Effects Of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise Research Articles

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise with Abdominal Strengthening Exercise in Improving Trunk Stability for Patients with Stroke

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise with Abdominal Strengthening Exercise in Improving Trunk Stability for Patients with Stroke

Comparison of the Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise According to the Presence or Absence of Gluteus Medius Muscle Weakness in Chronic Lower Back Pain Patients with Lumbar Instability

Comparison of the Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise According to the Presence or Absence of Gluteus Medius Muscle Weakness in Chronic Lower Back Pain Patients with Lumbar Instability

The effects of lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movements in non-specific low back pain (A randomized controlled trial).

This study aimed to investigate the added effect of jaw clenching on the efficacy of lumbar stabilization exercises to manage chronic non-specific low back pain. This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (SIPM&R) Karachi from April 2021 to April 2023. Eighty patients with chronic non-specific low back pain participated in this study. Forty patients each were randomly allocated to the lumbar stability exercise (LSE) group' and the lumbar stability exercise with teeth clenching (LSETC) group. Patients in both groups performed respective exercises twice weekly for 12 weeks. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU) were used to assess pain, disability, and muscle endurance respectively. Data were collected at the baseline, after six weeks and 12 weeks of intervention. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in pain, disability, and muscle endurance. Upon further stratification, participants aged 20-30 years in the LSETC group showed significantly higher scores than the LSE group for NPRS, RMDQ, and PBU after 12 weeks. Overall, the LSETC group showed relatively higher improvement in mean scores for NPRS, RMDQ, and PBU than the LSE group. Lumbar stabilization exercises with and without jaw movement are effective for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain. The addition of teeth clenching enhanced the effectiveness of lumbar stability exercises, especially in young adults. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04801212), Prospectively registered on March 16, 2021.

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises Using a Pilates Reformer on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises Using a Pilates Reformer on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

The Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on Pain, Muscle Morphology and Quality of Life in Women with Chronic Menstrual Back Pain

The Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on Pain, Muscle Morphology and Quality of Life in Women with Chronic Menstrual Back Pain

The Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises Using A Traction Force Sensor on The Flexibility of The Spine, Dynamic Balance, Pain Intensity, and ODI(Oswestry Disability Index) in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

The Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises Using A Traction Force Sensor on The Flexibility of The Spine, Dynamic Balance, Pain Intensity, and ODI(Oswestry Disability Index) in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises on Isokinetic Strength and Muscle Tension in Sedentary Men.

Lumbar stabilization exercises (LSE) lead to high levels of erector spinae muscle (ESM) activation, which has a positive effect on improving physical function. The purpose of this study is to identify factors explaining changes in muscle strength after 7 weeks of LSE and to evaluate changes in stiffness and contraction of the ESM. All participants (male: n = 42, age = 28.26 ± 10.97) were assessed for 60°/s isokinetic extensor muscle strength and tension using a tensiomyography (TMG) and isokinetic device before and after LSE. Maximum displacement (Dm) and average velocity up to 90% Dm (Vc 90) were significantly different before and after LSE. Additionally, participants' 60°/s isokinetic extensor strength was significantly higher after exercise. A regression analysis was conducted to test the explanatory power of the variables, and positive results were obtained in the increase in extensor strength before and after Vc 90 and LSE. Furthermore, statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. After LSE, the increase in 60°/s isokinetic extensor strength and ESM's Dm and Vc 90 can be interpreted as positive changes post-exercise in endurance muscles with a higher percentage of type I fibers. Our results can contribute to predicting the long-term exercise effect in sedentary workers and developing an individualized strategic exercise program.

To Compare the Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise and Conservative Treatment in Lowback Pain for Healthcare Professionals

Introduction: Lumbar stabilization exercise provides a greater support to spine and helps in preventing low back pain. Lumbar stabilization exercise includes pelvic tilting, Knee to chest position, lumbar rotation stretch, transverse abdominis tuck, hip bridging exercises. Aim: The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of lumbar stabilization exercises and conservative treatment in low back pain for health care professionals. Method: 30 subjects were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group A Consist of 15 subjects were given lumbar stabilization exercise with interferential therapy. Group B Consists of 15 subjects were given conservative treatment with interferential therapy. The outcome factor used is NPRS (Numerical pain rating scale) and Modified Oswestry low back pain disability Questionnaire. The collected data was tabulated &amp; analyzed using descriptive &amp; inferential statistics. Result: paired t-test revealed that the mean are statistically significant between pre-test and post test in lunbar stabilization group with p&lt;0.05 and the unpaired t-test conducted between group A and B resulted that there was a significant difference between the groups with the p value of 0.0001. Conclusion: This study concluded that lumbar stabilization exercises with interferential therapy (Group A) is more effective than conservative management with interferential therapy (Group B) in the management of low back pain among healthcare professionals.

