Effect Of Cochlear Implantation Research Articles

Subjective and functional outcome measures to evaluate performance of pediatric cochlear implant

BackgroundThe majority of research on the effects of cochlear implants has been on clinical evaluations of efficacy (hearing and speech skills and auditory thresholds). But it is unclear how much clinical efficacy metrics (speech, hearing, and language tests) actually demonstrate how beneficial cochlear implants (CI) are in everyday circumstances. In this study, we aim to assess the performance of a child’s current CI with both subjective and functional outcomes measures. Also, we aimed to assess factors affecting these outcomes after CI.MethodsThe study group included 45 cochlear-implanted children, and their chronological age ranges between 4 and 12 years. Children were divided according to their language age into three groups: group 1 (G1) includes15 children with a language age of less than 2 years, group 2 (G2) includes 15 children with a language age of 2 to less than 4 years, and group 3 (G3) includes 15 children with language age 4 to 6 years. Assessment was done in two sessions: one for phoniatric evaluation and another for audiological evaluation.ResultsCI enabled children to develop speech perception in a closed manner evidenced by the early speech perception (ESP) test with pattern perception being the easiest and monosyllabic words being the most difficult and the least to develop. Most children with CI were able to control their voice, to a lesser extent to use speech in meaningful use in social situations and to develop communication strategies in oral situations which were the least to develop, and this was evident by Meaningful Use of Speech Scale. Children with CI were able to acquire language, and their receptive language was better than expressive language, but their language age was below their chronological age.ConclusionThe cochlear implant is an effective rehabilitative tool for the treatment of prelingually deafened children, and this was evident by our results. A hierarchal approach of speech assessment according to the language age of the child and selection of age-appropriate speech perception test is very important to assess cochlear-implanted children Speech recognition had a high degree of variability. Early implantation age and increased duration of implant experience were the most important factors associated with good performance with CI, better speech perception, and better language outcomes.

The Effect of Cochlear Implant Stimulation on Postural Control.

There are contradictory reports on the effect of cochlear implantation on postural control. Associated vestibular loss, electrode insertion trauma, and electrical stimulus of a cochlear implant can influence postural control. This study focused on the electrical stimulation of the cochlea. We aimed to examine whether a cochlear implant's electrical stimulation affects postural control measured by posturography. Thirty-three patients with unilateral cochlear implants were included. We used three preprogrammed main tests and their nine subtests in posturography. Postural stability [general stability index (GSI)], fall risk index (FRI), and sensory integration [modified clinical test of sensory integration of balance (m-CTSIB)] were calculated. All tests were performed under three conditions: implant off (1), implant on (2), and implant on music (3). The mean age was 46.29±16.09 years. GSI was above normal limits in 78% of adult cochlear implant users. We found that FRI was high in 30% of patients, and m-CTSIB was defective in 42%. There were no statistically significant differences in GSI, FRI, and m-CTSIB. Cochlear implant stimulation was found to have positively affected postural control when the subject's data were visualized individually. GSI, FRI, and m-CTSIB dropped to 39%, 24%, and 24%, respectively, when music was on. There was a significant correlation between age and fall index. But this correlation disappeared when music was playing. Cochlear implant stimulation affected the vestibular system in almost all patients. The effect was positive in most patients.

Effects of Cochlear Implantation and Steroids on the Aging Guinea Pig Cochlea.

The objective was to determine the effects of older age on hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CI), and whether steroids improve hearing preservation in older animals. We hypothesized greater hearing preservation would be observed in (1) young animals compared to older animals and (2) older animals receiving steroids compared to no steroids. The secondary objective was to assess levels of fibrosis utilizing optical coherence tomography (OCT). Experimental Animal Study. Laboratory. Three groups of guinea pigs: young (YCI; 8.5 ± 0.5 weeks; n = 10), old (OCI; 19.1 ± 1.0 months; n = 9) and old + steroids (OCI+S; 19.1 ± 1.0 months; n = 9) underwent CI. The OCI+S group received a steroid taper over 7 days starting 2 days before surgery to 4 days after. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. OCT imaging was performed to assess cochleae for extent of fibrotic tissue growth in the scala tympani. The YCI group had significantly better hearing preservation as measured by smaller increases in ABR thresholds [mean shift: 2.79 ± 0.66] compared to the OCI group [mean shift = 12.44 ± 5.6]. The OCI+S group had significantly better hearing preservation [2.66 ± 1.50] compared to the OCI group. No significant differences was seen in fibrosis across groups. Young animals and older animals that received steroids had better hearing after CI than older animals not given steroids, but hearing preservation was not correlated with the level of fibrosis assessed using OCT. This work is the first to investigate differences in hearing preservation by age in an animal model, and supports the protective effects of steroids on hearing preservation in older individuals.

