Effects Of Cover Crops Research Articles

Cover crop rotation suppresses root-knot nematode infection by shaping soil microbiota.

Cover crop integration into grain crop rotations is a promising strategy for mitigating nematode-induced diseases in agriculture. However, the precise mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain elusive. Here, we first assessed the impact of five commonly used cover crops on the suppression of rice root-knot nematodes (RKNs). We then chose ryegrass as a model to explore the mechanistic basis of the suppression effect. Contrary to expectations, while ryegrass rotation significantly enhances soil fertility, this increased fertility has minimal impact on RKN suppression. Furthermore, neither integrated ryegrass residues nor root exudates exhibit direct toxicity towards RKNs. We demonstrated that ryegrass rotation primarily suppresses RKNs by enriching beneficial soil microbiota. By complementing with isolated bacteria strains, we further demonstrated that ryegrass-enriched bacteria not only directly reduce RKN infectivity and preference, but also activate plant immunity via the OsLRR-RLK-MAPK-WRKY-JA cascade, thereby diminishing RKN infection. Our study highlights the crucial role of soil microbiota in plant-nematode interactions, challenging conventional views on the direct effects of cover crops in nematode suppression. It offers a mechanistic understanding of the regulation potential and action modes of cover crops in mitigating nematode diseases, providing valuable insights for sustainable agriculture.

Agricultural practices influence soil microbiome assembly and interactions at different depths identified by machine learning

Agricultural practices affect soil microbes which are critical to soil health and sustainable agriculture. To understand prokaryotic and fungal assembly under agricultural practices, we use machine learning-based methods. We show that fertility source is the most pronounced factor for microbial assembly especially for fungi, and its effect decreases with soil depths. Fertility source also shapes microbial co-occurrence patterns revealed by machine learning, leading to fungi-dominated modules sensitive to fertility down to 30 cm depth. Tillage affects soil microbiomes at 0-20 cm depth, enhancing dispersal and stochastic processes but potentially jeopardizing microbial interactions. Cover crop effects are less pronounced and lack depth-dependent patterns. Machine learning reveals that the impact of agricultural practices on microbial communities is multifaceted and highlights the role of fertility source over the soil depth. Machine learning overcomes the linear limitations of traditional methods and offers enhanced insights into the mechanisms underlying microbial assembly and distributions in agriculture soils.

Reconciling plant and microbial ecological strategies to elucidate cover crop effects on soil carbon and nitrogen cycling

Abstract Plant economics, the way plants allocate and utilize resources, affect multiple soil processes through interactions with root and associated microbial communities. However, the interplay between plant economics and microbial ecological strategies remains poorly understood, which is crucial for integrated manipulation of plant‐ and microbe‐mediated functions in mitigating climate change and sustaining soil health. We used a field experiment with 11 cover crop species grown monocultures in the same base soil to test whether microbial ecological strategies are associated with plant economic strategies and if their interactions are linked to soil functions. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on root and leaf traits to identify the loadings of cover crop species on the plant trait space. Metagenomic analysis of rhizosphere microbial communities was conducted to infer their ecological strategies based on genetically encoded community‐aggregated traits. We found a synchronous relationship between the conservation gradient of plant economic strategies and the trade‐offs in microbial ecological strategies. Conservative plant strategists, such as Lolium multiflorum, Triticum turgidum and Brassica juncea, fostered microbial communities characterized by high growth yield potentials (Y‐strategies). This included increased microbial carbon fixation pathways, citrate cycle, ribosome and valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis. As a result, microbial metabolic efficiency improved, shown by higher microbial biomass carbon content and a lower metabolic quotient (qCO2), led to enhanced soil organic carbon accumulation. In comparison, acquisitive plants like Astragalus sinicus, Vicia villosa, Trifolium incarnatum and Medicago sativa stimulated microbial resource‐acquisition strategies (A‐strategies). This included enhanced bacterial chemotaxis, secretion systems, biotin metabolism and cell motility pathways, which in turn increased soil exoenzyme activity and accelerated soil nitrogen mineralization. Consequently, these species enhanced soil nitrogen availability and had substantial feedbacks on subsequent main crop productivity. Synthesis. This study demonstrates how plant economic strategies influence the balance between different microbial ecological strategies, specifically the trade‐offs in Y‐ and A‐strategies. These interactions exert control over carbon and nitrogen dynamics in the soil ecosystem. The findings provide insights for implementing nature‐based solutions to improve agroecosystem management practices.