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise with Kinesio Taping on Pain, Muscle Strength, and Oswestry Disability Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise with Kinesio Taping on Pain, Muscle Strength, and Oswestry Disability Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises on Stable versus Unstable Surface on Pain and Function in Mechanical Low Back Pain-an Evidence Based Study

Background: Low back pain is the most common complaint all over the world. Lumbar instability is an important causative factor for low back pain. Lumbar stabilization exercises are helpful in reducing and preventing its recurrence. Purpose: To study the evidences regarding effect of lumbar stabilization exercises on stable versus unstable surface on pain and function in mechanical low back pain. Methodology: The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. Evidences selected since year 2010-February 2020 from PubMed, Google Scholar, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Research Gate, Science Direct and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Key words used were: Lumbar stabilization exercise, Core stability exercise, Pain and Function. Analysis was done using 2 scales: PEDro scale and Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Scale. Total 202 articles were found, out of which 22 articles were relevant and from those 17 articles were included in the study and other articles were excluded as per eligibility criteria. Results: 11 studies were shown that core stability exercise is effective treatment for reducing pain and improving disability. (Level of evidence-1a,1b,2b). 2 studies were showed that motor control exercise was more effective than core stability exercise. (Level of evidence-1b). 4 studies shown that lumbar stabilization exercise performed on unstable surfaces showed significant improvement in back pain and disability (Level of evidence-1b, 2b). Conclusion: Lumbar stabilization exercise performed on unstable surface provide significant benefit in reducing pain and improving function in patients with mechanical low back pain. Keywords: Lumbar stabilization exercise, Core stability exercise, Pain and Function Low Back Pain.

Effects of lumbar stabilization exercise according to correct verbal instructions in pain and muscle strengthening of low back pain patient

Effects of lumbar stabilization exercise according to correct verbal instructions in pain and muscle strengthening of low back pain patient

코어안정화 운동이 요통이 있는 승마선수들의 승마운동 시 보법별 근활성도에 미치는 영향

이 연구는 요통이 있는 승마선수들을 대상으로 코어안정화 훈련을 시킨 후 승마운동 보법별 근활성도의 변화 차이를 알아보기 위해 실시되었다. 승마선수 14명을 코어안정화 운동군 (n=7)과 대조군 (n=7)으로 분류하여 실험을 진행하였다. 코어안정화 운동은 주 3회, 60분간, 8주간 실시하였다. 승마운동 시 보법별 근활성도는 좌속보와 구보 시 위팔두갈래근, 큰가슴근, 넓은등근, 척추세움근, 배곧은 근, 넙다리곧은근, 앞정강근, 바깥장딴지근에서 측정하였다. 코어안정화 운동 후 신체구성은 체질량지수가 시간에 따른 유의한 차이를 나타냈으며, 근육량은 시간과 집단에 따른 상호작용효과를 나타내었다(p<.05). 코어안정화 운동 후 좌속보 시 근활성도의 변화는 배곧은근에서 시간에 따른 차이의 경향을 나타내었으며 (p=.057), 시간과 집단에 따른 상호작용효과가 나타났다(p<.05). 척추세움근은 시간에 따른 유의한 차이가 나타났으며(p<.05), 바깥장딴지근은 시간과 집단에 따른 상호작용효과가 나타났다(p<.05). 코어 안정화 운동 후 속보 시 근활성도의 변화는 큰가슴근에 시간과 집단에 따른 상호작용효과가 유의한 차이를 나타났다(p<.05). 배곧은근은 집단 간에 유의한 차이가 나타났다(p<.05). 척추세움근은 시간에 따른 유의한 차이가 나타났으며(p<.05), 바깥장딴지근은 시간에 따른 유의한 효과가 나타났다(p<.05). 결론적으로 이 연구에서 요통이 있는 엘리트 승마선수들에게 코어 안정화 운동을 실시한 결과 코어 안정화 운동은 선수들의 요부 근활성도를 증가시키고 하지의 근 활성도를 조절할 수 있는데 도움이 된 것으로 생각된다. 따라서, 승마선수들의 경기시 부상예방과 경기력 증진을 위해 승마운동 외에도 선수들에게 추가적인 코어 안정화 운동이 필요하다는 것을 나타낸 결과로 사료된다.

The Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on the Physical Strength and Standing Posture Stability among Adolescents

The Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on the Physical Strength and Standing Posture Stability among Adolescents

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on the Strength, Range of Motion and Pain

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on the Strength, Range of Motion and Pain

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on the Strength, Range of Motion and Pain

Background: Few comparative studies have been conducted on strengthening the anterior and posterior muscles of the trunk via lumbar stabilization exercises.Objectives: To compare the effects of forward leaning exercise and supine bridging exercise in stability exercise.Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial (single blind).Methods: Thirty subjects with spondylolisthesis were participated in this study. Fifteen subjects performed the bridging exercises and fifteen subjects performed the forward leaning exercises. Each exercise was held for ten seconds per repetition, and four repetitions were considered one sub-session. A total of four sub-sessions were performed in one full exercise session. The full exercise session required thirty minutes, including rest time. Trunk strength and range of motion and Oswestry disability index were measured.Results: Two weeks later, trunk flexion strength and trunk extension range of motion were significantly increased in the forward leaning exercise group than in the supine bridging group, trunk extension strength were significantly increased in the supine bridging exercise group than in the forward leaning group. After two weeks, the pain score was significantly lower in the forward leaning exercise group than in the supine bridging group.Conclusion: This study has shown that stabilization exercises are effective in increasing range of motion and strength in spondylolisthesis subjects. It was especially confirmed that the method of strengthening the anterior muscles of the trunk is more effective than the standard stabilization exercise method.