Effects of cochlear implantation on auditory temporal processing in single-sided deafness: a report of two cases

BackgroundIndividuals with single-sided deafness have difficulty understanding speech in noise and determining sound direction in their daily lives. Cochlear implantation, a globally accepted rehabilitation method, has recently become used in Turkey in patients with single-sided deafness. In this study, the effects of cochlear implants on auditory temporal processing skills, speech-in-noise perception performance, tinnitus, and subjective benefit were reported in two patients with single-sided deafness.Case presentationThe cochlear implant was applied to two children with single-sided deafness with and without inner ear malformation. Speech in noise score, gaps in noise test, duration, and frequency pattern test were used. Also, cochlear implant benefits and the presence of tinnitus were questioned by questionnaires. Speech-in-noise perception performance and auditory temporal processing skills improved in the postoperative period compared to the preoperative period. It was also observed that although the cochlear implant improved the quality of life, motivation for device use decreased in the first 6 months of the postoperative period.ConclusionsCochlear implantation in individuals with single-sided deafness with and without inner ear malformation is useful in increasing auditory temporal processing skills and understanding speech in noise ability. In addition, cochlear implantation is a useful method to improve quality of life, especially regarding spatial perception, and it did not cause tinnitus in our patients. Selecting an implant model that enables data logging provides an advantage in determining the motivation to use the implants.

Effects of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundHearing loss has been reported as the most significant modifiable risk factor for dementia, but it is still unknown whether auditory rehabilitation can practically prevent cognitive decline. We aim to systematically analyze the longitudinal effects of auditory rehabilitation via cochlear implants (CIs). MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched relevant literature published from January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2022, using electronic databases, and selected studies in which CIs were performed mainly on older adults and follow-up assessments were conducted in both domains: speech perception and cognitive function. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for each domain and for each timepoint comparison (pre-CI vs. six months post-CI; six months post-CI vs. 12 months post-CI; pre-CI vs. 12 months post-CI), and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test. FindingsOf the 1918 retrieved articles, 20 research papers (648 CI subjects) were included. The results demonstrated that speech perception was rapidly enhanced after CI, whereas cognitive function had different speeds of improvement for different subtypes: executive function steadily improved significantly up to 12 months post-CI (g = 0.281, p < 0.001; g = 0.115, p = 0.003; g = 0.260, p < 0.001 in the order of timepoint comparison); verbal memory was significantly enhanced at six months post-CI and was maintained until 12 months post-CI (g = 0.296, p = 0.002; g = 0.095, p = 0.427; g = 0.401, p < 0.001); non-verbal memory showed no considerable progress at six months post-CI, but significant improvement at 12 months post-CI (g = −0.053, p = 0.723; g = 0.112, p = 0.089; g = 0.214, p = 0.023). InterpretationThe outcomes demonstrate that auditory rehabilitation via CIs could have a long-term positive impact on cognitive abilities. Given that older adults’ cognitive abilities are on the trajectory of progressive decline with age, these results highlight the need to increase the adoption of CIs among this population.

