Efficacy In Glioblastoma Research Articles

Immunoglobulin-like transcript 2 blockade restores antitumor immune responses in glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma stands as the most frequent primary brain tumor. Despite the multimodal therapy for glioblastoma patients, the survival rate is very low, highlighting the need for novel therapies that improve patient outcomes. Immune checkpoint blockade strategies are achieving promising results in a myriad of tumors and several studies have reported its efficacy in glioblastoma at a preclinical level. ILT2 is a novel immune checkpoint that exerts an inhibitory effect via the interaction with classical and non-classical HLA class-I molecules. Herein, we report that ILT2 blockade promotes antitumor responses against glioblastoma. In silico and immunohistochemical analyses revealed that the expression of ILT2 and its ligands HLA-A, -B, -C, and -E are highly expressed in patients with glioblastoma. Disruption of ILT2 with blocking monoclonal antibodies increased natural killer cell-mediated IFN-γ production and cytotoxicity against glioblastoma, partially reverting the immunosuppression linked to this malignancy. In addition, co-treatment with temozolomide strengthened the antitumor capacity of anti-ILT2-treated immune cells. Collectively, our results establish the basis for future studies regarding the clinical potential of ILT2 blockade alone or in combination regimens in glioblastoma.

Investigational cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor GLR2007 demonstrates activity against isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma and other solid tumors in mice xenograft models.

Cyclin-dependent kinases, CDK4 and CDK6, are essential in regulating the cell cycle, which is disrupted in cancers like isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma (GBM). Currently marketed CDK4/6 inhibitors, including abemaciclib, have shown preclinical efficacy in solid tumors, but factors such as poor blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration limit their efficacy in GBM. GLR2007 is an investigational CDK4/6 inhibitor with the potential for improved BBB penetration. In vitro assays were used to assess the potency and inhibition of CDK4/6 enzymatic activity of GLR2007. Using in vivo assays, the distribution of radiolabeled GLR2007 in rats was determined through quantitative whole-body autoradiography. The antitumor efficacy of GLR2007 was evaluated in human GBM and breast cancer orthotopic mice xenograft models, and human lung, colorectal, and liver cancer in a subcutaneous xenograft model. In tumor cell line proliferation assays, GLR2007 inhibited proliferation at lower concentration values than abemaciclib in 19 of 20 GBM, five of seven breast, 20 of 21 lung, and 24 of 24 liver cancer cell lines. Total levels of radiolabeled GLR2007 in the brains of rats exceeded those in plasma by 2.3–4.5-fold from 2–6 hours after dosing. A xenograft model showed that, compared with vehicle control, 50 mg/kg GLR2007 induced 95.9% tumor growth inhibition (TGI) (P<0.001) in GBM orthotopic xenografts, 81.4% TGI (P=0.037) in breast cancer orthotopic xenografts, and 91.5% TGI (P<0.001) in colorectal cancer subcutaneous xenografts. These studies show possible BBB penetration of GLR2007 and demonstrate its potential as a CDK4/6 inhibitor for the treatment of solid tumors, including GBM.

Perturbing DDR signaling enhances cytotoxic effects of local oncolytic virotherapy and modulates the immune environment in glioma

CAN-2409 is a replication-deficient adenovirus encoding herpes simplex virus (HSV) thymidine kinase (tk) currently in clinical trials for treatment of glioblastoma. The expression of tk in transduced cancer cells results in conversion of the pro-drug ganciclovir into a toxic metabolite causing DNA damage, inducing immunogenic cell death and immune activation. We hypothesize that CAN-2409 combined with DNA-damage-response inhibitors could amplify tumor cell death, resulting in an improved response. We investigated the effects of ATR inhibitor AZD6738 in combination with CAN-2409 in vitro using cytotoxicity, cytokine, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) assays in glioma cell lines and in vivo with an orthotopic syngeneic murine glioma model. Tumor immune infiltrates were analyzed by cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF). In vitro, we observed a significant increase in the DNA-damage marker γH2AX and decreased expression of PD-L1, pro-tumorigenic cytokines (interleukin-1β [IL-1β], IL-4), and ligand NKG2D after combination treatment compared with monotherapy or control. In vivo, long-term survival was increased after combination treatment (66.7%) compared with CAN-2409 (50%) and control. In a tumor re-challenge, long-term immunity after combination treatment was not improved. Our results suggest that ATR inhibition could amplify CAN-2409’s efficacy in glioblastoma through increased DNA damage while having complex immunological ramifications, warranting further studies to determine the ideal conditions for maximized therapeutic benefit.