Triple impact: Biochar, no-tillage, and cover crops for soil carbon enhancement and climate resilience in soybean farming

With the dissemination of conservation agriculture, no-tillage (NT) and cover crops have widely been adopted globally. However, their effects on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are controversial. Biochar is posited to mitigate climate change by increasing carbon (C) sequestration and decreasing GHG emission in soil. To investigate the comprehensive effect of NT, cover crops, and biochar on soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and net global warming potential (GWP), a split-split-plot experiment was conducted. The experiment involved various combinations of two tillage methods (NT; Moldboard plowing, MP), two cover crop treatments (Fallow, FA; Rye, RY), and two biochar treatments (with biochar application, WB; no biochar application, NB). NT and RY demonstrated a trend of increasing N2O emission, while WB tended to reduce the N2O emission in NT plots. NT–RY–WB increased the SOC stock (0–30 cm) by 23.2% in 2020 and 30.2% in 2021 compared with MP–FA–NB, indicating that this combination promoted C sequestration. Due to the heightened SOC stock, the net carbon dioxide (CO2) retention effectively compensated the GWP arising from non-CO2 emissions. Consequently, the triple combination of NT, RY and WB positively contributed to a decreased net GWP in the soybean field (−1231 kg CO2 equivalent ha−1 year−1 in 2020 and −2767 kg CO2 equivalent ha−1 year−1 in 2021). These findings highlight the considerable potential of the combined NT–RY–WB for SOC sequestration and net GWP decrease, positioning it as an environmentally beneficial agricultural system for mitigating climate change in Asia’s long-term food production.

The Effect of Cover Crops Planted as Green Manure Pure and Mixed on Some Soil Properties and Weed Control in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

The Effect of Cover Crops Planted as Green Manure Pure and Mixed on Some Soil Properties and Weed Control in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Cover crop alters rhizosphere sediments to recruit plant growth-promoting microorganisms, enhancing peanut production

Peanuts are typically grown in continuous monoculture in China, leading to continuous cropping obstacles and reduced yields. Cover cropping is emerging as a pivotal strategy for enhancing soil quality and promoting sustainable agriculture. However, the effects of cover crops on the rhizosphere environment, and how they benefit subsequent crops, are not well understood. We hypothesize that planting cover crop ryegrass during the winter fallow period could alter peanut rhizosphere sediments, recruit plant growth-promoting microorganisms, and ultimately enhance peanut production. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the impact of ryegrass cover cropping on rhizosphere sediments and peanut yield. Rhizosphere soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, pH, and soil enzymes, including sucrase, urease, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, and β-glucosidase, were analyzed, along with metabolomics, 16S rRNA, and fungal ITS sequence analyses, under traditional planting management (TP) and long-term cover crop (CC) treatments. The results showed that CC treatment significantly increased rhizosphere pH, enhanced soil organic carbon and total nitrogen levels, and elevated soil enzyme activities compared to TP treatment. Metabolomic analysis revealed that CC treatment upregulated compounds such as D-pinitol, palmitoleic acid, fructose, sorbitol, and sucrose, while downregulated compounds including benzoic acid, dodecanoic acid, and carbamic acid. This alteration in metabolite composition influenced the recruitment and function of the microbial community. Specifically, CC treatment markedly enhanced the abundance of growth-promoting microbes such as Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas, Lysobacter, Bradyrhizobium, and Mortierell etc., which are involved in important functions such as chemoheterotrophy, nitrate reduction, and plant saprotroph. Simultaneously, there was a decrease in pathogenic microorganisms, such as Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium oxysporum. Moreover, CC treatment positively influenced peanut root growth, resulting in longer roots and ultimately increase pod yield by 21.15 % compared to traditional winter fallow practices. These findings underscore the potential of cover cropping with ryegrass to improve rhizosphere microecosystem components, and ultimately enhance peanut productivity, providing valuable insights for sustainable agricultural practices.