Does the duration matter? Effect of cochlear implantation on language development in Mandarin-speaking children with hearing loss

Objective: Several studies have shown that cochlear implantation (CI) can influence language development in children with severe-to-profound hearing loss. However, whether the age of implantation and duration of CI use influence language development remains unclear, particularly in Mandarin-speaking children with hearing loss. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of CI-related variables on language development in these children. Methods: The present study recruited 133 Mandarin-speaking children with hearing loss, aged between 36 and 71 months chronologically, from a nonprofit organisation in Taiwan. The Revised Preschool Language Assessment (RPLA) was used to evaluate the children’s language performance. Results: Children with hearing loss demonstrated delayed language comprehension and oral expression. Among them, 34% achieved age-appropriate language development. The duration of CI use had a significant direct effect on language-related abilities. Conversely, the age of implantation did not have a significant direct effect. Furthermore, the age of initial interventions (auditory-oral) had a significant direct effect only on language comprehension. Compared with the age of implantation, the duration of CI use was a significant mediator of language-related abilities. Conclusion: In Mandarin-speaking children with late CIs, the duration of CI use is a more effective mediator of language development than the age of implantation.

Effect of cochlear implantation on speech recognition under different listening modes in children

Objective:To investigate speech recognition among children with a unilateral cochlear implant（CI）, bilateral CI, and bimodal hearing and identify the benefits of binaural hearing. Methods:A total of 67 children with severe sensorineural hearing loss who received bilateral CI, bimodal hearing, and unilateral CI from 2012 to 2021 were recruited, including 23 cases with unilateral CI, 25 cases of bimodal hearing, and 19 cases of bilateral CI. The aided hearing threshold at 250-4000 Hz and speech recognition performance of two-syllable words and short sentences in quiet and noisy environments were tested, respectively. Results:There was no significant difference in the hearing threshold results of the bilateral CI group, the bimodal hearing group, and the unilateral CI group by ANOVA（P>0.05）. According to the paired t-test within the group, the speech recognition of disyllabic words and short sentences in quiet and noisy environments were significantly different among the three groups（P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in the speech recognition rates of disyllabic words and short sentences among the three groups in a quiet environment（P>0.05）, but there was a statistically significant difference in a noisy environment（P<0.05）. Additional multiple linear regression analysis showed no significant difference in the recognition rates of disyllabic words and short sentences between the bimodal group and the bilateral CI group in quiet and noisy environments（β=-0.567, P>0.05; β=-0.643, P>0.05）. There was a statistically significant difference in speech recognition of disyllabic words and short sentences between the bimodal group and the unilateral CI group in the noise environment（β=-0.124, P<0.05）, but the difference was not statistically significant in a quiet environment（β=-0.671, P>0.05）; there was a statistically significant difference in the recognition rate of disyllabic words and short sentences between the bilateral CI group and the unilateral CI group in the noise environment（β=-0.226, P<0.05）, but the difference was not statistically significant in a quiet environment（β=-0.341, P>0.05）. Conclusion:Clinicians and guardians are encouraged to provide the most comprehensive audiological evaluation for children with hearing loss. Bilateral CI and bimodal hearing have demonstrated enormous advantages over unilateral CI regarding speech recognition in noise. Bimodal hearing deems a strong recommendation if the contralateral ear has sufficient speech recognition capability. Bilateral CI should be warranted if hearing aids deemed to be ineffective.

Treatment of deafness with the use of cochlear implants in children with severe heart defects

Objective: To assess the treatment of hearing loss in children with severe heart defects after cardiac surgeries in their early life. The evaluation included the preparation to the surgery, the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation. The study design: It was a retrospective study. In our database there are 7 children (age: 2.5-5.5) with congenital heart defect who have had cardiac surgery. All of them were implanted with a Cochlear CI512 device. Late implantation was a result of a necessity to perform life-saving cardiac surgeries. The children are still under the observation of audiologists and speech therapists.Results: Assessment of the four-frequency average of indicative free field audiometry shows that there is an increase of hearing ability within a given time period: without sound processor (SP) the threshold of hearing had been 112.75 dB, with SP (three month after surgery) it was 67.5 dB, 6 months after surgery was 49 dB. After the cochlear implantation, speech development of implanted children was faster than observed prior to cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Conclusion: Pre-operation planning reduces the risk during cochlear implantation. Cochlear implantation is safe for children with heart defects, if they are early diagnosed and treated.

Commentary: Effect of cochlear implantation on vestibular function in children: A scoping review.

Commentary: Effect of cochlear implantation on vestibular function in children: A scoping review.

The effects of cochlear implantation on middle ear function: A prospective study.

