated by the validation cohort. The univariate analysis, stepwise multivariate analysis, receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis were used to find out the independent risk factors. The calibration plot were used to evaluate the reliability of the models. Results: All patients (3219 cases) could be categorized into lung cancer (22.1%), genitourinary cancer (14.9%), upper gastrointestinal tract cancer (8.1%), colorectal cancer (3.1%), hepatocellular carcinoma (24.6%), pancreatobiliary cancer (3.8%), head and neck cancer (12.9%), melanoma (4.0%), breast cancer (1.9%) and lymphoma (0.5%). 80.2% of patients received anti-PD1, 19.8% of patients received anti-PD-L1. In training cohort, the cut-off value was set for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), total lymphocyte count (TLC), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutrition index (PNI) and hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet (HALP) score. The above risk factors showed significant difference in median OS in validation cohort respectively (Table). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that NLR, PNI and HALP score were independent risk factors in predicting OS. The hazard ratio were 1,439 (95% CI 1.149-1.801), 0.689 (95% CI 0.549-0.865) and 0.784 (95% CI 0.626-0.982) respectively. Conclusions: We developed nomogram models to investigate the immuno-nutritional status and predict the OS of cancer patients who received ICIs therapy. High NLR, low PNI and low HALP score were associated with worse OS. [Table: see text]

Predictive value of early dynamic changes of NLR and PLR for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

We analyzed the predictive value of dynamic changes in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). A total of 104 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with ICIs during August 2018 to June 2023 were included. Dynamic changes were defined as the difference between NLR and PLR on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2. Patients with increased NLR or PLR had an independently increased risk of disease progression at the first response evaluation (odds ratio [OR] 5.26, P = .005; OR 2.29, P = .042), disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.29, P = .003; HR 1.68, P = .027), and death (HR 1.86, P = .027; HR 1.68, P = .037). Furthermore, patients with a decrease in NLR showed longer progression-free survival, with HRs of 0.36 (P < .001) for those with low pre-ICI NLR and 0.52 (P = .041) for those with high pre-ICI NLR, compared to those with increased NLR. Increased NLR or PLR was associated with adverse outcomes after ICI treatment in patients with R/M HNSCC.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose immune checkpoint inhibitor as monotherapy in patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

188 Background: Immunotherapy is a novel anti-cancer therapy with different mechanisms compared with chemotherapy. Several studies have reported that low dose of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is effective. However, it is unknown whether the efficacy of low-dose immunotherapy is inferior to that of standard dose immunotherapy. We aimed to compare the existing randomized clinical trials on the efficacy of immunotherapy at low dose and standard dose as a single agent for patients with solid tumors. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials with the clinical outcomes of low dose and standard dose of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor as monotherapy until November 30, 2023. The low dose is defined as lower than the dose approved by FDA. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) and disease control rate (DCR) were collected. The Stata 15.0 software was used to analyze the data. Results: Twenty-two studies with 3226 patients with five ICIs for 22 solid tumors were included. There is no difference in OS (HR 1.12, 95% CI = 0.97-1.31; p &gt; 0.05), ORR (Odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% CI = 0.76-1.11; p &gt; 0.05) and DCR (OR 0.83, 95% CI = 0.65-1.06; p &gt; 0.05) for patients with low dose and standard dose of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Conclusions: Our results suggested that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor as monotherapy with a low dose may be as effective as standard dose for patients with solid tumors. The regular dose-response relationship may not be appropriate for ICIs. Further work is needed to explore the optimal dose of ICIs based on the comprehensive consideration of efficacy, safety, and economic assessment.

Clinical efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib as secondline or subsequent therapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Treatments are limited for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients in secondline or subsequent setting. This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anlotinib as secondline or subsequent therapy in ES-SCLC. We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients with ES-SCLC at Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital between January 2019 and March 2024. According to the different therapy regimes, they were divided into three groups, ICI plus anlotinib as secondline or subsequent therapy group (ICI + anlotinib group), single ICI as secondline or subsequent therapy group (single ICI therapy group), single chemotherapy as secondline therapy group (single chemotherapy group). Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival time (OS) among these three groups. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze different factors which correlated to PFS and OS. The adverse events were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in ICI + anlotinib group had a longer PFS and OS compared to patients in single ICI therapy group (median PFS [mPFS]: 6.7months vs. 4.6months, P = 0.007; median OS [mOS]:12.4months vs. 8.4months, P = 0.041) and single chemotherapy group (mPFS: 6.7months vs. 3.0months, P < 0.001; mOS: 12.4months vs. 7.2months, P = 0.002). The Cox regression analysis showed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), liver metastasis, brain metastasis and treatment regimes were independent predictors that affecting the PFS and OS of all the enrolled patients. The common adverse events (AEs) were wleukopenia and fatigue. There was no significant statistical difference in other AEs among the three groups except for leukopenia. ICI + anlotinib as secondline or subsequent therapy has better efficacy than single ICI group and single chemotherapy group and with tolerable toxicities for patients with ES-SCLC.