N supply and yield of sugar beet after cover cropping: effects of cover crop species and management

Despite long-time practice, the effect of cover crop (CC) cultivation on N supply and yield of subsequent sugar beet (SB) is not clear for the temperate climate of Central Europe. To elucidate, four field trials with oil radish, spring vetch, saia oat, and winter rye CCs were conducted on typical loessial soil in Germany. Mineral fertilizer N dose was varied as second factor: zero (N0) and optimum dose (Nopt). Biomass characteristics before winter, soil mineral nitrogen content in spring (SMN), and sugar yield and total plant N content of SB were measured. The CC N effect (Neff), calculated as the difference in SB N uptake after CC minus bare fallow, was computed for the periods sowing-summer (July/August) and summer-harvest. On average, sugar yield was decreased after rye and increased after vetch CC compared to bare fallow which was more pronounced under N0 than Nopt. In the period sowing-summer, characterized by a high SB N demand, Neff was close to 0 kg N ha–1 after rye and up to +30 kg N ha–1 after vetch. In contrast, Neff in summer-harvest was negative, amounting up to –80 kg N ha–1 after radish and rye. Regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between Neff in the period sowing-summer and the sugar yield difference between the cover crop treatments and bare fallow (R2 = 0.29). A multiple regression analysis (R2 = 0.68) indicated that high CC biomass combined with a large negative spring SMN difference between CC treatment and fallow caused a large yield penalty, which can be compensated for by elevated N fertilization. Moreover, CC management ensuring either a limited CC biomass or low SMN difference of CCs compared to fallow by e.g., later sowing, less vital CC species or early CC termination, will likely secure higher SB yield after CCs than fallow.

Winter cover crops and irrigation alter soil microbial community composition in an arid cropping system

Cover cropping is a well-established strategy to improve soil health, especially in arid and semi-arid agricultural systems. Benefits to soil health are often mediated via effects of cover crops on soil microbial community structure, function and diversity, crucial for regulating soil biogeochemical cycles, eventually promoting agricultural sustainability. However, limited water availability is a major constraint for both cover crop growth and soil microbial activity. This study sought to characterize and elucidate the shifts in soil microbial community structure in response to different cover crops and differential irrigation treatments using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiling in southern New Mexico. We tested five cover crop treatments: Pisum sativum (Australian winter pea), Hordeum vulgare cv. Stockford (barley), Brassica juncea cv. Caliente 199 (brown mustard), a three-way mix, and a fallow control — in combination with irrigation treatments of one, two, or three irrigation applications — in a split-plot design over two years. Zea mays (sweet corn) was grown as the summer cash crop. We collected soil samples just after cover crop planting in the fall of 2018, following second year cover crop termination but during Z. mays growth in June 2020, and after the second season of Z. mays growth in October 2020. Differential irrigation treatments did not lead to consistent patterns of change under any cover crop or irrigation treatment. However, PLFA parameters in cover cropped compared to winter fallow plots tended to decrease under one and three irrigations but increased with two irrigations. Changes were more common for bacterial than for fungal PLFA biomarkers, and more common in B. juncea and H. vulgare cover crops than in P. sativa or the mix. It is important to note that, while cover crop effects were inconsistent, cover cropping did lead to some shifts in PLFA biomarkers, even in the short two-year period of cover cropping.

Assessing and Quantifying the Carbon, Nitrogen, and Enzyme Dynamics Effects of Inter-row Cover Cropping on Soils and Apple Tree Development in Orchards

Cover crops between rows in orchards can improve the development of soil resources and increase agricultural productivity. However, there have been few reports of cover crops that can act as a “green manure” in apple orchards across arid and semiarid zones. This study investigated the effects of planting interrow vegetation on soil properties and apple tree performance during a 32-month experiment. There were six treatments: clean cultivation as a control; natural grass planting; planting with ryegrass; planting with alfalfa; planting with tall fescue; and planting with villous wild pea cover crops. The treatments primarily affected the 0- to 20-cm surface soil layer. Soil carbon, nitrogen, and enzyme levels initially decreased (during the first 12–24 months); then, they increased (24–32 months). The cover crops significantly increased nutrient contents (soluble organic carbon, microbial carbon and nitrogen, alkaline dissolved nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and ammonium nitrogen) in the 0- to 20-cm soil layer by more than 19.6% and increased the related enzyme activities by more than 25.2%. The alfalfa and wild pea alleys had a stronger effect on the soil environment than the control, natural grass, ryegrass, and tall fescue alley treatments; however, after 32 months, the alfalfa treatment inhibited fruit tree growth and development. This was unexpected because alfalfa seemed to have a positive effect on soil fertility characteristics. Under local ecological conditions, villous wild pea had the greatest effect on apple orchard productivity and significantly increased short branching by 15.9%, fruit weight per fruit by 12.6%, yield per plant by 8.6%, and soluble sugar content by 10.5% compared with clean cultivation. The correlation analysis showed that there were significant or highly significant positive correlations between fruit tree performance and soil carbon, nitrogen, and enzyme activity levels as the soil layer depth increased. Therefore, under local ecological conditions, cover crops have a greater effect on orchard surface soil fertility than on deeper soils, and intercropping with villous wild pea potentially produces the greatest improvement in apple orchard productivity.