Abstract 3329: Efficacy of EGFR/PI3K signaling inhibition is enhanced with LSD1 inhibition in glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) models

Abstract Mutated and dysregulated protein kinases, such as EGFR and PI3K, have become major targets in cancer therapy due to the growth advantage they confer and the frequency of alterations. In glioblastoma (GBM), EGFR and PI3K are two of the most mutated genes and result in hyperactivation of these kinases. However, single agent inhibition has offered minimal success, largely due to the development of resistance from compensatory downstream signaling pathways. One strategy to circumvent resistance and improve efficacy in GBM is to use combination therapy, such as concurrent inhibition of EGFR or PI3K with inhibition of relevant epigenetic modulators. In GBM, lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an important epigenetic regulator that has shown to promote kinase signaling in cancer models. Therefore, the present study sought to define the relationship between the EGFR/PI3K signaling pathway and LSD1 and to evaluate the efficacy of co-inhibition of EGFR/PI3K and LSD1 in GBM.Transcriptional changes were examined following knockdown of LSD1 in isogenic human GBM cells using RNA-seq. These data were analyzed by GSEA to evaluate biological processes associated with the LSD1 expression. We identified several kinase signaling processes that were enriched in GBM cells with wild type LSD1 such as gene sets for regulation of PI3K activity, RTK binding, and transmembrane RTK activity. The effect of kinase inhibition on LSD1 expression was assessed using western blot analysis. We also evaluated the effects of LSD1 inhibition on expression of downstream kinase signaling proteins. Three kinase inhibitors directed against either EGFR or PI3K were evaluated in GSCs as single agents and in combination with LSD1 inhibitors. The three kinase inhibitors, osimertinib, erlotinib, and BKM120, all have evidence of some brain penetrance. We also evaluated a novel dual kinase inhibitor, MTX-241, which targets both EGFR and PI3K simultaneously. Five LSD1 inhibitors were assessed for their ability to enhance efficacy of EGFR/PI3K inhibitors.Our results demonstrate that LSD1 protein expression can be modulated by stimulation of EGFR in patient-derived GSCs. We observed an increase in LSD1 protein expression following the addition of EGF in GSC 17 cells. The concurrent inhibition of EGFR/PI3K and LSD1 enhanced the in vitro efficacy compared to single agent, supporting convergence of kinase signaling and LSD1 dependent pathways. In fact, several treatment combinations of EGFR/PI3K inhibitors and LSD1 inhibitors resulted in synergistic effects in multiple GSC lines.In summary, our results highlight the need for effective therapy combinations that can reduce the population of GSCs and avoid the adaptive resistance that is typical of kinase inhibitors. Future studies will focus on evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of the most promising treatment combinations in vivo using orthotopic xenograft models of the GSCs. Citation Format: Lea Stitzlein, Matthew Luetzen, Caitlin McCabe, Maninder Khosla, Melissa Singh, Xiaoping Su, Yue Lu, Joy Gumin, Frederick Lang, Christopher Whitehead, Judith Sebolt-Leopold, Joya Chandra. Efficacy of EGFR/PI3K signaling inhibition is enhanced with LSD1 inhibition in glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3329.

Safety and Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising treatment option for patients with refractory hematological malignancies. However, its efficacy in glioblastoma remains unclear. Here, we performed a systematic review to summarize the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in glioblastoma.MethodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify articles published before June 30, 2021 describing the use of CAR T-cell therapy in glioblastoma. Information on the toxicity of CAR T-cell therapy was summarized. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy were estimated using a random-effects model with an inverse-variance weighting model and quantile estimation method, respectively.ResultsOf 397 articles identified, eight studies including 63 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with various CAR T-cell regimens were included in the analysis. Six (9.5%) patients developed cytokine release syndrome (grade ≤2), and 16 (25.4%) experienced non-critical neurological events. The pooled ORR was 5.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0–10.4; I2 = 0.05%), and the pooled median OS was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.7–9.5; I2 = 0.00%).ConclusionAlthough CAR T-cell therapy is a relatively safe therapeutic option in patients with glioblastoma, it shows marginal efficacy, suggesting that further research is necessary for its translation into clinical practice for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma.