Peripheral Blood TCRβ Repertoire, IL15, IL2 and Soluble Ligands for NKG2D Activating Receptor Predict Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer.

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the therapeutic paradigm of lung cancer (LC), becoming the standard of treatment for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable mutations. It has allowed the achievement of durable responses and resulted in significant survival benefits. However, not all patients respond; hence, molecular biomarkers are needed to help us predict which patients will respond. With this objective, a prospective observational study was designed, including a cohort of 55 patients with NSCLC who received ICIs. We studied whether biomarkers such as TCRβ and specific cytokines involved in the regulation of T cell activity were related to the immunotherapy response. In the survival analysis, it was found that patients with higher TCRβ clonality, lower TCRβ evenness, higher TCRβ Shannon diversity and lower TCRβ convergence had higher overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). However, no statistically significant association was observed. Regarding cytokines, those patients with higher levels of IL-2 and IL-15 presented statistically significantly shorter OS and PFS, respectively. In fact, in the multivariable analysis, the high IL-15 level increased the risk of death by three times. Although the sample size was small and more studies are needed to confirm our results, our study reveals promising markers of responses to ICIs.

Age-related efficacy of immunotherapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive meta-analysis

ObjectiveThe reported impact of age on the effectiveness of emerging immunotherapies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been inconsistent in clinical trials, largely due to an underrepresentation of older individuals. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in older patients with NSCLC. Materials and methodsThe literature up to April 2024 was reviewed to identify articles meeting the criteria for inclusion. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) across various age groups were examined. The ratio of HR (RHR) was computed and combined for each study. ResultsA preliminary search identified 118 articles, with 13 being phase II or III randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of nivolumab, avelumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic therapy. The analysis revealed that the HR for OS was 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.70–0.80, P=0.080) in patients aged under 75 years and 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.74–1.01, P=0.913) in patients aged 75 years and older. The combined RHR for patients aged 75 years and above versus those aged under 75 years was 1.14 (95 % CI: 0.97–1.34, P=0.697). There was no significant difference in OS benefit between patients over 75 years and younger patients (P=0.105). Subgroup analyses indicated that the benefit of OS was consistent across all subgroups and age groups. ConclusionsOur investigation found no significant differences in the efficacy of immunotherapy for patients with NSCLC aged 75 years and older compared to those under 75 years old. This suggests that the efficacy of immunotherapy against NSCLC is consistent across age groups.

Enhancing cancer immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy by regulating gut microbes: Opportunities and challenges

AbstractAs the largest microecosystem in the human body, gut microbes (GMs) and their metabolites play an important role in regulating human health. In recent years, immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) combined with antiangiogenic agents is an emerging combination therapy for cancer. There is growing evidence that GMs can affect the effectiveness of drugs to treat cancer. GMs not only regulate angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment, but also influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Many studies show that Bifidobacterium can upregulate the anticancer function of immune checkpoint blockers. In addition, GMs have been found to be involved in the formation of blood vessels and other developmental processes. Clinically, GMs are believed to play a key role in patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy and ICT. In this perspective, we provide an overview of the composition and function of the gut microbiome, and discuss the role of the GMs against the conditioning of angiogenic therapy and ICT. We also summarize new approaches and clinical translational trials using GMs for cancer therapy, and present opportunities and challenges for targeting GMs for cancer therapy in the future.

Blocking CX3CR1+ Tumor-Associated Macrophages Enhances the Efficacy of Anti-PD1 Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains limited, highlighting the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underlying treatment resistance. Accumulating evidence indicates that tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) within the tumor microenvironment demonstrate a key role in immune evasion and treatment resistance. This study explored the role of TAMs in the HCC tumor microenvironment. Our findings reveal that TAMs expressing CX3C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1) induced T-cell exhaustion through IL27 secretion in orthotopic models of HCC following treatment with anti-PD1. Moreover, we identified prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), released by immune-attacked tumor cells, as a key regulator of TAM transition to a CX3CR1+ phenotype. To augment the therapeutic response to anti-PD1 therapy, we propose targeting CX3CR1+ TAMs in addition to anti-PD1 therapy. Our study contributes to the understanding of the role of TAMs in cancer immunotherapy and highlights potential clinical implications for HCC treatment. The combination of targeting CX3CR1+ TAMs with anti-PD1 therapy holds promise for enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions in patients with HCC.