Although sound conduction mechanisms may influence by cochlear implantation (CI), it is not very clear whether, how, and to what extent these mechanisms may be influenced the pediatric population. Wideband tympanometry (WBT) is a sensitive tool to evaluate alternations in the middle ear mechanics in a wide frequency range. The current study aimed to explore CI's impacts on sound conduction across the middle ear cavity using WBT in pediatrics. In a prospective design, 35 unilaterally implanted children (<24 months of age) with normal temporal bone anatomy were included in this study. Traditional tympanometry (226-Hz) and WBT measures were compared for each child in the implanted and non-implanted ears preoperatively and three months postoperatively. No significant changes in the "static acoustic admittance" and "peak pressure" parameters were observed between the pre-CI and post-CI conditions in the implanted and non-implanted ears in the 226-Hz tympanometry test. Wideband absorbance recordings before CI surgery exhibited a double-peaked pattern over a frequency range of 250 to 8000Hz. The pre- and postoperative acoustic energy absorbance comparisons indicated a significantly reduced mid-frequency (1260 to 3175Hz) and high-frequency (5040 to 8000Hz) absorbance in the implanted ears. However, our results indicated no significant differences in sound absorbance between the pre- and postoperative conditions in non-implanted ears. Our findings suggested that WBT is a more sensitive method than traditional tympanometry for monitoring the mechanical status of the middle ear after cochlear implantation in pediatrics. Cochlear implantation in young children can significantly reduce mid- and high-frequency acoustic absorbance measured by WBT.

Single-Sided Deafness: Emotional and Social Handicap, Impact on Health Status and Quality of Life, Functional Hearing, and the Effects of Cochlear Implantation.

To evaluate the functional and subjective outcomes in individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD) treated with a cochlear implant (CI). Eighty-one adult CI users with SSD participated in this study. Functional assessments consisted of speech in noise testing and localization. Subjective assessments consisted of the Speech Spatial Quality of Hearing Scale, the Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit questionnaire, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults questionnaire, and the Glasgow Health Status Inventory and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory questionnaires. SSD has remarkable consequences on quality of life (QoL) and imposes a substantial emotional and social handicap on the individuals. Self-reported QoL improved after CI with tinnitus intrusion significantly reduced as early as 3 months post-CI. A significant improvement was seen in all speech understanding in noise configurations. Localization ability significantly improved with CI on. Our findings demonstrate that SSD reduces social and psychological QoL and imposes a remarkable level of handicap as per general and specific self-assessments tool. CI provided a significant improvement in function including speech understanding in noise and localization ability, as well as improved QoL and reduced tinnitus significantly in both the early and long terms.

Efficacy of cochlear implants in children with borderline hearing who have already achieved significant language development with hearing aids.

There are still debates about timing and effectiveness of cochlear implants (CI) in pediatric subjects with significant residual hearing who do not belong to traditional indication of CI. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of CI, specifically on improvement of pronunciation, among hearing-impaired children already with a substantial degree of language skills as evaluated by Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) scores or sentence score. Our cohort comprised pediatric CI recipients from July 2018 through October 2020. Among them, cases with CAP scores of 5 or 6 preoperatively were defined as "borderline cases". We investigated prevalence and etiologies, and compared speech evaluation data preoperatively and postoperatively at three time points (3, 6 and 9-12 months after implantation). Among 86 pediatric CI recipients, 13 subjects (15.12%) had language development that reached CAP scores of 5 or 6 before implantation. Postoperative speech evaluation data 6 months after implantation revealed significant improvement of pronunciation (Urimal Test of Articulation and Phonation scores: UTAP), Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) and word perception scores, but not of CAP and sentence perception scores. Notably, the significant improvement of pronunciation based on UTAP scores outstripped that of other speech parameters and this continued steadily up to one-year postoperatively. The result of the study serves as evidence for what to expect from cochlear implantation in hearing-impaired children who have already achieved a substantial degree of language development in terms of CAP scores or sentence perception scores, preoperatively.

Changes in Acoustic Absorbance Pre- and Post-Cochlear Implantation.