Modified Adenosines Sensitize Glioblastoma Cells to Temozolomide by Affecting DNA Methyltransferases.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary malignant brain tumor, and due to its unique features, its management is certainly one of the most challenging ones among all cancers. N6-isopentenyladenosine (IPA) and its analog N6-benzyladenosine (N6-BA) are modified nucleosides endowed with potent antitumor activity on different types of human cancers, including GBM. Corroborating our previous finding, we demonstrated that IPA and N6-BA affect GBM cell line proliferation by modulating the expression of the F-box WD repeat domain-containing-7 (FBXW7), a tumor suppressor with a crucial role in the turnover of many proteins, such as SREBPs and Mcl1, involved in malignant progression and chemoresistance. Luciferase assay revealed that IPA-mediated upregulation of FBXW7 translates in transcriptional inactivation of its oncogenic substrates (Myc, NFkB, or HIF-1α). Moreover, downregulating MGMT expression, IPA strongly enhances the killing effect of temozolomide (TMZ), producing a favorable sensitizing effect starting from a concentration range much lower than TMZ EC50. Through DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity assay, analysis of the global DNA methylation, and the histone modification profiles, we demonstrated that the modified adenosines behave similar to 5-AZA-dC, known DNMT inhibitor. Overall, our results provide new perspectives for the first time, suggesting the modified adenosines as epigenetic tools able to improve chemo- and radiotherapy efficacy in glioblastoma and potentially other cancers.

MiR-3189-targeted GLUT3 repression by HDAC2 knockdown inhibits glioblastoma tumorigenesis through regulating glucose metabolism and proliferation

BackgroundEpigenetic regulations frequently appear in Glioblastoma (GBM) and are highly associated with metabolic alterations. Especially, Histone deacetylases (HDACs) correlates with the regulation of tumorigenesis and cell metabolism in GBM progression, and HDAC inhibitors report to have therapeutic efficacy in GBM and other neurological diseases; however, GBM prevention and therapy by HDAC inhibition lacks a mechanism in the focus of metabolic reprogramming.MethodsHDAC2 highly express in GBM and is analyzed in TCGA/GEPIA databases. Therefore, HDAC2 knockdown affects GBM cell death. Analysis of RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR reveals that miR-3189 increases and GLUT3 decreases by HDAC2 knockdown. GBM tumorigenesis also examines by using in vivo orthotopic xenograft tumor models. The metabolism change in HDAC2 knockdown GBM cells measures by glucose uptake, lactate production, and OCR/ECAR analysis, indicating that HDAC2 knockdown induces GBM cell death by inhibiting GLUT3.ResultsNotably, GLUT3 was suppressed by increasing miR-3189, demonstrating that miR-3189-mediated GLUT3 inhibition shows an anti-tumorigenic effect and cell death by regulating glucose metabolism in HDAC2 knockdown GBM.ConclusionsOur findings will demonstrate the central role of HDAC2 in GBM tumorigenesis through the reprogramming of glucose metabolism by controlling miR-3189-inhibited GLUT3 expression, providing a potential new therapeutic strategy for GBM treatment.

Oncolytic Zika virus promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration and improves immunotherapy efficacy in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the deadliest primary brain tumor and is generally resistant to immunotherapy because of severe dysfunction of T cells. Novel treatment options are critically needed to overcome the immunotherapy resistance of GBM. Here we demonstrate that Zika virus (ZIKV) treatment improves the efficacy of anti-PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy in GBM. We found that ZIKV induces a strong pro-inflammatory response and increases CD4+ and CD8+ T cell intratumoral infiltration and activation in GBM mouse models. ZIKV treatment of mice bearing GBM tumors inhibits tumor growth and prolongs survival. These therapeutic effects of ZIKV on GBM tumors are negated in mice depleted of T cells. Moreover, ZIKV dramatically promotes activation of the type I interferon signaling pathway in GBM cells. ZIKV treatment potently sensitizes GBM to PD-L1 blockade and provides significant and durable survival benefits. Our findings reveal that ZIKV overcomes the resistance of GBM to immune checkpoint blockade, which may lead to therapeutic applications of ZIKV in individuals with GBM receiving immunotherapy.

Novel Immune-Related Gene-Based Signature Characterizing an Inflamed Microenvironment Predicts Prognosis and Radiotherapy Efficacy in Glioblastoma.