Corticosteroids for Immune-Related Adverse Events and Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy: Analysis of Six Clinical Trials.

Retrospective studies suggest that immunosuppressive treatment of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) impairs survival in patients with melanoma who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we study this association across tumor types using data from six international phase II/III registrational trials. A post hoc analysis was performed on individual patient data from the anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) + anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (anti-CTLA-4) treatment arms of six clinical trials (CheckMate-067, -142, -214, -648, -743, and -9LA). Among patients who received systemic immunosuppression for treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), associations of peak and cumulative corticosteroid dose, and use of second-line immunosuppression with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using multilevel Cox regression with adjustment for age and sex. Of the 1,959 patients who received anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 therapy, 834 patients who were treated with immunosuppression for trAEs were included. Eight hundred and thirty-two patients (100%) received corticosteroids and 81 patients (10%) received second-line immunosuppressants. High corticosteroid peak dose was associated with worse PFS: adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.29) for 1 versus 0.5 mg/kg prednisolone and HRadj, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.96) for 2 versus 0.5 mg/kg. Similar effects were observed for OS: HRadj, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.39) and HRadj, 1.66 (95% CI, 1.17 to 2.37) for 1 and 2 versus 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. Cumulative corticosteroid dose was not associated with survival. HRadj of use of second-line immunosuppression was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.68) for PFS and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.77) for OS. Higher corticosteroid peak dose for trAEs is associated with worse survival across tumor types, while cumulative dose is not. Too few patients received second-line immunosuppressants to confirm or reject an association with survival. These data argue for a reconsideration of irAE management approaches, starting with lower corticosteroid dose whenever feasible.

Inhibition of insulin-like growth factors increases production of CXCL9/10 by macrophages and fibroblasts and facilitates CD8+ cytotoxic T cell recruitment to pancreatic tumours.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with an urgent unmet clinical need for new therapies. Using a combination of in vitro assays and in vivo preclinical models we demonstrate that therapeutic inhibition of the IGF signalling axis promotes the accumulation of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells within the tumour microenvironment of PDAC tumours. Mechanistically, we show that IGF blockade promotes macrophage and fibroblast production of the chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 to facilitate CD8+ T cell recruitment and trafficking towards the PDAC tumour. Exploring this pathway further, we show that IGF inhibition leads to increased STAT1 transcriptional activity, correlating with a downregulation of the AKT/STAT3 signalling axis, in turn promoting Cxcl9 and Cxcl10 gene transcription. Using patient derived tumour explants, we also demonstrate that our findings translate into the human setting. PDAC tumours are frequently described as "immunologically cold", therefore bolstering CD8+ T cell recruitment to PDAC tumours through IGF inhibition may serve to improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors which rely on the presence of CD8+ T cells in tumours.

22 Association of a germline single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the interleukin-7 (IL7) gene with immune-related adverse events (irAEs)

Abstract Background Adverse events (AEs) can limit treatment immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) efficacy and worsen patient outcomes. Our group recently identified a germline IL7 SNP as a potential biomarker for prediction of irAEs (Groha, Nat Med 2022). In the current study, we sought to replicate the association between this IL7 SNP (rs16906115) and AEs in two clinical trials of patients with cancer treated with ICI regimens. Methods In the CheckMate-025 (CM025) trial (NCT01668784), involving patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) randomized to either nivolumab (NIVO) or everolimus (EVE), whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from tumor and peripheral blood samples were analyzed. The Cancer Genome Analysis pipeline was utilized to identify somatic alterations, and the STITCH pipeline was employed to determine SNP carrier status. In the BinTA-0037 (BTA-0037) trial (NCT03631706), focusing on patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), the carrier status of a surrogate SNP rs16906062 (R2=0.66) was determined from tumor WES in the pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) arm. Within each treatment arm, time to incident AEs were compared between carriers (SNP+) and non-carriers (SNP-) via multivariable Cox regression, controlling for age, sex, race, ECOG and sample purity. A SNP´treatment interaction term was also included in the entire CM025 cohort. Censoring for AEs occurred at death or last follow-up. A recurrent event analysis for AEs was conducted using the Andersen-Gill model, controlling for the same variables. Additionally, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were also assessed. Results In total, 534 pts were included (NIVO: n=189, PEMBRO: n=152, EVE: n=193), among which 82 (15.4%) were SNP+. There were no differences in clinical and pathological characteristics between SNP+ and SNP-, except for sex (SNP+ 16.1% vs. SNP- 30.1% in females, P=0.046). Similarly, no differences in somatic alterations, including single nucleotide and copy number variants were seen between SNP+ and SNP- in CM025. SNP carrier status had no effect on OS nor PFS in all treatment arms (all P≥0.22). The rate of grade 2+ AEs was significantly higher in SNP+ vs. SNP- in the NIVO arm (Figure A, HR=2.91[1.48-5.72]), but not in the EVE (Figure B, control, non-ICI) arm (HR=0.63[0.3-1.29], SNP´treatment Pinteraction=0.002). Similarly, the rate of all grade AEs in the PEMBRO arm of BTA-0037 was higher in SNP+ vs. SNP- (Figure C, HR=2.30[1.60-4.60]). The rate of recurrent grade 2+ AEs was also significantly higher in SNP+ vs. SNP- in the NIVO arm (HR=3.43[1.83-6.43]), whereas a trend for fewer recurrent grade 2+ AEs was seen in SNP+ vs. SNP- in the EVE arm (HR=0.46[0.17-1.25], SNP´treatment Pinteraction=0.0005). Figure: Kaplan-Meier curves showing the cumulative rate of adverse events in the NIVO (A) and EVE (B) arms of CM025, as well as the PEMBRO arm of BTA0037 (C), in SNP- and SNP+. Conclusions The IL7 SNP (rs16906115) is associated with significantly higher rates of grade 2+ AEs, including recurrent events, in pts with mRCC or mNSCLC treated with single agent PD-1 inhibitors but not with non-ICI regimens, with no effect on survival and efficacy outcomes. These results confirm the SNP’s predictive potential as a biomarker for irAEs to guide therapeutic decisions in pts treated with ICIs.