Until recently, there has been little investigation on the effects of cochlear implantation on the transmission of acoustic stimuli through the middle-ear system. Recent studies have shown that cochlear implantation decreases low-frequency acoustic absorbance, consistent with a stiffer middle-ear system postsurgery. The objectives of this study are (a) to investigate the time course of changes in acoustic absorbance post-cochlear implantation in the implanted ear and (b) to compare changes in acoustic absorbance between implanted and nonimplanted ears over time. Seventeen adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients within 6 months of device activation participated in this study. Wideband acoustic absorbance was measured in both ears at one to six different time points from pre-implantation up to 6-month postactivation. Analyses examined (a) changes in acoustic absorbance as compared to pre-implantation and (b) differences in acoustic absorbance between implanted and nonimplanted ears over time. Acoustic absorbance in the implanted ear decreased postsurgery for frequencies lower than 1.5 kHz and persisted through at least 6-month postactivation. We also observed that the spectral range of decreased acoustic absorbance in the implanted ear decreased with longer time postsurgery. Differences in acoustic absorbance between implanted and nonimplanted ears occurred over a broad spectral range at the activation time point and persisted through at least 3-month postactivation, though for a narrower spectral range at the later time point. Cochlear implantation increased middle-ear stiffness as indicated by decreased acoustic absorbance of low-frequency acoustic power. The findings of this study are consistent with those of previous studies and may have important implications toward understanding spatial hearing and programming of acoustic components for CI-combined electric and binaural acoustic stimulation patients.

The effect of cochlear implants on vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses in adults

Background Cochlear implants (CIs) as a golden solution for improving hearing for patients with profound hearing loss may although causes damage for peripheral vestibular system during insertion of electrode interpretatively leading to vestibular dysfunction. This can be assessed by several methods. One of the important methods is cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) which can assess the function of saccule. Aim of the work Study the effect of insertion of electrodes of CIs on the saccular function, by using cVEMP test which was performed before and after the operation. Also, cVEMP was measured in the CI-on and CI-off modes to determine if electrical stimulation of electrodes of CIs affects the saccular function or not. Materials and method Thirty adult CI candidates were recruited from the audiology unit of Hearing and Speech Institute. cVEMP was recorded preoperatively for each candidate and two months post operative. cVEMP testing was performed in the CI-on and CI-off modes. Results cVEMP response was recorded postoperatively for 19 out of 30 (63%) implanted ears. The amplitude of wave P and wave N in implanted ears with CI-off mode was decreased compared to preoperative results and this decrease is statistically significant. Also, amplitude of wave P and wave N in implanted ears with CI-on mode were increased compared to preoperative results and this increase is statistically significant. The interaural amplitude difference (IAD) ratio in postoperative CI-on mode was decreased compared to preoperative results and this decrease is not statistically significant. Conclusion cVEMP should be included in cochlear implant selection protocol with caloric testing as it is more sensitive for discovering vestibular disorders. Also, postoperative cVEMP testing in the CI-on and CI-off modes will offer accurate evaluation of saccule function after CI surgery.

Changes in cognitive performance after cochlear implantation in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives To conduct critical assessment of the literature on the effects of cochlear implantation on adults’ cognitive abilities. Design PubMed, Scopus, Lilacs, Web of Science, Livivo, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo, and grey literature were searched. Eligibility criteria: age 18 or over with severe-to-profound bilateral hearing loss, cochlear implantation, cognitive test before and after implantation. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB, ROBINS-I and MASTARI tools. Meta-analysis was performed. Study sample Out of 1830 studies, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Results On AlaCog test, significant improvement was found after implantation [MD = −46.64; CI95% = −69.96 to −23.33; I 2 = 71%]. No significant differences were found on the Flanker, Recall, Trail A and n-back tests (p > 0.05). For MMSE, no significance was found [MD 0.63; CI 95% = −2.19 to 3.45; I 2 = 88%]. On TMT, an overall significant effect with a 9-second decrease in processing speed post-implantation [MD = −9.43; CI95% = −15.42 to −3.44; I 2 = 0%]. Conclusion Cognitive improvements after cochlear implantation may depend on time and the cognitive task evaluated. Well-designed studies with longer follow-up are necessary to examine whether cochlear implantation has a positive influence on cognitive abilities. Development of cognitive assessment tools to hearing-impaired individuals is needed.