Nitrous oxide fluxes during a winter cover crop season in a Mississippi corn cropping system

Agroecosystems are the largest source of anthropogenic N2O fluxes. While cover crops (CC) offer benefits for soil health, their impacts on greenhouse gas fluxes are inconsistent. In the southeastern US, where intensive agriculture and low CC adoption are prevalent, few studies have investigated CC impact on soil N2O fluxes. Our study explored the effects of CC species and management practices on soil N2O fluxes during the winter CC growing season in Mississippi, which was conducted in a non-tilled corn cropping system with seven CC treatments. We measured in situ soil N2O fluxes, along with soil moisture and temperature, throughout the CC growing season from 2022 to 2023. Surface soil samples were also collected to analyze soil mineral nitrogen (N) content and enzyme activity. Over the study period (a total of 188 days), cumulative N2O fluxes were 0.50–1.03 ​kg N2O–N ha−1, with the lowest values from the annually-rotated Elbon rye treatment and the highest from the annually-rotated Austrian winter pea. Our results show that both CC treatments and sampling time significantly affected soil N2O fluxes. There was a strong positive correlation (r ​= ​0.34, p ​< ​0.05) between N2O fluxes and NO3–N content, which was lowest under continuous rye and rotated-rye treatments (0.31 and 0.34 ​mg ​kg−1 ). The results suggest that Elbon rye effectively reduced soil N2O fluxes during this period by lowering the soil NO3–N content, the primary substrate for denitrification. This study is one of the few studies to examine the impacts of cover crops on soil N2O fluxes in cropping systems in the southeastern US, offering insights into the cover crop effects on soil N2O fluxes during their growing season.

How a Long-Term Cover Crop Cultivation Impacts Soil Phosphorus Availability in a No-Tillage System?

The growth of cover crops can contribute to the increase in phosphorus content at depth by root decomposition. The aim of this work was to verify the effect of cover crops on soil phosphorus availability and use by successive plants, and the accumulation of soil P in a no-tillage system conducted for 14 years. This research was carried out during the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 crop seasons, whose treatments have been installed and maintained since 2003. The experimental design was a randomized block design, and the plots consisted of spring crops: pearl millet, forage sorghum, sunn hemp, and additionally, a fallow/chiseling area. The evaluation of available P was determined by P fractionation. In general, in the two years of evaluation, the accumulation of P in the shoot dry matter was higher in sunn hemp growth, on average 25% higher than pearl millet in 2016 and 40% higher than sorghum in 2017. The highest contents of labile inorganic P were in the sorghum-soybean and fallow/chiseling-soybean successions, with values higher than 50 mg kg-1 of P in the 0-0.1 m soil layer. However, in the other layers analyzed, the cover crops obtained higher availability of labile inorganic P. The systems using cover crops recovered 100% of the P fertilized in soybean.

Effect of cover crops on the suppressiveness of root rot and on the agronomic performance of cassava

Effect of cover crops on the suppressiveness of root rot and on the agronomic performance of cassava

Cover Crop Effects on Surface Runoff and Subsurface Flow in Rainfed Hillslope Farming and Connections to Water Quality

Abstract: Surface runoff and subsurface flow patterns were monitored in hillside runoff plots in almond and olive orchards with soils covered with spontaneous plants over two hydrological years. The experimental runoff plots were located on the south flank of the Sierra Nevada (Lanjarón, SE Spain) at 580 m a.s.l. with an area of 40 m2 (10 m × 4 m). The surface and subsurface discharge were collected and measured at different soil depths (0, 5, 10, 25, and 50 cm), and the dissolved nutrient concentrations (NO3–N, NH4–N, PO4–P, and K) were determined. According to the findings, the subsurface flow pathways drained most of the rainfall water compared with surface runoff, which was affected by plant cover. The influence of rainfall intensity (I30) on surface runoff was more meaningful than that on subsurface flow. Throughout the monitoring period, the runoff coefficients at soil depths of 0, 5, 10, 25, and 50 cm averaged 0.04, 0.11, 0.14, 0.17, and 0.18, respectively. Subsurface flow was one of the dominant pathways for N and K loss, whereas P loss mainly occurred via surface runoff. Moreover, the concentrations in subsurface flow were higher than the recommended level for standard water quality for NO3–N, NH4–N, and PO4–P. Subsurface flow was the main route of dissolved nutrient delivery, making these nutrients available to the root systems of trees, where nutrient uptake is more likely to occur. Thus, by lessening surface runoff and encouraging surface vegetation coverage to facilitate the recycling of nutrients and buffer the rainfall’s impact on the soil surface, nutrient loss control can be achieved.