Clinical outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with uncommon driver gene alterations

BackgroundLimited data exists on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon driver alterations in genes such as ERBB2, BRAF, RET, and MET. This study retrospectively assessed ICI-combination therapy outcomes in this molecular subset of NSCLC.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC confirmed with driver alterations in genes including ERBB2, BRAF, RET or MET, and received ICI combined with chemotherapy (ICI + chemo) and/or targeted therapy (ICI + chemo/TT) as first-line (1L) or second- or third-line (≥ 2L) treatment at Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and May 2024.ResultsOf the 181 patients included in the study, 131 patients received 1L-ICI + chemo (ERBB2, n = 64; BRAF, n = 34; RET, n = 23; and MET, n = 10), and 50 patients received ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT (ERBB2, n = 16; BRAF, n = 7; RET, n = 14; MET, n = 13). The full cohort had an overall response rate (ORR) of 45.9% and disease control rate of 84.0%. Among patients who received 1L-ICI + chemo, ORR ranged between 51.6% and 60.0%, with the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) of 8.2 and 21.0 months for those with ERBB2-altered tumors, 10.0 and 15.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 12.1 months and OS not reached for RET-altered tumors, and 6.2 and 28.0 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively. Additionally, ORR ranged between 14.3% and 30.8% for ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT; mPFS and mOS were 5.4 and 16.2 months for patients with ERBB2-altered tumors, 2.7 and 5.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 6.2 and 14.3 months for RET-altered tumors, and 5.7 and 11.5 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively.ConclusionICI-based combination therapies, regardless of treatment line, were effective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC harboring driver alterations in ERBB2, BRAF, RET, or MET. This suggests their potential as alternative treatment options in this patient population.

Negative association of steroids with immunotherapy efficacy in a multi-tumor cohort: time and dose-dependent

Previous studies have suggested a negative impact of steroids on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but how this effect is modulated by the dosage and time of administration is yet to be clarified. We have performed a retrospective analysis of 475 patients with advanced solid tumors treated with ICI as monotherapy from 2015 to 2022. Data regarding immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and clinical outcomes were collected. For each patient, the daily steroid dose (in mg/kg of prednisone) was registered until disease progression or death. The impact of cumulative doses on response rates and survival outcomes was analyzed within different periods. The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly lower among patients exposed to steroids within 30 days before the first cycle of ICI (C1) (20.3% vs. 36.7%, p < 0.01) and within the first 90 days of treatment (25.7% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.01). This negative association was confirmed by multivariable analysis. Higher mean steroid doses were observed among non-responders, and cumulative doses were inversely correlated with the disease control rate (DCR) around ICI initiation. Remarkably, poorer outcomes were observed even in patients belonging to the lowest dose quartile compared to the steroid-naïve population. The exposure to steroids after 6 months of ICI was not associated with worse survival outcomes. Our results suggest that the potential impact of steroids on ICI efficacy may be time-dependent, prevailing around ICI initiation, and dose-dependent, with modulation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a possible underlying mechanism.