Effective treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) remains an open challenge. Given the critical role of the immune microenvironment in the progression of cancers, we aimed to develop an immune-related gene (IRG) signature for predicting prognosis and improving the current treatment paradigm of GBM. Multi-omics data were collected, and various bioinformatics methods, as well as machine learning algorithms, were employed to construct and validate the IRG-based signature and to explore the characteristics of the immune microenvironment of GBM. A five-gene signature (ARPC1B, FCGR2B, NCF2, PLAUR, and S100A11) was identified based on the expression of IRGs, and an effective prognostic risk model was developed. The IRG-based risk model had superior time-dependent prognostic performance compared to well-studied molecular pathology markers. Besides, we found prominent inflamed features in the microenvironment of the high-risk group, including neutrophil infiltration, immune checkpoint expression, and activation of the adaptive immune response, which may be associated with increased hypoxia, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type, and necrosis. Notably, the IRG-based risk model had the potential to predict the effectiveness of radiotherapy. Together, our study offers insights into the immune microenvironment of GBM and provides useful information for clinical management of this desperate disease.

Convection enhanced delivery of EGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates Serclutamab talirine and Depatux-M in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts.

BackgroundEGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are highly effective against EGFR-amplified tumors, but poor distribution across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits their efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) when administered systemically. We studied whether convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse ADCs into orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFRvIII mutant GBM.MethodsThe efficacy of the EGFR-targeted ADCs depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) and Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. CED was performed in nontumor and tumor-bearing mice. Immunostaining was used to evaluate ADC distribution, pharmacodynamic effects, and normal cell toxicity.ResultsDose-finding studies in orthotopic GBM6 identified single infusion of 2 μg Ser-T and 60 μg Depatux-M as safe and effective associated with extended survival prolongation (>300 days and 95 days, respectively). However, with serial infusions every 21 days, four Ser-T doses controlled tumor growth but was associated with lethal toxicity approximately 7 days after the final infusion. Limiting dosing to two infusions in GBM108 provided profound median survival extension of over 200 days. In contrast, four Depatux-M CED doses were well tolerated and significantly extended survival in both GBM6 (158 days) and GBM108 (310 days). In a toxicity analysis, Ser-T resulted in a profound loss in NeuN+ cells and markedly elevated GFAP staining, while Depatux-M was associated only with modest elevation in GFAP staining.ConclusionCED of Depatux-M is well tolerated and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, CED of Ser-T was associated with a much narrower therapeutic window.

BDTX-1535 Goes after Osimertinib Resistance.

According to a preclinical report, the investigational tyrosine kinase inhibitor BDTX-1535 may mitigate resistance to osimertinib, the standard of care for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. It could also potentially treat central nervous system metastases, having shown preclinical efficacy in glioblastoma.

Differential gene expression-based connectivity mapping identified novel drug candidate and improved Temozolomide efficacy for Glioblastoma

BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) has a devastating median survival of only one year. Treatment includes resection, radiation therapy, and temozolomide (TMZ); however, the latter increased median survival by only 2.5 months in the pivotal study. A desperate need remains to find an effective treatment.MethodsWe used the Connectivity Map (CMap) bioinformatic tool to identify candidates for repurposing based on GBM’s specific genetic profile. CMap identified histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors as top candidates. In addition, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) identified HDAC1 and HDAC2 as the most upregulated and HDAC11 as the most downregulated HDACs. We selected PCI-24781/abexinostat due to its specificity against HDAC1 and HDAC2, but not HDAC11, and blood-brain barrier permeability.ResultsWe tested PCI-24781 using in vitro human and mouse GBM syngeneic cell lines, an in vivo murine orthograft, and a genetically engineered mouse model for GBM (PEPG - PTENflox/+; EGFRvIII+; p16Flox/− & GFAP Cre +). PCI-24781 significantly inhibited tumor growth and downregulated DNA repair machinery (BRCA1, CHK1, RAD51, and O6-methylguanine-DNA- methyltransferase (MGMT)), increasing DNA double-strand breaks and causing apoptosis in the GBM cell lines, including an MGMT expressing cell line in vitro. Further, PCI-24781 decreased tumor burden in a PEPG GBM mouse model. Notably, TMZ + PCI increased survival in orthotopic murine models compared to TMZ + vorinostat, a pan-HDAC inhibitor that proved unsuccessful in clinical trials.ConclusionPCI-24781 is a novel GBM-signature specific HDAC inhibitor that works synergistically with TMZ to enhance TMZ efficacy and improve GBM survival. These promising MGMT-agnostic results warrant clinical evaluation.