Effect of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline and quality of life in younger and older adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss

Purpose(a) To measure the change in cognition, the improvement of speech perception, and the subjective benefit in people under and over 60 years following cochlear implantation. (b) To assess the relationship between cognition, demographic, audiometric, and subjective outcomes in both age groups.Methods28 cochlear implant (CI) users were assigned to the < 60y group and 35 to the ≥ 60y group. Cognition was measured using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing impaired individuals (RBANS-H); subjective benefit was measured using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ); the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI); the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19); Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12); and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).ResultsPrior to surgery: the RBANS-H total score positively correlated with the domains “Advanced sound”, “Self-esteem”, and “Social functioning” of NCIQ, and negatively with HADS scores. 12 months post-implantation: the RBANS-H total score increased in the < 60y (p = 0.038) and in the ≥ 60y group (p < 0.001); speech perception and subjective outcomes also improved; RBANS-H total score positively correlated with “Self-esteem” domain in NCIQ. Age and the RBANS-H total score correlated negatively in the ≥ 60y group (p = 0.026).ConclusionsAfter implantation, both age groups demonstrated improved cognition, speech perception and quality of life. Their depression scores decreased. Age was inversely associated with cognition.

The effect of cochlear implants on cognitive function in older adults: A prospective, longitudinal 2-year follow-up study

ObjectivesIt is shown that eliminating hearing loss in mid-life may reduce the risk for deterioration in cognitive function. Cochlear implantation (CI) is the only available therapy that can eliminate hearing loss in patients who suffer from profound sensorineural hearing loss. This suggests there may be positive effects of hearing level on cognition in older adults following CI. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to clarify whether cognitive function can be improved or maintained using cochlear implants in older adult patients with hearing impairments. MethodsData for patients that underwent CI surgery for profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were collected prospectively. Patients aged 65 years and older were recruited at our university hospital from 2013 to 2017. Twenty-one patients (age range: 65–80 years) were included in this study. The primary outcome measurement was the change in cognitive function three points assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery. The secondary outcome measurements were the followings; the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and hearing and speech recognition threshold assessment before CI, and 1 and 2 years after CI. Differences in MMSE scores were compared for statistical significance using the Friedman test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used as a post hoc test. Possible correlations between MMSE scores and NCIQ subdomain scores 2 years after surgery were evaluated with Spearman's tests. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value <0.05. ResultsCI recipients showed significant improvement in MMSE scores. This improvement peaked 1 year after CI surgery. The postoperative MMSE score was correlated with the NCIQ speech production score but not with the other five NCIQ subdomains. There was no correlation between MMSE score and speech recognition. ConclusionSpeech production is important to improve cognitive function after CI, and this improvement peaked 1 year after CI. Although severe or profound hearing loss in older adults worsens the natural course of cognitive function decline, CI has positive impacts on cognitive function even if MMSE scores decrease 1 year after the peak (i.e., 2 years after CI). Talking with others based on hearing is crucial to improve cognitive function. We should encourage older adult patients to take many opportunities to talk with others after CI surgery.

Effects of cochlear implants on otolith function as evaluated by vestibulo-ocular reflex and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

Effects of cochlear implants on otolith function as evaluated by vestibulo-ocular reflex and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

The effects of cochlear implants on sequential time perception

ABSTRACT The study aimed to improve sequential time perception among deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children with and without cochlear implants (CIs) by administering an intervention programme using virtual-reality (VR) technology. The study included 55 children 7–10 years old who were divided into 3 groups: DHH children with CIs, DHH children without CIs, and a control group of typically-hearing children. Pre- and post- the intervention (8 weekly individual meetings), participants completed a sequential time measure. Results indicated that at pre-intervention, DHH children demonstrated less sequential time perception compared to typically-hearing children. Following the intervention, both research groups demonstrated significant improvement in sequential time perception. However, the improvement was much more significant in the group of children without CIs. Moreover, DHH children who received implants after the age of language acquisition (postlingually) showed a greater improvement in this measure compared to children who received implants prior to the age of language acquisition (prelingually).

The Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants in Patients with Inner Ear Malformation

The Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants in Patients with Inner Ear Malformation