Soil mineral nitrogen and winter wheat nitrogen productivity influenced by summer cover crop and nitrogen fertilization

Cover crops and nitrogen (N) fertilization may affect soil mineral N, N uptake, and N productivity (grain yield per unit plant available N) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). We evaluated the effect of summer cover crops and N fertilization rates on soil mineral N and winter wheat grain yield, N uptake, and N productivity in the Loess Plateau of China. We measured cover crop aboveground biomass N, soil mineral N (0-20 cm), and winter wheat yield, N uptake, and N productivity for four seasons from 2017-2018 to 2020-2021. Cover crops were soybean (Glycine max L., SB), sudangrass (Sorghum sudanense [Piper] Stapf, SG], soybean and sudangrass mixture (SS), and no cover crop (CK) and N fertilization rates were 0, 60, and 120 kg N ha−1 applied to wheat. The SB increased cover crop biomass N and soil mineral N by 15 to 65%, but SS increased winter wheat yield, protein concentration, and N uptake by 25 to 55% compared to SG and CK at most N fertilization rates and years. Nitrogen fertilization rate had a variable effect on cover crop and wheat parameters. Wheat N productivity was 55 to 85% greater with CK than cover crops, but decreased with increased N fertilization rates. The N fertilizer equivalence of cover crops for wheat yield and N uptake ranged from 31 kg N ha−1 for SG to 150 kg N ha−1 for SS. Overall, SS with 60 kg N ha−1 can sustain winter wheat N uptake and N productivity compared to SG or CK with or without N fertilization.

Interactive Effect of Cover Crop, Irrigation Regime, and Crop Phenology on Thrips Population Dynamics and Plant Growth Parameters in Upland Cotton

Interactive Effect of Cover Crop, Irrigation Regime, and Crop Phenology on Thrips Population Dynamics and Plant Growth Parameters in Upland Cotton

Impact of agroecological practices on Phytoseiidae communities in a vineyard of South of France: effect of covercrops and agroforestry.

Viticulture is characterized by substantial pesticide applications, impacting natural enemies. New pest control strategies and management of plant diversity into agrosystems acting as reservoirs of natural enemies are assumed to limit pesticide use. Various studies support this hypothesis but gaps exist on the effect of diversification on Phytoseiidae mites, generalist predators reported as prevalent and efficient natural enemies in vineyards. This study focuses on the effect of cover crop management (no cover crop, spontaneous cover crops with or without agroforestry) and grape variety (resistant cv. Artaban and cv. Syrah) on predatory mites and prey communities, in a newly planted experimental vineyard in South-East France. Samplings were carried out three times a year on vine, cover crops, and co-planted trees. Phytoseiidae, Tydeiidae, Eriophyidae mites and thrips were characterized. Nine Phytoseiidae species were identified on vine, the main ones being Kampimodromus aberrans, Typhlodromus exhilaratus, Phytoseius finitimus and Euseius gallicus. Kampimodromus aberrans was prevalent on the cv. Syrah, highlighting a strong effect of variety. The low unexpected effect of system management observed outcome could be due to several factors, such as the experimental plot size or the influence of vine stress on Phytoseiidae communities in vines with cover crops. All phytoseiid species present on vine were identifed at least once on cover crops and co-planted trees, suggesting their potential role as reservoirs. Further studies should be performed investigating the evolution of communities in this newly-planted experimental system, as well as potential differences in trophic network interactions.