Challenges and Prospects for Designer T and NK Cells in Glioblastoma Immunotherapy.

Simple SummaryDesigner T and NK cells are a modality within immunotherapy that manipulates receptor-ligand interactions to enhance cells of the immune system to destroy cancer more effectively. Patient’s own immune cells are isolated, genetically modified to improve responses against cancers cells, expanded, and subsequently reintroduced into the individual. Several clinical trials to investigate immunotherapy strategies that may garner lasting benefit even for cancer patients with glioblastoma (GBM), a deadly brain cancer with limited treatment options, are underway. Therapeutic potential for gene editing technologies in limiting rejection and adverse reactions to improve treatment responses in preclinical models is now translating into enduring efficacy in GBM patients.Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent, aggressive primary brain tumour with a dismal prognosis. Treatment at diagnosis has limited efficacy and there is no standardised treatment at recurrence. New, personalised treatment options are under investigation, although challenges persist for heterogenous tumours such as GBM. Gene editing technologies are a game changer, enabling design of novel molecular-immunological treatments to be used in combination with chemoradiation, to achieve long lasting survival benefits for patients. Here, we review the literature on how cutting-edge molecular gene editing technologies can be applied to known and emerging tumour-associated antigens to enhance chimeric antigen receptor T and NK cell therapies for GBM. A tight balance of limiting neurotoxicity, avoiding tumour antigen loss and therapy resistance, while simultaneously promoting long-term persistence of the adoptively transferred cells must be maintained to significantly improve patient survival. We discuss the opportunities and challenges posed by the brain contexture to the administration of the treatments and achieving sustained clinical responses.

P13.18 Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha exerts synergistic efficacy in glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite our understanding of the genetic changes that precipitate gliomagenesis, targeted therapy has failed in glioblastoma (GBM) with median survival not significantly improved over the past two decades. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations, including amplification and activating mutations, are among the most common genetic changes in GBM, occurring in more than half of cases. EGFR is located on Chr. 7, and Chr. 7 gain is one of the earliest events precipitating gliomagenesis. Various EGFR inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, and CAR-T cells have failed in GBM due to intrinsic heterogeneity and receptor tyrosine kinase bypass pathways that mediate therapeutic resistance. New targeted therapeutic approaches to leverage synergistic combinations are desperately needed to improve GBM prognosis. Using the TCGA and other GBM databases, we have previously demonstrated that the presence of PDGFRAamplification in patients with EGFR-amplified GBM carries significantly worse survival. EGFR and PDGFRA co-expression occur in more than one-third of GBM patients. The PDGFRA ligand PDGFA is also located on Chr. 7, and its expression is significantly increased with Chr. 7 gain and EGFR copy number increase. Therefore, Chr. 7 gain inherently leads to co-activation of both EGFR and PDGFRA signaling pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used models of patient-derived glioblastoma cells to test combined inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha in vitro. RESULTS Using patient-derived GBM models with Chr. 7 gain, we found that combined inhibition of both EGFR and PDGFRA using a variety of FDA-approved EGFR-targeted agents (Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Dacomitinib, Neratinib, and Osimertinib) and Crenolanib, respectively, leads to synergistic cytotoxicity in vitro. We found that inhibition of either EGFR or PDGFRA alone led to receptor cross-activation, and EGF and PDGF-AA-induced receptor tyrosine kinase activation was blocked by Neratinib and Crenolanib. Immunoprecipitation experiments and proximity ligation assays demonstrated that combined inhibition prevents EGFR and PDGFRA heterodimerization and pathways of therapeutic resistance. This combined inhibition led to decreased activation of downstream signaling pathways, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase. CONCLUSIONS We show that combined inhibition of EGFR and PDGFRA exerts synergistic cytotoxicity in GBM and prevents resistance pathways that emerge during single-agent targeted therapy against these receptor tyrosine kinases. These pathways are targetable with FDA-approved agents that could be used in patients with GBM with Chr. 7 gain.

