The Ionising Radiations Advisory Committee (IRAC) held itsfirst open meeting on 10 October 2001 in response to a request from the Health and Safety Commission (HSC) that all its advisory committees should follow the Commission's example and hold such meetings. Some of the other advisory committees have already held open meetings and others are planning to do so shortly.The aim of the meeting was to enable members of the public to meet IRAC members and to find out more about the Committee - how it worked and the type of issues it dealt with.The first two sessions were devoted to short presentations describing IRAC's work and influences, now and in the future, on radiation protection generally. The third session was a discussion forum. The agenda for the meeting and the presentations are posted on the web at: www.hse.gov.uk/foi/iracopen.htm.Each session of presentations was followed by questions of clarification and the third session of the meeting comprised an open forum. Many of the questions raised were not directly relevant to IRAC but, nevertheless, members provided brief responses and referred questions on to others as appropriate. One question had been notified in advance, asking whether members of IRAC agreed that it is now (regrettably) reasonably foreseeable that a loss of containment of radioactive material may occur at a nuclear facility as a result of impact by an aeroplane or by other hostile acts, and that this should be made clear in published guidance on REPPIR. This question was not within IRAC's remit. The Chairman of the Nuclear Safety Advisory Committee offered to take the question to the Committee's next meeting.Issues discussed included:Concerns that exposure to ionising radiation at low levels is more dangerous than is currently reflected in risk estimates. The European Parliament has adopted a resolution calling on the main international bodies, including the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the European Commission, to re-examine the risk model.How to communicate relative risk to the public, to put exposure to radiation in context.Whether there are different thresholds for different types of exposure, which was agreed to be a complicated issue.The new use of x-ray units at docks to screen vehicles for illegal immigrants. This had been the subject of a Home Office consultation exercise, see: www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk.Evaluation of the impact of radiation protection legislation, which provisions had had greatest effect and how areas still needing attention, such as industrial radiography, were being tackled.The perceived complexity of the system for obtaining HSE recognition for RPA bodies. The comments received during the review of the HSE Statement on radiation protection advisers, and HSE's proposed response, would be discussed by an advisory focus group - all the papers for this group are on the Society for Radiological Protection's web-site: www.srp-uk.org.The need for a database showing where to apply for authorisations in other European Union countries.
Read full abstract