Influence of cover crops on soil aggregate stability, size distribution and related factors in a no-till field

Soil aggregation plays an essential role in maintaining soil structure. A three-year field experiment was undertaken to explore the effects of cover crops on soil aggregate stability indices (mean weight diameter, water-stable aggregates greater than 0.25 mm, and soil erodibility factor), size distribution and their correlations with nine soil physical and chemical properties (soil bulk density, pH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, C/N, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, and cation exchange capacity) at 0–5 and 5–10 cm depths in a Marietta silt loam soil in a no-till field, Northeastern Mississippi. The cover crop treatments included elbon rye (Secale cereale L.), daikon radish (Raphanus sativus ssp. acanthiformis), Austrian winter field peas (Lathyrus hirsutus), and their mixture. The samples were wet-sieved to five size classes of aggregates (> 2, 2–1, 1–0.5, 0.5–0.25, and < 0.25 mm). Results showed that the < 0.25 mm aggregates dominated (50.95–78.02 %) soil aggregate size distribution at 0–5 and 5–10 cm depths. The rye plot soil displayed the greatest values for mean weight diameter (0.58 mm) in the two soil depths. Soil water-stable aggregates greater than 0.25 mm value under peas was significantly higher by 68.61 % compared to the no cover crop treatment at 0–5 cm depth, while soil erodibility factor did not change significantly. Mean weight diameter, water-stable aggregates greater than 0.25 mm, soil erodibility factor, 1–0.5 mm aggregates, and < 0.25 mm aggregates were significantly correlated with soil organic carbon, pH, bulk density, phosphorus, and potassium. The dominant factors driving changes in three aggregate stability indices and size fractions (excluding 2–1 mm aggregates) were bulk density and pH. Furthermore, high pH restricted soil aggregate stability and size distribution. This study demonstrated the positive impact of cover crops, specifically peas and rye, on soil aggregate stability and size distribution. This study will provide valuable information for future research on soil stabilization in crop production management systems.

Integrating Cover Crops into Soybean Systems in the Southern Great Plains: Impacts on Yield and Yield Components

The implementation of cover crops in crop rotation is a suggested soil health practice. As cover crops are not harvested and sold, they do not directly provide monetary gain to producers. Therefore, it is imperative that planting cover crops does not negatively affect the subsequent cash crop. However, there is no overall consensus in the literature regarding the effects of cover crops on cash crop yield. To better understand the effects of cover crops on soybean growth and yield in Oklahoma soybean systems, trials were conducted in Bixby, OK, in 2019 and Perkins, OK, in 2019, 2020, and 2021. The objectives of these trials were to (1) determine how different cover crop mixes affect soybean growth parameters and (2) determine if cover crops significantly influence soybean seed yield. Treatments within the trials included six cover crops and a fallow treatment. Soybeans were planted after the termination of the cover crops. Yield and growth parameter data were collected after harvest. No significant differences or consistent trends were detected in the yield among treatments. While cover crops had a significant impact on the number of three- and four-bean pods, no other differences in the growth parameters existed, and they never translated into significant yield differences. Based on our data, cover crops would not benefit the overall cash crop production in the continuous cover crop soybean system in Oklahoma. However, the fact that cover crops did not consistently or significantly reduce soybean yield allows growers to explore other benefits, such as weed management or soil health improvement.

Effects of cover crops and nitrogen fertilizer on greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential in a potato cropping system

The study was conducted to investigate the effects of cover crops and different nitrogen levels on greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential in a potato production system during the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 growing seasons at the Agricultural Research Farm of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. The experiment was arranged as a split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main factor was cover crop including hairy vetch, rye, mixed (rye + hairy vetch), and control (no cover crop), and the sub factor was nitrogen fertilizer (as urea) at four levels consisted of 0 (control), 33, 66 and 100 % of the recommended nitrogen fertilizer based on the soil test. Results showed that the use of cover crops as green manures increased net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) and the highest NECB was observed in the mixed treatment (rye + hairy vetch) along with the 66 % of nitrogen fertilizer. The mixed cover crops (hairy vetch + rye) along with the 100 % of nitrogen fertilizer showed higher CO2 emission and, while hairy vetch along with the 100 % of nitrogen fertilizer had higher emissions of N2O and CH4 during the potato growing season. It can be concluded that the use of cover crops as green manures before the planting of potato can notably increase greenhouse gas emissions and the net global warming.

Effects of Interseeding Cover Crops into Corn and Soybean on Biomass Production, Grain Yields and Ecosystem Services: A Review

Effects of Interseeding Cover Crops into Corn and Soybean on Biomass Production, Grain Yields and Ecosystem Services: A Review