Abstract 1300: Identification of efficacious treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) by applying computational drug sensitivity imputation to novel GBM avatars and GBM clinical datasets

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a debilitating disease associated with poor prognosis and a limited response to therapies. At present, patients receive chemotherapy with temozolomide, following radiation therapy and surgery; however, none of the treatments are curative, and clinical trials are recommended as the preferred option for eligible patients. Regrettably, only 3-5% of GBM patients survive 3 years or more. Therefore, it is imperative to develop efficacious therapies. To achieve this goal, we have developed a computation method that allows us to impute drug sensitivity when transcriptome data is available. We have applied this imputation method to several publicly available normal brain tissue, low grade glioma (LGG), and GBM patient datasets to identify compounds of interest. We also compared the leads from these patient/in vivo data analyses with those generated from previous imputations made using a novel GBM avatar model; this model was created by introducing different genetic driver mutations using CRISPR-Cas9 into human induced pluripotent stem cells, followed by differentiation to GBM-associated mutations containing neural progenitor cells (NPC) and animal engraftment to develop human adult GBM models. We applied the drug imputation to over 1200 human normal brain, LGG and GBM samples as well as 18 NPC, tumor sphere and engrafted GBM tumor avatar samples. For each sample, we imputed over 700 drug sensitivity scores. Our model was trained independently using one of two separate high throughput in vitro drug screening datasets (GDSC and CTRP). To identify drugs showing higher sensitivity in GBM than in normal tissues, we compared the imputed drug sensitivity for each compound between samples belonging to the precancerous or the non-high grade glioma state (represented by the normal tissue and LGG data) and samples representing the cancerous or high grade glioma state (GBM). We identified a number of compounds showing higher imputed sensitivity in samples belonging to the cancerous state when compared to those in the precancerous or LGG state. We were also able to cross check compounds of interest with our avatar data. Among them, some agents have been used in the clinic to treat GBM, supporting the validity of integration of our computational tool with novel ex vivo GBM avatars and GBM clinical data in the development of new therapeutic strategy for GBM. More importantly, we have identified other compounds with various mechanism of action that show higher efficacy in GBM and will be further evaluated with the goal to quickly translate into clinic. Therefore, we can successfully integrate ovel experimental and computational models to speed up drug discovery with the goal of finding new therapeutics for GBM. Citation Format: Danielle Maeser, Robert Gruener, Robert Galvin, Tomoyuki Koga, Frank B. Furnari, David Largaespada, Clark C. Chen, Stephanie R. Huang. Identification of efficacious treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) by applying computational drug sensitivity imputation to novel GBM avatars and GBM clinical datasets [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1300.

Suppression of mitochondrial ROS by prohibitin drives glioblastoma progression and therapeutic resistance

Low levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are crucial for maintaining cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their ability to resist therapy, but the ROS regulatory mechanisms in CSCs remains to be explored. Here, we discover that prohibitin (PHB) specifically regulates mitochondrial ROS production in glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) and facilitates GSC radiotherapeutic resistance. We find that PHB is upregulated in GSCs and is associated with malignant gliomas progression and poor prognosis. PHB binds to peroxiredoxin3 (PRDX3), a mitochondrion-specific peroxidase, and stabilizes PRDX3 protein through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Knockout of PHB dramatically elevates ROS levels, thereby inhibiting GSC self-renewal. Importantly, deletion or pharmacological inhibition of PHB potently slows tumor growth and sensitizes tumors to radiotherapy, thus providing significant survival benefits in GSC-derived orthotopic tumors and glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts. These results reveal a selective role of PHB in mitochondrial ROS regulation in GSCs and suggest that targeting PHB improves radiotherapeutic efficacy in glioblastoma.

Natural Compounds in Glioblastoma Therapy: Preclinical Insights, Mechanistic Pathways, and Outlook.

Simple SummaryGlioblastoma (GBM) is a tumor of the brain or spinal cord with poor clinical prognosis. Current interventions, such as chemotherapy and surgical tumor resection, are constrained by tumor invasion and cancer drug resistance. Dietary natural substances are therefore evaluated for their potential as agents in GBM treatment. Various substances found in fruits, vegetables, and other natural products restrict tumor growth and induce GBM cell death. These preclinical effects are promising but remain constrained by natural substances’ varying pharmacological properties. While many of the reviewed substances are available as over-the-counter supplements, their anti-GBM efficacy should be corroborated by clinical trials moving forward.Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive, often fatal astrocyte-derived tumor of the central nervous system. Conventional medical and surgical interventions have greatly improved survival rates; however, tumor heterogeneity, invasiveness, and chemotherapeutic resistance continue to pose clinical challenges. As such, dietary natural substances—an integral component of the lifestyle medicine approach to chronic diseases—are examined as potential chemotherapeutic agents. These heterogenous substances exert anti-GBM effects by upregulating apoptosis and autophagy, inducing cell cycle arrest, interfering with tumor metabolism, and inhibiting proliferation, neuroinflammation, chemoresistance, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Although these beneficial effects are promising, natural substances’ efficacy in GBM is constrained by their bioavailability and blood–brain barrier permeability; various chemical formulations are proposed to improve their pharmacological properties. Many of the reviewed substances are available as over-the-counter dietary supplements, underscoring their viability as lifestyle interventions. However, clinical trials remain necessary to substantiate the in vitro and in vivo properties of natural substances.