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on Static and Dynamic Balancing and Gait of Stroke Patients

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on Static and Dynamic Balancing and Gait of Stroke Patients

Effect of lumbar stabilization exercises and thoracic mobilization with strengthening exercises on pain level, thoracic kyphosis, and functional disability in chronic low back pain.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of lumbar stabilization exercise and thoracic mobilization with strengthening exercise on pain level, thoracic kyphosis, and functional disability in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). Thirty patients with CLBP were recruited based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly allocated into two groups i.e., Group A (n=15) and B (n=15). Group A has received lumbar stabilization exercise and thoracic mobilization with strengthening exercises and Group B received only lumbar stabilization exercises, three sessions per week for 4weeks both the groups. The conventional moist hot pack and interferential therapy was given to both the groups before the administration of exercise. Pre- and post-treatment pain level, Thoracic kyphosis, and functional disability were taken and statistical analysis was done. The result of this study showed significant improvement from pre-intervention to post-intervention on pain level, thoracic kyphosis, and functional disability for both the groups i.e., Group A and group B but Group A showed greater changes in Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), Kyphotic index, and Oswestry disability index (ODI), than Group B. The 4week of therapeutic intervention including lumbar stabilization exercise with thoracic mobilization and strengthening exercise showed significantly reduction of the thoracic kyphosis, pain level and functional disability in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

The effects of lumbar stabilization exercise on transversus abdominis muscle activation capacity and function in low back pain patients

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of lumbar stabilization exercises on pain intensity, transversus abdominis (TrA) activation capacity, functional disability, and TrA thickness in patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: The subjects of this study were 30 LB P patients. The experimental group performed diverse lumbar stabilization exercises (LSE) in different postures, and the control group conducted an ordinary trunk muscle strengthening exercise (TSE). All interventions were conducted 3 times per week for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Significant differences between LSE and TSE groups were shown in the pain intensity, TrA activation capacity, and functional disability after the intervention (p< 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between LSE and TSE groups in TrA thickness. CONCLUSION: This study provides clinical evidence that LSE for LBP patients is more effective than TSE in improving pain intensity, functional disability, and TrA activation capacity.

Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on Motor Neuron Excitability and Pain in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) causes neurological symptoms by compression of the dura mater and nerve roots. Due to the changed in proprioception inputs that can result in abnormal postural pattern, delayed reaction time, and changed in deep tendon reflex. Objective: To investigate the effects of lumbar stabilization exercises on motor neuron excitability and neurological symptoms in patients with LDH. Design: Randomized Controlled Trial (single blind) Methods: Thirty patients with LDH were recruited; they were randomly divided into the balance center stabilization resistance exercise group (n=15) and the Nordic walking group (n=15). Each group underwent their corresponding 20-minute intervention once a day, four times a week, for four weeks. Participants’ motor neuron excitability and low back pain were assessed before and after the four-week intervention. Results: There were significant differences in all variables within each group (p<.05). There were significant differences between the experimental and control groups in the changes of upper motor neuron excitability and pain (p<.05), but not in the changes of lower motor neuron excitability and Korean Oswestry Disability Index. Conclusion: Lumbar stabilization exercises utilizing concurrent contraction of deep and superficial muscles improved low back function in patients with LDH by lowering upper motor neuron excitability than compared to exercises actively moving the limbs. Lumbar stabilization exercises without pain have a positive impact on improving motor neuron excitability.

THE EFFECTS OF LUMBAR STABILIZATION EXERCISES ON A SWISS BALL IN PATIENTS WITH MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN

Background: Mechanical low back pain is one of the most common causes of discomfort amongst people all over. There are various exercises to reduce low back pain. Swiss ball exercises are one of the dynamic exercises which increase muscle strength, endurance, balance, and flexibility of the trunk while the individual leans on a swiss ball. Therefore the purpose of this study was to check the effects of lumbar stabilization exercises on a swiss ball in patients with mechanical low back pain. Methods: Forty participants out of which 30 were females and 10 were males who were suffering from mechanical low back pain between the age group of 20 to 60 years were included. They were divided into two groups, with each group having 20 subjects. One group was taught floor exercises, and the other was taught swiss ball exercises for two weeks thrice a week,i.e., six days. The pain and disability were checked with the Numeric Rating Scale, and Roland Morris Questionnaire scores respectively pre and post-intervention. Results: On comparison of the difference between both the groups the mean difference in the NRS and RMQ scores for floor group was one ± 1 and 0.75 ± 1.6(p<0.05). The mean difference in the NRS and RMQ scores for swiss ball group was 2.6 ± 0.5 and 3.7 ± 1.26(p<0.05). Conclusion: We can conclude that lumbar stabilization exercises on a swiss ball are effective in reducing mechanical low back pain compared to exercises done on the static surface.