Sex Differences in Glioblastoma Immunotherapy Response.

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary malignant brain tumor, remains difficult to treat and shares phenotypes, including an aberrant immune response, with other neurological disorders. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying this pathological immune response remains a priority, particularly as standard of care for advanced cancers evolves to include immunotherapies, which have yet to show strong clinical efficacy in GBM. Epidemiological evidence supports a sex difference in GBM, with increased prevalence in males, and recent studies identified differences between males and females ranging from genetic aberrations to cellular programs. Sex differences have also been identified in immune response, and in this mini-review, we present these differences to highlight potential sex-specific cellular and molecular mechanisms that underly GBM growth and response to immunotherapies. These sex differences offer an opportunity to understand GBM pathogenesis and extend beyond GBM to other tumors and neurological disorders to inform the development of next-generation therapies.

Combination immunotherapy strategies for glioblastoma.

Despite recent advances in treatment for a number of cancers with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), immunotherapy has had limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). The recent multi-centered CheckMate 143 trial in first time recurrent GBM and the Checkmate 498 trial in newly diagnosed unmethylated GBM showed that antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) failed to improve overall survival in patients with GBM. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have explored combining ICB with several other therapies including additional ICB against alternative checkpoint molecules, activation of costimulatory checkpoint molecules such as 4-1BB, radiation-induced tumor cell lysis and immunogenic recruitment, local chemotherapy, neoadjuvant ICB therapy, and myeloid cell reactivation. We have reviewed the literature on ICB seminal to the progression of several preclinical studies and clinical trials in order to provide a compendium of the current state of combination immunotherapy for GBM. For ongoing clinical trials without associated publications, we searched clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing studies using the keywords, "GBM" and "glioblastoma", as well as names of checkpoint molecules. Recent trends from clinical trials demonstrate that despite a variety of different combination strategies involving ICB, GBM remains largely elusive to current immunotherapies. There is a discordance of survival outcomes between GBM pre-clinical models and clinical trials, likely due to the heterogeneity of GBM in patients as well as other adaptive immune mechanisms not otherwise represented in murine models. However, in clinical studies, neoadjuvant ICB in GBM was found to diversify the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire and increase chemokine mRNA transcripts when comparing pre- and post- surgical time points. Moreover, an increase in peripheral and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) clonotypes were also observed when comparing adjuvant and neoadjuvant cohorts. Despite the lack of clinical survival benefit, immune modulation was observed in multiple different combination strategies for GBM in both preclinical and clinical studies, indicating that ICB combination therapy results in a significant immunological impact on the tumor microenvironment.

Using viral vectors to deliver local immunotherapy to glioblastoma.

The treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) has not seen significant improvement in over a decade. Immunotherapies target the immune system against tumor cells and have seen success in various cancer types. However, the efficacy of immunotherapies in GBM thus far has been limited. Systemic immunotherapies also carry with them concerns surrounding systemic toxicities as well as penetration of the blood-brain barrier. These concerns may potentially limit their efficacy in GBM and preclude the use of combinatorial immunotherapy, which may be needed to overcome the severe multidimensional immune suppression seen in GBM patients. The use of viral vectors to deliver immunotherapies directly to tumor cells has the potential to improve immunotherapy delivery to the CNS, reduce systemic toxicities, and increase treatment efficacy. Indeed, preclinical studies investigating the delivery of immunomodulators to GBM using viral vectors have demonstrated significant promise. In this review, the authors discuss previous studies investigating the delivery of local immunotherapy using viral vectors. They also discuss the future of these treatments, including the reasoning behind immunomodulator and vector selection, patient safety, personalized therapies, and the need for combinatorial treatment.